“The Lord’s Supper”
This transcript:- Was machine generated.
- Has not been checked for errors.
- May not be entirely accurate.
WEBVTT
00:00.000 --> 00:05.200
If you are new to our channel e3, please subscribe to at least one for more recipes and videos.
00:30.000 --> 00:46.120
Welcome to the Stone Choir podcast. I am Corey J. Mahler and I'm still whoa. On today's Stone
00:46.120 --> 00:52.400
Choir we're going to be discussing Communion or the Sacrum or the Altar or the Eucharist. We
00:52.400 --> 00:58.080
are doing kind of a collection here. We began with baptism about a month ago, about two weeks
00:58.320 --> 01:04.160
ago, we did the Reformation episode and we thought that we would end up that sort of grouping with a
01:04.160 --> 01:10.240
discussion of Communion because they all go together and we'll explain kind of how that works
01:10.240 --> 01:16.000
historically. I mentioned in the Reformation episode that there are effectively four distinct
01:16.000 --> 01:21.520
groups that emerged from the Reformation, at least by Lutheran standards. There are obviously the
01:21.520 --> 01:25.280
Roman Catholics who remained Roman Catholic. Their doctrine really didn't change much at
01:25.280 --> 01:30.960
Trent. It did change but not much. You have the Lutherans who emerged from the Roman Catholic
01:30.960 --> 01:37.680
Church. You have the Reformed and you have the Anabaptists. And the reason that we divide everybody
01:37.680 --> 01:43.920
else, including ourselves into those four distinct groups, has to do with the nature of the arguments
01:43.920 --> 01:49.440
in the Reformation itself. So obviously the Reformation principally was kicked off based on
01:50.080 --> 01:55.600
disagreement about justification. So on one side you have Rome with one approach to justification
01:55.600 --> 02:00.720
and on the other side you have the Protestants with a different version of justification,
02:00.720 --> 02:07.200
effectively faith alone, grace alone. As soon as the Reformation kicked off, there were immediately
02:07.200 --> 02:13.120
additional arguments within the Protestant camp about a bunch of other stuff. Because as we said
02:13.120 --> 02:18.800
in the Reformation episode, like the gates were open, once people started asking the question,
02:18.800 --> 02:25.680
what did the Roman Catholic Church get wrong, it became a matter of concern. Well, you know,
02:25.680 --> 02:33.440
did how many things did they get wrong? And unfortunately a lot of people reflexively went
02:33.440 --> 02:39.040
way too far in rejecting things that were not distinctives of the Roman Catholic Church, but in
02:39.040 --> 02:44.400
fact just been traditional Christian doctrine in the east and the west, going back to the very
02:44.400 --> 02:54.640
beginning of the Church. So the initial division was on justification. The substantial immediate
02:54.640 --> 02:59.440
divisions after that were about the sacraments. The two principal sacraments that Lutherans
02:59.440 --> 03:05.440
recognize are baptism, which we did an entire episode on, and communion. And as we mentioned
03:05.440 --> 03:10.560
in the baptism episode, Lutherans and Roman Catholics are more or less in agreement on
03:10.560 --> 03:15.920
almost all baptism. There's a small matter of disagreement surrounding original sin as
03:15.920 --> 03:21.760
it interacts with baptism, but otherwise we're pretty much on the same page. And when you look
03:21.760 --> 03:28.240
at communion, there are very significant differences between Lutheran and Roman Catholic doctrine
03:28.240 --> 03:32.160
that were initially part of the arguments of Lutheran and the other. Lutheran reformers
03:32.160 --> 03:38.240
had against Rome, but almost immediately all of the other people who had also left Rome but
03:38.240 --> 03:45.680
didn't agree with the Lutheran position went so much further that looking backward today,
03:46.640 --> 03:52.320
Lutherans effectively get lumped in with Roman Catholics in terms of communion. A lot of people,
03:52.320 --> 03:58.960
if they're coming from certainly like a Baptist upbringing, when you look at Lutheran doctrine
03:58.960 --> 04:03.760
on baptism and communion, you're going to say these guys are just papas. These guys are Catholics.
04:04.400 --> 04:09.920
And like you said, there's significant disagreements on communion, but there's so much
04:09.920 --> 04:15.680
more significant between Lutherans and the Reformed and the Baptists that they're kind of right.
04:15.680 --> 04:21.200
And so there's not a clean division of three and one anymore. It's almost kind of one and one and a
04:21.200 --> 04:26.480
half and then the other two. And so we'll talk a little bit down the road about in the Lutheran
04:26.480 --> 04:34.160
Confessions, initially what began as us disputing with Rome very quickly became a four-way fight
04:34.160 --> 04:39.760
with what the Confessions call the Sacramentarians. Today it's the Reformed and the Anabaptists,
04:39.760 --> 04:44.960
which today are Baptists. And those four distinct bodies, the reason we consider those distinct
04:44.960 --> 04:50.080
is that none of them agree on both sacraments. They'll fall into one camp or the other on either of
04:50.080 --> 04:56.080
them, such that there's no possible substantial agreement about doctrine among any of them.
04:56.240 --> 05:02.000
There cannot be any sort of unity until we overcome those disagreements about the sacraments.
05:02.000 --> 05:07.440
So that's why they're foundational issues. And that's probably why we're going to do this episode.
05:07.440 --> 05:11.360
As we said before, we don't do too many episodes. They're kind of systematic theology.
05:11.360 --> 05:15.520
And we're not trying to sell Lutheranism. Obviously we're Lutheran. We think it's important,
05:15.520 --> 05:19.680
but we had a lot of questions about it. And it's, like I said, it really nicely bookends
05:19.680 --> 05:26.320
the Reformation episode with the Baptism episode in terms of, like, here's why we have these
05:26.320 --> 05:31.280
different groups. Why did I mention in the Reformation episode that Lutherans just kind of
05:31.280 --> 05:37.440
laugh when Reformed guys think that we're part of the same camp? Like, it seems alien to us.
05:37.440 --> 05:41.680
And it has to do with Communion. It doesn't have to do with Baptism. It has to do with Communion.
05:42.320 --> 05:46.160
And so working through these issues, at least explaining them, like,
05:46.160 --> 05:51.600
I'm, this is an episode that I said earlier on Twitter teasing it, that this is going to make
05:51.600 --> 05:56.880
everybody mad. Because what we say is going to disagree with everything that everyone else believes
05:56.880 --> 06:00.080
unless you're Lutheran. And even some of the Lutherans are going to get mad at some of the things
06:00.080 --> 06:05.280
we say, because a couple of things we say disagree with Luther, but don't disagree with the Confessions,
06:05.280 --> 06:09.600
because they weren't always completely aligned. And it's not something to worry about. But like,
06:09.600 --> 06:17.760
it's just, it's how things play out in history. So to begin, we're going to dig in in John 6.
06:17.760 --> 06:24.160
This is one of the first areas where we don't agree with some of what Luther ended up saying down the
06:24.160 --> 06:31.120
road. John 6 is the chapter that begins with the Feeding of the 5000. And then it's what's called
06:31.120 --> 06:39.360
the Bread of Life Discourse. And it's a beautiful chapter. It's a very long chapter in John. And
06:39.360 --> 06:44.720
there's so much theology packed into it. The reason we wanted to begin there is that our view
06:45.440 --> 06:50.480
in distinction from Luther's, but again, as I said, not in distinction from what the Confessions
06:50.480 --> 06:59.040
say, John 6 is fundamentally Jesus cataclyzing the disciples and the assembled crowd about communion.
06:59.040 --> 07:04.320
It's about faith. It's about the entire Christian faith, but specifically dealing with some of the
07:04.320 --> 07:09.840
particulars of communion in such a way that later on when we address the other verses that deal
07:09.840 --> 07:15.760
specifically with the words of institution at the Last Supper, and then subsequently,
07:15.760 --> 07:22.240
when Paul reiterates them, there's a short version there at the time, but the long version is found
07:22.240 --> 07:29.680
in John 6. And so it's important because this framing of the discussion of communion really
07:29.680 --> 07:34.560
lays bare all the disputes. Every single disagreement that you will have with us and that you all have
07:34.560 --> 07:39.920
with each other in different denominations, that we all are mutually incompatible in terms of how
07:39.920 --> 07:46.240
we view communion, it boils down to the short version in 1 Corinthians 11 and the long version
07:46.240 --> 07:50.160
in John 6. So we're going to read all and then go through some of the particulars because
07:51.760 --> 07:57.120
the divisions are clear in Jesus' teaching, including the responses from both the Pharisees
07:57.120 --> 08:04.240
and the crowd who had the very same responses 2,000 years ago that we see today in these discussions.
08:04.960 --> 08:11.840
Two quick points before I get into reading the long passage from John 6. First, to be entirely
08:11.840 --> 08:20.480
fair to Luther, he did affirm both that John 6 is catechesis on the Lord's Supper and that it deals
08:20.480 --> 08:24.640
with faith, which is the position of the Confessions, the Lutheran Confessions.
08:25.600 --> 08:30.720
He did emphasize the faith aspect in dealing with the Reformed in part because he was simply
08:30.720 --> 08:36.640
tired of arguing with them. I'm sure that even some of our Reformed listeners can commiserate
08:36.640 --> 08:45.360
with Luther on that one. And the second point is Woe mentioned that these divisions in the church
08:45.760 --> 08:51.600
really center on the sacraments, which is absolutely true. And I just want to read
08:51.600 --> 08:55.120
Article 7 of the Augsburg Confession because it really points out
08:56.000 --> 08:59.280
this has been the nature of things from the Reformation forward.
09:00.720 --> 09:06.320
And so Article 7 defining the church. Our churches teach that one holy church is to
09:06.320 --> 09:12.000
remain forever. The church is the congregation of saints in which the gospel is purely taught
09:12.000 --> 09:16.480
and the sacraments correctly administered. For the true unity of the church,
09:16.480 --> 09:21.200
it is enough to agree about the doctrine of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments.
