“Perspicuous and Vulgar: On the Clarity of Scripture”
This transcript:- Was machine generated.
- Has not been checked for errors.
- May not be entirely accurate.
WEBVTT
00:00.000 --> 00:04.080
Thank you for making me recommend for you!
00:30.000 --> 00:43.040
Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast, I am Corey J. Moller, and I'm Woe.
00:43.040 --> 00:47.920
In this episode, we will be discussing Scripture, Quas Scripture, which is to say Scripture
00:47.920 --> 00:55.840
as the inerrant, plenarily verbally inspired Word of God, which Christians must read, believe,
00:55.840 --> 01:02.000
and defend, and which Satan ceaselessly attacks.
01:02.000 --> 01:07.240
If I am not convinced by the testimonies of Scripture and clear rational arguments, for
01:07.240 --> 01:11.960
I believe neither the Pope nor the Council's alone, since it is a fact that they have often
01:11.960 --> 01:17.200
erred and contradicted themselves, then I am by the passages of the Holy Scriptures, which
01:17.200 --> 01:22.080
I have cited, overcome in my conscience and held captive to the Word of God.
01:22.080 --> 01:27.240
Therefore, I can and will retract nothing, because it is neither safe nor helpful to do
01:27.240 --> 01:29.400
anything against conscience.
01:29.400 --> 01:34.240
Here I stand, I cannot do otherwise, God help me, amen.
01:34.240 --> 01:39.040
This is Martin Luther's testimony to the die of arms in April 1521.
01:39.040 --> 01:45.080
I wanted to open with that statement, because it's one of the most famous things that Luther
01:45.080 --> 01:53.000
said that's known, you know, within Lutheranism, it's known across Protestantism at large.
01:53.000 --> 01:58.120
I think probably a lot of people know the phrase, here I stand, somewhat famously, even
01:58.120 --> 02:00.240
if they don't know where it came from.
02:00.240 --> 02:04.400
The reason I want to open with that in particular is that there are a couple points in there
02:04.400 --> 02:10.520
that Luther makes about appealing directly to Scripture and about plain reason, that although
02:10.520 --> 02:16.560
modern Lutherans believe that those words are inheritance and the Luther spirit and those
02:16.560 --> 02:22.720
words are spirit, in fact, it's pretty normal within our churches today to go in the opposite
02:22.720 --> 02:27.880
direction, to obfuscate Scripture and to try to make things more complicated than they
02:27.880 --> 02:34.360
are, and to either ignore a rational argument, so perhaps even to say that reason has no
02:34.360 --> 02:42.200
place in the faith, and as a result, when someone, especially a layman, points to Scripture,
02:42.200 --> 02:48.280
we are frequently shouted down or mocked or belittled or reprimanded as though we have
02:48.280 --> 02:50.240
done something wrong.
02:50.240 --> 02:55.480
So this episode today, we're talking about scriptural inarrency, about the plain reading
02:55.480 --> 02:59.680
of Scripture, about the plain words of Scripture, and whether that's actually true, whether it
02:59.680 --> 03:02.120
is true, the Scripture is plain.
03:02.120 --> 03:07.080
I've made a point in numerous past episodes from the Provincial Album, and I'll probably
03:07.080 --> 03:13.040
say it in every episode, Scripture is clear, and when I've been saying that, it is a very
03:13.040 --> 03:18.480
deliberate needle driven into the eyes of these men who think that Scripture is not clear,
03:18.480 --> 03:24.040
who think that when we read these words on the page that are given to us by God, transmitted
03:24.040 --> 03:29.820
through time miraculously, and by human hands at the same time, we can't really be sure
03:29.820 --> 03:31.260
what we're reading.
03:31.260 --> 03:37.780
And so to say Scripture is clear about anything is defiance against that spirit.
03:37.780 --> 03:43.500
Before we get into the nature of reading Scripture, I think it's important to begin with the
03:43.500 --> 03:48.220
point in time where the lady was actually first able to read Scripture because one of the
03:48.220 --> 03:54.340
things that was lost in the Western Church was access to the Word of God as Rome continued
03:54.340 --> 03:58.820
to preserve Latin as the soul language people didn't speak Latin anymore.
03:58.820 --> 04:04.900
And so only the very educated would know Latin, and the books themselves were incredibly
04:04.900 --> 04:08.180
expensive because they were all andridden.
04:08.180 --> 04:13.020
So it was really a breakthrough for the first time, particularly in English, when the Word
04:13.020 --> 04:17.660
of God was translated into English, and so we're going to begin there.
04:17.660 --> 04:20.900
And so of course, if we begin there, we have to begin with really three men that would
04:20.900 --> 04:24.780
be Wycliffe, Huss and Tindale.
04:24.780 --> 04:29.300
Two of them, the latter two, were executed for their efforts.
04:29.300 --> 04:32.540
Wycliffe did actually manage to live out his life.
04:32.540 --> 04:38.060
And the things for which the Roman Church persecuted these men, yes, they had disagreements
04:38.060 --> 04:40.220
theologically, but that was not the core of it.
04:40.220 --> 04:45.340
The core was that these men wanted the Scriptures to be accessible to the laity, which is to
04:45.340 --> 04:47.740
say they wanted it to be in the vernacular.
04:47.780 --> 04:53.980
As mentioned, having it in Latin, when no one speaks Latin anymore, except for the tiny
04:53.980 --> 05:01.460
upper educated crust of society, is not making the Word of God accessible to the common
05:01.460 --> 05:02.860
people of your nation.
05:02.860 --> 05:04.140
And Scripture is very clear.
05:04.140 --> 05:08.740
You are supposed to study and discuss and think about the Word of God when you rise, when
05:08.740 --> 05:09.980
you go to bed.
05:09.980 --> 05:15.260
As you walk by the way at dinner, all of these times you are supposed to discuss these things.
05:15.260 --> 05:21.580
You cannot do that if you don't have the Scriptures in a language who understand.
05:21.580 --> 05:28.020
And so in the case of Wycliffe, who has one of the first English translations of the Bible,
05:28.020 --> 05:31.940
and he translated it, his associates may have translated the Old Testament, but he certainly
05:31.940 --> 05:34.660
translated the New Testament.
05:34.660 --> 05:40.500
And so the Roman Catholic Church didn't manage to kill him, as mentioned previously.
05:40.500 --> 05:46.340
He managed to die a natural death, however, just to show the vindictiveness and the spitefulness
05:46.340 --> 05:48.140
of the Roman Church.
05:48.140 --> 05:53.100
They dug up his bones, burned them, and then tossed the ashes into the river in order to
05:53.100 --> 05:58.780
make a statement about their disagreement with him, which is to say that they did not want
05:58.780 --> 06:01.820
the common people to have the Scriptures in their hands in a way they could understand
06:01.820 --> 06:06.940
them, because that challenged the power of Rome.
06:06.940 --> 06:10.780
If the Scriptures aren't a language that only those associated with Rome, which at
06:10.780 --> 06:15.420
the time would have essentially been, only priests would have known Latin, or the handful
06:15.420 --> 06:20.220
of men who were highly educated at universities reading texts in Latin.
06:20.220 --> 06:25.740
Rome could have exercised a great deal of control then, and in addition, Rome objected to
06:25.740 --> 06:30.780
any attempts to produce the Bible really at all.
06:30.780 --> 06:35.220
Wasn't just producing the Bible in a language that was understood by the common people in
06:35.220 --> 06:39.860
the vernacular, if you attempted to print and distribute the Bible in Latin, they still
06:39.860 --> 06:43.820
would have killed you for that, because you would have been making it accessible not
06:43.820 --> 06:47.700
to the common man, but outside of Rome's control.
06:47.700 --> 06:54.260
And it's that control that Rome wanted to exercise, and that's basically sacerdotalism.
06:54.260 --> 07:03.460
It's the belief that the priesthood in the Roman sense here, they act as a go-between
07:03.460 --> 07:05.140
roar, the laity and God.
07:05.140 --> 07:08.380
The only way you can get to God is through your priests.
07:08.380 --> 07:12.020
That's basically the view of Rome at the time.
07:12.020 --> 07:15.180
It's still somewhat the view of Rome today, of course, it's complicated by the fact that
07:15.180 --> 07:18.900
Rome also seems to think that you can go through Mary or the Saints, but that is a separate
07:18.900 --> 07:20.220
issue.
07:20.220 --> 07:25.340
But it's the sacerdotalism that lies at the core of the problems that we will be discussing
07:25.340 --> 07:27.180
today.
07:27.180 --> 07:33.580
Because when you have pastors or priests or even theologians who are arguing, know the
07:33.580 --> 07:39.380
common man, know you, cannot understand the scriptures, you cannot read them for yourself,
07:39.380 --> 07:40.380
and understand what they mean.
07:40.380 --> 07:43.620
I have to do it for you.
07:43.620 --> 07:47.140
All of that falls under the umbrella of sacerdotalism.
07:47.140 --> 07:53.500
There is a fantastic quote that we found from one of Wycliffe's opponents who, in their
07:53.500 --> 07:59.260
hand-bringing way, they stated, the jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity.
07:59.260 --> 08:01.420
They're referring to scripture there.
08:01.420 --> 08:06.940
God's word, which was the jewel of the clergy, meaning them, had become the toy of the laity.
08:06.940 --> 08:14.060
They were so terrified of the idea of the common Christian abusing or misusing scripture
08:14.060 --> 08:17.860
that they were willing to kill men to keep them away from them.
08:17.860 --> 08:22.620
Well, and of course, they were, because even if you had it in Latin, particularly if you
08:22.620 --> 08:26.020
had it in the vernacular, but even if you had it in Latin, then educated man could
08:26.020 --> 08:32.060
start reading the scriptures and start seeing things like, say, 2nd Timothy 316.
08:32.060 --> 08:36.460
All scriptures, breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction,
08:36.460 --> 08:37.660
and for training and righteousness.
08:37.660 --> 08:41.060
If you start reading these things that are all throughout scripture, it's not in just
08:41.060 --> 08:45.940
one place or a handful, it's everywhere beginning to end, Genesis to Revelation.
08:45.940 --> 08:50.900
If you start seeing these things, these men will start asking questions.
08:50.900 --> 08:54.020
Why have we restricted this from the laity?
08:54.020 --> 08:56.300
Why do they not have access to this?
08:56.300 --> 08:59.380
Why do the priests not want me to read the Word of God?
08:59.380 --> 09:04.060
If the Word of God is telling me to read the Word of God?
09:04.060 --> 09:09.220
And it's because Rome wanted to maintain that authority, because the authority of Rome
09:09.220 --> 09:16.380
is built on a handful of claims, one of which being that the Pope essentially is Christ
09:16.380 --> 09:21.340
on earth, and they will actually literally use those words from time to time.
09:21.340 --> 09:28.060
And so if scripture is the Word of God, God speaking directly to whomever is reading
09:28.060 --> 09:32.740
or listening, then you don't need this go between.
09:32.740 --> 09:37.180
You don't need the Pope, and then you can start to question the Pope's power, which is
09:37.180 --> 09:41.780
exactly what Rome, of course, did not want.
09:41.780 --> 09:48.380
When Rome hated the fact that the scriptures had been translated into the vernacular,
09:48.380 --> 09:54.600
that when they executed John Huss, they actually used Wycliffe's Bible as kindling on his
09:54.600 --> 09:57.180
pyre for his stake.
09:57.180 --> 10:02.660
They burned the Bible to murder a man for preaching and speaking from a Bible that they
10:02.660 --> 10:05.260
didn't want people to have access to.
10:06.260 --> 10:14.100
If you look at these men in history, Wycliffe, Huss and Tyndale, they did make doctrinal
10:14.100 --> 10:15.100
errors.
10:15.100 --> 10:21.580
We're not saying that Rome was wrong about the errors that these men made, but I think
10:21.580 --> 10:25.540
that that's actually part of the point of why it's so important.
10:25.540 --> 10:31.740
This scripture be accessible to everyone, because for these men, prior to the Reformation,
10:31.740 --> 10:35.860
Wycliffe was in the mid-1300s.
10:35.860 --> 10:44.180
When they undertook translating scripture into the vernacular, they became outlaws.
10:44.180 --> 10:48.500
They effectively became outside of the church, which meant that they didn't have the support
10:48.500 --> 10:53.820
of other Christians in the establishment, and that's not normal.
10:53.820 --> 10:56.740
Christians are not supposed to be solo.
10:56.740 --> 11:02.660
When we talk about scripture and air and sea and about the fact that the word is fruitful
11:02.660 --> 11:08.140
for these things, it does not follow that we want every man sitting under a tree by
11:08.140 --> 11:13.100
himself reading his Bible and never having any contact with other Christians.
11:13.100 --> 11:15.220
These things are meant to be discussed.
11:15.220 --> 11:17.420
God says that iron sharpens iron.
11:17.420 --> 11:22.220
That's talking about doctrine as much as anything, and there are numerous places in scripture
11:22.300 --> 11:26.900
where it says, particularly in the New Testament, there must be disagreements among you so that
11:26.900 --> 11:29.020
the truth may be known.
11:29.020 --> 11:36.940
When doctrine is reasoned out properly and argued from scripture, that is what God wants
11:36.940 --> 11:37.940
of us.
11:37.940 --> 11:43.620
He wants us to have scripture, to read scripture, to discuss it, and to argue, to figure
11:43.620 --> 11:46.540
out who is right.
11:46.540 --> 11:50.820
What we're going to get to in the second half of this episode is that one of the main
11:50.820 --> 11:56.660
attacks today, for a while, the attack was, well, scripture is not real, or it's true,
11:56.660 --> 11:58.260
but it's not accurate.
11:58.260 --> 12:04.500
There's some of that today, but it's sort of morphing into a thing where you can just
12:04.500 --> 12:07.980
say, that's your interpretation.
12:07.980 --> 12:11.260
You have your Bible and I have mine, and we can just believe what we want.
12:11.260 --> 12:17.580
As long as we confess Jesus in our heart, it's all good, man.
12:17.580 --> 12:23.740
The papers and others repeat the silly lie that there are 30,000 denominations today.
12:23.740 --> 12:25.580
It's pure nonsense for one thing.
12:25.580 --> 12:32.580
There may be a couple dozen branches that have discernible, very particular beliefs that
12:32.580 --> 12:38.420
differ from each other, and all the rest is basically just flavors of Baptist in one or
12:38.420 --> 12:39.420
two others.
12:39.420 --> 12:44.300
We should also point out that the claims from Rome and the East, when it comes to unity,
12:44.300 --> 12:48.580
are complete fabrications out of whole cloth.
12:48.580 --> 12:49.700
They are not unified.
12:49.700 --> 12:56.140
You have various groups within each of those umbrella church to use the term loosely bodies
12:56.140 --> 12:57.820
that don't agree with each other.
12:57.820 --> 13:04.300
They have categorical disagreements on doctrine from, in the case of the Eastern Orthodox,
13:04.300 --> 13:10.420
one national church to another, or even one body within a single nation to another.
13:10.420 --> 13:16.260
The unity they supposedly have and they try to make as an argument against Protestants
13:16.260 --> 13:17.940
is just complete nonsense.
13:17.940 --> 13:19.660
The facts do not bear it out.
13:19.660 --> 13:25.020
We can throw in the, for the show notes, the picture showing the relationship of the
13:25.020 --> 13:29.620
various Eastern Orthodox churches who are and are not in communion with one another over
13:29.620 --> 13:31.260
various things.
13:31.260 --> 13:34.940
It's as complicated as the org chart for any large international corporation, if not more
13:34.940 --> 13:35.940
so.
13:35.940 --> 13:39.100
Some of them are not in communion with each other.
13:39.260 --> 13:43.220
They don't have anathematize each other, but they say, yeah, we're not even of the same
13:43.220 --> 13:44.220
belief.
13:44.220 --> 13:48.500
That falls just under the umbrella of quote-unquote orthodoxy.
13:48.500 --> 13:49.500
Yes.
13:49.500 --> 13:53.260
You've got the same thing going on in Rome with those.
13:53.260 --> 13:55.780
It depends on how far you're willing to extend the umbrella.
13:55.780 --> 13:59.500
Are those who think the seat of Peter is vacant, still Roman Catholic?
13:59.500 --> 14:00.820
Are they not?
14:00.820 --> 14:03.260
Are the Jesuits and the Dominicans the same?
14:03.260 --> 14:05.100
It's just, it's never ending.
14:05.100 --> 14:07.660
Their claims of unity are complete nonsense.
14:07.660 --> 14:13.500
And you mentioned the word solo versus, say, perhaps solo.
14:13.500 --> 14:19.420
It does bring up the issue of most people don't even understand what solo-scriptura means
14:19.420 --> 14:24.900
anymore because no one knows Latin, which is funny that we're talking about translating
14:24.900 --> 14:30.140
things into the vernacular, and we discover a problem related to people not knowing Latin.
14:30.140 --> 14:32.620
But it is what it is.
14:32.620 --> 14:36.620
People look at solo-scriptura, and they won't know the term because people aren't taught
14:36.620 --> 14:37.620
even English anymore.
14:37.620 --> 14:39.460
They think it's the nomative.
14:39.460 --> 14:42.900
And so they think it's scripture alone, but that's not what it is.
14:42.900 --> 14:43.900
It's in the ablative.
14:43.900 --> 14:45.620
It is bi-scriptural alone.
14:45.620 --> 14:52.380
And what we mean when we say solo-scriptura is that scripture is the norming norm.
14:52.380 --> 14:53.460
It is the norma-normans.
14:53.460 --> 14:57.700
It is the standard by which all doctrine is tested.
14:57.700 --> 15:03.220
It does not mean that we take only scripture.
15:03.220 --> 15:05.940
We still look to our fathers in the faith.
15:05.940 --> 15:07.020
We still look to tradition.
15:07.020 --> 15:12.620
We look to all of these good things that have been preserved by the grace of God.
15:12.620 --> 15:15.500
They are just not the ultimate authority.
15:15.500 --> 15:21.220
And so when you said that these men were separated from the church, that's true, and that
15:21.220 --> 15:27.700
is exactly as you said, unnatural Christians are supposed to live within the context of
15:27.700 --> 15:33.500
the church, in a Christian society, in a Christian nation, in Christian families.
15:33.500 --> 15:37.140
And part of that is you have to have the word.
15:37.140 --> 15:42.380
Because we're going right back to headship as we always do, it is incumbent on the master
15:42.380 --> 15:47.420
of the house, which is to say the father, the oldest man in the house typically.
15:47.420 --> 15:52.700
It is incumbent on him to know the word, and to see that those in his house are instructed
15:52.700 --> 15:53.700
in it.
15:53.700 --> 15:58.980
And that's why you have the admonitions in the small catechism as the father of the
15:58.980 --> 16:01.660
house is supposed to teach.
16:01.660 --> 16:06.620
And also, he is supposed to question those in his household and see if they are actually
16:06.620 --> 16:11.180
learning this material, because one day the father is going to stand before his father
16:11.180 --> 16:16.180
in heaven and have to answer for what he did or did not do with regard to the authority
16:16.180 --> 16:19.180
he was given on earth.
16:19.180 --> 16:24.180
And the reason the discussion of scriptural and errancy and its suitableness for teaching
16:24.180 --> 16:30.220
is so important, is that particularly for new believers coming to the faith, or even
16:30.220 --> 16:35.020
for someone who's not a Christian yet, but they think they want to be a Christian and
16:35.020 --> 16:37.300
they want to know what does that mean.
16:37.300 --> 16:44.140
You look at this enormous menu of biting, bickering, angering, angry, in many cases killing
16:44.140 --> 16:49.540
each other for 1,500 years or more groups that all call themselves Christian, and every
16:49.540 --> 16:52.500
single one of them says that all the others are wrong.
16:52.500 --> 16:55.580
How is anyone to know how to make sense of that?
16:55.580 --> 17:01.620
And the easy thing for people to do is to throw up their hands and say, either to pick one,
17:01.620 --> 17:06.820
which is one of the reasons that I started, I mentioned last week that I had rebranded
17:06.820 --> 17:09.780
and started talking a lot more about my faith.
17:09.780 --> 17:14.660
And particularly about being a Lutheran, I did so because I saw more and more of men,
17:14.660 --> 17:20.980
the men on the right of the political spear, being attracted to Christianity and having
17:20.980 --> 17:22.620
this very problem.
17:22.620 --> 17:26.940
They see all the bickering, they see all the options, they don't know what to do.
17:26.940 --> 17:32.660
And they're either not Christian or they're barely Christian, and so they don't have
17:32.660 --> 17:38.460
any frame of reference for evaluating scriptural or doctrinal claims.
17:38.460 --> 17:43.020
All they can do is sort of look at the superficial aspects of things.
17:43.020 --> 17:49.860
And what I saw years ago and what's continuing to this day is that a great many men who want
17:49.860 --> 17:53.820
to become Christian because they see, even if they don't understand God, they don't understand
17:53.820 --> 17:57.860
Jesus and justification, they understand the Satan's real.
17:57.860 --> 18:02.420
They understand that evil is a real thing and that it is supernatural.
18:02.420 --> 18:06.700
It's not just that there are bad people, some of which are in some ethnic groups, but
18:06.860 --> 18:08.940
they're bad people in general.
18:08.940 --> 18:15.420
It's the, they see that those people cannot solely be bad because they had bad parents or
18:15.420 --> 18:19.620
they had a bad religion or a bad upbringing.
18:19.620 --> 18:23.780
There's an animating spirit that is clear in the world.
18:23.780 --> 18:27.060
And in many cases, it's only clear to unbelievers.
18:27.060 --> 18:31.100
Christians don't even see it anymore because we just say, oh, we're all sinners.
18:31.100 --> 18:34.820
Unbelievers can see more clearly than us that this is a spiritual war that we are in
18:34.820 --> 18:36.180
the mid-stuff.
18:36.180 --> 18:41.260
And so these men who don't know Jesus, but they do know that Satan has to be a real thing.
18:41.260 --> 18:45.780
They look at the churches and so one of the tests is, well, which one's biggest?
18:45.780 --> 18:47.100
The answer is Rome.
18:47.100 --> 18:49.260
Rome has more than a billion adherents worldwide.
18:49.260 --> 18:52.780
So obviously, I mean, they're the winner by default, clearly.
18:52.780 --> 18:56.140
I mean, that's the, that's the churchiest church you can go for.
18:56.140 --> 18:59.740
And then when you actually look at Rome, they have smells and bells.
18:59.740 --> 19:03.620
They have great optics, you know, they have, they have vestments.
19:03.620 --> 19:06.620
They have beautiful buildings.
19:06.620 --> 19:09.100
They have history.
19:09.100 --> 19:12.900
They have historic claims, some of which are actually true many are not.
19:12.900 --> 19:17.580
But, you know, again, even if some of their historical claims are not true, if someone
19:17.580 --> 19:22.700
is coming to the church as a blank slate, they're going to go for which everyone has more
19:22.700 --> 19:24.260
historical claims.