09:21.760 --> 09:27.040
It is not necessary that human traditions that his rights or ceremonies instituted by men
09:27.040 --> 09:34.080
should be the same everywhere. As Paul says, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and
09:34.080 --> 09:42.000
father of all. Ephesians 4, 5 through 6. And so clearly, given the definition of the church,
09:43.200 --> 09:48.800
unless we can agree on the sacraments, we can't have that full unity. That doesn't mean we can't
09:48.800 --> 09:53.600
agree on many things and get along and work together. It just means we can't have the full
09:53.600 --> 10:00.960
unity of full communion without agreement on the sacraments. And so I will read now from John 6.
10:01.520 --> 10:05.520
On the next day the crowd that remained on the other side of the sea
10:06.080 --> 10:10.160
saw that there had been only one boat there and that Jesus had not entered the boat with
10:10.160 --> 10:16.000
his disciples, but that his disciples had gone away alone. Other boats from Tiberius came near
10:16.000 --> 10:20.720
the place where they had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. So when the crowd
10:20.720 --> 10:26.400
saw that Jesus was not there, nor his disciples, they themselves got into the boats and went to
10:26.400 --> 10:32.480
Capernaum seeking Jesus. When they found him on the other side of the sea they said to him,
10:32.480 --> 10:40.160
Rabbi, when did you come here? Jesus answered them, truly, truly I say to you, you are seeking me,
10:40.160 --> 10:45.760
not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not work for the food
10:45.760 --> 10:50.800
that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to
10:51.760 --> 10:57.840
you, for on him God the Father has set his seal. Then they said to him, what must we do to be
10:57.840 --> 11:04.640
doing the works of God? Jesus answered them, this is the work of God that you believe in him whom
11:04.640 --> 11:11.440
he has sent. So they said to him, then what sign do you do that we may see and believe you,
11:11.440 --> 11:16.480
what work do you perform? Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, as it is written,
11:16.560 --> 11:23.040
he gave them bread from heaven to eat. Jesus then said to them, truly, truly I say to you,
11:23.040 --> 11:27.840
it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my father gives you the true bread from
11:27.840 --> 11:33.040
heaven, for the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.
11:33.760 --> 11:40.560
They said to him, sir, give us this bread always. Jesus said to them, I am the bread of life,
11:40.560 --> 11:45.520
whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst,
11:45.520 --> 11:51.600
but I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. All that the Father gives me will
11:51.600 --> 11:57.680
come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out. For I have come down from heaven,
11:57.680 --> 12:04.080
not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me,
12:04.080 --> 12:08.480
that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day.
12:09.200 --> 12:14.640
For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should
12:14.720 --> 12:20.960
have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. So the Jews grumbled about him because
12:20.960 --> 12:28.560
he said, I am the bread that came down from heaven. They said, is this not Jesus, the Son of Joseph,
12:28.560 --> 12:33.360
whose Father and Mother we know? How does he now say, I have come down from heaven?
12:34.240 --> 12:39.600
Jesus answered them, do not grumble among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the
12:39.600 --> 12:46.000
Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the prophets,
12:46.000 --> 12:51.840
and they will all be taught by God. Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me,
12:52.480 --> 12:57.360
not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God, he has seen the Father.
12:58.080 --> 13:03.920
Truly truly I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life, I am the bread of life.
13:03.920 --> 13:09.120
Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness and they died. This is the bread that comes down
13:09.120 --> 13:14.880
from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from
13:14.880 --> 13:20.400
heaven. If anyone eats of this bread he will live forever, and the bread that I will give
13:20.400 --> 13:26.160
for the life of the world is my flesh. The Jews then disputed among themselves saying,
13:26.160 --> 13:32.640
how can this man give us his flesh to eat? So Jesus said to them, truly truly I say to you,
13:32.640 --> 13:37.760
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
13:37.760 --> 13:43.360
Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the
13:43.360 --> 13:48.160
last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
13:49.680 --> 13:56.400
Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father
13:56.400 --> 14:02.560
sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me he also will live because of me.
14:03.280 --> 14:07.920
This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like the bread the Fathers ate and died.
14:08.480 --> 14:14.000
Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever. Jesus said these things in the synagogue,
14:14.000 --> 14:18.880
as he taught at Capernaum. When many of his disciples heard it they said,
14:18.880 --> 14:24.960
this is a hard saying, who can listen to it. But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples
14:24.960 --> 14:30.160
were grumbling about this said to them, do you take offense at this? Then what if you were to see
14:30.240 --> 14:35.040
the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the Spirit who gives life,
14:35.040 --> 14:40.240
the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life,
14:40.240 --> 14:45.360
but there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning,
14:45.360 --> 14:50.320
who those were who did not believe, and who it was who would betray him. And he said,
14:50.960 --> 14:55.360
this is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.
14:56.160 --> 15:00.240
After this, many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him.
15:00.240 --> 15:03.840
So Jesus said to the twelve, do you want to go away as well?
15:04.560 --> 15:10.240
Simon Peter answered him, Lord to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,
15:10.240 --> 15:15.280
and we have believed and have come to know that you are the Holy One of God.
15:17.040 --> 15:21.920
That's obviously a very long passage and I recommend you go back and reread it yourselves.
15:21.920 --> 15:29.360
It's beautiful, it's straight from the mouth of God, and it's vital to understanding the theology
15:29.360 --> 15:35.040
of both faith and communion. There are a couple of interesting things in there that I want to
15:35.040 --> 15:40.960
tease out. Obviously, there's extensive discussion of eating flesh and drinking blood,
15:40.960 --> 15:47.040
and when you look in the Greek words that are used for flesh, it's sarks. It means actual
15:47.040 --> 15:53.840
flesh. If you were to find roadkill and cut a piece off, that's what you're talking about,
15:53.840 --> 16:00.080
that type of flesh. It's not any sort of metaphorical version, it's the real material version of the
16:00.080 --> 16:09.440
thing. The historic disputes about this have been, well, this can't possibly be true because
16:09.520 --> 16:17.120
from the post-Reformation era, we have faith alone, precluding all works, and so there's the
16:17.120 --> 16:22.960
passage where Jesus says, whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood has eternal life,
16:22.960 --> 16:26.400
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
16:28.080 --> 16:35.680
If you misunderstand faith alone, grace alone, you will not understand that this is not a work.
16:36.640 --> 16:40.240
That's one of the problems that we addressed in the baptism episode at some lengths. We're not
16:40.240 --> 16:47.120
going to repeat the arguments about how sacraments interact with human action. The short version
16:47.120 --> 16:53.120
is that when God says to do something and you receive his gift when you do it, and then you do
16:53.120 --> 16:59.360
it, that's not a work in the sense of us affecting anything. That is us receiving God's gift. It's
16:59.840 --> 17:05.280
like going to church and hearing the word of God. Yes, going to church is obedience, but the hearing
17:06.080 --> 17:13.040
is passive. It's receptive. When it discusses us eating and drinking from Christ's body and blood,
17:13.840 --> 17:18.960
it's receiving something. It's not doing something. We'll get to that elsewhere in this episode,
17:18.960 --> 17:24.880
but it's just important that this is one of the distinctions of a sacrament, that if you misplace
17:24.880 --> 17:30.000
the action as, oh, well, I'm doing this. Therefore, any passage that says do something
17:30.880 --> 17:36.880
must necessarily mean that it can't be salvific. You're missing out on a lot of Scripture,
17:36.880 --> 17:41.120
because there's stuff that God says to do that's clearly not us saving ourselves. There's nowhere
17:41.120 --> 17:45.680
in Scripture where God says you can save yourself. There's many places in Scripture where God says
17:45.680 --> 17:51.520
to do stuff, in particular when the sacraments are delivered by God to us, as in the case of
17:51.520 --> 17:57.280
baptism and in the case of communion. What we receive is the very forgiveness that God promised
17:57.280 --> 18:03.440
to deliver from the cross. I think the strongest argument to be made for how none of this can be
18:03.440 --> 18:11.040
taken entirely is Al Goree. Obviously, it's describing faith. Faith is absolutely inextricable.
18:11.040 --> 18:16.240
Faith is how we receive salvation. No doubt about that. Faith is how we receive the gifts in the
18:16.240 --> 18:22.160
sacraments. God is pouring out his abundance of his grace to us through the sacraments.
18:23.200 --> 18:28.000
The fact that there's a physical means with it doesn't change the equation. Apart from giving us
18:28.000 --> 18:34.080
a physical touchstone in history, in time, in a place that we can point to and say, yes, right here,
18:34.080 --> 18:40.480
God is giving me his stuff here. Whatever he promised to be attached to the stuff, I will also
18:40.480 --> 18:47.440
receive. The physical presence of elements is part of God's reassurance to us that he's keeping
18:47.440 --> 18:54.160
all the other promises. The argument from the Jews, they disputed it and said, how can this man give
18:54.160 --> 19:00.320
us his flesh to eat? That's one of the arguments that is used against this passage, possibly,
19:00.320 --> 19:06.160
being about communion. Because how can that be? One of the arguments is that, well,
19:06.800 --> 19:12.720
God is stuck at the right hand of the Father. He has a corporeal body. Jesus Christ, the incarnate
19:12.720 --> 19:21.760
Son of God, can no longer do what he could do when he was not corporeal. How can this man give us
19:21.760 --> 19:29.280
his flesh to eat is, I think, critically set in the context of this passage, which, as I mentioned
19:29.280 --> 19:34.720
at the beginning, it's immediately after the feeding of the 5,000. The day before, they had
19:34.720 --> 19:40.960
all sat down and they had the 5 loaves and the 2 fishes, and Jesus performed the miracle. They
19:40.960 --> 19:46.560
got back 12 baskets full after everyone had been fed, 5,000 men and women and children beside.