19:24.260 --> 19:29.060
And so it appeals to them, the Rome and that the East will say, we're older than those
19:29.060 --> 19:30.060
other guys.
19:30.060 --> 19:31.780
That Protestant stuff, that's new.
19:31.780 --> 19:35.060
That started in the 1500s.
19:35.060 --> 19:41.620
And the reason I started talking about my Lutheran faith was to say, hey, the Reformation
19:41.620 --> 19:42.980
was just that.
19:42.980 --> 19:44.980
It was not a revolution.
19:44.980 --> 19:48.340
It was not an overthrow of the church to replace it.
19:48.340 --> 19:54.900
It was a Reformation of the church as she had been centuries prior and a restoration
19:54.900 --> 20:01.380
of beliefs which had been once held within the church and then were lost precisely
20:01.380 --> 20:05.100
because the people were prohibited from having access to Scripture.
20:05.100 --> 20:09.220
And that's actually what happened to Luther, although he was a scholar, he was, he was
20:09.220 --> 20:14.140
reading the word, but it wasn't until he actually went back and actually really read
20:14.140 --> 20:21.260
Romans and Galatians that he had the breakthrough that what he had been taught in his own churches
20:21.260 --> 20:25.300
and what he'd been teaching as a, as a teacher in the church was actually false.
20:25.300 --> 20:27.340
It was contrary to Scripture.
20:27.340 --> 20:35.340
And so the Reformation didn't begin in a fever dream of Luther or in his desire to be
20:35.340 --> 20:36.580
a revolutionary.
20:36.580 --> 20:39.220
It became, it began in the word of God.
20:39.220 --> 20:45.740
It began in a man reading Scripture for the first time clearly and saying, hey, this
20:45.740 --> 20:48.180
isn't what what God told us.
20:48.180 --> 20:51.540
And if that's the case, then something has to be done.
20:51.540 --> 20:55.540
And we're in a similar situation today and so we're talking about why Scripture is both
20:55.540 --> 20:58.420
an errant and why it's accessible.
20:58.420 --> 21:03.820
It's not a mystery to us and it's very important that we combat anyone who says, oh, it's,
21:03.820 --> 21:08.100
it's really confusing because when people are coming into the church and they're looking
21:08.100 --> 21:13.660
for a church, if they see us making those claims, hey, they're not going to be interested
21:13.660 --> 21:16.140
in us because we're, we're equivocating.
21:16.140 --> 21:21.060
We're saying, we're saying the truth is unknowable that it's just all up for grabs and whatever
21:21.060 --> 21:22.500
you feel, man.
21:22.500 --> 21:25.140
And they know that that is a worldly thing.
21:25.140 --> 21:30.220
We have ceased to recognize that we again, and we talked about the genealogy of ideas.
21:30.220 --> 21:34.940
A pagan can look at the one, at the way Christians talk in our churches and see that a lot of
21:34.940 --> 21:38.180
it can't be Christian because it's modern.
21:38.180 --> 21:39.460
It's a modern ethos.
21:39.460 --> 21:47.860
It's a modern philosophical approach to something that if the claims are true is ancient, is,
21:47.860 --> 21:49.460
is originated from God.
21:49.460 --> 21:51.900
It's originated from a supernatural source.
21:51.900 --> 21:56.220
And so it's not going to be buffeted by the whims of philosophy as it evolves over
21:56.220 --> 21:57.620
the centuries.
21:57.620 --> 22:03.700
And so having these discussions and talking about the clarity of Scripture is not just about,
22:03.700 --> 22:05.660
it's not about winning arguments on the internet.
22:05.660 --> 22:08.820
It's not about seeing who's going to be more right.
22:08.820 --> 22:15.420
It's about reaching souls that are lost and are groping in the darkness towards God in
22:15.420 --> 22:19.580
a way that, as Christians, Scripture says that's clearly that's possible, that it is
22:19.580 --> 22:23.500
possible for people to grop their way towards God.
22:23.500 --> 22:24.860
You can't save yourself.
22:24.860 --> 22:28.860
You're not going to come to faith because you try really hard because you think about
22:28.860 --> 22:29.860
it.
22:29.860 --> 22:34.780
Faith is given as a gift through the hearing of the Word, which is Scripture.
22:34.780 --> 22:42.020
So pointing to Scripture is the way to save souls and denying Scripture outright or denying
22:42.020 --> 22:45.380
acts to Scripture is a way to damn souls.
22:45.380 --> 22:48.700
And that's why this conversation is important.
22:48.700 --> 22:53.220
It's worth actually emphasizing what you said about Luther.
22:53.220 --> 22:58.300
Luther was a monk and he still did not have access to Scripture, not ready access until
22:58.300 --> 23:04.980
he had been a monk for a while because even from those who were in the church being trained
23:04.980 --> 23:11.220
to teach in the church, they were largely using secondary and tertiary materials instead
23:11.220 --> 23:13.620
of Scripture.
23:13.620 --> 23:18.380
That's how far Rome had corrupted things by the time of the Reformation.
23:18.380 --> 23:23.580
And why the Reformation was absolutely necessary.
23:23.580 --> 23:26.980
And that's something that's just that's unfathomable to us today.
23:26.980 --> 23:30.860
We can't even understand not having the Bible because like I have, I don't know, I've
23:30.860 --> 23:33.380
probably done some Bibles in my house and I've done it.
23:33.380 --> 23:34.380
At least.
23:34.380 --> 23:35.380
Yeah.
23:35.380 --> 23:39.300
And I have the Bible on every one of my devices too and numerous translations and, you
23:39.300 --> 23:46.100
know, it's, we're so buried in Scripture that we take it for granted to something that,
23:46.100 --> 23:51.380
but in that day it was something that men literally died to get their hands on as they
23:51.380 --> 23:52.380
should.
23:52.380 --> 23:56.340
It was worth dying to get their hands on a single Bible.
23:56.340 --> 23:59.740
For the common man, the only time you would see a Bible is if there happened to be an
23:59.740 --> 24:01.940
altar Bible in your church.
24:01.940 --> 24:05.180
And it would be a Latin, so it would be of no use to them.
24:05.180 --> 24:07.500
Yeah, it would be an ornate Latin.
24:07.500 --> 24:09.620
You wouldn't even be allowed anywhere near it.
24:09.620 --> 24:14.740
So even if you had been able to get near it, it would have been useless to you.
24:14.740 --> 24:17.420
But you were allowed to view it from afar at best.
24:17.420 --> 24:22.700
And now, you know, I have logos open here in the background, my computer with however many,
24:22.700 --> 24:27.180
probably a hundred different translations and various languages and diglots and triglots
24:27.180 --> 24:31.180
and interlinear and the wealth of materials we have today.
24:31.180 --> 24:37.860
And it reminds me of a comment from Luther about men in his day, how little of an excuse
24:37.860 --> 24:40.660
the pastor teachers had for neglecting.
24:40.660 --> 24:42.820
It's from the large gaticism.
24:42.820 --> 24:46.940
Now little excuse they had for neglecting their duties and properly learning and studying
24:46.940 --> 24:50.420
the word considering what they had at their disposal.
24:50.420 --> 24:58.180
Now imagine what we have at our disposal and how little fathers and even pastors, and
24:58.180 --> 25:04.620
if we have any theologians, bother to learn about these things, despite the immense wealth
25:04.620 --> 25:10.660
of material that we have on hand, it's really just unforgivable.
25:11.660 --> 25:14.140
It is a tragedy.
25:14.140 --> 25:20.420
And so as we start talking specifically about the issue, I want to begin with a particular
25:20.420 --> 25:25.900
word that's used very often in these discussions and that word is interpret.
25:25.900 --> 25:32.420
So if I'm talking about something from scripture and I talk to you and you have a different
25:32.420 --> 25:38.100
idea and I don't agree with your idea and we trade proof texts back and forth, at some
25:38.180 --> 25:41.660
point one of us is probably going to say if we're taking cheap shots, you and I, Corey
25:41.660 --> 25:45.260
wouldn't do this, but it's very common in Christian discourse for somebody to say,
25:45.260 --> 25:48.180
well, that's just your interpretation.
25:48.180 --> 25:54.420
And that's a word that's incredibly dangerous and so I want to begin by focusing on what
25:54.420 --> 25:59.220
does the word interpret or interpretation mean in scripture?
25:59.220 --> 26:01.140
What does it mean today?
26:01.140 --> 26:03.060
And where did it come into the English language?
26:03.060 --> 26:08.660
So we're going to start in the middle with the definition of the word and the etymology.
26:08.660 --> 26:15.340
One of the proper definitions of it is to expound the meeting of to render clear or explicit
26:15.340 --> 26:22.140
and it came to us via old French from Latin interpretari meaning to explain, to expound
26:22.140 --> 26:23.700
and to understand.
26:23.700 --> 26:30.140
Now when you say interpret in terms of Christian dialogue, in view of the Latin root of the
26:30.140 --> 26:32.780
word, that's entirely fair.
26:32.820 --> 26:36.680
The problem is that no one knows the Latin root and that's not what they're actually
26:36.680 --> 26:38.780
talking about.
26:38.780 --> 26:43.980
The word when we say interpretation today is much closer to the word that's actually
26:43.980 --> 26:50.500
in scripture and so when you look in scripture for where interpret or interpretation is
26:50.500 --> 26:53.700
translated in English, it's also correctly translated.
26:53.700 --> 26:58.940
Now I'm not trying to set the modern word against the scriptural word because it's a
26:58.940 --> 27:05.420
good translation but it's important to note that when interpretation is discussed in
27:05.420 --> 27:09.300
scripture, it's never used the way we use it today ever.
27:09.300 --> 27:13.540
There are four things that are interpreted in scripture.
27:13.540 --> 27:18.380
The first is visions and dreams as in the case of Joseph when he was translating the
27:18.380 --> 27:20.860
dreams for his master.
27:20.860 --> 27:27.660
The second is signs and wonders as in the case where Daniel translated for Balthazar,
27:27.660 --> 27:36.180
and many, many Teclupars and meant the third is prophecies which are interpreted by
27:36.180 --> 27:42.300
a prophet before they come to fruition and prophecy is an interesting case because once
27:42.300 --> 27:46.420
a prophecy has been fulfilled, it is generally accessible.
27:46.420 --> 27:52.220
The plain reading of the prophecy is going to match up with what was prophesied but until
27:52.220 --> 27:58.540
such a time as God makes manifest his will described in that prophecy, you aren't necessarily
27:58.540 --> 28:01.340
going to know what it's going to look like.
28:01.340 --> 28:05.580
And we talked about that in the previous episode where we talked about Genesis 315 and the
28:05.580 --> 28:11.860
promise of the Messiah and how that was a less fleshed out version of that promise than
28:11.860 --> 28:17.860
was found in Isaiah where he talked about the Messiah being born of a virgin and of us being
28:17.860 --> 28:19.860
healed by his stripes.
28:19.860 --> 28:25.140
Those were also prophecies that they were much more explicit prophecies, both fleshing
28:25.140 --> 28:30.140
out the earlier one and pointing to the ultimate fruition.
28:30.140 --> 28:38.660
So prophecy is interpreted in advance, it's not interpreted in arrears.
28:38.660 --> 28:43.540
The last one is interpretation of foreign languages, it's seen most often in the New Testament
28:43.540 --> 28:49.820
where at Pentecost and also in the churches where some were given the gift of tongues,
28:49.820 --> 28:54.100
others were given the gift of interpretation.
28:54.100 --> 28:59.380
Now it's important to note that in all four of these cases, what is being interpreted?
28:59.380 --> 29:03.380
It's not the way we talk about interpreting scripture.
29:03.380 --> 29:09.380
It's talking about interpreting something that's unknowable to the observer or to the reader.
29:09.380 --> 29:14.420
When you have a vision or dream, the reason that the prophets who were given the gift of
29:14.420 --> 29:20.100
interpreting those visions and dreams had to do so is that it was symbolic language.
29:20.100 --> 29:24.820
When you have the seven fat cows and the seven skinny cows and who knows what it meant,
29:24.820 --> 29:29.860
it wasn't accessible via reason to interpret that dream.
29:29.860 --> 29:37.900
It was a gift of God that the gift of the vision was interpreted by the gift of interpretation.
29:37.900 --> 29:43.580
So in scripture, that's a kind of case in signs and wonders and the four languages,
29:43.580 --> 29:52.500
and prophecy, it is a gift from God to interpret the unknowable and to something knowable.
29:52.500 --> 29:57.940
When we look in scripture, we see, well, this is what interpretation means.
29:57.940 --> 30:00.980
In our own minds, I think that sort of becomes rooted.
30:00.980 --> 30:05.660
Then when we say to each other, well, that's your interpretation.
30:05.660 --> 30:10.540
Even if we're not necessarily thinking it fundamentally, that's what's actually coming
30:10.540 --> 30:16.780
out of our mouths is that, well, you're, you're scrying in the guts of scripture and
30:16.780 --> 30:20.860
you have some, you have this pile of stuff and you've turned it into something that you
30:20.860 --> 30:25.300
think, but when I rifle through those guts, I find something different.
30:25.300 --> 30:31.260
I find another interpretation, and that's simply not what the word means today when we're
30:31.260 --> 30:35.900
talking about it's not a good word to use in Christian discourse.
30:35.900 --> 30:40.980
If I had a book in front of me and we were sitting side by side, and I handed you the book
30:40.980 --> 30:46.460
or the comic book even, I said, like, can you interpret this for me?
30:46.460 --> 30:49.620
And you looked at it and it was English, you'd stare at me and laugh like, what are you
30:49.620 --> 30:50.620
talking about?
30:50.620 --> 30:52.980
Why do you need me to interpret it?
30:52.980 --> 30:56.980
So we instinctively know that interpret doesn't mean what it meant in Latin.
30:56.980 --> 30:59.620
It doesn't mean to explain or expound anymore.
30:59.620 --> 31:04.180
When we say interpret, we're saying we're beginning with something unknowable and turning
31:04.180 --> 31:06.020
into something noble.
31:06.020 --> 31:11.860
And that's the real danger when we're addressing scripture because one of the common attacks
31:11.860 --> 31:17.540
on scripture itself is the denial that it's clear, the denial that what the words that
31:17.540 --> 31:23.020
you have in front of you can possibly be understood, either unless you're a pastor or
31:23.020 --> 31:28.940
unless you know the original languages, or maybe they can't be understood at all.
31:29.060 --> 31:35.460
The only possible fruit of having access to scripture is numerous conflicting interpretations
31:35.460 --> 31:40.700
with no tiebreaker, with no one to say, this is right and this is wrong.
31:40.700 --> 31:44.340
And that's why it's so important to make sure that we're speaking clearly when we're
31:44.340 --> 31:49.460
talking about scripture because when we talk about scripture on this podcast, we're
31:49.460 --> 31:52.300
not interpreting anything, you know, unless we translate.
31:52.300 --> 31:57.100
So for example, the quote that I gave begin with from Luther, core, you translated that
31:57.100 --> 32:00.860
from the original German because the version I had was in a meme.
32:00.860 --> 32:05.060
And I don't want to make claims from memes, even, you know, it was a pretty good translation,
32:05.060 --> 32:09.500
but you gave one that's probably a little less common that's what's typically quoted,
32:09.500 --> 32:13.620
but is a faithful interpretation of Luther's original words.
32:13.620 --> 32:17.700
That was an interpretation because you started in German, which I can't read and I didn't
32:17.700 --> 32:20.420
have access to the source material readily.
32:20.420 --> 32:23.740
And you gave me something in English, that is interpretation.
32:23.740 --> 32:24.740
But that's disgusting.
32:24.740 --> 32:25.740
What's in scripture?
32:25.740 --> 32:26.740
We're not interpreting.
32:26.740 --> 32:27.740
We're using reason.
32:27.740 --> 32:33.660
Yeah, we do actually retain the Latin sense because we do still have the word interpreter.
32:33.660 --> 32:37.580
So we retain it there because when you use an interpreter, it literally means someone
32:37.580 --> 32:42.420
who is translating from a language you do not know into a language you do know.
32:42.420 --> 32:48.980
And so if we think about it, we do still have the sense of the term, but when people
32:48.980 --> 32:53.020
use interpretation, what they really mean when it comes to scripture and things like
32:53.180 --> 33:00.940
that is personal interpretation, which leads us into personal truth, which is not a thing.
33:00.940 --> 33:02.540
Something is true or false.
33:02.540 --> 33:05.100
These are basic laws of logic.
33:05.100 --> 33:09.740
It is not a personal truth because truth is not personal.
33:09.740 --> 33:10.740
Truth is truth.
33:10.740 --> 33:17.220
A statement is true or false and it is so for everyone at all times in all places or
33:17.220 --> 33:20.300
else it's not true.
33:20.300 --> 33:30.780
And additionally here, we have the issue of, when it comes to truth, let's look at translation.
33:30.780 --> 33:39.180
The famous part of that Luther wrote is, if I were to interpret that as Luther saying
33:39.180 --> 33:45.420
I would like an orange juice, please, that's not an interpretation, that's just wrong.
33:45.420 --> 33:48.500
And so there is an actual truth content there.
33:48.500 --> 33:49.740
It means something.
33:49.740 --> 33:53.460
And if you translate it accurately, you are relaying that truth.
33:53.460 --> 33:55.540
You are properly interpreting it.
33:55.540 --> 33:58.580
But if you mis-translate it, you aren't interpreting.
33:58.580 --> 34:01.180
You are misleading.
34:01.180 --> 34:07.460
But there is another source of this idea of personal truth or personal interpretation,
34:07.460 --> 34:12.700
particularly in the American context, although there are also some cults, supposedly Christian
34:12.700 --> 34:17.180
cults in Europe and other places that engage in the same behavior, it's penicostalism,
34:17.180 --> 34:23.660
it's enthusiasm, it's the belief that if I just do whatever, at least they're using
34:23.660 --> 34:25.300
the word, which is better than they are sometimes.
34:25.300 --> 34:31.780
But if I just stare at the word, I will suddenly be given this personal insight into the
34:31.780 --> 34:34.420
secret meaning of the word.
34:34.420 --> 34:42.300
Now, it's careful, it is important to carefully divide here the difference between a regenerate
34:42.300 --> 34:45.220
Christian will have the Holy Spirit.
34:45.220 --> 34:50.980
And so we'll be able to read and understand Scripture, which is a very important point
34:50.980 --> 34:56.420
for what we are discussing today, versus those who say that they will be given some
34:56.420 --> 35:01.740
sort of gnostic special insight into the real meaning that everyone else has gotten
35:01.740 --> 35:02.740
wrong.
35:02.740 --> 35:07.300
Those people, that is a cult practice, that is not Christian.
35:07.300 --> 35:12.420
And that's another source of this personal interpretation, and it's of a kind with
35:12.420 --> 35:18.620
people who gibber in nonsense, supposed languages, in church and say that speaking in tongues,
35:18.620 --> 35:19.620
it's not.
35:19.620 --> 35:20.940
Scripture is very clear.
35:20.940 --> 35:25.300
There should be an interpreter because tongues are human tongues.
35:25.300 --> 35:28.740
The point of that gift of the Spirit is so that you can talk to someone who does not
35:28.740 --> 35:30.420
speak your language.
35:30.420 --> 35:34.380
Less important today, given technology, and the fact that, again, we have this wealth
35:34.380 --> 35:41.180
of material for learning languages, back in biblical times, it would have been impossible
35:41.180 --> 35:46.460
basically for a common man to learn a foreign language from a country that was 300 miles
35:46.460 --> 35:47.940
away even.
35:47.940 --> 35:52.300
And so those gifts were more important back then.
35:52.300 --> 35:56.100
But there was another point I wanted to add here quickly.
35:56.100 --> 36:02.860
There are two terms that we should mention because the typical terms you hear, well, one
36:02.860 --> 36:06.420
is the typical term you hear one is a mistake, but the typical terms you hear when discussing
36:06.420 --> 36:13.540
this issue, perspicuous, or perspicacity, perspicuity, two different terms are perspicacity versus
36:13.540 --> 36:14.540
perspicuity.
36:14.540 --> 36:18.380
Perspicuity is what we're talking about, which is that Scripture is clearly expressed
36:18.380 --> 36:20.460
and easily understood.
36:20.460 --> 36:23.380
Perspicacity is the term some people mistake.
36:23.380 --> 36:26.300
That's a quality of having already inside into things.
36:26.300 --> 36:29.300
So a person has perspicacity.
36:29.300 --> 36:30.500
Scripture has perspicuity.
36:30.500 --> 36:33.980
You can also say perspicuousness, but that one's awkward.
36:33.980 --> 36:35.340
That's what we're talking about here.
36:35.340 --> 36:37.020
Scripture is clear.
36:37.020 --> 36:42.260
Scripture can be understood by the average man if he reads it.
36:42.260 --> 36:46.020
But again, for the regenerate Christian, you will also have the Holy Spirit that are guiding
36:46.020 --> 36:47.020
you.
36:47.020 --> 36:49.700
So if there are people who say that Scripture isn't clear, you can understand Scripture,
36:49.700 --> 36:55.740
it's dark, and it's incomprehensible and penetrable, they're actually calling God a liar.
36:55.740 --> 36:58.820
Because God says that He will help you to understand these things.
36:58.820 --> 37:02.140
And Scripture also, throughout, says that it is clear.
37:02.140 --> 37:07.300
I have a quote here from Luther in a book that the Reformed happened to love the bondage
37:07.300 --> 37:08.860
of the will.
37:08.860 --> 37:13.300
But he threads the needle here when it comes to the fact that yes, there are some parts
37:13.300 --> 37:15.100
of Scripture that are still confusing.
37:15.100 --> 37:16.940
There are.
37:16.940 --> 37:23.100
But the core doctrines, the core truth of Scripture, the overwhelming majority of Scripture, is
37:23.100 --> 37:24.580
clear and easily understood.
37:24.580 --> 37:28.540
So here's the quote from Luther.
37:28.540 --> 37:32.620
The subject matter of the Scriptures, therefore, is all quite accessible.
37:32.620 --> 37:37.540
Even though some texts are still obscure owing to our ignorance of their terms, truly it
37:37.540 --> 37:42.180
is stupid and impious when we know that the subject matter of Scripture has all been
37:42.180 --> 37:47.940
placed in the clearest light, to call it obscure on account of a pure obscure words.
37:47.940 --> 37:52.060
If the words are obscure in one place, yet they are plain in another, and it is one in
37:52.060 --> 37:56.780
the same theme, published quite openly to the whole world, which in the Scriptures is
37:56.780 --> 38:01.660
sometimes expressed in plain words and sometimes lies as yet hidden at obscure words.
38:01.660 --> 38:06.380
Now, when the things signified as in the light, it does not matter of this or that sign of
38:06.380 --> 38:11.500
it as in darkness, since many other signs of the same thing are meanwhile in the light.
38:11.500 --> 38:15.500
Who will say that a public fountain is not in the light because those who are in a narrow
38:15.500 --> 38:21.140
side street do not see it, whereas all who are in the marketplace do see it.
38:21.140 --> 38:25.060
Your reference to the Corsian cave, therefore, is irrelevant.