19:48.160 --> 19:53.440
Right in the very context of him saying this and the Jews saying, how can this be that he could
19:53.440 --> 20:01.200
give us his flesh to eat, the very context of the miracles demonstrates that God was showing how he
20:01.200 --> 20:06.160
does it. He says, I'm going to do it, and he does it. It's miraculous. It is outside of the
20:06.160 --> 20:13.600
material world that 5 loaves and 2 fishes could feed everybody. It's impossible, but Jesus did it,
20:13.600 --> 20:20.000
and it was just as plain as day. There was no magic. There was no moment. There was no flashes.
20:20.000 --> 20:25.600
He just said, pass it out, and they did. They got back so much more than they had handed out that
20:26.160 --> 20:30.640
it was clear to everyone that a great miracle had been performed. That was his introduction to
20:30.640 --> 20:37.680
saying, here is how I will feed you. Then when he finished, the disciples heard it and they
20:37.680 --> 20:42.320
grumbled. They said, this is a hard saying. Who can listen to this? Many of them grumbled and they
20:42.320 --> 20:48.960
walked away. They abandoned him on the spot. Now, this is critical because if this passage in John 6
20:48.960 --> 20:54.240
were just about faith, which they understood, he'd been talking about faith, even the Jews who were
20:54.240 --> 20:59.840
not believing understood faith. They understood the concept of believing and then receiving things
20:59.840 --> 21:06.000
from God. If it had been clear from Jesus' teaching that day, the text that we just read,
21:06.000 --> 21:11.120
if it had been clear that this was only about faith and not about something more immediate,
21:11.120 --> 21:15.360
more material than that, they wouldn't have been confused. They wouldn't have said,
21:15.360 --> 21:18.880
this is a hard saying. If they had, he would have said, no, no, wait, come back, come back. I didn't
21:18.880 --> 21:24.880
mean that. It's all spiritual. There's nothing physical here. He said, do you take offense?
21:25.840 --> 21:29.440
Then if you were seeing the Son of Man ascending to where he was before,
21:30.160 --> 21:33.360
he's saying to them, if you don't believe this small thing that I'm telling you,
21:33.360 --> 21:38.640
how will you believe the greater things? Then they wandered off. I think one of the most beautiful
21:38.640 --> 21:43.760
parts of this and the reason that we let that passage go long was Simon Peter's confession at
21:43.760 --> 21:48.000
the end. After some of the other disciples had wandered off because they were offended,
21:48.960 --> 21:54.320
Jesus said, what do you believe? Will you go away as well? Peter famously
21:54.320 --> 21:59.040
responded, Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. He didn't say, I get it.
21:59.040 --> 22:04.160
It makes perfect sense to me. He said, where else are we going to go? I think this is a perfect
22:04.160 --> 22:10.640
example of proper faith when receiving hard teachings. This is a hard teaching. We've said
22:10.640 --> 22:18.240
in the past episode, there are a few places in scripture where our reason collapses. You have
22:18.320 --> 22:25.040
the hypostatic union of Jesus Christ being fully God and fully man. How can there be two 100% in
22:25.040 --> 22:32.160
one thing? What sort of analogies can you invent to try to explain that? Effectively, every analogy
22:32.160 --> 22:38.320
that men have invented in the past has effectively created some sort of heresy because it's irrational.
22:38.320 --> 22:43.760
It's not two boards glued together. It's not two halves in a cup. It's not a mixture. There's no
22:43.760 --> 22:49.760
comparison for when Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man. It's impossible. It doesn't make sense.
22:50.400 --> 22:56.000
That is the essential predicate for the entire Christian faith, that this man who was incarnate
22:56.000 --> 23:02.880
is also fully God. The same is absolutely true when we're looking at communion. When Jesus said,
23:02.880 --> 23:07.280
they didn't know yet what was going to happen with communion. It wasn't until later on the last
23:07.280 --> 23:13.680
supper when he actually instituted it. This is a teaching moment to explain the theology behind
23:13.840 --> 23:20.000
it. As we'll get to in a bit, when they received that teaching on the night he was betrayed,
23:20.000 --> 23:25.280
there was an argument. All the questions went away because they received it the same way.
23:25.280 --> 23:30.000
I don't think they understood it any better, but when he said, this is my body given for the
23:30.000 --> 23:33.920
forgiveness of your sins, it wasn't out of left field because they had heard it before.
23:33.920 --> 23:39.920
They had heard it here at this moment the day after the feeding of the 5000. Whatever questions
23:39.920 --> 23:45.040
they may have had, whatever doubts they may have had, he had cataclyzed them. When he said it,
23:45.040 --> 23:49.840
when it was finally being instituted, they just received it and they ate and they drank and they
23:49.840 --> 23:56.480
gave thanks. I think that this is a good point to define a few terms to go over some things that
23:56.480 --> 24:05.040
are frequently confused. Two of the most important terms here are sacrament and sacrifice. It is
24:05.040 --> 24:12.160
important to understand the distinction between these two things because this is where the Roman
24:12.160 --> 24:22.560
error creeps in. Rome wants to turn the sacrament of the altar into a sacrifice, which it is not in
24:22.560 --> 24:28.080
the sense that they use it, but I'll define the terms first so that we are on the same page as it
24:28.080 --> 24:34.880
were. A sacrament is a ceremony or work in which God presents what the promise of the ceremony
24:34.880 --> 24:41.920
offers. For Christians, well as Lutherans we are not going to quibble over the number of the
24:41.920 --> 24:46.160
sacraments. We're very explicit in our confessions and elsewhere that we're not going to do that.
24:46.720 --> 24:51.040
Rome insisted we had to recognize a certain number of sacraments. We said there are most
24:51.040 --> 24:55.840
certainly two. We're not going to debate whether there are more. If you want to call marriage a
24:55.840 --> 25:03.200
sacrament, have fun and other things as well. But obviously the two core sacraments on which
25:03.200 --> 25:08.800
Christians cannot disagree that these are sacraments would be baptism and the Lord's Supper.
25:10.480 --> 25:16.400
And so you cannot call these a work and the reason you can't call them a work in terms of human
25:16.400 --> 25:22.000
beings doing the work is because these are God's work and so you cannot steal from God.
25:22.800 --> 25:29.200
To call baptism or to call the Lord's Supper a human work is to say that a human being is doing
25:29.200 --> 25:39.040
God's work. Now certainly God uses the hands, the mouth of the pastor as means to deliver his work,
25:39.920 --> 25:45.680
to deliver his blessing, his promises to those who receive them. That does not make them the work
25:45.760 --> 25:54.080
of the pastor. They are still God's work. And now a sacrifice, a sacrifice contrary to a sacrament,
25:54.080 --> 26:01.040
is a ceremony or work that we give to God in order to provide him honor. Now notably, there are two
26:01.040 --> 26:06.800
kinds of sacrifice and it is important to know both of them because one of them is in play here and
26:06.800 --> 26:14.560
one is not with regard to those of us mortals who are partaking of the Eucharist.
26:15.680 --> 26:21.120
And so one of those is in fact the Eucharistic Sacrifice. This does not merit the forgiveness
26:21.120 --> 26:27.280
of sins or reconciliation. It is practiced by those who have already been reconciled.
26:27.280 --> 26:32.160
This is so that we may give thanks or return gratitude for the forgiveness of sins that
26:32.160 --> 26:39.200
has already been received or for other benefits. The other kind of sacrifice there has been one
26:39.200 --> 26:45.200
in the history of the world that is an atoning sacrifice. That is a work that makes satisfaction
26:45.200 --> 26:50.800
for guilt and punishment. Obviously there has been only one, that is Christ's sacrifice,
26:50.800 --> 26:59.760
that is the atonement. And so Rome's error when it comes to the Lord's Supper is that they believe
26:59.760 --> 27:07.200
that each time the priest oversees the Lord's table, oversees the Sacrament,
27:07.200 --> 27:16.080
he is re-sacrificing Christ. And that's false. Christ's sacrifice was once for all, one atonement.
27:16.080 --> 27:21.520
That is why Christ said from the cross, it is finished. This is not something that plays out
27:21.520 --> 27:26.880
again on altars across the world through all eternity or at least until the end of the world.
27:27.600 --> 27:37.040
Once for all, what we are doing is one, in remembrance of Christ, two, receiving the benefits
27:37.040 --> 27:44.320
of Christ, and three, giving thanks for those benefits. What we are doing is a Eucharistic
27:44.320 --> 27:48.960
sacrifice, the sacrifice of praise. All we're doing is using a Greek term for that in essence.
27:49.600 --> 27:54.720
And so it's important to keep in mind these moving parts, the difference between a Sacrament
27:54.720 --> 28:04.800
and a Sacrifice. The Lord's Supper is a Sacrament. It is God bringing His gifts to us. We in turn,
28:05.440 --> 28:10.240
after partaking of the Sacrament, and in fact in partaking of the Sacrament,
28:10.240 --> 28:16.800
give a Eucharistic sacrifice, a sacrifice of praise, we are praising God for the gifts He has given us.
28:19.200 --> 28:24.560
These have to be kept distinct, because we cannot steal from God that which is properly His,
28:24.560 --> 28:29.200
we cannot claim to be the one doing His works, because they are His works.
28:30.400 --> 28:34.560
There's no good in an Atoning Sacrifice if it is made by a mere man.
28:35.840 --> 28:43.520
The Atoning Sacrifice required the God-man who is Christ. Because, again as we have said many
28:43.520 --> 28:51.440
times before, the debt of sin being infinite required demanded an infinite Atonement, and the
28:51.440 --> 28:58.720
only possible infinite Atonement is Christ. And so one of the fundamental problems here, if you get
28:59.840 --> 29:07.920
the theology wrong, the doctrine wrong on the Sacrament, on the Lord's Supper, is that you are
29:07.920 --> 29:15.760
implicitly denying the Unio Personalis, the personal union of God and man in Christ.