38:25.060 --> 38:27.620
It is not how things are in the Scriptures.
38:27.620 --> 38:32.180
Matters of the highest majesty and the profoundest mysteries are no longer hidden away, but
38:32.180 --> 38:36.500
have been brought out and are openly displayed before the very doors.
38:36.500 --> 38:41.900
For Christ has opened our minds so that we may understand the Scriptures, Luke 2445, and
38:41.900 --> 38:45.700
the Gospel is preached to the whole creation, Mark 1615.
38:45.700 --> 38:50.300
Their voice has gone out to all the earth, Romans 1018, and whatever was written was written
38:50.300 --> 38:53.100
for our instruction, Romans 154.
38:53.100 --> 38:58.900
Also, all Scripture inspired by God is profitable for teaching 2 Timothy 316.
38:58.900 --> 39:03.900
See then whether you and all the sophists can produce any single mystery that is still
39:03.900 --> 39:06.580
abstruse in the Scriptures.
39:06.580 --> 39:11.380
Luther is of course responding to Erasmus who had argued essentially that Scripture was
39:11.380 --> 39:12.380
impenetrable.
39:12.380 --> 39:17.660
And this is something that we emphasized in our previous episode, we were talking about
39:17.740 --> 39:18.740
election.
39:18.740 --> 39:25.020
We specifically pointed out the predestination versus the so-called double predestination
39:25.020 --> 39:31.180
or the hypostatic union of Christ or the Trinity or the Eucharist.
39:31.180 --> 39:37.940
These are a few places where Scripture is clear, but reason is not clear, and that's
39:37.940 --> 39:39.940
a very limited set.
39:39.940 --> 39:44.500
So it's a trick that the devil plays on us and that we are all too willing to play
39:44.580 --> 39:51.740
on ourselves and on each other to say that, well, this verse seems to contradict this
39:51.740 --> 39:52.740
verse.
39:52.740 --> 39:55.140
So I'm going to pick the one that I like the most.
39:55.140 --> 40:02.300
And the reason that I began with that quote in part was that, again, Luther refers both
40:02.300 --> 40:07.300
to the testimonies of Scripture and to clear rational arguments.
40:07.300 --> 40:14.300
And I mentioned that the reason is something that Christians are either used too much
40:14.300 --> 40:20.220
of, as in the case of some denominations, where reason is used in the Magisterial sense,
40:20.220 --> 40:25.300
where all of their beliefs must be in submission to their own reason.
40:25.300 --> 40:29.660
As Lutherans, we advocate the ministerial use of reason, where we do our best with what
40:29.660 --> 40:33.540
we have and where our reason fails us.
40:33.540 --> 40:37.260
We look at the plain words of Scripture and where we don't understand them.
40:37.260 --> 40:38.860
We still confess them.
40:38.860 --> 40:41.020
That is what faith means.
40:41.020 --> 40:46.380
But reason has a very precious place in the church.
40:46.380 --> 40:48.900
And this is found in Scripture itself.
40:48.900 --> 40:56.060
When you look, there are 17, or sorry, 13 places in the New Testament where the Greek
40:56.060 --> 41:02.420
word, D. L. Ego Mai, is used, that word means to converse or address, to lecture, to
41:02.420 --> 41:05.300
argue, or to reason.
41:05.300 --> 41:12.500
Now when it appears in the New Testament, almost all of the uses are in the sense of dialectical
41:12.500 --> 41:18.700
reason, of arguments, not in a knockdown dragout argument, but making a series of logical
41:18.700 --> 41:21.420
propositions to reach a conclusion.
41:21.420 --> 41:24.220
And they're done principally by Paul.
41:24.220 --> 41:31.780
In Acts 17, he repeatedly reasoned from the Scriptures with both the Jew and Greek.
41:31.780 --> 41:34.340
It says the same thing in Acts 18.
41:34.340 --> 41:38.420
It says three times in 17 and 18 that he reasoned, sorry, four times, I'm just scrolling
41:38.420 --> 41:39.940
through here five times.
41:39.940 --> 41:41.340
It just keeps going.
41:41.340 --> 41:46.860
Over and over, Paul is going to the synagogues into the public places, and he is reasoning
41:46.860 --> 41:48.180
from Scripture.
41:48.180 --> 41:58.180
Now Paul had revelations directly from God, and his writings to us are the revelation of
41:58.180 --> 41:59.660
God.
41:59.660 --> 42:07.820
But when he spoke to his fellow Jews, and he spoke to the Gentiles, there were cases where
42:07.820 --> 42:13.260
he would reveal something prophetic, but his go to was to reason from the Scriptures.
42:13.260 --> 42:18.180
Now, the Scripture that they had in that day was the entirety of the Old Testament, the
42:18.180 --> 42:19.180
Tanakh.
42:19.180 --> 42:22.980
They didn't have the New Testament yet, because Paul hadn't written it, and the few other
42:22.980 --> 42:26.580
authors who contribute to what we call the New Testament today.
42:26.580 --> 42:30.220
But when he reasoned with them, he was obeying God.
42:30.220 --> 42:36.260
He was saying, look, here we have the prophecy in Genesis and Isaiah and elsewhere that there
42:36.260 --> 42:41.180
would be a Messiah, and now I point to you to Jesus and to his life and to his preaching
42:41.180 --> 42:44.740
and his ministry and his death and his resurrection.
42:44.740 --> 42:52.700
As a testimony to the fulfillment of those prophecies, Paul was using a reason to explicate
42:52.700 --> 42:53.700
prophecy.
42:53.780 --> 43:00.340
See, again, he didn't have to use a special revelation from God to explain the prophecy
43:00.340 --> 43:05.940
because he was in the review mirror, both the prophecy itself and its fulfillment.
43:05.940 --> 43:11.860
What Paul had to do was to use a plain reason from the plain words that were given to the
43:11.860 --> 43:17.620
Hebrews and the Old Testament and to all of us to say, look, God said this and then God
43:17.620 --> 43:22.100
did this, what God said and what God did look exactly the same.
43:22.100 --> 43:23.580
That's reason.
43:23.580 --> 43:30.580
It takes faith for us to believe it, but just as a jurist is someone, particularly at
43:30.580 --> 43:36.180
the time who, you know, just having access to the facts and not having access to faith,
43:36.180 --> 43:40.540
could potentially believe that too, now it may not be salvific without faith, but they
43:40.540 --> 43:44.980
would reach the same conclusions by virtue of reason.
43:44.980 --> 43:48.380
Now to be clear, we're not saying here the reason can save you.
43:48.380 --> 43:52.100
That's never the point it is faith that saves and faith alone.
43:52.100 --> 43:58.340
The reason is a gift of God that is given to every man, although not an equal measure.
43:58.340 --> 44:02.700
Some men are apparently entirely bereft of reason and some men seem to have too much
44:02.700 --> 44:05.140
of it because they can't shut it off.
44:05.140 --> 44:10.580
The reason is a gift that is given to us by God to help make sense of the things that
44:10.580 --> 44:14.860
God has also given to us and scripture is what God has given to us.
44:14.860 --> 44:17.140
God has not given us tradition.
44:17.140 --> 44:23.020
One is what has been passed down for our benefit, but I want to quote Luther's works of
44:23.020 --> 44:27.780
volume one where he's talking about Genesis, and we're going to get into in a minute, one
44:27.780 --> 44:31.780
of the reasons we're talking about this is that recently on the internet there have been
44:31.780 --> 44:35.940
people who call themselves Lutherans and call themselves Christians who are directly
44:35.940 --> 44:42.060
in opening attacking Genesis is again, they're saying, well, yeah, it's true, but I'm not
44:42.060 --> 44:44.140
going to go along with it being factual.
44:44.140 --> 44:46.900
That's a bridge too far.
44:46.900 --> 44:51.500
And one of the appeals that these men actually made was to the church fathers who disagreed
44:51.500 --> 44:57.300
in some cases with Genesis being a narrative, particularly the first nine books, which are
44:57.300 --> 45:04.700
considered more metaphorical, kind of a narrative, but not a factual recounting.
45:04.700 --> 45:06.940
Here's what Luther had to say.
45:06.940 --> 45:12.460
Whenever we see that the opinions of the fathers are not in agreement with scripture, we respectfully
45:12.460 --> 45:18.980
bear with them and acknowledge them as our forefathers, but we do not on account, on their
45:18.980 --> 45:24.740
account, give up the authority of scripture, Aristotle's statement in the first book of
45:24.740 --> 45:31.540
his ethics is well put and true, better it is to defend the truth than to be too much devoted
45:31.540 --> 45:35.020
to those who are our friends in our relatives.
45:35.020 --> 45:39.380
And this is above all the proper attitude for a philosopher, for although both truth and
45:39.380 --> 45:43.580
friends are dear to us, preference must be given to truth.
45:43.580 --> 45:48.140
If a pagan maintains that this must be the attitude in their secular discourses, how
45:48.140 --> 45:53.780
much more must it be in our attitude in those which involve the clear witness of scripture,
45:53.780 --> 45:58.420
that we dare not give preference to the authority of men over that scripture.
45:58.420 --> 46:03.300
Human beings can err, but the word of God is the very wisdom of God in the absolutely
46:03.300 --> 46:05.300
infallible truth.
46:05.300 --> 46:11.140
So also Luther had to say about his forefathers and the faith of the church fathers, disagreeing
46:11.140 --> 46:12.980
with genesis.
46:12.980 --> 46:14.900
And that's what we're talking about here.
46:14.900 --> 46:17.860
It is possible for anyone to err.
46:17.860 --> 46:22.340
It is not possible for a man to err and to be faithful to scripture.
46:22.340 --> 46:27.540
And so the reason that these arguments and discussions must be had and must be had in
46:27.540 --> 46:35.460
public is so that it can be plain to all where the scriptural revelation ends and where
46:35.460 --> 46:41.420
man's additions to it begin, because reason can go too far and there are some denominations
46:41.420 --> 46:43.500
that take reason too far.
46:43.500 --> 46:47.220
But reason can also be neglected.
46:47.220 --> 46:52.660
And so it's a very dangerous for anyone to advocate, well, we can't know what that means.
46:52.660 --> 46:58.460
Well, yes, it is theoretically possible that you can read something in scripture that
46:58.460 --> 47:01.620
you cannot understand, but it's incredibly unlikely.
47:01.620 --> 47:05.620
And those things have already been identified in the past by all of the other men who for
47:05.620 --> 47:08.660
thousands of years have struggled with these same questions.
47:08.660 --> 47:13.140
So we don't need to come in blind and mindless to scripture.
47:13.140 --> 47:18.860
We can look to what the fathers have said, but we can only look to them in the light of
47:18.860 --> 47:21.460
scripture and not the other way around.
47:21.460 --> 47:26.980
As Cory, as you mentioned, when Luther was first accessing scripture even as a monk,
47:26.980 --> 47:30.220
it was through the eyes of other men and through the words of other men.
47:30.220 --> 47:35.980
And his revelation was when he finally read scripture itself and realized that what he
47:35.980 --> 47:39.060
had been handed through tradition didn't add up.
47:39.060 --> 47:40.780
It wasn't what was scriptural.
47:40.780 --> 47:46.900
And so reason has a very crucial place in the life of a Christian, again, subordinated
47:46.900 --> 47:56.420
to faith, but used wherever possible to make clear that which can be made clear from scripture.
47:56.420 --> 48:03.380
And I would just want to pose a question to those men who say that we cannot use reason
48:03.380 --> 48:09.460
in order to interpret or in order to exegy, it would be a better term, really.
48:09.460 --> 48:12.260
What are they using?
48:12.260 --> 48:14.580
What are they doing when they are reading scripture?
48:14.580 --> 48:17.380
How is it that they are teaching?
48:17.380 --> 48:23.380
Because you will hear this from certain pastors and teachers that you can't use reason
48:23.380 --> 48:27.780
in order to understand these things or they aren't clear or any of these.
48:27.780 --> 48:32.860
What is it they are doing that these other men cannot do?
48:32.860 --> 48:34.500
And why is it that we should believe them?
48:34.500 --> 48:36.740
Of course, we know what they're actually doing.
48:36.740 --> 48:41.060
It's a cartel is what it really is.
48:41.060 --> 48:46.780
They have the exclusive authority to interpret scripture because they got a little stamp
48:46.780 --> 48:53.140
on a piece of paper saying that they're allowed to do it according to whatever group.
48:53.140 --> 48:56.740
If it's the Roman church, then it's according to the Pope.
48:56.740 --> 49:00.980
If it's some other church, then typically it's according to some seminary.
49:00.980 --> 49:01.980
And that's not how it works.
49:01.980 --> 49:04.340
I'm not saying that seminary education is bad.
49:04.340 --> 49:08.540
It's certainly in our era has its problems.
49:08.540 --> 49:17.900
But just because you have an MDiv does not mean that you are an expert in all things scripture.
49:17.900 --> 49:20.420
In fact, it may be a fairly good indication that you were not.
49:20.420 --> 49:25.500
One would hope that those with an MDiv would recognize that because in basically any other
49:25.500 --> 49:33.260
field, the higher you go in degrees and education that field, the more you realize how little
49:33.260 --> 49:36.860
you know, and of all places in which that should be true.
49:36.860 --> 49:40.700
It should certainly be true when it comes to scripture because you're dealing with
49:40.700 --> 49:42.860
the word of an infinite God.
49:42.860 --> 49:47.500
You should absolutely know it forward and backward, the things that can be known.
49:47.500 --> 49:51.860
But you are going to realize that there is always more for you to learn.
49:51.860 --> 49:54.060
It's the same thing that is said in the small catechism.
49:54.060 --> 49:57.340
It's those who read it through once, then throw it in the corner and think, I've read
49:57.340 --> 49:58.340
that.
49:58.340 --> 49:59.340
I'm good enough.
49:59.340 --> 50:00.340
I'm done.
50:00.340 --> 50:03.860
No, you read it every day because God will continue to teach you and so you continue
50:03.860 --> 50:08.700
to read scripture because you will continue to learn.
50:08.700 --> 50:14.580
And so I just, I would want to know what these men are doing when they are somehow exegiting
50:14.580 --> 50:18.740
scripture, but without resorting to reason or, and again, we know what they're doing.
50:18.740 --> 50:22.780
They're reading what others have written and just parroting it.
50:22.780 --> 50:26.380
Which there's nothing necessarily wrong with that.
50:26.380 --> 50:30.740
Some very good teachers are simply, we could call them a synthesis teacher.
50:30.740 --> 50:35.500
There's synthesizing materials from others, who know more than you, and then teaching
50:35.500 --> 50:38.580
it to others, who know less than you do.
50:38.580 --> 50:40.420
That's perfectly valid.
50:40.420 --> 50:44.060
You have scholars who do that as well, who synthesize quotes from various other authors
50:44.060 --> 50:46.060
and peeper did a lot of that.
50:46.060 --> 50:51.300
A good scholar at his own right, but a lot of what he did, was corralling together quotes
50:51.300 --> 50:53.540
and things and vaulted in some of that as well.
50:53.540 --> 50:58.980
That's not a condemnation of those men, sometimes that's what you need to do as a teacher.
50:58.980 --> 51:03.700
But reason is a gift from God.
51:03.700 --> 51:09.620
It is a valid tool, but as you said, it's just something we do not put it on a throne.
51:09.620 --> 51:13.300
It's not the magisterial use of reason, it's the ministerial use.
51:13.300 --> 51:19.220
Reason is a servant we employ to help us understand scripture.
51:19.220 --> 51:25.260
And scripture itself testifies over and over again that it is complete, that it is from
51:25.260 --> 51:29.980
God, that it is an errant, and that it is valuable for these purposes.
51:29.980 --> 51:36.820
I mind a few verses I like to read now that just from Olden New Testament that make clear
51:36.820 --> 51:44.140
how much God reinforces to the Christian that this stuff is vital.
51:44.140 --> 51:49.340
And Isaiah 8, God says himself, to the law and to the testimony.
51:49.340 --> 51:54.540
If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
51:55.100 --> 52:01.340
In Matthew 4, Jesus said, but he answered, it is written, again quoting back to the Old Testament,
52:01.340 --> 52:06.060
man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.
52:06.780 --> 52:14.220
Now those who heard Jesus speaking in his earthly ministry were blessed that all of the many words
52:14.220 --> 52:19.260
that he spoke were direct from the mouth of God, which John records as more than could be written
52:19.260 --> 52:20.380
in all the books in the world.
52:21.180 --> 52:26.460
That statement is equally true of scripture, and that is one of the things that one of the
52:26.460 --> 52:31.900
attacks that Satan through these vipers who live in our churches today will make is that they
52:31.900 --> 52:37.900
will try to subdivide the scripture that we have before us, the Bible that you have in your hands,
52:37.900 --> 52:42.780
and say, well, this part, yeah, this part is definitely from God, but this part might,
52:42.780 --> 52:45.340
yeah, it is a little sketchy. I am not sure about that.
52:45.980 --> 52:53.660
And a couple of episodes go, I exhorted people to read the read letters in the New Testament
52:53.660 --> 52:58.460
for a very specific purpose, and I spent more time talking about how dangerous it was
52:58.460 --> 53:02.940
than I did about actually describing what you would have because of this very reason that there
53:02.940 --> 53:08.220
are people, again, who will say, well, if it's not in red, well, maybe God didn't really say it.
53:08.220 --> 53:13.020
I actually heard Kanye say that this week in a quote, and I was just shaking my head, like,
53:13.020 --> 53:18.540
please, Lord, don't put me in the same boat as him as a theologian, but it's important to
53:19.740 --> 53:25.900
remember that every word of scripture is from God, and God himself says it, and if you don't
53:25.900 --> 53:31.580
believe that, then you call God a liar, and the truth is not in you, and you do not have God,
53:31.580 --> 53:38.380
and that's where this stuff comes bound to, when you, when Cory and I fight for sound doctrine,
53:38.380 --> 53:43.980
for agreeing with scripture, even when we don't like it, there are things in scripture that I have
53:43.980 --> 53:50.060
a hard time with, not because I don't believe them, or that I don't want to obey God, but because
53:50.060 --> 53:55.820
they're hard to hear, because they condemn things that I have believed in the past, or the way I
53:55.820 --> 54:01.980
want to live in the future, or the things I like to do right now. Those are not reasons not to
54:01.980 --> 54:08.220
believe God, but there are hardened hearts and there are seared consciences in men who will
54:08.220 --> 54:14.860
gleefully say that these literalists, like you and I Cory, don't really have access to scripture,
54:14.860 --> 54:19.980
because we're so dumb, and we're such hayseeds, that we just read the Bible and believe it,
54:19.980 --> 54:24.300
and that's just, that's really dangerous, and it's embarrassing, and Christians should be better
54:24.700 --> 54:33.820
than that. That's not what God says. In Matthew 5, Jesus reiterates what was said in Isaiah,
54:33.820 --> 54:38.220
he says, for truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter,
54:38.220 --> 54:43.260
nor the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the law, until everything is
54:43.260 --> 54:48.700
accomplished. Now, this in the King James is the famous John Titl quote, I think here I actually
54:48.700 --> 54:55.900
used NIV because I like how it works best with the Greek, but the smallest stroke of a pen
54:55.900 --> 55:02.460
and the smallest letter refers to the fact that there's no part of scripture, there's no corner
55:02.460 --> 55:07.980
that you can find, there's no piece of a letter that you can find that is so insignificant,
55:07.980 --> 55:14.140
that you can leave it out and still have God. And there's a word in there that I want to highlight,
55:14.220 --> 55:20.140
because Jesus said, will by any means disappear from the law. Now, one of the games that these
55:20.140 --> 55:25.260
vipers will play, he'll say, well, the law, that's the Torah, that's the first five books, that's
55:25.260 --> 55:30.540
the Pentateuch, that's the book, that's the law of Moses, that's just that's a tiny portion of
55:30.540 --> 55:36.780
the Old Testament. He's not talking about the whole thing, nonsense. Jesus, who is the word,
55:36.780 --> 55:41.980
knows what the word is, he knows what was revealed to Moses and to the other prophets,
55:41.980 --> 55:47.100
because he's the one who revealed it. So when these men try to say, well, Jesus isn't really
55:47.100 --> 55:52.620
talking about the whole thing, they're trying to devalue your souls, and that's why fighting over
55:52.620 --> 55:59.100
an air and see and fighting over the whole of scripture being vital is so important. Really,
55:59.100 --> 56:06.060
it's the same thing that we run into again and again and again and again. Satan has changed his
56:06.060 --> 56:12.940
tactics over the centuries, because he has done certain things and the church has responded
56:12.940 --> 56:20.060
and dealt with the issue, and so he does something else. We've mentioned that the church
56:20.060 --> 56:27.900
handled with the Reformation, Article 4 justification. We handled that problem. Yes, there are still
56:27.900 --> 56:35.820
cults, sex that do not get it right, but the church handled the problem of the denial of
56:35.820 --> 56:43.420
by grace through faith. And so what did Satan do? Well, he switched gears. He's going to attack
56:43.420 --> 56:48.380
the first article of the creed, creation, ontology, the nature of things. Instead of attacking
56:48.380 --> 56:55.420
justification, it's the same thing that's happening here. If Satan cannot keep the scriptures out
56:55.420 --> 57:01.180
of the hands of the laity, which he can no longer do, because good luck putting that back in the
57:01.180 --> 57:07.100
bottle at this point, everyone who wants to have a Bible could have a Bible. Everyone can have
57:07.100 --> 57:13.580
the word of God. Anyone with a smartphone has access to a wealth of information that would make
57:14.620 --> 57:20.780
the wealthiest scholar in human history envious in comparison. Kings had libraries the likes of which
57:21.900 --> 57:28.620
don't even hold a candle to what we have today. And so Satan isn't going to attack that because
57:28.620 --> 57:33.340
he can no longer keep it out of your hands. He cannot make it so it's just in Latin and you don't
57:33.340 --> 57:41.500
know Latin. But what he can do is he can have false teachers, wolves, snakes. He can send them out
57:41.500 --> 57:45.900
and they'll tell you, is that what God really said? So of course, he's not really changing his
57:45.900 --> 57:51.340
tactics that much from the beginning. But the goal now is to make you think that scripture is
57:51.340 --> 57:57.820
unclear. That scripture is difficult to understand. That you cannot just read scripture as
57:58.460 --> 58:04.060
a layman and understand it and get something out of it. And that's not what scripture says because
58:04.060 --> 58:11.340
the goal as ever is to get you to willingly or unwillingly, willingly or unwittingly, call God a
58:11.340 --> 58:18.940
liar. That's what happens with the denial of certain aspects of creation. It's what happens with
58:18.940 --> 58:26.060
the denial of ontology. It's what happens when you say that scripture is unclear because God says
58:26.060 --> 58:35.020
it is clear. And Hebrews 4 is written, for the word of God is living an act of sharper than any
58:35.020 --> 58:40.940
two-edged sword, piercing the division of soul and spirit of joints and marrow and discerning the
58:40.940 --> 58:47.100
thoughts and intentions of the heart. And one of my favorite quotes I found was from Isaiah 55.