29:16.480 --> 29:23.040
Because many of the arguments, supposed arguments, against the Sacramental Union,
29:23.040 --> 29:29.040
the Sacramental Presence of Christ, Christ being actually present in the Sacrament,
29:29.040 --> 29:35.520
in, with, and under the bread and wine, one of the most common arguments against that is that how can
29:35.520 --> 29:41.760
this be? It's an argument based on reason, obviously, and human reason does fail, it has limits,
29:41.840 --> 29:49.280
it's the misuse of reason that is at issue here. The difference between reason as Magister or Master
29:49.280 --> 29:57.760
and reason as Servant. Reason is a Servant you use to understand things. Reason is not the Master
29:57.760 --> 30:06.080
of the Universe that determines what is real. If you look at it, top down as reason imposing
30:06.480 --> 30:17.120
reality, that's incorrect, that's reason as Magister. If you are looking at it instead as reason as one
30:17.120 --> 30:22.800
of your interpretive lenses to understand reality, that's reason as Minister, reason as Servant,
30:22.800 --> 30:28.880
that is the correct use of reason. But when you attempt to apply reason as a Master to these
30:28.880 --> 30:34.720
things, particularly the Mysteries of God, you are not going to be able to understand them in that
30:34.720 --> 30:41.280
light. You have to understand them from what God has revealed about them, and what God has revealed
30:41.280 --> 30:49.040
about them we'll get to in Christ's words and Paul's explanation of those words. But when God
30:49.040 --> 30:55.280
speaks what he says is true and you simply believe it, you do not have to subject his words to your
30:55.280 --> 31:05.840
reason to prove that they are true. And then I would also like to expand on the issue of what is
31:05.840 --> 31:14.880
of work? Is this faith plus works? And the answer to that, the second question is no. This is not
31:14.880 --> 31:20.000
faith plus works as we have highlighted before particularly in the baptism episode but also
31:20.000 --> 31:30.560
elsewhere. The Spirit uses means to create faith and to strengthen faith. Baptism is one of the
31:30.560 --> 31:35.280
primary means, the word being the other. Of course the word flows through all of this because a
31:35.280 --> 31:41.600
sacrament, another way of defining it is simply the word plus an element, the word plus a sign,
31:41.600 --> 31:47.520
a physical thing. That is one of the traditional or classical definitions of a sacrament. And so
31:47.520 --> 31:53.840
the word is always present, but you have word and baptism to create faith, and then you have word
31:53.840 --> 31:59.600
and supper to strengthen faith. That is the way that things are supposed to go, that is the way
31:59.600 --> 32:07.760
that God has ordained it. And as I've mentioned before, we being spiritual and physical, being
32:07.760 --> 32:14.480
spirit and body, will set aside the issue of mind and such matters for now. But the fact that we have
32:15.120 --> 32:23.840
these dual natures, God reaches out to us where we are and how we are, what we are. We have the word
32:24.480 --> 32:31.040
which reaches the spirit. Yes, it also reaches the physical ear, but you have also the physical
32:31.040 --> 32:38.080
signs. The body can understand the physical signs. The part of you that is physical can understand
32:38.080 --> 32:45.520
water, can understand bread, can understand wine. God uses these to strengthen your faith,
32:46.240 --> 32:54.560
to reach the totality of who and what you are, not just the spirit, because you are not a spirit
32:54.560 --> 33:01.280
riding around in a meat suit. That's a mischaracterization. You are your body, you are your soul,
33:01.280 --> 33:06.400
you are both of those things. And so there's some bit of understanding you can have if you can grasp
33:06.400 --> 33:12.720
that to a certain degree of the personal union. But to get back to that original point, if you
33:12.720 --> 33:24.400
deny that you can have bread and body, wine and blood, simultaneously present, you are tacitly
33:24.400 --> 33:30.800
saying that the personal union cannot be possible. And you may think, well, the difference is that
33:30.800 --> 33:37.600
the one is God, the one is Christ, and the other is bread. No. Because you have Christ's word saying
33:37.600 --> 33:43.040
that it is bread and that it is body, saying that it is wine and that it is blood. You also have
33:43.040 --> 33:48.480
his word about the personal union in a number of places in Scripture. God does not lie.
33:48.480 --> 33:54.480
God always speaks the truth. God always speaking the truth. We have to believe what he has told us.
33:55.440 --> 34:01.680
And then to emphasize, Woe's comment about the right hand of the Father, because this is
34:02.400 --> 34:08.480
an issue that comes up constantly in this area, and it is vitally important to understand this,
34:08.480 --> 34:15.680
to get this right. Because theological and doctrinal errors flow from this, left, right, and center.
34:16.880 --> 34:22.160
The right hand of the Father is not a physical location. How do we know this?
34:23.120 --> 34:32.080
The Father is Spirit. The Father does not have a right hand. The right hand of the Father is not
34:32.080 --> 34:39.360
a physical location, because again, the Father is not physical. Scripture is very clear. Scripture
34:39.360 --> 34:45.280
says this in a number of places. The Father and the Spirit, obviously, one would hope that
34:45.280 --> 34:50.480
with the Spirit this is obvious, but the Father and the Spirit being Spirit, being not corporeal,
34:51.280 --> 34:59.360
do not have right hands. And so their right hands cannot be a physical location. The right hand
34:59.360 --> 35:05.280
of the Father is a position of power and authority. When Scripture speaks of the right hand of the
35:05.280 --> 35:13.520
Father and Christ being there, think of it as a right hand man. Or, historically, many kings would
35:13.520 --> 35:19.680
have a vizier or equivalent, someone, some minister who was very high ranking, who acted as his right
35:19.680 --> 35:26.000
hand and was called his right hand. That is what Scripture is saying when it says Christ is the
35:26.000 --> 35:32.080
right hand of the Father. It is a matter of the exaltation of Christ. It is not a matter of a
35:32.080 --> 35:39.760
physical location. So no, he is not physically limited to some specific small place in heaven.
35:39.760 --> 35:46.800
That is not how this works. Also notably, heaven, not a physical location. But that's a point for
35:46.800 --> 35:53.840
another time. Before we conclude with John 6, I just want to provide a warning to the folks who
35:53.840 --> 35:59.680
are still shouting at us that can't possibly be about the Eucharist, can't be about communion.
35:59.680 --> 36:07.680
I want to reread a small portion. Jesus says, For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
36:07.680 --> 36:12.640
Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood abides in me, and I in him.
36:12.800 --> 36:18.880
The reason that this is important is that if you say, Well, that can't possibly be about communion,
36:18.880 --> 36:26.640
because that's tying your salvation to a work, any argument along those lines that anyone would
36:26.640 --> 36:33.440
make, including some Lutherans against John 6 being Eucharistic, must necessarily and absolutely
36:33.440 --> 36:39.760
apply to baptism now saves you. And see, this is something that astonishes me that some folks
36:39.760 --> 36:46.400
who agree that baptism can be salvific, and they can maybe agree that communion is salvific,
36:46.400 --> 36:52.880
but they will sternly argue against John 6 being about the Eucharist, specifically because of this
36:52.880 --> 37:00.000
language that Jesus uses that's conditional. Well, if baptism now saves you, then it's obvious that
37:00.000 --> 37:04.960
if you reject baptism, you're rejecting salvation. And we talked about in the baptism episode says
37:04.960 --> 37:10.480
nothing about someone who's unable to be baptized. You know, it's not a question of rejection. If
37:10.480 --> 37:16.000
it's a question of the absence of the opportunity, that is not something that's going to separate
37:16.000 --> 37:21.360
you from Christ because it is faith that saves. And that's crucial in all this faith undergirds
37:22.000 --> 37:30.800
salvation period. And there is faith in baptism, and there is faith in communion, and there is
37:30.800 --> 37:37.200
faith in the forgiveness of sins, the confession and absolution of sins. Again, this is all God
37:37.200 --> 37:43.360
pouring out as gifts to us in all these myriad ways. And so just when you read the text of this,
37:43.360 --> 37:50.800
if you're like, that can't possibly be because there's this conditional here, try that same logic
37:50.800 --> 37:56.720
that you're applying to this, to baptism now saves you, and see a baptism survives as a sacrament.
37:56.800 --> 38:03.280
What you will find is that it doesn't. If you remove John 6 as being also about communion,
38:04.480 --> 38:10.160
the logic by which you do that is going to nullify baptism. I think that's one of the strongest
38:10.160 --> 38:16.320
pieces of evidence that this must be. It's the same type of thing. Another piece of evidence for it is
38:16.320 --> 38:24.640
back at the beginning. Jesus directly makes the manna in the desert typologically pointing towards
38:25.120 --> 38:31.120
the bread of life, which is him, which is his body. And how do we receive his body? If it's
38:31.120 --> 38:36.880
spiritual, if it's by faith, then we're not receiving anything physical. And the type would fall apart
38:36.880 --> 38:41.920
because they were given manna in the desert. There was actual bread that fell from heaven,
38:41.920 --> 38:46.800
physical bread. They gathered it up in baskets, and they ate it. And as he said, it sustained them,
38:46.800 --> 38:52.960
but they still died. The same is true of all the sacrifices in the Old Testament. Blood was shed,
38:52.960 --> 38:58.400
but it always pointed towards what? The actual shedding of Christ's blood on the cross.
38:58.960 --> 39:03.840
This is how the typology in the Old Testament always plays out. You have the smaller version
39:03.840 --> 39:11.520
that's a physical object that points toward the final anti-type of the thing, and that is also
39:11.520 --> 39:17.360
physical. So it would not be possible if Jesus is making the comparison between physical manna
39:17.360 --> 39:24.720
from heaven and himself as manna from heaven coming from God. That doesn't then become allegorical.
39:24.720 --> 39:31.840
He's still talking about his flesh as he says over and over. He gets gratuitous and cumulative
39:31.840 --> 39:38.320
in the passage where he's talking about his blood being true, food, etc. So don't ignore that typology
39:38.320 --> 39:45.680
as being a necessary part of this being sacramental catechesis. I can tell you just from personal
39:45.680 --> 39:52.160
experience, there are multiple Baptists I know who, when they read this, they ceased to be Baptists
39:52.160 --> 39:57.600
because they realized they had precluded that view of the sacrament. They realized that they were
39:57.600 --> 40:04.480
Lutheran when they actually believed what John 6 said about communion. Now, I find it terrifying
40:04.480 --> 40:09.120
that there would be then anyone, but especially Lutherans, to come along and say, no, no, no,
40:09.120 --> 40:15.440
well, that's not about communion. If it is having this efficacious and beneficial outcome in the
40:15.440 --> 40:21.360
faith and the souls of men to realize that a false confession needs to be reoriented in a way
40:21.360 --> 40:25.840
that is Lutheran, we're like, yes, absolutely, that is correct to then say, well, but not that text,
40:25.840 --> 40:32.960
that can't be it. That's judge the tree by its fruit. And when men read John 6 and they become
40:32.960 --> 40:38.320
Lutheran, please don't argue with them. Please just don't do that. The same sort of typology,
40:38.320 --> 40:45.760
incidentally, is used by Jesus elsewhere, again, pointing physically. We always quote John 3.16
40:45.760 --> 40:52.640
and sometimes 17 and 18. But John 3.14 says, And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,
40:52.640 --> 40:57.200
so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.
40:58.480 --> 41:02.400
If you remember that story, they were being, they've been cursed by God, they're being bitten by
41:02.400 --> 41:08.000
poisonous snakes and dying. God told Moses to craft a bronze serpent, put it up on a pole,
41:08.000 --> 41:13.600
whoever looked, whoever gazed upon that serpent would be saved from the poison. He did it,
41:13.600 --> 41:21.360
and many of Israel lived. And Jesus himself says in John 3, This is typological of me hanging on
41:21.360 --> 41:27.760
the cursed tree of the cross. The bronze serpent was a typological pointer to Christ's sacrifice
41:28.640 --> 41:35.120
when he was crucified. Again, there's physical on both ends of that. You will not have typology
41:35.120 --> 41:41.040
where the physical version then just sort of falls off into, into what? It doesn't just vanish
41:41.040 --> 41:48.400
into space. It can't just float away. It has to point to something physical. So please, you know,
41:49.360 --> 41:55.200
one of the interesting things about the reason that Luther doesn't necessarily go as hard as we
41:55.200 --> 42:02.880
do with this is that John 6 is not necessary for the Lutheran view of the sacrament of communion.
42:02.880 --> 42:08.640
If John 6 were not present, we would still have much the same understanding. And that's part of
42:08.640 --> 42:12.960
why he was, he just didn't want to fight with the Reformed anymore. At the end of his life,
42:12.960 --> 42:19.840
he was sick of constantly doing the same battles over and over again. That fact that
42:20.800 --> 42:25.440
a man would make a concession so as not to have to keep getting beaten about the face and head
42:26.400 --> 42:31.040
doesn't mean that it doesn't apply. It just means that sometimes you're gonna,
42:31.040 --> 42:37.200
if you have the argument nailed down elsewhere, you don't need additional evidence. But we have
42:37.200 --> 42:40.960
the luxury, you know, like, certainly Cori and I have the luxury of no one's yelling at us because
42:40.960 --> 42:45.280
you don't have mics, you're yelling, but we can't hear you. So we can just go on and on.
42:46.800 --> 42:52.720
When we point to this, it's because it's all, it's all what Jesus said. This is by far the richest
42:52.720 --> 43:00.160
and most fleshed out, I'm not saying that ironically, version of catechesis. And so as we get into the
43:00.160 --> 43:05.200
actual words of institution, just keep in mind the reaction that the apostles had, you know,
43:05.200 --> 43:10.800
the disciples and their gathered in the upper room on Monday, Thursday. There was no arguing.
43:10.800 --> 43:15.760
There was no saying, how can this be? There was nothing except for acquiescence because
43:15.760 --> 43:22.640
their teacher had already explained it to him. And this is something that I think it's an important
43:22.640 --> 43:26.320
thing when you're reading the New Testament, particularly when you're reading the Gospels,
43:26.400 --> 43:34.080
and then moved to Acts and beyond. Prior to Pentecost, these 12 men, you know, 11 survive because
43:34.080 --> 43:38.960
Judas obviously apostatized and was killed and then replaced. He killed himself, self-murdered.
43:40.080 --> 43:46.720
These men went to seminary with God for three years, three and a half years. Jesus taught them
43:46.720 --> 43:51.760
every day. They lived together. They ate together morning till night. They were constantly discussing
43:51.760 --> 43:58.400
these things. He was constantly teaching them. In many places it's recorded, Jesus telling them,
43:58.400 --> 44:03.120
basically, you'll understand later. And they understood later at Pentecost when they received
44:03.120 --> 44:10.080
the gift of the Holy Spirit. This teaching, the catechesis in the seminary education that they
44:10.080 --> 44:18.000
received at Christ's feet was unlocked by the Holy Spirit. And so I think one of the things that's,
44:18.960 --> 44:24.800
I think we kind of just assumed today, we kind of read into the text of Acts and beyond. Well,
44:24.800 --> 44:31.440
the apostles were special and they were inspired by God. And we just kind of assumed that what they
44:31.440 --> 44:39.120
say in Acts and beyond was New Revelation from God directly. I think it's a much more natural
44:39.120 --> 44:42.800
reading, particularly when you look at what happens, you know, from the end of, you know,
44:42.800 --> 44:46.880
especially the end of Luke to Acts, which is effectively part one and part two of the same
44:46.880 --> 44:54.320
book. I wish John came first and then Luke and Acts were bookended. Because when you look at that,
44:54.320 --> 45:00.960
Peter in particular, you know, Peter's like the Kool-Aid man of theology. He's boisterous and he's
45:00.960 --> 45:06.960
enthusiastic and he just crashes through walls and he's like, what's up guys? I'm going to be the
45:06.960 --> 45:12.400
loudest, most confident man in the room, even if he has no idea what he's talking about. And
45:12.400 --> 45:16.800
God bless him for it because many of his confessions, even when he didn't understand something,
45:16.800 --> 45:23.040
he still got enough right. He's like, yeah, that is a good model for our faith. And yet,
45:23.040 --> 45:28.800
what do we see immediately after Pentecost? He's the man who stands up and just unloads this sermon
45:28.800 --> 45:35.840
out of nowhere that's beautiful. It's rich, it's textural, there's so much theology and scripture
45:35.840 --> 45:42.400
that he pulls in. And in some cases, it is new teaching. But I think that if you understand
45:42.400 --> 45:48.320
that the Holy Spirit unlocked the seminary education that had been locked away behind blinders,
45:49.200 --> 45:53.920
it makes a lot more sense where all that stuff came from. And so as these men, as the apostles,
45:53.920 --> 45:58.720
who had lived with Jesus for three and a half years, as they go up on with the rest of their
45:58.720 --> 46:04.240
lives and their ministries, they certainly did receive direct revelation. Paul in particular
46:04.240 --> 46:09.520
did not have the benefit. So he was talking to God directly, God communicated with him,
46:09.520 --> 46:13.840
something that does not exist for us today. So not minimizing the fact that they did,
46:13.840 --> 46:17.920
in some case, you know, John, obviously with his revelation, the apocalypse,
46:18.560 --> 46:23.520
that was all new, that was directly coming from God. That wasn't something the book itself says,
46:23.520 --> 46:29.520
this was a direct revelation. It wasn't something that Jesus told him. So they absolutely did,
46:29.600 --> 46:36.800
in some cases, receive new, inspired teaching. They were inspired. But much of what they were
46:36.800 --> 46:43.200
inspired by was not immediate, but it was through their seminary education with Jesus.
46:43.920 --> 46:48.560
And so just keep that in mind as you look at the things that they say in Acts and beyond. And even
46:48.560 --> 46:54.560
as the passages were about to read on the night of the Last Supper, and then what Paul says about
46:54.560 --> 47:02.400
the same moment, the fact that they just sat there and received it faithfully with no argument,
47:02.400 --> 47:06.560
they're short, they're brief scenes. It's obviously a very short scene that we're given. It was an
47:06.560 --> 47:12.640
entire night. But the fact that God doesn't say anything about them arguing or grumbling or doubting
47:12.640 --> 47:19.200
or anything is a clear indication that they'd heard this before. They'd heard it at the feeding
47:19.200 --> 47:24.320
in the 5,000. And so it wasn't new information. It was the fulfillment of what had already been
47:24.320 --> 47:29.520
taught. That's exactly how Catechesis works in churches today. Almost every church, whatever
47:29.520 --> 47:36.800
their views of communion, there's typically some form of teaching before communion. It's the same
47:36.800 --> 47:42.800
thing. You teach and then you deliver. So the disconnection temporarily from the feeding of
47:42.800 --> 47:48.800
5,000 to later on in the upper room when they actually received First Communion, the First
47:48.800 --> 47:54.800
Communion, it makes perfect sense. It's the same model that we have followed ever since. You teach
47:55.360 --> 48:00.880
someone what it is, and then you give it to them, just as Jesus did for the apostles. It's been
48:00.880 --> 48:08.240
passed on to all of us as well. Before we get into the passages dealing with the words of institution,
48:08.240 --> 48:12.000
and we'll really deal with just two of those. There are a couple of parallel ones. We'll mention
48:12.000 --> 48:17.600
the parallel ones, but not read them into the episode, as it were. I want to address
48:18.560 --> 48:21.200
promise and typology. First, promise.
48:23.440 --> 48:28.560
Promise is a central concept to everything we're discussing here, and indeed, to the Christian
48:28.560 --> 48:36.880
faith. And the reason for that is, how do you receive a promise? Because what is promised here
48:36.880 --> 48:41.680
in the Lord's Supper is the forgiveness of sins. We'll get into that with the words of institution,
48:41.680 --> 48:48.240
what is promised in baptism is forgiveness of sins. But how do you receive a promise?