58:47.740 --> 58:53.500
God says, for my thoughts are not your thoughts. Neither are your ways my ways. Declare is the Lord.
58:54.140 --> 58:59.260
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts
58:59.260 --> 59:04.780
than your thoughts. For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return there,
59:04.780 --> 59:10.060
but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the
59:10.060 --> 59:18.140
eater. So shall my word be that, goes forth from my mouth. It shall not return to me empty,
59:18.140 --> 59:23.820
but it shall accomplish that which I purpose and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it.
59:25.100 --> 59:32.060
God gave us these words for our clarity, for our comfort, and for our salvation,
59:32.060 --> 59:39.900
and anytime Satan through his certain servants on this planet gets you to doubt even a tiny bit of it.
59:40.700 --> 59:47.660
That is the whole armor of God having a chink put in it. That is a place where now Satan can get
59:47.660 --> 59:53.100
through the armor and can get to your flesh, where God is no longer protecting you because you're
59:53.100 --> 59:59.100
no longer believing God. It's not that God has lost his power. It's the you of satiside is word
59:59.100 --> 01:00:07.180
even by the smallest decree. And when we do that, we're a terrible risk. One of the reasons that we
01:00:07.180 --> 01:00:11.660
did this episode this week was that for the last few days there's been a stink and I'm not going
01:00:11.660 --> 01:00:16.700
to go into the drama because we've been talking enough about Twitter, but there are those who claim that
01:00:18.220 --> 01:00:26.300
the six days of creation are their true, but they're not literal. In other words, God has
01:00:26.300 --> 01:00:31.180
revealed something that's true in the narrative sense, but not in the factual sense.
01:00:31.820 --> 01:00:42.460
And one of the attacks that this man, Lymanstein on Twitter made was to mock the six days of creation
01:00:42.460 --> 01:00:51.260
where in Genesis 1 and 2, God reveals that in the beginning, God said, let there be light and
01:00:51.260 --> 01:00:58.620
there was light. That was day one. And it wasn't until late that he created the sun and the stars.
01:00:58.620 --> 01:01:06.380
And so these mockers, these scoffers will say, well, the six days of creation can't be literal
01:01:06.380 --> 01:01:11.420
because how can God say that there was light on day one when there was no source of light
01:01:11.420 --> 01:01:16.700
until later days because as the big brain ratter to these guys all know through their material
01:01:16.700 --> 01:01:23.980
knowledge of the world that in order for there to be light, you need an unbounded nuclear reactor
01:01:23.980 --> 01:01:30.940
in the sky emitting photons. That's how science gives us light, right? That's what stars do. The stars
01:01:30.940 --> 01:01:37.500
give light. And now we're not going to make the the scientific case for creation, even though there
01:01:37.500 --> 01:01:44.140
is one and the more we learning about the first moments of creation, the more we see how clearly
01:01:44.140 --> 01:01:53.740
scripture the the genesis of count of creation is literal. God says let there be light and there was
01:01:53.740 --> 01:02:01.020
light. Now that's God speaking. That is a voice. That is a sound. And then light occurs from it.
01:02:01.580 --> 01:02:05.500
The red at our mocks and says, well, that's stupid. That's utterly impossible. Everyone knows that.
01:02:05.500 --> 01:02:12.940
Can't happen except in the 70s or sorry in the 30s, they some German scientists discovered
01:02:12.940 --> 01:02:20.460
sonoma luminescence where it is literally possible to create light from sound. It turns out that if
01:02:20.460 --> 01:02:28.060
you emit a particular type of sound into a liquid, it will cause a bubble to appear and collapse.
01:02:28.060 --> 01:02:35.180
And in that collapse, you get intensely high temperatures on the order of tens of thousands of
01:02:35.180 --> 01:02:41.420
kelvin degrees kelvin. When the bubble collapses, there's a flash of light. You can have a fluid
01:02:41.420 --> 01:02:48.220
where light appears by virtue of a sound being passed through it. Now what does liquid have to do
01:02:48.220 --> 01:02:57.420
this? Well, also in the genesis account, the spirit of God hovered over the waters. Now the man who
01:02:57.980 --> 01:03:04.700
mocks the literalist reading genesis will say, well, as a material expert as a scientist, I know that
01:03:05.580 --> 01:03:11.580
water is H2O. It's two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. There was no water because God hadn't
01:03:11.580 --> 01:03:17.980
created the waters yet. So what's this water stuff? It must be a metaphor. Well, again, just in the
01:03:17.980 --> 01:03:27.100
last couple decades, as particle physicists and other scientists have unwound the big bang
01:03:28.140 --> 01:03:34.700
to based on the physical evidence in found in the universe to try to figure out the very earliest
01:03:34.700 --> 01:03:41.100
moments of they don't call creation, but it's really creation. What do they find before there was
01:03:41.100 --> 01:03:47.900
a matter? They call it quark glue on plasma. You can Google that and you can read about the
01:03:48.780 --> 01:03:54.940
the theoretical aspects and then the physical experiments they've done. Every scientist will describe,
01:03:54.940 --> 01:04:03.020
describe quark glue on plasma as the most perfect liquid. It is a liquid that is more liquid than any
01:04:03.020 --> 01:04:08.300
liquid that we have. It's more liquid than water in terms of its liquid properties. The reason they
01:04:08.300 --> 01:04:12.700
were excited is they expected a gas because when they were doing their simulations and their
01:04:12.700 --> 01:04:18.140
thought experiments to try to find what was there before the big bang, they thought, well,
01:04:18.140 --> 01:04:26.300
it must be a gas. They found a liquid. They found waters. Now, why would God speak to Moses when
01:04:26.300 --> 01:04:34.940
he gave him the narrative of Genesis? Why would he say water? Well, Moses didn't know anything about
01:04:34.940 --> 01:04:41.740
particle physics. He didn't know anything about strength theory, but it was also true. It literally
01:04:41.740 --> 01:04:47.580
happened. God hovered over the face of the waters and the scientists have now simulated those very
01:04:47.580 --> 01:04:53.180
waters. These are men who deny they deny God. They're trying to find something so that they can say
01:04:53.180 --> 01:04:58.620
that we didn't need God. Here's what we found instead. The more that they dig, the more that they
01:04:58.620 --> 01:05:03.740
find the first two chapters of Genesis revealed in their experiments. Now, they'll never see it
01:05:03.740 --> 01:05:07.500
because their eyes are closed and their hearts are hardened. They don't have faith and they
01:05:07.500 --> 01:05:13.420
hate God and they don't know God at the same time. But as Christians, we don't need to be afraid
01:05:13.420 --> 01:05:19.180
of science looking to scripture as we look to scripture because they're saying the same thing.
01:05:20.300 --> 01:05:24.460
Now, when I mentioned the big bang, you're going to think, oh, well, he thinks that the, you know,
01:05:24.460 --> 01:05:28.780
he's not a young earth creationist. I absolutely am. And that's the point of this discussion.
01:05:29.100 --> 01:05:36.940
When God created the universe, how old was it? That's what they're trying to answer.
01:05:37.980 --> 01:05:42.780
There's a separate question that's a little more accessible to us. When God created man,
01:05:42.780 --> 01:05:51.580
when God created Adam, how old was he? Was he zero? We hadn't lived today, but God created a man,
01:05:51.580 --> 01:05:59.500
a fully formed sexually mature man is who stood in the garden with God. So God didn't make a
01:05:59.500 --> 01:06:08.380
sheet of fetus, the gestated in a box. He made a fully grown man. Adam had an age. My personal theory,
01:06:08.380 --> 01:06:14.060
which is, it's not a belief, it's just something I, as I was reading scripture, I noticed Adam died
01:06:14.060 --> 01:06:22.060
after 930 years. Methuselah, who's the oldest lived man in scripture, lived 969 years. And my
01:06:22.060 --> 01:06:28.300
brain did the math and said, well, that means that Methuselah lived 39 years longer than Adam.
01:06:28.860 --> 01:06:33.980
That's a conspicuous number if you're familiar with numerology in scripture because 40 is a
01:06:33.980 --> 01:06:39.500
significant number. It's usually signifies trial. But I thought, and that's what made me think,
01:06:39.500 --> 01:06:45.260
well, how old was Adam? Personally, I think he was probably created as a 40 year old because
01:06:45.260 --> 01:06:50.620
that would make him the first, first born man in creation, the oldest man in creation. He was the
01:06:50.620 --> 01:06:55.660
only man who was ever perfect. He was the only man who ever walked sinlessly with God. And so
01:06:55.660 --> 01:07:00.700
my personal theory, again, this is not, I'm not adding to scripture. It's not a matter of faith
01:07:00.700 --> 01:07:06.380
or salvation. It's just a theory. When I die, I'll find out. And God will say, either, yeah,
01:07:06.380 --> 01:07:10.940
good guess or no, you made a mess of this. Here's what really happened. So no faith hinges on
01:07:10.940 --> 01:07:15.980
this. And there's no, there's no belief downstream from it. But I think that Adam had to have an
01:07:15.980 --> 01:07:23.740
anage. Maybe he was 15. Maybe he was 20. Maybe he was 100. 40 seems to work. But he has an age. And so
01:07:23.740 --> 01:07:30.700
when we looked to the age of the universe, how old was the universe that God created? It was 13.77
01:07:30.700 --> 01:07:36.460
billion years old. God didn't create a universe from scratch and then set it in motion.
01:07:37.180 --> 01:07:43.020
From the beginning, he said it in motion as though it had been in motion for billions of years.
01:07:43.020 --> 01:07:50.700
And that's what we see today. That's why the starlight that comes to our eyes is older than creation
01:07:51.420 --> 01:07:58.300
because God created those stars in those places in the universe with their light, with their
01:07:58.300 --> 01:08:03.820
photons already, already streaming towards us, according to the natural laws of the universe. And
01:08:03.820 --> 01:08:09.020
such a way that the whole thing makes sense and the whole things works. God wasn't making up something
01:08:09.020 --> 01:08:13.980
from whole cloth. Well, he was, but he wasn't making something that would be fictitious. He was
01:08:13.980 --> 01:08:19.900
making something that was a real whole machine. The machine of the universe is internally consistent.
01:08:20.540 --> 01:08:27.500
And so his core and I appeal to scientific understanding of these things. It's not an attack on
01:08:27.500 --> 01:08:35.100
faith. It is a confirmation of the faith that we find by virtue of literal simple plain readings
01:08:35.100 --> 01:08:41.260
of the scripture that's been revealed to us. And it's almost as if scripture somewhere says that
01:08:41.260 --> 01:08:44.860
it's the glory of God to conceal things and the glory of princes to reveal them.
01:08:46.140 --> 01:08:53.340
Princes, of course, don't necessarily just mean princes. And so we are able to use the things
01:08:53.420 --> 01:08:59.020
God has given us, which would be our intelligence, our wisdom, insight, whatever attribute it
01:08:59.020 --> 01:09:05.420
happens to be. In order to investigate the world, in order to investigate the things that he created
01:09:05.420 --> 01:09:13.580
into which he placed us as head. And so science properly understood, I don't want to get into
01:09:13.580 --> 01:09:18.380
the technicalities there of what science used to mean and what it means now, but it's just knowledge.
01:09:19.260 --> 01:09:24.860
Science is a way of going about things, obtaining knowledge. It's not contrary to scripture.
01:09:24.860 --> 01:09:30.620
It does not conflict with scripture. It's not anti-Christian. Most of the great men in these
01:09:30.620 --> 01:09:36.140
fields who made the major advances that really meant something were Christian. Some of them were
01:09:36.140 --> 01:09:45.020
monks, you have Mendel, but these were Christian men investigating creation. And that's part of why
01:09:45.100 --> 01:09:53.260
science really took off in Europe. Science, yes, in some parts of the ancient world advanced to a
01:09:53.260 --> 01:10:03.100
certain level beyond what Europe was at relatively at the time. But that all stopped many centuries
01:10:03.100 --> 01:10:10.140
ago. And Europe has been far and away in advance of others since then, because Europeans were looking
01:10:10.220 --> 01:10:15.020
at the world from a Christian perspective. We were looking at the world as something that is
01:10:15.660 --> 01:10:23.580
created by an intelligent and loving God in a way that is comprehensible to us. There are of course
01:10:23.580 --> 01:10:28.460
things that are beyond our comprehension. At the time, they didn't know that because they couldn't
01:10:28.460 --> 01:10:33.260
delve down into the inner workings of the proton and start looking at it going, this doesn't actually
01:10:33.260 --> 01:10:39.660
make sense to us. They couldn't do that. But they could certainly look at the grand scale of things,
01:10:39.660 --> 01:10:47.260
the macro scale, and realize this is a world built by an intelligent God. We are placed in here
01:10:47.260 --> 01:10:53.740
in his image. We have intelligence. We can understand the world. And so you can shore up what is
01:10:53.740 --> 01:11:00.700
said in Scripture with science. Yes, today you have scientists and others who attempt to undermine
01:11:00.700 --> 01:11:07.100
Scripture using science. The problem is most of the people who get high up in these fields
01:11:07.180 --> 01:11:10.460
wind up confirming the things that are in Scripture and some of them wind up converting,
01:11:10.460 --> 01:11:19.820
particularly geneticists and men like that. And God says in Scripture, he created the universe to
01:11:19.820 --> 01:11:25.740
testify to his own glory. And that is the reason that Christians delve into these subjects,
01:11:25.740 --> 01:11:32.700
not to try to second-guess God, but to try to find God's glory in his creation because it
01:11:32.700 --> 01:11:37.980
testifies to it. Everyone, Christian pagan alike, when they look up at the stars,
01:11:38.620 --> 01:11:43.820
humans are mesmerized. It's something that has always captivated the human spirit.
01:11:44.620 --> 01:11:51.340
And the Christian, frankly, the Christian, I think, has forgotten why today. Maybe we may look
01:11:51.340 --> 01:11:56.540
up and think, oh, well, that's nice. And honestly, I think the way that most Christians today think
01:11:56.540 --> 01:12:01.820
is, oh, look what God did for me. Look how beautiful God made the universe for me. Look at all the
01:12:01.820 --> 01:12:07.340
things that God's doing for me. That's not what Scripture says. Scripture talks about the heavens
01:12:07.340 --> 01:12:14.140
testifying to God's glory, not to man's glory, not to man's entertainment, but to God. The angels
01:12:14.140 --> 01:12:20.780
in heaven, before they proclaim the greatness of God for his salvation of man, they proclaim his
01:12:20.780 --> 01:12:25.420
greatness as creator. And that's why we keep talking about the first article because a lot of
01:12:25.420 --> 01:12:30.700
this stuff is bound up the first article of the creeds that God created the heavens and the earth
01:12:31.420 --> 01:12:37.660
because this attack that Satan is undertaking today is an attack on the belief
01:12:38.540 --> 01:12:46.780
that creation, that material, the humans, that us as individuals in the world came from God.
01:12:47.740 --> 01:12:51.180
Because as long as you set up in motion, you can say, well, yeah, there's another
01:12:51.180 --> 01:12:55.740
explanation for that. You can delete God. And that's what these men do. And they say, well, no,
01:12:55.740 --> 01:13:00.460
there wasn't actually a 624-hour day creation. That doesn't make sense because, you know, you got
01:13:00.460 --> 01:13:06.860
the lights coming before stars. Clearly, it's kind of made up. No. And the appeal to science is
01:13:06.860 --> 01:13:13.020
not to say, look, you should believe Genesis now because science confirms it, believe Scripture
01:13:13.020 --> 01:13:19.260
literally. And then when the scientists agree, give praise to God for his revelation because we
01:13:19.260 --> 01:13:26.460
knew it first, Moses knew about court cluonplasma before the scientists who discovered it. He didn't
01:13:26.460 --> 01:13:32.380
know the name. He didn't care because it wasn't about introspecting matter. It was about testifying
01:13:32.380 --> 01:13:37.500
to God's glory. And that is what the Christian life needs to be about. When we talk about these
01:13:37.500 --> 01:13:42.860
material things, when we talk about race, and we talk about other things that are in the world,
01:13:42.860 --> 01:13:49.340
it is not to replace God. It is not to denigrate or to doubt God. It is to say, look at the glory
01:13:49.340 --> 01:13:56.780
of what God made. Because the bottom line is this, everything in creation testifies to God's glory,
01:13:56.780 --> 01:14:04.300
including the diversity of mankind. So when we do the episodes on race, that is testifying to the
01:14:04.300 --> 01:14:11.420
beauty of God, to the magnificence of our Creator, that men can live at the North Pole, and they can
01:14:11.420 --> 01:14:17.660
live at the equator. That's insane. There's no other species that can pull that off. We can,
01:14:17.660 --> 01:14:25.340
because within our genes, God gave us the ability to evolve in 6,000 years, not evolving from a monkey,
01:14:25.340 --> 01:14:32.300
but to change in short periods of time in response to the environment. And some of the evolution,
01:14:32.300 --> 01:14:37.660
some of the genetic changes, which is what it really is, is just gene expression. Some of those
01:14:37.660 --> 01:14:45.100
are beneficial, and some of those are degradation, because the fall is also in play. Once creation fell,
01:14:45.100 --> 01:14:51.660
our genome began to corrupt. Things started going wrong. So looking to Scripture
01:14:53.420 --> 01:15:00.220
is about finding where what God says is made clear for His glory, and that should always be the
01:15:00.220 --> 01:15:05.100
motivation. We're not, I'm probably not even going to get into the flood thing, but I'll just
01:15:05.100 --> 01:15:10.220
point out that there are these places like the Six Day Creation and the flood, where guys say,
01:15:10.220 --> 01:15:16.380
oh, maybe it was a localized flood, and then we find the same flood strata all over the world,
01:15:16.380 --> 01:15:21.740
and then they make up other lies, say, oh, maybe there was a global flood, but then all the water
01:15:21.740 --> 01:15:25.820
evaporated, and all the bones were left lying around. It was a big mess, and it was really depressing,
01:15:25.820 --> 01:15:33.660
and poor, poor no, no wonder you got drunk. You can't read Scripture, and just make stuff up, and
01:15:34.940 --> 01:15:39.260
so I want to point out that when I said the thing about Adam maybe being 40 years old,
01:15:40.620 --> 01:15:45.740
that's a pious speculation, but it never goes any further. I would never pin anything on it,
01:15:46.300 --> 01:15:51.340
and that's where a lot of this stuff goes wrong, is that there are other men who will make up
01:15:51.340 --> 01:15:55.340
something that's consistent for Scripture. It doesn't disagree with it, but that they say, look
01:15:55.340 --> 01:15:59.820
what I've discovered, look what I've found. Let me build up a whole religion around this thing.
01:16:00.700 --> 01:16:06.860
They're modern scholars who do that. They find some little thing, they piously speculate, at
01:16:06.860 --> 01:16:11.020
least, to begin with, and then they build a whole pantheon of lies on top of it, and say, look,
01:16:11.020 --> 01:16:15.100
you've got to believe all this stuff, because this is what naturally froze flows from Scripture. No,
01:16:15.740 --> 01:16:19.500
there's no proof of what age Adam was. I have no idea. I could be completely wrong. You
01:16:19.500 --> 01:16:23.740
shouldn't believe, because I said it. It's just an interesting thing to think about, but it's
01:16:23.740 --> 01:16:31.580
interesting in the context of God setting the universe in motion, not from infancy. It's the chicken
01:16:31.580 --> 01:16:38.140
and egg joke is answered in Scripture. God tells us the chicken came first, Adam came first,
01:16:38.140 --> 01:16:45.740
the entire universe was set in motion as it is today, and then it continued as God had created
01:16:45.740 --> 01:16:51.980
it to evolve, to expand, to change, and ultimately to proclaim his glory as it goes through the
01:16:51.980 --> 01:16:58.620
motions of the incredibly unfathomably complex machinery that could only have been conceived of
01:16:58.620 --> 01:17:03.260
in God's mind, and that's why it testifies to his glory. It's not just about entertaining us,
01:17:03.260 --> 01:17:10.860
we're mesmerized because it is a natural revelation of the infinite creator who also died on the cross
01:17:10.860 --> 01:17:19.260
for us as a man and as God, because he loved us in our own place and time, even when he's also
01:17:19.260 --> 01:17:25.500
maintaining this not infinite universe, but it seems like it from our tiny perspective. The same
01:17:25.500 --> 01:17:31.500
God that knows about every quirk inside every atom in the universe, and he knows their count,
01:17:31.500 --> 01:17:36.540
and he knows where they are, and he knows what they're doing right now. He also knows us individually,
01:17:36.540 --> 01:17:42.540
and he knows our troubles, and he knows our sins, and he knows our doubts and our fears, and he knows
01:17:42.540 --> 01:17:48.380
our names, and the elect had their names written in the book of life. God's a very busy God, and he has
01:17:48.380 --> 01:17:53.980
time for all of, because he's more powerful than being possibly comprehend, and these discussions
01:17:53.980 --> 01:18:00.860
should ultimately focus on how wonderful it is that a God so infinite and so magisterial
01:18:01.980 --> 01:18:07.820
made sure the scripture, a book that you can hold in your hand, can be transmitted through time
01:18:07.820 --> 01:18:14.220
and be accessible to us today in a way that anyone can understand and can come to faith and be saved.
01:18:15.980 --> 01:18:20.140
And that actually raises a point that I want to reiterate from an earlier episode,
01:18:20.780 --> 01:18:23.020
because people get this backward all the time.
01:18:26.060 --> 01:18:34.940
We do not trust God because we trust scripture. We trust scripture because we trust God.
01:18:36.860 --> 01:18:41.980
If you look at things the first way, which is incorrect, that's when you're going to come up with
01:18:41.980 --> 01:18:49.660
things like the JDP theory, and the idea of the day-age theory, and all of these various things
01:18:50.300 --> 01:18:57.420
that are ways to get around perceived problems in scripture, because if you are justifying your
01:18:57.420 --> 01:19:04.460
belief in God on the basis of scripture, then what you are going to do is you are going to try and
01:19:04.460 --> 01:19:08.700
explain away anything in scripture that you cannot understand, because you're really basing
01:19:08.780 --> 01:19:14.380
everything on your reason. But if you trust scripture because scripture is the word of God,
01:19:15.260 --> 01:19:22.700
then any of these perceived issues are to problem. Because it's from God, God is perfectly
01:19:22.700 --> 01:19:30.940
trustworthy. God literally is truth. God cannot lie is a sufficient way to say it's not technically
01:19:30.940 --> 01:19:36.300
accurate. We'll go into that another time. And so you trust scripture because it is the word of
01:19:36.300 --> 01:19:43.660
God, and you trust it because God is perfectly trustworthy. And so that order matters, which one
01:19:43.660 --> 01:19:50.220
you trust and why. And there are just a couple of things that I'll make sure I add to the show notes
01:19:50.220 --> 01:19:56.220
for us this time. Saint Basil has writings on the hexameron, the hexameron, just meeting the
01:19:56.220 --> 01:20:02.940
the six day creation, hex six hammer day. And I think we can also link to a couple of things about
01:20:03.340 --> 01:20:08.940
blood. We have some materials on that that aren't behind a paywall, which is another problem in
01:20:08.940 --> 01:20:16.780
and of itself, but for another day. Yeah. And again, where the point is not to make a defense of,
01:20:16.780 --> 01:20:22.140
oh, we'll look how scripture accords with science. It's what you just said scripture accords with God.