48:49.600 --> 48:56.240
If I promise you that I will do something, the only way that you can receive that promise from me
48:56.960 --> 49:05.360
is to believe what I've said. You have to believe that I will do what I have said I will do.
49:06.080 --> 49:12.160
It's faith. It's belief. That is how you receive a promise. And so all of these things, the core
49:12.160 --> 49:21.440
of the Christian faith, the things we are dealing in here, are promises. You receive those via faith.
49:21.440 --> 49:26.880
And so when someone tells you that, oh, well, this teaching means there's works, no it doesn't,
49:26.880 --> 49:31.520
this has nothing to do with human works. It has everything to do with Christ's work.
49:32.400 --> 49:41.440
But it is not a human work that receives the promise. It is faith, and faith is the free gift
49:41.440 --> 49:48.960
of God. And so God gives you the capacity, the attribute, the thing that receives
49:50.720 --> 49:57.280
the promise, and that is faith. And so there's no work here on your part. It is all from God,
49:57.280 --> 50:01.360
because He gives you both the capacity to receive the promise, and then He gives you
50:01.360 --> 50:08.080
the promise as well. And the second point I wanted to make is the issue of typology.
50:09.760 --> 50:15.200
We've spoken of typology a fair number of times in this podcast, and we will continue to do so.
50:16.240 --> 50:22.080
I find it very unfortunate that many modern Christian denominations have essentially
50:23.040 --> 50:29.920
jettisoned typology. It's no longer taught, it's no longer used, it's ignored. And that is deeply
50:29.920 --> 50:36.800
unfortunate, because Scripture is incredibly rich, and a great deal of that richness comes from
50:36.800 --> 50:41.920
typology, because typology flows from the beginning of Scripture all the way to the end.
50:43.040 --> 50:49.040
And just as one example of that, you have the Tree of Life standing in the New Jerusalem in
50:49.120 --> 50:54.560
Revelation. But you also have the Tree of Life all the way back in Genesis in the garden.
50:56.880 --> 51:03.680
But you also have the Tree of Life in Christ. Christ is the Tree of Life. It is His flesh
51:03.680 --> 51:12.880
that is given for food to the world, to the elect. And it gives us eternal life. It gives us salvation.
51:13.440 --> 51:19.520
Now, to be clear, that salvation is offered to everyone. Scripture is incredibly clear.
51:19.520 --> 51:24.240
Ton Cosmon, it is Cosmos, the universe. It is all things that are redeemed in Christ.
51:24.880 --> 51:31.040
It is the elect and only the elect who benefit from it. The difference between the objective and
51:31.040 --> 51:38.560
the subjective justification. But typology flows throughout Scripture. You have typology of Christ
51:38.560 --> 51:46.000
sacrifice and of our worship in the Old Testament sacrificial system. You have the typology of
51:46.000 --> 51:52.160
Christ as the rock with the rock in the Old Testament, out of whom, out of which, depending
51:52.160 --> 51:58.160
on your emphasis there, flows living water, water of life, that keeps the ancient Israelites alive
51:58.160 --> 52:04.160
in the desert. And speaking of flowing waters, I will make one sort of tangential point here
52:04.160 --> 52:12.800
right before I get into Matthew. We see both sacraments flowing directly from Christ on Golgotha.
52:14.000 --> 52:22.400
When his side is pierced by that spear, what flows out? It is water and blood. So what do you have
52:22.400 --> 52:28.880
present there? You have his body, you have water, and you have his blood. Well, that's baptism.
52:29.680 --> 52:34.080
And that's the sacrament of the table. That's the Lord's Supper. You have both sacraments,
52:34.720 --> 52:39.040
typologically and physically present there on the cross.
52:41.920 --> 52:47.280
But now I'll read from Matthew 26, the words of institution. I said I would give the parallel
52:47.280 --> 52:53.840
chapters as well, the parallel sections. Those would be Mark 14 and Luke 22, but we'll be reading
52:53.840 --> 52:55.040
from Matthew 26.
53:24.400 --> 53:31.520
There are a few important parts of this that we didn't already cover in John 6. One,
53:31.520 --> 53:37.760
he specifically says, this is my blood of the covenant which is poured out for many for the
53:37.760 --> 53:45.120
forgiveness of sins. Now, this is crucial because he's saying that communion does something.
53:46.080 --> 53:53.600
What does it do? It forgives sins. Again, there's no work here of any man. The work is of God,
53:53.600 --> 53:59.040
the deliverance is through means. We receive those means of grace, and they are indeed means of
53:59.040 --> 54:05.920
grace. And this is a point where, thankfully, the Reformed, the Lutherans, and the Roman Catholics
54:05.920 --> 54:12.640
all agree that communion does deliver the forgiveness of sins. Baptists, the Anabaptists
54:12.640 --> 54:20.800
stand alone in rejecting that because they do not understand what sola fide means. They think that
54:20.880 --> 54:25.680
anything that any man does can't possibly have anything to do with forgiveness of sins because
54:25.680 --> 54:31.200
that would be us taking credit. Jesus, God everywhere, says the opposite. There's a whole
54:31.200 --> 54:35.920
bunch of stuff where God tells us where he's going to deliver the forgiveness of sins.
54:35.920 --> 54:42.480
Baptism now saves you. This blood is poured out for the forgiveness of sins, just as his
54:42.480 --> 54:47.680
body was sacrificed for the forgiveness of sins. And again, typologically, that was the
54:47.680 --> 54:53.120
essence of the sacrificial system. There were blood offerings and there were meat offerings
54:53.840 --> 55:00.640
that were typologically pointing forward to the cross. To the final, the ultimate, the pure,
55:00.640 --> 55:06.800
the only sacrifice that actually mattered, because it says elsewhere in the New Testament,
55:06.800 --> 55:13.600
that those sacrifices couldn't do anything by themselves. They were an expression of faith.
55:13.600 --> 55:20.960
They pointed to Jesus' perfect sacrifice once and for all time. So the words of institution,
55:20.960 --> 55:26.240
when it talks about the forgiveness of sins, it's not simply talking about Jesus' blood
55:26.960 --> 55:31.760
was shed on the cross for the forgiveness of sins. Remember, this is taking, this is my body,
55:31.760 --> 55:38.080
drink of it all of you, for this is the blood, my blood of the covenant. This is how the forgiveness
55:38.080 --> 55:45.520
of sins is delivered, which is precisely what Jesus said in John 6. He said, whoever has true
55:45.520 --> 55:52.240
flesh and drinks true blood is going to receive eternal life. That was the whole point of that.
55:52.240 --> 55:58.160
And that's why people got annoyed and they wandered off. Like, well, that can't be. They were confused
55:58.160 --> 56:04.000
and they were annoyed because they took it literally. They listened to John 6 literally. He didn't
56:04.000 --> 56:08.160
correct them. He didn't say, no, no, no, it's a figure. Don't worry about it. It's not actually
56:08.160 --> 56:14.880
about blood and body. There's nothing gross here. It's okay. He didn't say it at all. He let them
56:14.880 --> 56:22.800
go and asked the disciples, the 12, what do you think? You can leave too. So again, this is why
56:22.800 --> 56:28.320
it is a sacrament to us and really to everyone, except the Baptist. And if you're Baptist and
56:28.320 --> 56:34.560
you reject that, we're not trying to pick on you. We're trying to clearly delineate the substantial
56:34.560 --> 56:41.040
distinctions among us. And the reason is why we're not the same denomination. Why until such disputes
56:41.040 --> 56:47.120
rooted in Scripture are resolved, there can't be complete unanimity on what the faith means.
56:47.120 --> 56:53.520
Because this is big ticket stuff. Remember the words of institution, given on the night in
56:53.520 --> 56:59.120
which he was betrayed. That was his very last act. Everything else was him being taken in the garden
56:59.120 --> 57:06.560
and then executed and rising. And this was his last act of ministry effectively. Everything after
57:06.560 --> 57:11.760
this was leading to his death and resurrection. I'm not saying that's not ministry, but this was
57:11.760 --> 57:16.400
his last teaching moment. Everything he said afterwards is like, look, I'm fulfilling what I
57:16.400 --> 57:22.640
came to do. I did it. The other thing I want to point to is that he says, I tell you, I will not
57:22.640 --> 57:27.280
drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it with you and my father's kingdom.
57:28.320 --> 57:33.840
Fruit of the vine is synonymous with wine. It's used in lots of different places in Scripture.
57:33.840 --> 57:40.320
There's only one thing that it means. It means alcoholic wine, which is itself redundant. There's
57:40.320 --> 57:46.560
no such thing as non-alcoholic wine. Now in docks, I can say, I started a distillery. I produced
57:46.560 --> 57:52.960
hundreds of thousands of gallons of alcohol. Both as an industry expert and as someone who
57:52.960 --> 57:58.880
could do this very experiment that you could do in your garage, if you take a pail and you mash
57:58.880 --> 58:05.360
up a bunch of grapes and you put a lid on it and you put something on it to seal it in and it's
58:05.360 --> 58:09.920
called a bubbler, you can put something that will make just a one-way passage where you put
58:09.920 --> 58:15.600
a little water in it so gases can escape, but nothing can get in and just let it sit for the
58:15.680 --> 58:20.720
weekend. When you come back several days later, it's going to be bubbling and the reason it's
58:20.720 --> 58:26.400
going to be bubbling is that you've now produced alcohol. All you did was squished some grapes
58:26.400 --> 58:33.840
through in a bucket and you've produced alcohol. Why? Because there's everywhere in nature and
58:33.840 --> 58:40.720
certainly absolutely everywhere in nature in Jesus' day. Yeast is on everything. Natural yeast is on
58:40.720 --> 58:47.200
all the fruit in the universe. It's just there. It's regional. It's specific to different types
58:47.200 --> 58:52.960
of plants. It's specific to parts of the country, parts of the world. There's always yeast on stuff.