01:20:23.180 --> 01:20:29.980
scripture is from God, and it is in God we trust. God who made heaven and earth and gave us his
01:20:29.980 --> 01:20:37.420
word through all time for our edification. If he can speak the universe into existence, he can
01:20:37.420 --> 01:20:44.060
do anything. And these men who cast doubt on, oh, well, maybe God really really didn't mean that.
01:20:44.060 --> 01:20:48.060
Maybe God didn't do that. I don't think God could have done that because the math doesn't add up.
01:20:49.180 --> 01:20:54.540
They don't have God. They don't believe in God. They don't trust in God. They deny him. And if you
01:20:54.620 --> 01:21:01.740
deny the father, you deny the son. If you deny the son, you have no salvation. And so it's not
01:21:01.740 --> 01:21:09.820
just about doubts or speculation about scientific things. It's fundamentally about the root of faith
01:21:09.820 --> 01:21:16.700
itself, and whether it's rooted in God through scripture or whether it's rooted in our own reason
01:21:16.700 --> 01:21:21.660
and our ability to make sense of things. And then hopefully we can bold God on so that that makes
01:21:21.660 --> 01:21:27.580
it okay. And that's not the Christian life and flee from any man who even suggests otherwise.
01:21:29.580 --> 01:21:38.140
God has two books as Christians used to say and should say again, scripture is one creation is the
01:21:38.140 --> 01:21:47.260
other. God is consistent as an author. We will close with a quote from 2nd Timothy 3.
01:21:47.980 --> 01:21:54.140
3. Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil
01:21:54.140 --> 01:22:00.220
people and imposter will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. But as for you,
01:22:00.220 --> 01:22:05.020
continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it,
01:22:05.020 --> 01:22:09.660
and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make
01:22:09.660 --> 01:22:15.900
you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All scripture is breathed out by God,
01:22:15.900 --> 01:22:21.580
and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
01:22:21.580 --> 01:22:26.540
that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
WEBVTT
00:00:00 – 00:00:04: Thank you for making me recommend for you!
00:00:30 – 00:00:43: Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast, I am Corey J. Moller, and I'm Woe.
00:00:43 – 00:00:47: In this episode, we will be discussing Scripture, Quas Scripture, which is to say Scripture
00:00:47 – 00:00:55: as the inerrant, plenarily verbally inspired Word of God, which Christians must read, believe,
00:00:55 – 00:01:02: and defend, and which Satan ceaselessly attacks.
00:01:02 – 00:01:07: If I am not convinced by the testimonies of Scripture and clear rational arguments, for
00:01:07 – 00:01:11: I believe neither the Pope nor the Council's alone, since it is a fact that they have often
00:01:11 – 00:01:17: erred and contradicted themselves, then I am by the passages of the Holy Scriptures, which
00:01:17 – 00:01:22: I have cited, overcome in my conscience and held captive to the Word of God.
00:01:22 – 00:01:27: Therefore, I can and will retract nothing, because it is neither safe nor helpful to do
00:01:27 – 00:01:29: anything against conscience.
00:01:29 – 00:01:34: Here I stand, I cannot do otherwise, God help me, amen.
00:01:34 – 00:01:39: This is Martin Luther's testimony to the die of arms in April 1521.
00:01:39 – 00:01:45: I wanted to open with that statement, because it's one of the most famous things that Luther
00:01:45 – 00:01:53: said that's known, you know, within Lutheranism, it's known across Protestantism at large.
00:01:53 – 00:01:58: I think probably a lot of people know the phrase, here I stand, somewhat famously, even
00:01:58 – 00:02:00: if they don't know where it came from.
00:02:00 – 00:02:04: The reason I want to open with that in particular is that there are a couple points in there
00:02:04 – 00:02:10: that Luther makes about appealing directly to Scripture and about plain reason, that although
00:02:10 – 00:02:16: modern Lutherans believe that those words are inheritance and the Luther spirit and those
00:02:16 – 00:02:22: words are spirit, in fact, it's pretty normal within our churches today to go in the opposite
00:02:22 – 00:02:27: direction, to obfuscate Scripture and to try to make things more complicated than they
00:02:27 – 00:02:34: are, and to either ignore a rational argument, so perhaps even to say that reason has no
00:02:34 – 00:02:42: place in the faith, and as a result, when someone, especially a layman, points to Scripture,
00:02:42 – 00:02:48: we are frequently shouted down or mocked or belittled or reprimanded as though we have
00:02:48 – 00:02:50: done something wrong.
00:02:50 – 00:02:55: So this episode today, we're talking about scriptural inarrency, about the plain reading
00:02:55 – 00:02:59: of Scripture, about the plain words of Scripture, and whether that's actually true, whether it
00:02:59 – 00:03:02: is true, the Scripture is plain.
00:03:02 – 00:03:07: I've made a point in numerous past episodes from the Provincial Album, and I'll probably
00:03:07 – 00:03:13: say it in every episode, Scripture is clear, and when I've been saying that, it is a very
00:03:13 – 00:03:18: deliberate needle driven into the eyes of these men who think that Scripture is not clear,
00:03:18 – 00:03:24: who think that when we read these words on the page that are given to us by God, transmitted
00:03:24 – 00:03:29: through time miraculously, and by human hands at the same time, we can't really be sure
00:03:29 – 00:03:31: what we're reading.
00:03:31 – 00:03:37: And so to say Scripture is clear about anything is defiance against that spirit.
00:03:37 – 00:03:43: Before we get into the nature of reading Scripture, I think it's important to begin with the
00:03:43 – 00:03:48: point in time where the lady was actually first able to read Scripture because one of the
00:03:48 – 00:03:54: things that was lost in the Western Church was access to the Word of God as Rome continued
00:03:54 – 00:03:58: to preserve Latin as the soul language people didn't speak Latin anymore.
00:03:58 – 00:04:04: And so only the very educated would know Latin, and the books themselves were incredibly
00:04:04 – 00:04:08: expensive because they were all andridden.
00:04:08 – 00:04:13: So it was really a breakthrough for the first time, particularly in English, when the Word
00:04:13 – 00:04:17: of God was translated into English, and so we're going to begin there.
00:04:17 – 00:04:20: And so of course, if we begin there, we have to begin with really three men that would
00:04:20 – 00:04:24: be Wycliffe, Huss and Tindale.
00:04:24 – 00:04:29: Two of them, the latter two, were executed for their efforts.
00:04:29 – 00:04:32: Wycliffe did actually manage to live out his life.
00:04:32 – 00:04:38: And the things for which the Roman Church persecuted these men, yes, they had disagreements
00:04:38 – 00:04:40: theologically, but that was not the core of it.
00:04:40 – 00:04:45: The core was that these men wanted the Scriptures to be accessible to the laity, which is to
00:04:45 – 00:04:47: say they wanted it to be in the vernacular.
00:04:47 – 00:04:53: As mentioned, having it in Latin, when no one speaks Latin anymore, except for the tiny
00:04:53 – 00:05:01: upper educated crust of society, is not making the Word of God accessible to the common
00:05:01 – 00:05:02: people of your nation.
00:05:02 – 00:05:04: And Scripture is very clear.
00:05:04 – 00:05:08: You are supposed to study and discuss and think about the Word of God when you rise, when
00:05:08 – 00:05:09: you go to bed.
00:05:09 – 00:05:15: As you walk by the way at dinner, all of these times you are supposed to discuss these things.
00:05:15 – 00:05:21: You cannot do that if you don't have the Scriptures in a language who understand.
00:05:21 – 00:05:28: And so in the case of Wycliffe, who has one of the first English translations of the Bible,
00:05:28 – 00:05:31: and he translated it, his associates may have translated the Old Testament, but he certainly
00:05:31 – 00:05:34: translated the New Testament.
00:05:34 – 00:05:40: And so the Roman Catholic Church didn't manage to kill him, as mentioned previously.
00:05:40 – 00:05:46: He managed to die a natural death, however, just to show the vindictiveness and the spitefulness
00:05:46 – 00:05:48: of the Roman Church.
00:05:48 – 00:05:53: They dug up his bones, burned them, and then tossed the ashes into the river in order to
00:05:53 – 00:05:58: make a statement about their disagreement with him, which is to say that they did not want
00:05:58 – 00:06:01: the common people to have the Scriptures in their hands in a way they could understand
00:06:01 – 00:06:06: them, because that challenged the power of Rome.
00:06:06 – 00:06:10: If the Scriptures aren't a language that only those associated with Rome, which at
00:06:10 – 00:06:15: the time would have essentially been, only priests would have known Latin, or the handful
00:06:15 – 00:06:20: of men who were highly educated at universities reading texts in Latin.
00:06:20 – 00:06:25: Rome could have exercised a great deal of control then, and in addition, Rome objected to
00:06:25 – 00:06:30: any attempts to produce the Bible really at all.
00:06:30 – 00:06:35: Wasn't just producing the Bible in a language that was understood by the common people in
00:06:35 – 00:06:39: the vernacular, if you attempted to print and distribute the Bible in Latin, they still
00:06:39 – 00:06:43: would have killed you for that, because you would have been making it accessible not
00:06:43 – 00:06:47: to the common man, but outside of Rome's control.
00:06:47 – 00:06:54: And it's that control that Rome wanted to exercise, and that's basically sacerdotalism.
00:06:54 – 00:07:03: It's the belief that the priesthood in the Roman sense here, they act as a go-between
00:07:03 – 00:07:05: roar, the laity and God.
00:07:05 – 00:07:08: The only way you can get to God is through your priests.
00:07:08 – 00:07:12: That's basically the view of Rome at the time.
00:07:12 – 00:07:15: It's still somewhat the view of Rome today, of course, it's complicated by the fact that
00:07:15 – 00:07:18: Rome also seems to think that you can go through Mary or the Saints, but that is a separate
00:07:18 – 00:07:20: issue.
00:07:20 – 00:07:25: But it's the sacerdotalism that lies at the core of the problems that we will be discussing
00:07:25 – 00:07:27: today.
00:07:27 – 00:07:33: Because when you have pastors or priests or even theologians who are arguing, know the
00:07:33 – 00:07:39: common man, know you, cannot understand the scriptures, you cannot read them for yourself,
00:07:39 – 00:07:40: and understand what they mean.
00:07:40 – 00:07:43: I have to do it for you.
00:07:43 – 00:07:47: All of that falls under the umbrella of sacerdotalism.
00:07:47 – 00:07:53: There is a fantastic quote that we found from one of Wycliffe's opponents who, in their
00:07:53 – 00:07:59: hand-bringing way, they stated, the jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity.
00:07:59 – 00:08:01: They're referring to scripture there.
00:08:01 – 00:08:06: God's word, which was the jewel of the clergy, meaning them, had become the toy of the laity.
00:08:06 – 00:08:14: They were so terrified of the idea of the common Christian abusing or misusing scripture
00:08:14 – 00:08:17: that they were willing to kill men to keep them away from them.
00:08:17 – 00:08:22: Well, and of course, they were, because even if you had it in Latin, particularly if you
00:08:22 – 00:08:26: had it in the vernacular, but even if you had it in Latin, then educated man could
00:08:26 – 00:08:32: start reading the scriptures and start seeing things like, say, 2nd Timothy 316.
00:08:32 – 00:08:36: All scriptures, breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction,
00:08:36 – 00:08:37: and for training and righteousness.
00:08:37 – 00:08:41: If you start reading these things that are all throughout scripture, it's not in just
00:08:41 – 00:08:45: one place or a handful, it's everywhere beginning to end, Genesis to Revelation.
00:08:45 – 00:08:50: If you start seeing these things, these men will start asking questions.
00:08:50 – 00:08:54: Why have we restricted this from the laity?
00:08:54 – 00:08:56: Why do they not have access to this?
00:08:56 – 00:08:59: Why do the priests not want me to read the Word of God?
00:08:59 – 00:09:04: If the Word of God is telling me to read the Word of God?
00:09:04 – 00:09:09: And it's because Rome wanted to maintain that authority, because the authority of Rome
00:09:09 – 00:09:16: is built on a handful of claims, one of which being that the Pope essentially is Christ
00:09:16 – 00:09:21: on earth, and they will actually literally use those words from time to time.
00:09:21 – 00:09:28: And so if scripture is the Word of God, God speaking directly to whomever is reading
00:09:28 – 00:09:32: or listening, then you don't need this go between.
00:09:32 – 00:09:37: You don't need the Pope, and then you can start to question the Pope's power, which is
00:09:37 – 00:09:41: exactly what Rome, of course, did not want.
00:09:41 – 00:09:48: When Rome hated the fact that the scriptures had been translated into the vernacular,
00:09:48 – 00:09:54: that when they executed John Huss, they actually used Wycliffe's Bible as kindling on his
00:09:54 – 00:09:57: pyre for his stake.
00:09:57 – 00:10:02: They burned the Bible to murder a man for preaching and speaking from a Bible that they
00:10:02 – 00:10:05: didn't want people to have access to.
00:10:06 – 00:10:14: If you look at these men in history, Wycliffe, Huss and Tyndale, they did make doctrinal
00:10:14 – 00:10:15: errors.
00:10:15 – 00:10:21: We're not saying that Rome was wrong about the errors that these men made, but I think
00:10:21 – 00:10:25: that that's actually part of the point of why it's so important.
00:10:25 – 00:10:31: This scripture be accessible to everyone, because for these men, prior to the Reformation,
00:10:31 – 00:10:35: Wycliffe was in the mid-1300s.
00:10:35 – 00:10:44: When they undertook translating scripture into the vernacular, they became outlaws.
00:10:44 – 00:10:48: They effectively became outside of the church, which meant that they didn't have the support
00:10:48 – 00:10:53: of other Christians in the establishment, and that's not normal.
00:10:53 – 00:10:56: Christians are not supposed to be solo.
00:10:56 – 00:11:02: When we talk about scripture and air and sea and about the fact that the word is fruitful
00:11:02 – 00:11:08: for these things, it does not follow that we want every man sitting under a tree by
00:11:08 – 00:11:13: himself reading his Bible and never having any contact with other Christians.
00:11:13 – 00:11:15: These things are meant to be discussed.
00:11:15 – 00:11:17: God says that iron sharpens iron.
00:11:17 – 00:11:22: That's talking about doctrine as much as anything, and there are numerous places in scripture
00:11:22 – 00:11:26: where it says, particularly in the New Testament, there must be disagreements among you so that
00:11:26 – 00:11:29: the truth may be known.
00:11:29 – 00:11:36: When doctrine is reasoned out properly and argued from scripture, that is what God wants
00:11:36 – 00:11:37: of us.
00:11:37 – 00:11:43: He wants us to have scripture, to read scripture, to discuss it, and to argue, to figure
00:11:43 – 00:11:46: out who is right.
00:11:46 – 00:11:50: What we're going to get to in the second half of this episode is that one of the main
00:11:50 – 00:11:56: attacks today, for a while, the attack was, well, scripture is not real, or it's true,
00:11:56 – 00:11:58: but it's not accurate.
00:11:58 – 00:12:04: There's some of that today, but it's sort of morphing into a thing where you can just
00:12:04 – 00:12:07: say, that's your interpretation.
00:12:07 – 00:12:11: You have your Bible and I have mine, and we can just believe what we want.
00:12:11 – 00:12:17: As long as we confess Jesus in our heart, it's all good, man.
00:12:17 – 00:12:23: The papers and others repeat the silly lie that there are 30,000 denominations today.
00:12:23 – 00:12:25: It's pure nonsense for one thing.
00:12:25 – 00:12:32: There may be a couple dozen branches that have discernible, very particular beliefs that
00:12:32 – 00:12:38: differ from each other, and all the rest is basically just flavors of Baptist in one or
00:12:38 – 00:12:39: two others.
00:12:39 – 00:12:44: We should also point out that the claims from Rome and the East, when it comes to unity,
00:12:44 – 00:12:48: are complete fabrications out of whole cloth.
00:12:48 – 00:12:49: They are not unified.
00:12:49 – 00:12:56: You have various groups within each of those umbrella church to use the term loosely bodies
00:12:56 – 00:12:57: that don't agree with each other.
00:12:57 – 00:13:04: They have categorical disagreements on doctrine from, in the case of the Eastern Orthodox,
00:13:04 – 00:13:10: one national church to another, or even one body within a single nation to another.
00:13:10 – 00:13:16: The unity they supposedly have and they try to make as an argument against Protestants
00:13:16 – 00:13:17: is just complete nonsense.
00:13:17 – 00:13:19: The facts do not bear it out.
00:13:19 – 00:13:25: We can throw in the, for the show notes, the picture showing the relationship of the
00:13:25 – 00:13:29: various Eastern Orthodox churches who are and are not in communion with one another over
00:13:29 – 00:13:31: various things.
00:13:31 – 00:13:34: It's as complicated as the org chart for any large international corporation, if not more
00:13:34 – 00:13:35: so.
00:13:35 – 00:13:39: Some of them are not in communion with each other.
00:13:39 – 00:13:43: They don't have anathematize each other, but they say, yeah, we're not even of the same
00:13:43 – 00:13:44: belief.
00:13:44 – 00:13:48: That falls just under the umbrella of quote-unquote orthodoxy.
00:13:48 – 00:13:49: Yes.
00:13:49 – 00:13:53: You've got the same thing going on in Rome with those.
00:13:53 – 00:13:55: It depends on how far you're willing to extend the umbrella.
00:13:55 – 00:13:59: Are those who think the seat of Peter is vacant, still Roman Catholic?
00:13:59 – 00:14:00: Are they not?
00:14:00 – 00:14:03: Are the Jesuits and the Dominicans the same?
00:14:03 – 00:14:05: It's just, it's never ending.
00:14:05 – 00:14:07: Their claims of unity are complete nonsense.
00:14:07 – 00:14:13: And you mentioned the word solo versus, say, perhaps solo.
00:14:13 – 00:14:19: It does bring up the issue of most people don't even understand what solo-scriptura means
00:14:19 – 00:14:24: anymore because no one knows Latin, which is funny that we're talking about translating
00:14:24 – 00:14:30: things into the vernacular, and we discover a problem related to people not knowing Latin.
00:14:30 – 00:14:32: But it is what it is.
00:14:32 – 00:14:36: People look at solo-scriptura, and they won't know the term because people aren't taught
00:14:36 – 00:14:37: even English anymore.
00:14:37 – 00:14:39: They think it's the nomative.
00:14:39 – 00:14:42: And so they think it's scripture alone, but that's not what it is.
00:14:42 – 00:14:43: It's in the ablative.
00:14:43 – 00:14:45: It is bi-scriptural alone.
00:14:45 – 00:14:52: And what we mean when we say solo-scriptura is that scripture is the norming norm.
00:14:52 – 00:14:53: It is the norma-normans.
00:14:53 – 00:14:57: It is the standard by which all doctrine is tested.
00:14:57 – 00:15:03: It does not mean that we take only scripture.
00:15:03 – 00:15:05: We still look to our fathers in the faith.
00:15:05 – 00:15:07: We still look to tradition.
00:15:07 – 00:15:12: We look to all of these good things that have been preserved by the grace of God.
00:15:12 – 00:15:15: They are just not the ultimate authority.
00:15:15 – 00:15:21: And so when you said that these men were separated from the church, that's true, and that
00:15:21 – 00:15:27: is exactly as you said, unnatural Christians are supposed to live within the context of
00:15:27 – 00:15:33: the church, in a Christian society, in a Christian nation, in Christian families.
00:15:33 – 00:15:37: And part of that is you have to have the word.
00:15:37 – 00:15:42: Because we're going right back to headship as we always do, it is incumbent on the master
00:15:42 – 00:15:47: of the house, which is to say the father, the oldest man in the house typically.
00:15:47 – 00:15:52: It is incumbent on him to know the word, and to see that those in his house are instructed
00:15:52 – 00:15:53: in it.
00:15:53 – 00:15:58: And that's why you have the admonitions in the small catechism as the father of the
00:15:58 – 00:16:01: house is supposed to teach.
00:16:01 – 00:16:06: And also, he is supposed to question those in his household and see if they are actually
00:16:06 – 00:16:11: learning this material, because one day the father is going to stand before his father
00:16:11 – 00:16:16: in heaven and have to answer for what he did or did not do with regard to the authority
00:16:16 – 00:16:19: he was given on earth.
00:16:19 – 00:16:24: And the reason the discussion of scriptural and errancy and its suitableness for teaching
00:16:24 – 00:16:30: is so important, is that particularly for new believers coming to the faith, or even
00:16:30 – 00:16:35: for someone who's not a Christian yet, but they think they want to be a Christian and
00:16:35 – 00:16:37: they want to know what does that mean.
00:16:37 – 00:16:44: You look at this enormous menu of biting, bickering, angering, angry, in many cases killing
00:16:44 – 00:16:49: each other for 1,500 years or more groups that all call themselves Christian, and every
00:16:49 – 00:16:52: single one of them says that all the others are wrong.
00:16:52 – 00:16:55: How is anyone to know how to make sense of that?
00:16:55 – 00:17:01: And the easy thing for people to do is to throw up their hands and say, either to pick one,
00:17:01 – 00:17:06: which is one of the reasons that I started, I mentioned last week that I had rebranded
00:17:06 – 00:17:09: and started talking a lot more about my faith.
00:17:09 – 00:17:14: And particularly about being a Lutheran, I did so because I saw more and more of men,
00:17:14 – 00:17:20: the men on the right of the political spear, being attracted to Christianity and having
00:17:20 – 00:17:22: this very problem.
00:17:22 – 00:17:26: They see all the bickering, they see all the options, they don't know what to do.
00:17:26 – 00:17:32: And they're either not Christian or they're barely Christian, and so they don't have
00:17:32 – 00:17:38: any frame of reference for evaluating scriptural or doctrinal claims.
00:17:38 – 00:17:43: All they can do is sort of look at the superficial aspects of things.
00:17:43 – 00:17:49: And what I saw years ago and what's continuing to this day is that a great many men who want
00:17:49 – 00:17:53: to become Christian because they see, even if they don't understand God, they don't understand
00:17:53 – 00:17:57: Jesus and justification, they understand the Satan's real.
00:17:57 – 00:18:02: They understand that evil is a real thing and that it is supernatural.
00:18:02 – 00:18:06: It's not just that there are bad people, some of which are in some ethnic groups, but
00:18:06 – 00:18:08: they're bad people in general.
00:18:08 – 00:18:15: It's the, they see that those people cannot solely be bad because they had bad parents or
00:18:15 – 00:18:19: they had a bad religion or a bad upbringing.
00:18:19 – 00:18:23: There's an animating spirit that is clear in the world.
00:18:23 – 00:18:27: And in many cases, it's only clear to unbelievers.
00:18:27 – 00:18:31: Christians don't even see it anymore because we just say, oh, we're all sinners.
00:18:31 – 00:18:34: Unbelievers can see more clearly than us that this is a spiritual war that we are in
00:18:34 – 00:18:36: the mid-stuff.
00:18:36 – 00:18:41: And so these men who don't know Jesus, but they do know that Satan has to be a real thing.
00:18:41 – 00:18:45: They look at the churches and so one of the tests is, well, which one's biggest?
00:18:45 – 00:18:47: The answer is Rome.
00:18:47 – 00:18:49: Rome has more than a billion adherents worldwide.
00:18:49 – 00:18:52: So obviously, I mean, they're the winner by default, clearly.
00:18:52 – 00:18:56: I mean, that's the, that's the churchiest church you can go for.
00:18:56 – 00:18:59: And then when you actually look at Rome, they have smells and bells.
00:18:59 – 00:19:03: They have great optics, you know, they have, they have vestments.
00:19:03 – 00:19:06: They have beautiful buildings.
00:19:06 – 00:19:09: They have history.
00:19:09 – 00:19:12: They have historic claims, some of which are actually true many are not.
00:19:12 – 00:19:17: But, you know, again, even if some of their historical claims are not true, if someone
00:19:17 – 00:19:22: is coming to the church as a blank slate, they're going to go for which everyone has more
00:19:22 – 00:19:24: historical claims.
00:19:24 – 00:19:29: And so it appeals to them, the Rome and that the East will say, we're older than those
00:19:29 – 00:19:30: other guys.
00:19:30 – 00:19:31: That Protestant stuff, that's new.
00:19:31 – 00:19:35: That started in the 1500s.
00:19:35 – 00:19:41: And the reason I started talking about my Lutheran faith was to say, hey, the Reformation
00:19:41 – 00:19:42: was just that.
00:19:42 – 00:19:44: It was not a revolution.
00:19:44 – 00:19:48: It was not an overthrow of the church to replace it.
00:19:48 – 00:19:54: It was a Reformation of the church as she had been centuries prior and a restoration
00:19:54 – 00:20:01: of beliefs which had been once held within the church and then were lost precisely
00:20:01 – 00:20:05: because the people were prohibited from having access to Scripture.
00:20:05 – 00:20:09: And that's actually what happened to Luther, although he was a scholar, he was, he was
00:20:09 – 00:20:14: reading the word, but it wasn't until he actually went back and actually really read
00:20:14 – 00:20:21: Romans and Galatians that he had the breakthrough that what he had been taught in his own churches
00:20:21 – 00:20:25: and what he'd been teaching as a, as a teacher in the church was actually false.
00:20:25 – 00:20:27: It was contrary to Scripture.
00:20:27 – 00:20:35: And so the Reformation didn't begin in a fever dream of Luther or in his desire to be
00:20:35 – 00:20:36: a revolutionary.
00:20:36 – 00:20:39: It became, it began in the word of God.
00:20:39 – 00:20:45: It began in a man reading Scripture for the first time clearly and saying, hey, this
00:20:45 – 00:20:48: isn't what what God told us.
00:20:48 – 00:20:51: And if that's the case, then something has to be done.
00:20:51 – 00:20:55: And we're in a similar situation today and so we're talking about why Scripture is both
00:20:55 – 00:20:58: an errant and why it's accessible.
00:20:58 – 00:21:03: It's not a mystery to us and it's very important that we combat anyone who says, oh, it's,
00:21:03 – 00:21:08: it's really confusing because when people are coming into the church and they're looking
00:21:08 – 00:21:13: for a church, if they see us making those claims, hey, they're not going to be interested
00:21:13 – 00:21:16: in us because we're, we're equivocating.
00:21:16 – 00:21:21: We're saying, we're saying the truth is unknowable that it's just all up for grabs and whatever
00:21:21 – 00:21:22: you feel, man.
00:21:22 – 00:21:25: And they know that that is a worldly thing.
00:21:25 – 00:21:30: We have ceased to recognize that we again, and we talked about the genealogy of ideas.
00:21:30 – 00:21:34: A pagan can look at the one, at the way Christians talk in our churches and see that a lot of
00:21:34 – 00:21:38: it can't be Christian because it's modern.
00:21:38 – 00:21:39: It's a modern ethos.
00:21:39 – 00:21:47: It's a modern philosophical approach to something that if the claims are true is ancient, is,
00:21:47 – 00:21:49: is originated from God.
00:21:49 – 00:21:51: It's originated from a supernatural source.
00:21:51 – 00:21:56: And so it's not going to be buffeted by the whims of philosophy as it evolves over
00:21:56 – 00:21:57: the centuries.
00:21:57 – 00:22:03: And so having these discussions and talking about the clarity of Scripture is not just about,
00:22:03 – 00:22:05: it's not about winning arguments on the internet.
00:22:05 – 00:22:08: It's not about seeing who's going to be more right.
00:22:08 – 00:22:15: It's about reaching souls that are lost and are groping in the darkness towards God in
00:22:15 – 00:22:19: a way that, as Christians, Scripture says that's clearly that's possible, that it is
00:22:19 – 00:22:23: possible for people to grop their way towards God.
00:22:23 – 00:22:24: You can't save yourself.
00:22:24 – 00:22:28: You're not going to come to faith because you try really hard because you think about
00:22:28 – 00:22:29: it.
00:22:29 – 00:22:34: Faith is given as a gift through the hearing of the Word, which is Scripture.
00:22:34 – 00:22:42: So pointing to Scripture is the way to save souls and denying Scripture outright or denying
00:22:42 – 00:22:45: acts to Scripture is a way to damn souls.
00:22:45 – 00:22:48: And that's why this conversation is important.
00:22:48 – 00:22:53: It's worth actually emphasizing what you said about Luther.
00:22:53 – 00:22:58: Luther was a monk and he still did not have access to Scripture, not ready access until
00:22:58 – 00:23:04: he had been a monk for a while because even from those who were in the church being trained
00:23:04 – 00:23:11: to teach in the church, they were largely using secondary and tertiary materials instead
00:23:11 – 00:23:13: of Scripture.
00:23:13 – 00:23:18: That's how far Rome had corrupted things by the time of the Reformation.
00:23:18 – 00:23:23: And why the Reformation was absolutely necessary.
00:23:23 – 00:23:26: And that's something that's just that's unfathomable to us today.
00:23:26 – 00:23:30: We can't even understand not having the Bible because like I have, I don't know, I've
00:23:30 – 00:23:33: probably done some Bibles in my house and I've done it.
00:23:33 – 00:23:34: At least.
00:23:34 – 00:23:35: Yeah.
00:23:35 – 00:23:39: And I have the Bible on every one of my devices too and numerous translations and, you
00:23:39 – 00:23:46: know, it's, we're so buried in Scripture that we take it for granted to something that,
00:23:46 – 00:23:51: but in that day it was something that men literally died to get their hands on as they
00:23:51 – 00:23:52: should.
00:23:52 – 00:23:56: It was worth dying to get their hands on a single Bible.
00:23:56 – 00:23:59: For the common man, the only time you would see a Bible is if there happened to be an
00:23:59 – 00:24:01: altar Bible in your church.
00:24:01 – 00:24:05: And it would be a Latin, so it would be of no use to them.
00:24:05 – 00:24:07: Yeah, it would be an ornate Latin.
00:24:07 – 00:24:09: You wouldn't even be allowed anywhere near it.
00:24:09 – 00:24:14: So even if you had been able to get near it, it would have been useless to you.
00:24:14 – 00:24:17: But you were allowed to view it from afar at best.
00:24:17 – 00:24:22: And now, you know, I have logos open here in the background, my computer with however many,
00:24:22 – 00:24:27: probably a hundred different translations and various languages and diglots and triglots
00:24:27 – 00:24:31: and interlinear and the wealth of materials we have today.
00:24:31 – 00:24:37: And it reminds me of a comment from Luther about men in his day, how little of an excuse
00:24:37 – 00:24:40: the pastor teachers had for neglecting.
00:24:40 – 00:24:42: It's from the large gaticism.
00:24:42 – 00:24:46: Now little excuse they had for neglecting their duties and properly learning and studying
00:24:46 – 00:24:50: the word considering what they had at their disposal.
00:24:50 – 00:24:58: Now imagine what we have at our disposal and how little fathers and even pastors, and
00:24:58 – 00:25:04: if we have any theologians, bother to learn about these things, despite the immense wealth
00:25:04 – 00:25:10: of material that we have on hand, it's really just unforgivable.
00:25:11 – 00:25:14: It is a tragedy.
00:25:14 – 00:25:20: And so as we start talking specifically about the issue, I want to begin with a particular
00:25:20 – 00:25:25: word that's used very often in these discussions and that word is interpret.
00:25:25 – 00:25:32: So if I'm talking about something from scripture and I talk to you and you have a different
00:25:32 – 00:25:38: idea and I don't agree with your idea and we trade proof texts back and forth, at some
00:25:38 – 00:25:41: point one of us is probably going to say if we're taking cheap shots, you and I, Corey
00:25:41 – 00:25:45: wouldn't do this, but it's very common in Christian discourse for somebody to say,
00:25:45 – 00:25:48: well, that's just your interpretation.
00:25:48 – 00:25:54: And that's a word that's incredibly dangerous and so I want to begin by focusing on what
00:25:54 – 00:25:59: does the word interpret or interpretation mean in scripture?
00:25:59 – 00:26:01: What does it mean today?
00:26:01 – 00:26:03: And where did it come into the English language?
00:26:03 – 00:26:08: So we're going to start in the middle with the definition of the word and the etymology.
00:26:08 – 00:26:15: One of the proper definitions of it is to expound the meeting of to render clear or explicit
00:26:15 – 00:26:22: and it came to us via old French from Latin interpretari meaning to explain, to expound
00:26:22 – 00:26:23: and to understand.
00:26:23 – 00:26:30: Now when you say interpret in terms of Christian dialogue, in view of the Latin root of the
00:26:30 – 00:26:32: word, that's entirely fair.
00:26:32 – 00:26:36: The problem is that no one knows the Latin root and that's not what they're actually
00:26:36 – 00:26:38: talking about.
00:26:38 – 00:26:43: The word when we say interpretation today is much closer to the word that's actually
00:26:43 – 00:26:50: in scripture and so when you look in scripture for where interpret or interpretation is
00:26:50 – 00:26:53: translated in English, it's also correctly translated.
00:26:53 – 00:26:58: Now I'm not trying to set the modern word against the scriptural word because it's a
00:26:58 – 00:27:05: good translation but it's important to note that when interpretation is discussed in
00:27:05 – 00:27:09: scripture, it's never used the way we use it today ever.
00:27:09 – 00:27:13: There are four things that are interpreted in scripture.
00:27:13 – 00:27:18: The first is visions and dreams as in the case of Joseph when he was translating the
00:27:18 – 00:27:20: dreams for his master.
00:27:20 – 00:27:27: The second is signs and wonders as in the case where Daniel translated for Balthazar,
00:27:27 – 00:27:36: and many, many Teclupars and meant the third is prophecies which are interpreted by
00:27:36 – 00:27:42: a prophet before they come to fruition and prophecy is an interesting case because once
00:27:42 – 00:27:46: a prophecy has been fulfilled, it is generally accessible.
00:27:46 – 00:27:52: The plain reading of the prophecy is going to match up with what was prophesied but until
00:27:52 – 00:27:58: such a time as God makes manifest his will described in that prophecy, you aren't necessarily
00:27:58 – 00:28:01: going to know what it's going to look like.
00:28:01 – 00:28:05: And we talked about that in the previous episode where we talked about Genesis 315 and the
00:28:05 – 00:28:11: promise of the Messiah and how that was a less fleshed out version of that promise than
00:28:11 – 00:28:17: was found in Isaiah where he talked about the Messiah being born of a virgin and of us being
00:28:17 – 00:28:19: healed by his stripes.
00:28:19 – 00:28:25: Those were also prophecies that they were much more explicit prophecies, both fleshing
00:28:25 – 00:28:30: out the earlier one and pointing to the ultimate fruition.
00:28:30 – 00:28:38: So prophecy is interpreted in advance, it's not interpreted in arrears.
00:28:38 – 00:28:43: The last one is interpretation of foreign languages, it's seen most often in the New Testament
00:28:43 – 00:28:49: where at Pentecost and also in the churches where some were given the gift of tongues,
00:28:49 – 00:28:54: others were given the gift of interpretation.
00:28:54 – 00:28:59: Now it's important to note that in all four of these cases, what is being interpreted?
00:28:59 – 00:29:03: It's not the way we talk about interpreting scripture.
00:29:03 – 00:29:09: It's talking about interpreting something that's unknowable to the observer or to the reader.
00:29:09 – 00:29:14: When you have a vision or dream, the reason that the prophets who were given the gift of
00:29:14 – 00:29:20: interpreting those visions and dreams had to do so is that it was symbolic language.
00:29:20 – 00:29:24: When you have the seven fat cows and the seven skinny cows and who knows what it meant,
00:29:24 – 00:29:29: it wasn't accessible via reason to interpret that dream.
00:29:29 – 00:29:37: It was a gift of God that the gift of the vision was interpreted by the gift of interpretation.
00:29:37 – 00:29:43: So in scripture, that's a kind of case in signs and wonders and the four languages,
00:29:43 – 00:29:52: and prophecy, it is a gift from God to interpret the unknowable and to something knowable.
00:29:52 – 00:29:57: When we look in scripture, we see, well, this is what interpretation means.
00:29:57 – 00:30:00: In our own minds, I think that sort of becomes rooted.
00:30:00 – 00:30:05: Then when we say to each other, well, that's your interpretation.
00:30:05 – 00:30:10: Even if we're not necessarily thinking it fundamentally, that's what's actually coming
00:30:10 – 00:30:16: out of our mouths is that, well, you're, you're scrying in the guts of scripture and
00:30:16 – 00:30:20: you have some, you have this pile of stuff and you've turned it into something that you
00:30:20 – 00:30:25: think, but when I rifle through those guts, I find something different.
00:30:25 – 00:30:31: I find another interpretation, and that's simply not what the word means today when we're
00:30:31 – 00:30:35: talking about it's not a good word to use in Christian discourse.
00:30:35 – 00:30:40: If I had a book in front of me and we were sitting side by side, and I handed you the book
00:30:40 – 00:30:46: or the comic book even, I said, like, can you interpret this for me?
00:30:46 – 00:30:49: And you looked at it and it was English, you'd stare at me and laugh like, what are you
00:30:49 – 00:30:50: talking about?
00:30:50 – 00:30:52: Why do you need me to interpret it?
00:30:52 – 00:30:56: So we instinctively know that interpret doesn't mean what it meant in Latin.
00:30:56 – 00:30:59: It doesn't mean to explain or expound anymore.
00:30:59 – 00:31:04: When we say interpret, we're saying we're beginning with something unknowable and turning
00:31:04 – 00:31:06: into something noble.
00:31:06 – 00:31:11: And that's the real danger when we're addressing scripture because one of the common attacks
00:31:11 – 00:31:17: on scripture itself is the denial that it's clear, the denial that what the words that
00:31:17 – 00:31:23: you have in front of you can possibly be understood, either unless you're a pastor or
00:31:23 – 00:31:28: unless you know the original languages, or maybe they can't be understood at all.
00:31:29 – 00:31:35: The only possible fruit of having access to scripture is numerous conflicting interpretations
00:31:35 – 00:31:40: with no tiebreaker, with no one to say, this is right and this is wrong.
00:31:40 – 00:31:44: And that's why it's so important to make sure that we're speaking clearly when we're
00:31:44 – 00:31:49: talking about scripture because when we talk about scripture on this podcast, we're
00:31:49 – 00:31:52: not interpreting anything, you know, unless we translate.
00:31:52 – 00:31:57: So for example, the quote that I gave begin with from Luther, core, you translated that
00:31:57 – 00:32:00: from the original German because the version I had was in a meme.
00:32:00 – 00:32:05: And I don't want to make claims from memes, even, you know, it was a pretty good translation,
00:32:05 – 00:32:09: but you gave one that's probably a little less common that's what's typically quoted,
00:32:09 – 00:32:13: but is a faithful interpretation of Luther's original words.
00:32:13 – 00:32:17: That was an interpretation because you started in German, which I can't read and I didn't
00:32:17 – 00:32:20: have access to the source material readily.
00:32:20 – 00:32:23: And you gave me something in English, that is interpretation.
00:32:23 – 00:32:24: But that's disgusting.
00:32:24 – 00:32:25: What's in scripture?
00:32:25 – 00:32:26: We're not interpreting.
00:32:26 – 00:32:27: We're using reason.
00:32:27 – 00:32:33: Yeah, we do actually retain the Latin sense because we do still have the word interpreter.
00:32:33 – 00:32:37: So we retain it there because when you use an interpreter, it literally means someone
00:32:37 – 00:32:42: who is translating from a language you do not know into a language you do know.
00:32:42 – 00:32:48: And so if we think about it, we do still have the sense of the term, but when people
00:32:48 – 00:32:53: use interpretation, what they really mean when it comes to scripture and things like
00:32:53 – 00:33:00: that is personal interpretation, which leads us into personal truth, which is not a thing.
00:33:00 – 00:33:02: Something is true or false.
00:33:02 – 00:33:05: These are basic laws of logic.
00:33:05 – 00:33:09: It is not a personal truth because truth is not personal.
00:33:09 – 00:33:10: Truth is truth.
00:33:10 – 00:33:17: A statement is true or false and it is so for everyone at all times in all places or
00:33:17 – 00:33:20: else it's not true.
00:33:20 – 00:33:30: And additionally here, we have the issue of, when it comes to truth, let's look at translation.
00:33:30 – 00:33:39: The famous part of that Luther wrote is, if I were to interpret that as Luther saying
00:33:39 – 00:33:45: I would like an orange juice, please, that's not an interpretation, that's just wrong.
00:33:45 – 00:33:48: And so there is an actual truth content there.
00:33:48 – 00:33:49: It means something.
00:33:49 – 00:33:53: And if you translate it accurately, you are relaying that truth.
00:33:53 – 00:33:55: You are properly interpreting it.
00:33:55 – 00:33:58: But if you mis-translate it, you aren't interpreting.
00:33:58 – 00:34:01: You are misleading.
00:34:01 – 00:34:07: But there is another source of this idea of personal truth or personal interpretation,
00:34:07 – 00:34:12: particularly in the American context, although there are also some cults, supposedly Christian
00:34:12 – 00:34:17: cults in Europe and other places that engage in the same behavior, it's penicostalism,
00:34:17 – 00:34:23: it's enthusiasm, it's the belief that if I just do whatever, at least they're using
00:34:23 – 00:34:25: the word, which is better than they are sometimes.
00:34:25 – 00:34:31: But if I just stare at the word, I will suddenly be given this personal insight into the
00:34:31 – 00:34:34: secret meaning of the word.
00:34:34 – 00:34:42: Now, it's careful, it is important to carefully divide here the difference between a regenerate
00:34:42 – 00:34:45: Christian will have the Holy Spirit.
00:34:45 – 00:34:50: And so we'll be able to read and understand Scripture, which is a very important point
00:34:50 – 00:34:56: for what we are discussing today, versus those who say that they will be given some
00:34:56 – 00:35:01: sort of gnostic special insight into the real meaning that everyone else has gotten
00:35:01 – 00:35:02: wrong.
00:35:02 – 00:35:07: Those people, that is a cult practice, that is not Christian.
00:35:07 – 00:35:12: And that's another source of this personal interpretation, and it's of a kind with
00:35:12 – 00:35:18: people who gibber in nonsense, supposed languages, in church and say that speaking in tongues,
00:35:18 – 00:35:19: it's not.
00:35:19 – 00:35:20: Scripture is very clear.
00:35:20 – 00:35:25: There should be an interpreter because tongues are human tongues.
00:35:25 – 00:35:28: The point of that gift of the Spirit is so that you can talk to someone who does not
00:35:28 – 00:35:30: speak your language.
00:35:30 – 00:35:34: Less important today, given technology, and the fact that, again, we have this wealth
00:35:34 – 00:35:41: of material for learning languages, back in biblical times, it would have been impossible
00:35:41 – 00:35:46: basically for a common man to learn a foreign language from a country that was 300 miles
00:35:46 – 00:35:47: away even.
00:35:47 – 00:35:52: And so those gifts were more important back then.
00:35:52 – 00:35:56: But there was another point I wanted to add here quickly.
00:35:56 – 00:36:02: There are two terms that we should mention because the typical terms you hear, well, one
00:36:02 – 00:36:06: is the typical term you hear one is a mistake, but the typical terms you hear when discussing
00:36:06 – 00:36:13: this issue, perspicuous, or perspicacity, perspicuity, two different terms are perspicacity versus
00:36:13 – 00:36:14: perspicuity.
00:36:14 – 00:36:18: Perspicuity is what we're talking about, which is that Scripture is clearly expressed
00:36:18 – 00:36:20: and easily understood.
00:36:20 – 00:36:23: Perspicacity is the term some people mistake.
00:36:23 – 00:36:26: That's a quality of having already inside into things.
00:36:26 – 00:36:29: So a person has perspicacity.
00:36:29 – 00:36:30: Scripture has perspicuity.
00:36:30 – 00:36:33: You can also say perspicuousness, but that one's awkward.
00:36:33 – 00:36:35: That's what we're talking about here.
00:36:35 – 00:36:37: Scripture is clear.
00:36:37 – 00:36:42: Scripture can be understood by the average man if he reads it.
00:36:42 – 00:36:46: But again, for the regenerate Christian, you will also have the Holy Spirit that are guiding
00:36:46 – 00:36:47: you.
00:36:47 – 00:36:49: So if there are people who say that Scripture isn't clear, you can understand Scripture,
00:36:49 – 00:36:55: it's dark, and it's incomprehensible and penetrable, they're actually calling God a liar.
00:36:55 – 00:36:58: Because God says that He will help you to understand these things.
00:36:58 – 00:37:02: And Scripture also, throughout, says that it is clear.
00:37:02 – 00:37:07: I have a quote here from Luther in a book that the Reformed happened to love the bondage
00:37:07 – 00:37:08: of the will.
00:37:08 – 00:37:13: But he threads the needle here when it comes to the fact that yes, there are some parts
00:37:13 – 00:37:15: of Scripture that are still confusing.
00:37:15 – 00:37:16: There are.
00:37:16 – 00:37:23: But the core doctrines, the core truth of Scripture, the overwhelming majority of Scripture, is
00:37:23 – 00:37:24: clear and easily understood.
00:37:24 – 00:37:28: So here's the quote from Luther.
00:37:28 – 00:37:32: The subject matter of the Scriptures, therefore, is all quite accessible.
00:37:32 – 00:37:37: Even though some texts are still obscure owing to our ignorance of their terms, truly it
00:37:37 – 00:37:42: is stupid and impious when we know that the subject matter of Scripture has all been
00:37:42 – 00:37:47: placed in the clearest light, to call it obscure on account of a pure obscure words.