58:53.600 --> 59:01.440
Yeast in the presence of sugar with the right pH and the right temperatures
59:02.000 --> 59:08.240
is going to produce two things. It's going to burp carbon dioxide, which is why you would get
59:08.240 --> 59:13.120
bubbles coming out of your little bubbler if you seal this package up and it's going to excrete
59:13.120 --> 59:20.160
ethanol, which is alcohol. This is how God made the universe. It's not like man used some sort of
59:20.160 --> 59:26.000
alchemy to begin. Demons didn't need to teach anybody how to make alcohol. You accidentally
59:26.000 --> 59:31.360
get alcohol if you just mishandle fruit. The Mongolians, they had fermented yaks milk.
59:31.920 --> 59:39.600
They things get alcoholic very easily. Now the degree of alcohol that's present can vary,
59:39.600 --> 59:44.800
but when Jesus says fruit of the vine, he's only talking about one thing. He's talking about real
59:44.800 --> 59:52.240
natural wine with alcohol and not just a little bit either. The very first miracle that he did at
59:52.240 --> 59:58.880
the wedding of Cana produced a huge volume of alcohol. Why? Because it was a party. Was he
59:58.880 --> 01:00:04.960
say there's going to be wine in heaven? Alcohol is part of creation. It is not a part of the fall.
01:00:04.960 --> 01:00:12.880
It is how God made everything to work. It's notable that today there are denominations
01:00:12.880 --> 01:00:18.720
that reject their tea toddlers either entirely or they simply reject wine in the sacrament.
01:00:20.240 --> 01:00:27.120
One that is completely in violation of the words of institution. If you are not using wine,
01:00:27.120 --> 01:00:33.280
you are not having communion because God says to use wine. The Trayvon Martin
01:00:33.280 --> 01:00:38.800
communion with Skittles in Arizona iced tea, that's the kind of theology that you're
01:00:38.800 --> 01:00:44.000
employing if you think you can just start substituting stuff. Notably, grape juice.
01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.680
People are like, you juice grapes and you can have no alcohol. No, you can't.
01:00:48.320 --> 01:00:53.440
The reason that grape juice exists today is that a Wesleyan Methodist named Welch
01:00:54.320 --> 01:01:00.640
denied communion and wanted to produce non-alcoholic wine so that his abolitionist,
01:01:00.640 --> 01:01:07.680
detotaling Methodist congregation could practice communion as they thought they were. They were
01:01:07.680 --> 01:01:14.880
not. It was a farce. But the very existence of pasteurized grapes and grape juice,
01:01:15.520 --> 01:01:21.520
it's a modern scientific, synthetic rejection of scripture. That's the only reason that exists
01:01:21.520 --> 01:01:28.720
today. It was created for the purpose of denying what God said to do. Today, you go to the story,
01:01:28.720 --> 01:01:32.480
like you have the wine aisle and you have the juice aisle and you think, oh, this is all just
01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:39.520
natural. It seems obvious when you're at the grocery store that obviously juice is the natural
01:01:39.520 --> 01:01:45.680
product and then wine is the special product that the bad boys make if they want to make alcohol.
01:01:45.680 --> 01:01:51.040
It's the other way around. All you get in nature is alcohol. You have to work really hard to actually
01:01:51.040 --> 01:01:55.920
just make juice that's never going to grow anything. That is a much more unnatural product.
01:01:56.720 --> 01:02:03.120
When Jesus says fruit of the vine and elsewhere, he says wine, he's talking about alcohol. Alcohol
01:02:03.120 --> 01:02:09.520
is not only a gift from God, but it is explicitly commanded of us for the purpose of communion.
01:02:09.520 --> 01:02:14.080
Even if you don't want to drink it anywhere else, you must drink wine at communion because that's
01:02:14.160 --> 01:02:23.280
what God instituted. I think one of the disputes that has evolved over time is after the Reformation,
01:02:23.280 --> 01:02:29.120
when everyone started getting really fiddly and introspective with the sacrament,
01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:36.000
there became this impulse to try to create the minimum viable communion. What is the smallest
01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:43.920
set of operant conditions we can have where it's still communion? I personally despise this impulse
01:02:43.920 --> 01:02:49.680
in so many people because it's just do what God said. What does he say? He says take, eat.
01:02:50.560 --> 01:02:57.440
Here's what it is. Say this, do this, eat it, receive it. That's it. That is communion. The whole
01:02:57.440 --> 01:03:03.360
thing is communion. If you don't have wine, you don't have communion. If you consecrate it,
01:03:03.360 --> 01:03:08.400
and then instead of eating it, you put it in a monstrance and you parade it around,
01:03:09.360 --> 01:03:14.640
that's not communion either. You're taking something that God intended for one purpose
01:03:14.640 --> 01:03:19.120
and saying, I'm not going to do what you said. I'm going to do something else. This is one of the
01:03:19.120 --> 01:03:25.280
reasons I mentioned the Reformation episode, the Lutheran Confessions in some places refer to
01:03:25.280 --> 01:03:29.680
the Roman Catholic Mass as the abomination of the Mass. This is one of the reasons, is that when
01:03:29.680 --> 01:03:37.040
they consecrate the bread and wine, in the words of institution, Jesus and Paul both clearly say,
01:03:37.920 --> 01:03:42.400
eat, hand drink. One of the things that Rome has long done is denied people the,
01:03:43.120 --> 01:03:49.280
if you call it right, they're denied the wine. They're only given the bread. There's a logical
01:03:49.280 --> 01:03:55.120
construction there that if, because the bread is the body, which is true, and the body must
01:03:55.120 --> 01:03:58.960
necessarily have blood in it, they're already getting blood, so they don't need the wine.
01:03:59.920 --> 01:04:05.040
That's not what God said to do. Why are you trying to logic this? What problem are you trying to solve?
01:04:05.040 --> 01:04:10.880
Just do what God said to do. One of the other abuses that occurs in Rome is that
01:04:13.520 --> 01:04:19.360
they will consecrate the bread. They will say that it has transubstantiated into Christ's flesh.
01:04:20.320 --> 01:04:26.400
Then rather than eating it, which is what God said to do, at some point they decided, you know what,
01:04:26.400 --> 01:04:30.960
we got God. Right here, we got God on a plate. As I said, they have these monstrances. There's,
01:04:30.960 --> 01:04:37.360
monstrances are very fancy presentation cases where they will preserve and parade around
01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:45.600
the body of Christ, the host, to adore it. Now, not only is this an abuse of what is actually
01:04:45.600 --> 01:04:52.400
directed in Scripture, which says nothing of the sort, but it also is a direct corollary
01:04:53.120 --> 01:04:57.040
to the events of the Old Testament where, you know, we mentioned the bronze serpent
01:04:57.760 --> 01:05:02.000
that Moses created at God's command. God said, create this image of a serpent,
01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:07.360
put it up on a wooden pole. Everyone who looks upon it will be healed. They will be saved. They
01:05:07.360 --> 01:05:14.480
won't die from the poison. They did that. They obeyed. Then that bronze serpent shows up later
01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:22.160
in the Old Testament as a false idol named Nehustan. They saved the serpent because like, well,
01:05:22.160 --> 01:05:27.040
God did this one good thing with it. You know, it's pretty cool. You know, we spent some time on
01:05:27.040 --> 01:05:33.040
it. We got this. Let's see what else we can do with it. They saved something that God gave
01:05:33.040 --> 01:05:40.480
for a good purpose and they started worshiping it. They named it Nehustan and they worshiped
01:05:40.480 --> 01:05:46.160
the bronze serpent as an idol. They took the very thing that God had provided according to his good
01:05:46.160 --> 01:05:55.920
will as a salvific means of the flesh and of the soul. They turned it into idolatry. This is
01:05:55.920 --> 01:06:01.200
exactly what the Roman Catholics do with their Corpus Christi parades. They were given something
01:06:01.200 --> 01:06:06.720
for one purpose. They abuse it. They rip it from that purpose and they parade it around and they
01:06:06.720 --> 01:06:14.800
worship it. It's Nehustan worship. It's an abomination. On one hand, they had the obedience
01:06:14.800 --> 01:06:21.600
to believe and to do everything up until eating or drinking where they deny the drinking to some.
01:06:23.360 --> 01:06:28.400
Just do what God said. I think that's one of the key distinctives when you're looking at some of
01:06:28.400 --> 01:06:34.960
the variations in different denominational treatments of this stuff. How closely are you
01:06:34.960 --> 01:06:40.560
following what God said to do? If he says, wine, you're like, no, I don't want wine. I think it's
01:06:40.560 --> 01:06:47.600
sinful to drink. Well, crucially, not only does God not say that it's sinful to drink alcohol,
01:06:47.600 --> 01:06:54.400
God commands the drinking of alcohol for the forgiveness of sins. Just as one last aside
01:06:54.400 --> 01:07:02.720
here makes me incredibly, incredibly angry when there's someone who's an alcoholic who is told,
01:07:02.720 --> 01:07:08.400
no, it's okay if you don't drink any wine and communion because I understand that you're forbidden
01:07:08.400 --> 01:07:14.160
to ever have any alcohol again. One, that's not true. That's not what AA teaches. Even if it were,
01:07:14.160 --> 01:07:19.760
that would make AA a false cult in opposition to Christianity. To whatever extent, that might be
01:07:19.760 --> 01:07:24.400
true. It's neither here nor there. They do a lot of good, but there's also some very weird stuff
01:07:24.400 --> 01:07:30.480
about it. The simple fact is that if someone else teaches you, you will sin by drinking alcohol
01:07:30.480 --> 01:07:37.360
when God says this alcohol is for the forgiveness of sins. If you believe the man, you're denying
01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:41.920
your sin and you're violating the first and second commandments, you're calling God a liar.
01:07:41.920 --> 01:07:46.160
God says to do something like, no, God, I can't do that. You said it's to forgive my sins.