00:37:47 – 00:37:52: If the words are obscure in one place, yet they are plain in another, and it is one in
00:37:52 – 00:37:56: the same theme, published quite openly to the whole world, which in the Scriptures is
00:37:56 – 00:38:01: sometimes expressed in plain words and sometimes lies as yet hidden at obscure words.
00:38:01 – 00:38:06: Now, when the things signified as in the light, it does not matter of this or that sign of
00:38:06 – 00:38:11: it as in darkness, since many other signs of the same thing are meanwhile in the light.
00:38:11 – 00:38:15: Who will say that a public fountain is not in the light because those who are in a narrow
00:38:15 – 00:38:21: side street do not see it, whereas all who are in the marketplace do see it.
00:38:21 – 00:38:25: Your reference to the Corsian cave, therefore, is irrelevant.
00:38:25 – 00:38:27: It is not how things are in the Scriptures.
00:38:27 – 00:38:32: Matters of the highest majesty and the profoundest mysteries are no longer hidden away, but
00:38:32 – 00:38:36: have been brought out and are openly displayed before the very doors.
00:38:36 – 00:38:41: For Christ has opened our minds so that we may understand the Scriptures, Luke 2445, and
00:38:41 – 00:38:45: the Gospel is preached to the whole creation, Mark 1615.
00:38:45 – 00:38:50: Their voice has gone out to all the earth, Romans 1018, and whatever was written was written
00:38:50 – 00:38:53: for our instruction, Romans 154.
00:38:53 – 00:38:58: Also, all Scripture inspired by God is profitable for teaching 2 Timothy 316.
00:38:58 – 00:39:03: See then whether you and all the sophists can produce any single mystery that is still
00:39:03 – 00:39:06: abstruse in the Scriptures.
00:39:06 – 00:39:11: Luther is of course responding to Erasmus who had argued essentially that Scripture was
00:39:11 – 00:39:12: impenetrable.
00:39:12 – 00:39:17: And this is something that we emphasized in our previous episode, we were talking about
00:39:17 – 00:39:18: election.
00:39:18 – 00:39:25: We specifically pointed out the predestination versus the so-called double predestination
00:39:25 – 00:39:31: or the hypostatic union of Christ or the Trinity or the Eucharist.
00:39:31 – 00:39:37: These are a few places where Scripture is clear, but reason is not clear, and that's
00:39:37 – 00:39:39: a very limited set.
00:39:39 – 00:39:44: So it's a trick that the devil plays on us and that we are all too willing to play
00:39:44 – 00:39:51: on ourselves and on each other to say that, well, this verse seems to contradict this
00:39:51 – 00:39:52: verse.
00:39:52 – 00:39:55: So I'm going to pick the one that I like the most.
00:39:55 – 00:40:02: And the reason that I began with that quote in part was that, again, Luther refers both
00:40:02 – 00:40:07: to the testimonies of Scripture and to clear rational arguments.
00:40:07 – 00:40:14: And I mentioned that the reason is something that Christians are either used too much
00:40:14 – 00:40:20: of, as in the case of some denominations, where reason is used in the Magisterial sense,
00:40:20 – 00:40:25: where all of their beliefs must be in submission to their own reason.
00:40:25 – 00:40:29: As Lutherans, we advocate the ministerial use of reason, where we do our best with what
00:40:29 – 00:40:33: we have and where our reason fails us.
00:40:33 – 00:40:37: We look at the plain words of Scripture and where we don't understand them.
00:40:37 – 00:40:38: We still confess them.
00:40:38 – 00:40:41: That is what faith means.
00:40:41 – 00:40:46: But reason has a very precious place in the church.
00:40:46 – 00:40:48: And this is found in Scripture itself.
00:40:48 – 00:40:56: When you look, there are 17, or sorry, 13 places in the New Testament where the Greek
00:40:56 – 00:41:02: word, D. L. Ego Mai, is used, that word means to converse or address, to lecture, to
00:41:02 – 00:41:05: argue, or to reason.
00:41:05 – 00:41:12: Now when it appears in the New Testament, almost all of the uses are in the sense of dialectical
00:41:12 – 00:41:18: reason, of arguments, not in a knockdown dragout argument, but making a series of logical
00:41:18 – 00:41:21: propositions to reach a conclusion.
00:41:21 – 00:41:24: And they're done principally by Paul.
00:41:24 – 00:41:31: In Acts 17, he repeatedly reasoned from the Scriptures with both the Jew and Greek.
00:41:31 – 00:41:34: It says the same thing in Acts 18.
00:41:34 – 00:41:38: It says three times in 17 and 18 that he reasoned, sorry, four times, I'm just scrolling
00:41:38 – 00:41:39: through here five times.
00:41:39 – 00:41:41: It just keeps going.
00:41:41 – 00:41:46: Over and over, Paul is going to the synagogues into the public places, and he is reasoning
00:41:46 – 00:41:48: from Scripture.
00:41:48 – 00:41:58: Now Paul had revelations directly from God, and his writings to us are the revelation of
00:41:58 – 00:41:59: God.
00:41:59 – 00:42:07: But when he spoke to his fellow Jews, and he spoke to the Gentiles, there were cases where
00:42:07 – 00:42:13: he would reveal something prophetic, but his go to was to reason from the Scriptures.
00:42:13 – 00:42:18: Now, the Scripture that they had in that day was the entirety of the Old Testament, the
00:42:18 – 00:42:19: Tanakh.
00:42:19 – 00:42:22: They didn't have the New Testament yet, because Paul hadn't written it, and the few other
00:42:22 – 00:42:26: authors who contribute to what we call the New Testament today.
00:42:26 – 00:42:30: But when he reasoned with them, he was obeying God.
00:42:30 – 00:42:36: He was saying, look, here we have the prophecy in Genesis and Isaiah and elsewhere that there
00:42:36 – 00:42:41: would be a Messiah, and now I point to you to Jesus and to his life and to his preaching
00:42:41 – 00:42:44: and his ministry and his death and his resurrection.
00:42:44 – 00:42:52: As a testimony to the fulfillment of those prophecies, Paul was using a reason to explicate
00:42:52 – 00:42:53: prophecy.
00:42:53 – 00:43:00: See, again, he didn't have to use a special revelation from God to explain the prophecy
00:43:00 – 00:43:05: because he was in the review mirror, both the prophecy itself and its fulfillment.
00:43:05 – 00:43:11: What Paul had to do was to use a plain reason from the plain words that were given to the
00:43:11 – 00:43:17: Hebrews and the Old Testament and to all of us to say, look, God said this and then God
00:43:17 – 00:43:22: did this, what God said and what God did look exactly the same.
00:43:22 – 00:43:23: That's reason.
00:43:23 – 00:43:30: It takes faith for us to believe it, but just as a jurist is someone, particularly at
00:43:30 – 00:43:36: the time who, you know, just having access to the facts and not having access to faith,
00:43:36 – 00:43:40: could potentially believe that too, now it may not be salvific without faith, but they
00:43:40 – 00:43:44: would reach the same conclusions by virtue of reason.
00:43:44 – 00:43:48: Now to be clear, we're not saying here the reason can save you.
00:43:48 – 00:43:52: That's never the point it is faith that saves and faith alone.
00:43:52 – 00:43:58: The reason is a gift of God that is given to every man, although not an equal measure.
00:43:58 – 00:44:02: Some men are apparently entirely bereft of reason and some men seem to have too much
00:44:02 – 00:44:05: of it because they can't shut it off.
00:44:05 – 00:44:10: The reason is a gift that is given to us by God to help make sense of the things that
00:44:10 – 00:44:14: God has also given to us and scripture is what God has given to us.
00:44:14 – 00:44:17: God has not given us tradition.
00:44:17 – 00:44:23: One is what has been passed down for our benefit, but I want to quote Luther's works of
00:44:23 – 00:44:27: volume one where he's talking about Genesis, and we're going to get into in a minute, one
00:44:27 – 00:44:31: of the reasons we're talking about this is that recently on the internet there have been
00:44:31 – 00:44:35: people who call themselves Lutherans and call themselves Christians who are directly
00:44:35 – 00:44:42: in opening attacking Genesis is again, they're saying, well, yeah, it's true, but I'm not
00:44:42 – 00:44:44: going to go along with it being factual.
00:44:44 – 00:44:46: That's a bridge too far.
00:44:46 – 00:44:51: And one of the appeals that these men actually made was to the church fathers who disagreed
00:44:51 – 00:44:57: in some cases with Genesis being a narrative, particularly the first nine books, which are
00:44:57 – 00:45:04: considered more metaphorical, kind of a narrative, but not a factual recounting.
00:45:04 – 00:45:06: Here's what Luther had to say.
00:45:06 – 00:45:12: Whenever we see that the opinions of the fathers are not in agreement with scripture, we respectfully
00:45:12 – 00:45:18: bear with them and acknowledge them as our forefathers, but we do not on account, on their
00:45:18 – 00:45:24: account, give up the authority of scripture, Aristotle's statement in the first book of
00:45:24 – 00:45:31: his ethics is well put and true, better it is to defend the truth than to be too much devoted
00:45:31 – 00:45:35: to those who are our friends in our relatives.
00:45:35 – 00:45:39: And this is above all the proper attitude for a philosopher, for although both truth and
00:45:39 – 00:45:43: friends are dear to us, preference must be given to truth.
00:45:43 – 00:45:48: If a pagan maintains that this must be the attitude in their secular discourses, how
00:45:48 – 00:45:53: much more must it be in our attitude in those which involve the clear witness of scripture,
00:45:53 – 00:45:58: that we dare not give preference to the authority of men over that scripture.
00:45:58 – 00:46:03: Human beings can err, but the word of God is the very wisdom of God in the absolutely
00:46:03 – 00:46:05: infallible truth.
00:46:05 – 00:46:11: So also Luther had to say about his forefathers and the faith of the church fathers, disagreeing
00:46:11 – 00:46:12: with genesis.
00:46:12 – 00:46:14: And that's what we're talking about here.
00:46:14 – 00:46:17: It is possible for anyone to err.
00:46:17 – 00:46:22: It is not possible for a man to err and to be faithful to scripture.
00:46:22 – 00:46:27: And so the reason that these arguments and discussions must be had and must be had in
00:46:27 – 00:46:35: public is so that it can be plain to all where the scriptural revelation ends and where
00:46:35 – 00:46:41: man's additions to it begin, because reason can go too far and there are some denominations
00:46:41 – 00:46:43: that take reason too far.
00:46:43 – 00:46:47: But reason can also be neglected.
00:46:47 – 00:46:52: And so it's a very dangerous for anyone to advocate, well, we can't know what that means.
00:46:52 – 00:46:58: Well, yes, it is theoretically possible that you can read something in scripture that
00:46:58 – 00:47:01: you cannot understand, but it's incredibly unlikely.
00:47:01 – 00:47:05: And those things have already been identified in the past by all of the other men who for
00:47:05 – 00:47:08: thousands of years have struggled with these same questions.
00:47:08 – 00:47:13: So we don't need to come in blind and mindless to scripture.
00:47:13 – 00:47:18: We can look to what the fathers have said, but we can only look to them in the light of
00:47:18 – 00:47:21: scripture and not the other way around.
00:47:21 – 00:47:26: As Cory, as you mentioned, when Luther was first accessing scripture even as a monk,
00:47:26 – 00:47:30: it was through the eyes of other men and through the words of other men.
00:47:30 – 00:47:35: And his revelation was when he finally read scripture itself and realized that what he
00:47:35 – 00:47:39: had been handed through tradition didn't add up.
00:47:39 – 00:47:40: It wasn't what was scriptural.
00:47:40 – 00:47:46: And so reason has a very crucial place in the life of a Christian, again, subordinated
00:47:46 – 00:47:56: to faith, but used wherever possible to make clear that which can be made clear from scripture.
00:47:56 – 00:48:03: And I would just want to pose a question to those men who say that we cannot use reason
00:48:03 – 00:48:09: in order to interpret or in order to exegy, it would be a better term, really.
00:48:09 – 00:48:12: What are they using?
00:48:12 – 00:48:14: What are they doing when they are reading scripture?
00:48:14 – 00:48:17: How is it that they are teaching?
00:48:17 – 00:48:23: Because you will hear this from certain pastors and teachers that you can't use reason
00:48:23 – 00:48:27: in order to understand these things or they aren't clear or any of these.
00:48:27 – 00:48:32: What is it they are doing that these other men cannot do?
00:48:32 – 00:48:34: And why is it that we should believe them?
00:48:34 – 00:48:36: Of course, we know what they're actually doing.
00:48:36 – 00:48:41: It's a cartel is what it really is.
00:48:41 – 00:48:46: They have the exclusive authority to interpret scripture because they got a little stamp
00:48:46 – 00:48:53: on a piece of paper saying that they're allowed to do it according to whatever group.
00:48:53 – 00:48:56: If it's the Roman church, then it's according to the Pope.
00:48:56 – 00:49:00: If it's some other church, then typically it's according to some seminary.
00:49:00 – 00:49:01: And that's not how it works.
00:49:01 – 00:49:04: I'm not saying that seminary education is bad.
00:49:04 – 00:49:08: It's certainly in our era has its problems.
00:49:08 – 00:49:17: But just because you have an MDiv does not mean that you are an expert in all things scripture.
00:49:17 – 00:49:20: In fact, it may be a fairly good indication that you were not.
00:49:20 – 00:49:25: One would hope that those with an MDiv would recognize that because in basically any other
00:49:25 – 00:49:33: field, the higher you go in degrees and education that field, the more you realize how little
00:49:33 – 00:49:36: you know, and of all places in which that should be true.
00:49:36 – 00:49:40: It should certainly be true when it comes to scripture because you're dealing with
00:49:40 – 00:49:42: the word of an infinite God.
00:49:42 – 00:49:47: You should absolutely know it forward and backward, the things that can be known.
00:49:47 – 00:49:51: But you are going to realize that there is always more for you to learn.
00:49:51 – 00:49:54: It's the same thing that is said in the small catechism.
00:49:54 – 00:49:57: It's those who read it through once, then throw it in the corner and think, I've read
00:49:57 – 00:49:58: that.
00:49:58 – 00:49:59: I'm good enough.
00:49:59 – 00:50:00: I'm done.
00:50:00 – 00:50:03: No, you read it every day because God will continue to teach you and so you continue
00:50:03 – 00:50:08: to read scripture because you will continue to learn.
00:50:08 – 00:50:14: And so I just, I would want to know what these men are doing when they are somehow exegiting
00:50:14 – 00:50:18: scripture, but without resorting to reason or, and again, we know what they're doing.
00:50:18 – 00:50:22: They're reading what others have written and just parroting it.
00:50:22 – 00:50:26: Which there's nothing necessarily wrong with that.
00:50:26 – 00:50:30: Some very good teachers are simply, we could call them a synthesis teacher.
00:50:30 – 00:50:35: There's synthesizing materials from others, who know more than you, and then teaching
00:50:35 – 00:50:38: it to others, who know less than you do.
00:50:38 – 00:50:40: That's perfectly valid.
00:50:40 – 00:50:44: You have scholars who do that as well, who synthesize quotes from various other authors
00:50:44 – 00:50:46: and peeper did a lot of that.
00:50:46 – 00:50:51: A good scholar at his own right, but a lot of what he did, was corralling together quotes
00:50:51 – 00:50:53: and things and vaulted in some of that as well.
00:50:53 – 00:50:58: That's not a condemnation of those men, sometimes that's what you need to do as a teacher.
00:50:58 – 00:51:03: But reason is a gift from God.
00:51:03 – 00:51:09: It is a valid tool, but as you said, it's just something we do not put it on a throne.
00:51:09 – 00:51:13: It's not the magisterial use of reason, it's the ministerial use.
00:51:13 – 00:51:19: Reason is a servant we employ to help us understand scripture.
00:51:19 – 00:51:25: And scripture itself testifies over and over again that it is complete, that it is from
00:51:25 – 00:51:29: God, that it is an errant, and that it is valuable for these purposes.
00:51:29 – 00:51:36: I mind a few verses I like to read now that just from Olden New Testament that make clear
00:51:36 – 00:51:44: how much God reinforces to the Christian that this stuff is vital.
00:51:44 – 00:51:49: And Isaiah 8, God says himself, to the law and to the testimony.
00:51:49 – 00:51:54: If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
00:51:55 – 00:52:01: In Matthew 4, Jesus said, but he answered, it is written, again quoting back to the Old Testament,
00:52:01 – 00:52:06: man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.
00:52:06 – 00:52:14: Now those who heard Jesus speaking in his earthly ministry were blessed that all of the many words
00:52:14 – 00:52:19: that he spoke were direct from the mouth of God, which John records as more than could be written
00:52:19 – 00:52:20: in all the books in the world.
00:52:21 – 00:52:26: That statement is equally true of scripture, and that is one of the things that one of the
00:52:26 – 00:52:31: attacks that Satan through these vipers who live in our churches today will make is that they
00:52:31 – 00:52:37: will try to subdivide the scripture that we have before us, the Bible that you have in your hands,
00:52:37 – 00:52:42: and say, well, this part, yeah, this part is definitely from God, but this part might,
00:52:42 – 00:52:45: yeah, it is a little sketchy. I am not sure about that.
00:52:45 – 00:52:53: And a couple of episodes go, I exhorted people to read the read letters in the New Testament
00:52:53 – 00:52:58: for a very specific purpose, and I spent more time talking about how dangerous it was
00:52:58 – 00:53:02: than I did about actually describing what you would have because of this very reason that there
00:53:02 – 00:53:08: are people, again, who will say, well, if it's not in red, well, maybe God didn't really say it.
00:53:08 – 00:53:13: I actually heard Kanye say that this week in a quote, and I was just shaking my head, like,
00:53:13 – 00:53:18: please, Lord, don't put me in the same boat as him as a theologian, but it's important to
00:53:19 – 00:53:25: remember that every word of scripture is from God, and God himself says it, and if you don't
00:53:25 – 00:53:31: believe that, then you call God a liar, and the truth is not in you, and you do not have God,
00:53:31 – 00:53:38: and that's where this stuff comes bound to, when you, when Cory and I fight for sound doctrine,
00:53:38 – 00:53:43: for agreeing with scripture, even when we don't like it, there are things in scripture that I have
00:53:43 – 00:53:50: a hard time with, not because I don't believe them, or that I don't want to obey God, but because
00:53:50 – 00:53:55: they're hard to hear, because they condemn things that I have believed in the past, or the way I
00:53:55 – 00:54:01: want to live in the future, or the things I like to do right now. Those are not reasons not to
00:54:01 – 00:54:08: believe God, but there are hardened hearts and there are seared consciences in men who will
00:54:08 – 00:54:14: gleefully say that these literalists, like you and I Cory, don't really have access to scripture,
00:54:14 – 00:54:19: because we're so dumb, and we're such hayseeds, that we just read the Bible and believe it,
00:54:19 – 00:54:24: and that's just, that's really dangerous, and it's embarrassing, and Christians should be better
00:54:24 – 00:54:33: than that. That's not what God says. In Matthew 5, Jesus reiterates what was said in Isaiah,
00:54:33 – 00:54:38: he says, for truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter,
00:54:38 – 00:54:43: nor the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the law, until everything is
00:54:43 – 00:54:48: accomplished. Now, this in the King James is the famous John Titl quote, I think here I actually
00:54:48 – 00:54:55: used NIV because I like how it works best with the Greek, but the smallest stroke of a pen
00:54:55 – 00:55:02: and the smallest letter refers to the fact that there's no part of scripture, there's no corner
00:55:02 – 00:55:07: that you can find, there's no piece of a letter that you can find that is so insignificant,
00:55:07 – 00:55:14: that you can leave it out and still have God. And there's a word in there that I want to highlight,
00:55:14 – 00:55:20: because Jesus said, will by any means disappear from the law. Now, one of the games that these
00:55:20 – 00:55:25: vipers will play, he'll say, well, the law, that's the Torah, that's the first five books, that's
00:55:25 – 00:55:30: the Pentateuch, that's the book, that's the law of Moses, that's just that's a tiny portion of
00:55:30 – 00:55:36: the Old Testament. He's not talking about the whole thing, nonsense. Jesus, who is the word,
00:55:36 – 00:55:41: knows what the word is, he knows what was revealed to Moses and to the other prophets,
00:55:41 – 00:55:47: because he's the one who revealed it. So when these men try to say, well, Jesus isn't really
00:55:47 – 00:55:52: talking about the whole thing, they're trying to devalue your souls, and that's why fighting over
00:55:52 – 00:55:59: an air and see and fighting over the whole of scripture being vital is so important. Really,
00:55:59 – 00:56:06: it's the same thing that we run into again and again and again and again. Satan has changed his
00:56:06 – 00:56:12: tactics over the centuries, because he has done certain things and the church has responded
00:56:12 – 00:56:20: and dealt with the issue, and so he does something else. We've mentioned that the church
00:56:20 – 00:56:27: handled with the Reformation, Article 4 justification. We handled that problem. Yes, there are still
00:56:27 – 00:56:35: cults, sex that do not get it right, but the church handled the problem of the denial of
00:56:35 – 00:56:43: by grace through faith. And so what did Satan do? Well, he switched gears. He's going to attack
00:56:43 – 00:56:48: the first article of the creed, creation, ontology, the nature of things. Instead of attacking
00:56:48 – 00:56:55: justification, it's the same thing that's happening here. If Satan cannot keep the scriptures out
00:56:55 – 00:57:01: of the hands of the laity, which he can no longer do, because good luck putting that back in the
00:57:01 – 00:57:07: bottle at this point, everyone who wants to have a Bible could have a Bible. Everyone can have
00:57:07 – 00:57:13: the word of God. Anyone with a smartphone has access to a wealth of information that would make
00:57:14 – 00:57:20: the wealthiest scholar in human history envious in comparison. Kings had libraries the likes of which
00:57:21 – 00:57:28: don't even hold a candle to what we have today. And so Satan isn't going to attack that because
00:57:28 – 00:57:33: he can no longer keep it out of your hands. He cannot make it so it's just in Latin and you don't
00:57:33 – 00:57:41: know Latin. But what he can do is he can have false teachers, wolves, snakes. He can send them out
00:57:41 – 00:57:45: and they'll tell you, is that what God really said? So of course, he's not really changing his
00:57:45 – 00:57:51: tactics that much from the beginning. But the goal now is to make you think that scripture is
00:57:51 – 00:57:57: unclear. That scripture is difficult to understand. That you cannot just read scripture as
00:57:58 – 00:58:04: a layman and understand it and get something out of it. And that's not what scripture says because
00:58:04 – 00:58:11: the goal as ever is to get you to willingly or unwillingly, willingly or unwittingly, call God a
00:58:11 – 00:58:18: liar. That's what happens with the denial of certain aspects of creation. It's what happens with
00:58:18 – 00:58:26: the denial of ontology. It's what happens when you say that scripture is unclear because God says
00:58:26 – 00:58:35: it is clear. And Hebrews 4 is written, for the word of God is living an act of sharper than any
00:58:35 – 00:58:40: two-edged sword, piercing the division of soul and spirit of joints and marrow and discerning the
00:58:40 – 00:58:47: thoughts and intentions of the heart. And one of my favorite quotes I found was from Isaiah 55.
00:58:47 – 00:58:53: God says, for my thoughts are not your thoughts. Neither are your ways my ways. Declare is the Lord.
00:58:54 – 00:58:59: For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts
00:58:59 – 00:59:04: than your thoughts. For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return there,
00:59:04 – 00:59:10: but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the
00:59:10 – 00:59:18: eater. So shall my word be that, goes forth from my mouth. It shall not return to me empty,
00:59:18 – 00:59:23: but it shall accomplish that which I purpose and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it.
00:59:25 – 00:59:32: God gave us these words for our clarity, for our comfort, and for our salvation,
00:59:32 – 00:59:39: and anytime Satan through his certain servants on this planet gets you to doubt even a tiny bit of it.
00:59:40 – 00:59:47: That is the whole armor of God having a chink put in it. That is a place where now Satan can get
00:59:47 – 00:59:53: through the armor and can get to your flesh, where God is no longer protecting you because you're
00:59:53 – 00:59:59: no longer believing God. It's not that God has lost his power. It's the you of satiside is word
59:59 – 01:00:07
even by the smallest decree. And when we do that, we're a terrible risk. One of the reasons that we
01:00:07 – 01:00:11: did this episode this week was that for the last few days there's been a stink and I'm not going
01:00:11 – 01:00:16: to go into the drama because we've been talking enough about Twitter, but there are those who claim that
01:00:18 – 01:00:26: the six days of creation are their true, but they're not literal. In other words, God has
01:00:26 – 01:00:31: revealed something that's true in the narrative sense, but not in the factual sense.
01:00:31 – 01:00:42: And one of the attacks that this man, Lymanstein on Twitter made was to mock the six days of creation
01:00:42 – 01:00:51: where in Genesis 1 and 2, God reveals that in the beginning, God said, let there be light and
01:00:51 – 01:00:58: there was light. That was day one. And it wasn't until late that he created the sun and the stars.
01:00:58 – 01:01:06: And so these mockers, these scoffers will say, well, the six days of creation can't be literal
01:01:06 – 01:01:11: because how can God say that there was light on day one when there was no source of light
01:01:11 – 01:01:16: until later days because as the big brain ratter to these guys all know through their material
01:01:16 – 01:01:23: knowledge of the world that in order for there to be light, you need an unbounded nuclear reactor
01:01:23 – 01:01:30: in the sky emitting photons. That's how science gives us light, right? That's what stars do. The stars
01:01:30 – 01:01:37: give light. And now we're not going to make the the scientific case for creation, even though there
01:01:37 – 01:01:44: is one and the more we learning about the first moments of creation, the more we see how clearly
01:01:44 – 01:01:53: scripture the the genesis of count of creation is literal. God says let there be light and there was
01:01:53 – 01:02:01: light. Now that's God speaking. That is a voice. That is a sound. And then light occurs from it.
01:02:01 – 01:02:05: The red at our mocks and says, well, that's stupid. That's utterly impossible. Everyone knows that.
01:02:05 – 01:02:12: Can't happen except in the 70s or sorry in the 30s, they some German scientists discovered
01:02:12 – 01:02:20: sonoma luminescence where it is literally possible to create light from sound. It turns out that if
01:02:20 – 01:02:28: you emit a particular type of sound into a liquid, it will cause a bubble to appear and collapse.
01:02:28 – 01:02:35: And in that collapse, you get intensely high temperatures on the order of tens of thousands of
01:02:35 – 01:02:41: kelvin degrees kelvin. When the bubble collapses, there's a flash of light. You can have a fluid
01:02:41 – 01:02:48: where light appears by virtue of a sound being passed through it. Now what does liquid have to do
01:02:48 – 01:02:57: this? Well, also in the genesis account, the spirit of God hovered over the waters. Now the man who
01:02:57 – 01:03:04: mocks the literalist reading genesis will say, well, as a material expert as a scientist, I know that
01:03:05 – 01:03:11: water is H2O. It's two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. There was no water because God hadn't
01:03:11 – 01:03:17: created the waters yet. So what's this water stuff? It must be a metaphor. Well, again, just in the
01:03:17 – 01:03:27: last couple decades, as particle physicists and other scientists have unwound the big bang
01:03:28 – 01:03:34: to based on the physical evidence in found in the universe to try to figure out the very earliest
01:03:34 – 01:03:41: moments of they don't call creation, but it's really creation. What do they find before there was
01:03:41 – 01:03:47: a matter? They call it quark glue on plasma. You can Google that and you can read about the
01:03:48 – 01:03:54: the theoretical aspects and then the physical experiments they've done. Every scientist will describe,
01:03:54 – 01:04:03: describe quark glue on plasma as the most perfect liquid. It is a liquid that is more liquid than any
01:04:03 – 01:04:08: liquid that we have. It's more liquid than water in terms of its liquid properties. The reason they
01:04:08 – 01:04:12: were excited is they expected a gas because when they were doing their simulations and their
01:04:12 – 01:04:18: thought experiments to try to find what was there before the big bang, they thought, well,
01:04:18 – 01:04:26: it must be a gas. They found a liquid. They found waters. Now, why would God speak to Moses when
01:04:26 – 01:04:34: he gave him the narrative of Genesis? Why would he say water? Well, Moses didn't know anything about
01:04:34 – 01:04:41: particle physics. He didn't know anything about strength theory, but it was also true. It literally
01:04:41 – 01:04:47: happened. God hovered over the face of the waters and the scientists have now simulated those very
01:04:47 – 01:04:53: waters. These are men who deny they deny God. They're trying to find something so that they can say
01:04:53 – 01:04:58: that we didn't need God. Here's what we found instead. The more that they dig, the more that they
01:04:58 – 01:05:03: find the first two chapters of Genesis revealed in their experiments. Now, they'll never see it
01:05:03 – 01:05:07: because their eyes are closed and their hearts are hardened. They don't have faith and they
01:05:07 – 01:05:13: hate God and they don't know God at the same time. But as Christians, we don't need to be afraid
01:05:13 – 01:05:19: of science looking to scripture as we look to scripture because they're saying the same thing.
01:05:20 – 01:05:24: Now, when I mentioned the big bang, you're going to think, oh, well, he thinks that the, you know,
01:05:24 – 01:05:28: he's not a young earth creationist. I absolutely am. And that's the point of this discussion.
01:05:29 – 01:05:36: When God created the universe, how old was it? That's what they're trying to answer.
01:05:37 – 01:05:42: There's a separate question that's a little more accessible to us. When God created man,
01:05:42 – 01:05:51: when God created Adam, how old was he? Was he zero? We hadn't lived today, but God created a man,
01:05:51 – 01:05:59: a fully formed sexually mature man is who stood in the garden with God. So God didn't make a
01:05:59 – 01:06:08: sheet of fetus, the gestated in a box. He made a fully grown man. Adam had an age. My personal theory,
01:06:08 – 01:06:14: which is, it's not a belief, it's just something I, as I was reading scripture, I noticed Adam died
01:06:14 – 01:06:22: after 930 years. Methuselah, who's the oldest lived man in scripture, lived 969 years. And my
01:06:22 – 01:06:28: brain did the math and said, well, that means that Methuselah lived 39 years longer than Adam.
01:06:28 – 01:06:33: That's a conspicuous number if you're familiar with numerology in scripture because 40 is a
01:06:33 – 01:06:39: significant number. It's usually signifies trial. But I thought, and that's what made me think,
01:06:39 – 01:06:45: well, how old was Adam? Personally, I think he was probably created as a 40 year old because
01:06:45 – 01:06:50: that would make him the first, first born man in creation, the oldest man in creation. He was the
01:06:50 – 01:06:55: only man who was ever perfect. He was the only man who ever walked sinlessly with God. And so
01:06:55 – 01:07:00: my personal theory, again, this is not, I'm not adding to scripture. It's not a matter of faith
01:07:00 – 01:07:06: or salvation. It's just a theory. When I die, I'll find out. And God will say, either, yeah,
01:07:06 – 01:07:10: good guess or no, you made a mess of this. Here's what really happened. So no faith hinges on
01:07:10 – 01:07:15: this. And there's no, there's no belief downstream from it. But I think that Adam had to have an
01:07:15 – 01:07:23: anage. Maybe he was 15. Maybe he was 20. Maybe he was 100. 40 seems to work. But he has an age. And so
01:07:23 – 01:07:30: when we looked to the age of the universe, how old was the universe that God created? It was 13.77
01:07:30 – 01:07:36: billion years old. God didn't create a universe from scratch and then set it in motion.
01:07:37 – 01:07:43: From the beginning, he said it in motion as though it had been in motion for billions of years.
01:07:43 – 01:07:50: And that's what we see today. That's why the starlight that comes to our eyes is older than creation
01:07:51 – 01:07:58: because God created those stars in those places in the universe with their light, with their
01:07:58 – 01:08:03: photons already, already streaming towards us, according to the natural laws of the universe. And
01:08:03 – 01:08:09: such a way that the whole thing makes sense and the whole things works. God wasn't making up something
01:08:09 – 01:08:13: from whole cloth. Well, he was, but he wasn't making something that would be fictitious. He was
01:08:13 – 01:08:19: making something that was a real whole machine. The machine of the universe is internally consistent.
01:08:20 – 01:08:27: And so his core and I appeal to scientific understanding of these things. It's not an attack on
01:08:27 – 01:08:35: faith. It is a confirmation of the faith that we find by virtue of literal simple plain readings
01:08:35 – 01:08:41: of the scripture that's been revealed to us. And it's almost as if scripture somewhere says that
01:08:41 – 01:08:44: it's the glory of God to conceal things and the glory of princes to reveal them.
01:08:46 – 01:08:53: Princes, of course, don't necessarily just mean princes. And so we are able to use the things
01:08:53 – 01:08:59: God has given us, which would be our intelligence, our wisdom, insight, whatever attribute it
01:08:59 – 01:09:05: happens to be. In order to investigate the world, in order to investigate the things that he created
01:09:05 – 01:09:13: into which he placed us as head. And so science properly understood, I don't want to get into
01:09:13 – 01:09:18: the technicalities there of what science used to mean and what it means now, but it's just knowledge.
01:09:19 – 01:09:24: Science is a way of going about things, obtaining knowledge. It's not contrary to scripture.
01:09:24 – 01:09:30: It does not conflict with scripture. It's not anti-Christian. Most of the great men in these
01:09:30 – 01:09:36: fields who made the major advances that really meant something were Christian. Some of them were
01:09:36 – 01:09:45: monks, you have Mendel, but these were Christian men investigating creation. And that's part of why
01:09:45 – 01:09:53: science really took off in Europe. Science, yes, in some parts of the ancient world advanced to a
01:09:53 – 01:10:03: certain level beyond what Europe was at relatively at the time. But that all stopped many centuries
01:10:03 – 01:10:10: ago. And Europe has been far and away in advance of others since then, because Europeans were looking
01:10:10 – 01:10:15: at the world from a Christian perspective. We were looking at the world as something that is
01:10:15 – 01:10:23: created by an intelligent and loving God in a way that is comprehensible to us. There are of course
01:10:23 – 01:10:28: things that are beyond our comprehension. At the time, they didn't know that because they couldn't
01:10:28 – 01:10:33: delve down into the inner workings of the proton and start looking at it going, this doesn't actually
01:10:33 – 01:10:39: make sense to us. They couldn't do that. But they could certainly look at the grand scale of things,
01:10:39 – 01:10:47: the macro scale, and realize this is a world built by an intelligent God. We are placed in here
01:10:47 – 01:10:53: in his image. We have intelligence. We can understand the world. And so you can shore up what is
01:10:53 – 01:11:00: said in Scripture with science. Yes, today you have scientists and others who attempt to undermine
01:11:00 – 01:11:07: Scripture using science. The problem is most of the people who get high up in these fields
01:11:07 – 01:11:10: wind up confirming the things that are in Scripture and some of them wind up converting,
01:11:10 – 01:11:19: particularly geneticists and men like that. And God says in Scripture, he created the universe to
01:11:19 – 01:11:25: testify to his own glory. And that is the reason that Christians delve into these subjects,
01:11:25 – 01:11:32: not to try to second-guess God, but to try to find God's glory in his creation because it
01:11:32 – 01:11:37: testifies to it. Everyone, Christian pagan alike, when they look up at the stars,
01:11:38 – 01:11:43: humans are mesmerized. It's something that has always captivated the human spirit.
01:11:44 – 01:11:51: And the Christian, frankly, the Christian, I think, has forgotten why today. Maybe we may look
01:11:51 – 01:11:56: up and think, oh, well, that's nice. And honestly, I think the way that most Christians today think
01:11:56 – 01:12:01: is, oh, look what God did for me. Look how beautiful God made the universe for me. Look at all the
01:12:01 – 01:12:07: things that God's doing for me. That's not what Scripture says. Scripture talks about the heavens
01:12:07 – 01:12:14: testifying to God's glory, not to man's glory, not to man's entertainment, but to God. The angels
01:12:14 – 01:12:20: in heaven, before they proclaim the greatness of God for his salvation of man, they proclaim his
01:12:20 – 01:12:25: greatness as creator. And that's why we keep talking about the first article because a lot of
01:12:25 – 01:12:30: this stuff is bound up the first article of the creeds that God created the heavens and the earth
01:12:31 – 01:12:37: because this attack that Satan is undertaking today is an attack on the belief
01:12:38 – 01:12:46: that creation, that material, the humans, that us as individuals in the world came from God.
01:12:47 – 01:12:51: Because as long as you set up in motion, you can say, well, yeah, there's another
01:12:51 – 01:12:55: explanation for that. You can delete God. And that's what these men do. And they say, well, no,
01:12:55 – 01:13:00: there wasn't actually a 624-hour day creation. That doesn't make sense because, you know, you got
01:13:00 – 01:13:06: the lights coming before stars. Clearly, it's kind of made up. No. And the appeal to science is
01:13:06 – 01:13:13: not to say, look, you should believe Genesis now because science confirms it, believe Scripture
01:13:13 – 01:13:19: literally. And then when the scientists agree, give praise to God for his revelation because we
01:13:19 – 01:13:26: knew it first, Moses knew about court cluonplasma before the scientists who discovered it. He didn't
01:13:26 – 01:13:32: know the name. He didn't care because it wasn't about introspecting matter. It was about testifying
01:13:32 – 01:13:37: to God's glory. And that is what the Christian life needs to be about. When we talk about these
01:13:37 – 01:13:42: material things, when we talk about race, and we talk about other things that are in the world,
01:13:42 – 01:13:49: it is not to replace God. It is not to denigrate or to doubt God. It is to say, look at the glory
01:13:49 – 01:13:56: of what God made. Because the bottom line is this, everything in creation testifies to God's glory,
01:13:56 – 01:14:04: including the diversity of mankind. So when we do the episodes on race, that is testifying to the
01:14:04 – 01:14:11: beauty of God, to the magnificence of our Creator, that men can live at the North Pole, and they can
01:14:11 – 01:14:17: live at the equator. That's insane. There's no other species that can pull that off. We can,
01:14:17 – 01:14:25: because within our genes, God gave us the ability to evolve in 6,000 years, not evolving from a monkey,
01:14:25 – 01:14:32: but to change in short periods of time in response to the environment. And some of the evolution,
01:14:32 – 01:14:37: some of the genetic changes, which is what it really is, is just gene expression. Some of those
01:14:37 – 01:14:45: are beneficial, and some of those are degradation, because the fall is also in play. Once creation fell,
01:14:45 – 01:14:51: our genome began to corrupt. Things started going wrong. So looking to Scripture
01:14:53 – 01:15:00: is about finding where what God says is made clear for His glory, and that should always be the
01:15:00 – 01:15:05: motivation. We're not, I'm probably not even going to get into the flood thing, but I'll just
01:15:05 – 01:15:10: point out that there are these places like the Six Day Creation and the flood, where guys say,
01:15:10 – 01:15:16: oh, maybe it was a localized flood, and then we find the same flood strata all over the world,
01:15:16 – 01:15:21: and then they make up other lies, say, oh, maybe there was a global flood, but then all the water
01:15:21 – 01:15:25: evaporated, and all the bones were left lying around. It was a big mess, and it was really depressing,
01:15:25 – 01:15:33: and poor, poor no, no wonder you got drunk. You can't read Scripture, and just make stuff up, and
01:15:34 – 01:15:39: so I want to point out that when I said the thing about Adam maybe being 40 years old,
01:15:40 – 01:15:45: that's a pious speculation, but it never goes any further. I would never pin anything on it,
01:15:46 – 01:15:51: and that's where a lot of this stuff goes wrong, is that there are other men who will make up
01:15:51 – 01:15:55: something that's consistent for Scripture. It doesn't disagree with it, but that they say, look
01:15:55 – 01:15:59: what I've discovered, look what I've found. Let me build up a whole religion around this thing.
01:16:00 – 01:16:06: They're modern scholars who do that. They find some little thing, they piously speculate, at
01:16:06 – 01:16:11: least, to begin with, and then they build a whole pantheon of lies on top of it, and say, look,
01:16:11 – 01:16:15: you've got to believe all this stuff, because this is what naturally froze flows from Scripture. No,
01:16:15 – 01:16:19: there's no proof of what age Adam was. I have no idea. I could be completely wrong. You
01:16:19 – 01:16:23: shouldn't believe, because I said it. It's just an interesting thing to think about, but it's
01:16:23 – 01:16:31: interesting in the context of God setting the universe in motion, not from infancy. It's the chicken
01:16:31 – 01:16:38: and egg joke is answered in Scripture. God tells us the chicken came first, Adam came first,
01:16:38 – 01:16:45: the entire universe was set in motion as it is today, and then it continued as God had created
01:16:45 – 01:16:51: it to evolve, to expand, to change, and ultimately to proclaim his glory as it goes through the
01:16:51 – 01:16:58: motions of the incredibly unfathomably complex machinery that could only have been conceived of
01:16:58 – 01:17:03: in God's mind, and that's why it testifies to his glory. It's not just about entertaining us,
01:17:03 – 01:17:10: we're mesmerized because it is a natural revelation of the infinite creator who also died on the cross
01:17:10 – 01:17:19: for us as a man and as God, because he loved us in our own place and time, even when he's also
01:17:19 – 01:17:25: maintaining this not infinite universe, but it seems like it from our tiny perspective. The same
01:17:25 – 01:17:31: God that knows about every quirk inside every atom in the universe, and he knows their count,
01:17:31 – 01:17:36: and he knows where they are, and he knows what they're doing right now. He also knows us individually,
01:17:36 – 01:17:42: and he knows our troubles, and he knows our sins, and he knows our doubts and our fears, and he knows
01:17:42 – 01:17:48: our names, and the elect had their names written in the book of life. God's a very busy God, and he has
01:17:48 – 01:17:53: time for all of, because he's more powerful than being possibly comprehend, and these discussions
01:17:53 – 01:18:00: should ultimately focus on how wonderful it is that a God so infinite and so magisterial
01:18:01 – 01:18:07: made sure the scripture, a book that you can hold in your hand, can be transmitted through time
01:18:07 – 01:18:14: and be accessible to us today in a way that anyone can understand and can come to faith and be saved.
01:18:15 – 01:18:20: And that actually raises a point that I want to reiterate from an earlier episode,
01:18:20 – 01:18:23: because people get this backward all the time.
01:18:26 – 01:18:34: We do not trust God because we trust scripture. We trust scripture because we trust God.
01:18:36 – 01:18:41: If you look at things the first way, which is incorrect, that's when you're going to come up with
01:18:41 – 01:18:49: things like the JDP theory, and the idea of the day-age theory, and all of these various things
01:18:50 – 01:18:57: that are ways to get around perceived problems in scripture, because if you are justifying your
01:18:57 – 01:19:04: belief in God on the basis of scripture, then what you are going to do is you are going to try and
01:19:04 – 01:19:08: explain away anything in scripture that you cannot understand, because you're really basing
01:19:08 – 01:19:14: everything on your reason. But if you trust scripture because scripture is the word of God,
01:19:15 – 01:19:22: then any of these perceived issues are to problem. Because it's from God, God is perfectly
01:19:22 – 01:19:30: trustworthy. God literally is truth. God cannot lie is a sufficient way to say it's not technically
01:19:30 – 01:19:36: accurate. We'll go into that another time. And so you trust scripture because it is the word of
01:19:36 – 01:19:43: God, and you trust it because God is perfectly trustworthy. And so that order matters, which one
01:19:43 – 01:19:50: you trust and why. And there are just a couple of things that I'll make sure I add to the show notes
01:19:50 – 01:19:56: for us this time. Saint Basil has writings on the hexameron, the hexameron, just meeting the
01:19:56 – 01:20:02: the six day creation, hex six hammer day. And I think we can also link to a couple of things about
01:20:03 – 01:20:08: blood. We have some materials on that that aren't behind a paywall, which is another problem in
01:20:08 – 01:20:16: and of itself, but for another day. Yeah. And again, where the point is not to make a defense of,
01:20:16 – 01:20:22: oh, we'll look how scripture accords with science. It's what you just said scripture accords with God.
01:20:23 – 01:20:29: scripture is from God, and it is in God we trust. God who made heaven and earth and gave us his
01:20:29 – 01:20:37: word through all time for our edification. If he can speak the universe into existence, he can
01:20:37 – 01:20:44: do anything. And these men who cast doubt on, oh, well, maybe God really really didn't mean that.
01:20:44 – 01:20:48: Maybe God didn't do that. I don't think God could have done that because the math doesn't add up.
01:20:49 – 01:20:54: They don't have God. They don't believe in God. They don't trust in God. They deny him. And if you
01:20:54 – 01:21:01: deny the father, you deny the son. If you deny the son, you have no salvation. And so it's not
01:21:01 – 01:21:09: just about doubts or speculation about scientific things. It's fundamentally about the root of faith
01:21:09 – 01:21:16: itself, and whether it's rooted in God through scripture or whether it's rooted in our own reason
01:21:16 – 01:21:21: and our ability to make sense of things. And then hopefully we can bold God on so that that makes
01:21:21 – 01:21:27: it okay. And that's not the Christian life and flee from any man who even suggests otherwise.
01:21:29 – 01:21:38: God has two books as Christians used to say and should say again, scripture is one creation is the
01:21:38 – 01:21:47: other. God is consistent as an author. We will close with a quote from 2nd Timothy 3.
01:21:47 – 01:21:54: 3. Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil
01:21:54 – 01:22:00: people and imposter will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. But as for you,
01:22:00 – 01:22:05: continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it,
01:22:05 – 01:22:09: and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make
01:22:09 – 01:22:15: you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All scripture is breathed out by God,
01:22:15 – 01:22:21: and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
01:22:21 – 01:22:26: that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.