01:07:46.160 --> 01:07:53.600
I would sin if I did that. Just as a mathematical question, the amount of alcohol on a small sip
01:07:54.160 --> 01:08:01.360
cannot possibly raise your blood alcohol whatsoever. I understand that there are people who
01:08:01.360 --> 01:08:04.560
struggle with addiction. I have friends who struggle with addiction. I understand
01:08:05.280 --> 01:08:15.120
that this one specific case must be the exception. If you sincerely believe that you are going to
01:08:15.120 --> 01:08:21.760
sin by obeying God, you shouldn't be communing anyway, not until you get straightened out to
01:08:21.760 --> 01:08:26.400
the fact that God is saying this is for the forgiveness of sins. You must believe that.
01:08:26.400 --> 01:08:31.040
If you can't believe that, that would be unworthy receiving, which is the next thing we're going
01:08:31.040 --> 01:08:36.960
to get to. There are so many of these small variations where we start fiddling with what
01:08:36.960 --> 01:08:44.320
God said to do. It's so simple. It's so simple. What God did in the upper room on Monday, Thursday
01:08:44.320 --> 01:08:49.760
is as simple as it could be. It's a meal. Eat the bread, drink the wine, and yes, it must be real
01:08:49.760 --> 01:08:54.480
bread too. It doesn't matter if it's leavened or unleavened, but it has to be bread. It can't be
01:08:54.480 --> 01:08:59.120
potato chips. It can't be skittles. It has to be bread. Why? Because that's what God said.
01:09:00.080 --> 01:09:05.920
That's it. We don't need to try to reverse engineer it and find the minimum viable communion
01:09:05.920 --> 01:09:10.000
so that we can get away with getting God's gifts by some other means.
01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:15.440
That's not Christianity. What are people doing when they go down that path? It's not a path of
01:09:15.440 --> 01:09:21.440
faithfulness, and it inevitably leads to worse consequences. It's not just one small abuse.
01:09:21.440 --> 01:09:26.240
It will get worse and worse because you can't mess with God's things and call Him a liar and come
01:09:26.320 --> 01:09:35.280
out of it okay. Before we get to additional theology and doctrine, here we'll read one more
01:09:35.280 --> 01:09:41.440
section of Scripture dealing with a number of other issues related to the Lord's Supper,
01:09:41.440 --> 01:09:48.560
and also recounting again the words of institution. This time the reading is from First Corinthians,
01:09:48.560 --> 01:09:54.480
First Corinthians 11. For I receive from the Lord what I also delivered to you,
01:09:54.480 --> 01:09:59.520
that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks
01:09:59.520 --> 01:10:05.360
he broke it and said, This is my body, which is for you, do this in remembrance of me.
01:10:06.240 --> 01:10:09.040
In the same way also he took the cup after Supper saying,
01:10:09.840 --> 01:10:15.760
This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this as often as you drink it in remembrance of me.
01:10:16.480 --> 01:10:21.440
For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until
01:10:21.440 --> 01:10:27.440
he comes. Whoever therefore eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner
01:10:27.440 --> 01:10:33.040
will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself then,
01:10:33.040 --> 01:10:38.240
and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning
01:10:38.240 --> 01:10:45.120
the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. This is why many of you are weak and ill and some have
01:10:45.120 --> 01:10:54.000
died. Before we get into the specific matter of what it means to eat and drink in an unworthy
01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:00.640
manner and the consequences of doing that, I want to highlight one of the words here that often comes
01:11:00.640 --> 01:11:07.760
up in arguments against understanding the Lord's Supper simply as Christ has presented it to us,
01:11:08.560 --> 01:11:14.480
and that word is remembrance. Now I said earlier that one of the points of
01:11:15.120 --> 01:11:19.840
this sacrament is in fact to remember Christ, and that is simply what Scripture teaches here,
01:11:20.640 --> 01:11:24.320
but we need to know what it means to remember Christ.
01:11:26.320 --> 01:11:34.640
To remember Christ means something specific in this context. The reason for that is that simply
01:11:34.640 --> 01:11:43.120
noting historical facts avails nothing. That's worth nothing to you. Demons have that knowledge,
01:11:43.120 --> 01:11:49.760
as Scripture points out and as is pointed out by basically every Christian theologian down through
01:11:49.760 --> 01:11:57.760
time. Demons have knowledge, it doesn't save them. This comes back to something we have discussed
01:11:57.760 --> 01:12:05.840
previously. There are three kinds of belief or knowledge that are at issue when we discuss theology.
01:12:05.840 --> 01:12:12.800
There would be Noticia, Ascensus, and Fiducius. These are just the Latin terms. Two of them you
01:12:12.800 --> 01:12:18.640
can certainly understand immediately. Noticia is just notice, Ascensus is Ascent, and Fiducius,
01:12:19.040 --> 01:12:27.520
Fiduciary, Trust. Demons have Noticia. They know that these things happen.
01:12:28.320 --> 01:12:34.560
These things happened in the past. Demons also have Ascensus. They assent to the fact that these
01:12:34.560 --> 01:12:40.720
things happen. They don't contest that Christ died on the cross. They don't contest any of the narrative
01:12:40.720 --> 01:12:47.440
in Scripture, and so demons quite frankly have a better faith than many. But what demons do not
01:12:47.440 --> 01:12:53.840
have and what is called for here in remembering Christ, because it's not mere or bare remembrance,
01:12:53.840 --> 01:13:01.600
it's not Noticia, it's not even Noticia and Ascensus, it is Fiducius. It is faith. What is called for
01:13:01.600 --> 01:13:07.520
is belief in the things that Christ said, in the things that he promised. That is what Christians
01:13:07.520 --> 01:13:13.680
have. That is what separates a believer from a demon or an unbeliever. Hardly a difference in
01:13:13.680 --> 01:13:20.880
this case. And so to remember Christ is to remember his benefits, to remember what he has promised,
01:13:20.880 --> 01:13:25.600
what he has told us, what he has said will happen, what he has said that his supper does.
01:13:26.400 --> 01:13:34.240
That is what it means to remember Christ. A bare recounting of the facts is not what is in view here.
01:13:34.240 --> 01:13:39.920
That is not what a Christian does, because a Christian has more than just the belief that the
01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:46.160
thing happened, a scent to the reality of the thing, a Christian has trust in it. And so that
01:13:46.160 --> 01:13:52.960
is what the word remembrance means. And so a focus by certain groups on the word remembrance, as if
01:13:52.960 --> 01:13:58.800
that somehow undermines the totality of the teaching or changes what Christ is saying,
01:14:01.120 --> 01:14:04.640
is just an abominable perversion of Scripture. It is absolutely false.
01:14:05.520 --> 01:14:13.680
Calling to remembrance the work of Christ is faith. That is what is demanded of the believer.
01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:19.120
That is what is demanded for those who would approach the table. And that is part of what it
01:14:19.120 --> 01:14:26.080
means to approach in a worthy manner. Because not to have faith in the reality of this sacrament
01:14:26.080 --> 01:14:29.120
is to approach the table in an unworthy manner.
01:14:29.920 --> 01:14:39.520
So that 1 Corinthians 11 passage is vital for our understanding of the doctrine of communion,
01:14:39.520 --> 01:14:48.160
because in just two paragraphs, it effectively chops up all the different denominations into
01:14:48.160 --> 01:14:54.880
all the buckets that we fall into today. Every single dispute is represented in this text.
01:14:55.840 --> 01:15:01.680
So you have the remembrance argument, as Corey just dispatched. That is the view of some,
01:15:01.680 --> 01:15:06.320
you know, the Baptists and Jehovah's Witnesses say that there's nothing there. It's not a means of
01:15:06.320 --> 01:15:14.320
grace. It's literally just you do it and you remember Jesus and thanks for, you know, thanks
01:15:14.320 --> 01:15:19.120
for being Jesus. They're not that, well, some of them are that sacrilegious, frankly, that's
01:15:19.600 --> 01:15:25.840
that's how the Arizona iced tea and Skittles happen in the first place. It was, it was that sort of
01:15:25.840 --> 01:15:31.280
view that if it's just, you know, remembering God, who cares? Why would you need wine? It's how it's
01:15:31.280 --> 01:15:36.560
how Baptists can be teetotalers because all bets are off. Like it's just, if you're just remembering
01:15:36.560 --> 01:15:40.400
God, if that's the important part, then doing what he said doesn't matter. Because frankly,
01:15:40.400 --> 01:15:45.920
if you do what God says, that makes you acting in earning your salvation. And so you can't be
01:15:45.920 --> 01:15:51.040
Christian, right? Well, no, that's not who said that's not how any of this works. You do what God
01:15:51.040 --> 01:15:56.720
says because he says to do it. No one, no Christian thinks that doing stuff is going to save you.
01:15:56.720 --> 01:16:02.240
I mean, that's again, that was one of the divisions at the initial spark of the Reformation.
01:16:02.800 --> 01:16:07.440
You had the issues with indulgences and with pilgrimages and these other requirements that
01:16:08.080 --> 01:16:12.320
Rome said, this is going to earn you a time off in purgatory. You can do this stuff. You're going to
01:16:12.320 --> 01:16:18.160
earn some portion of your salvation. Even if it's not the eternal part, you're still going to be stuck
01:16:18.160 --> 01:16:26.720
in kind of baby hell for a while. This will help out. Part of the Reformation was a rejection
01:16:26.720 --> 01:16:34.160
saying that's contrary to all of Scripture. Your conflating works with justification as never
01:16:34.160 --> 01:16:38.960
permissible. And yet, once we get on the other side of that justification argument, there's
01:16:38.960 --> 01:16:45.520
still many places where individual denominations still try to bring that notion back into attack,
01:16:45.520 --> 01:16:51.520
more things that are frankly just basic parts of Christian doctrine. So remembrance is right out.
01:16:52.880 --> 01:16:57.840
Eating the bread and drinking the cup, again, that's something that Rome for a long time
01:16:58.880 --> 01:17:05.040
either restricted or forbade or at least an offer to the laity, so-called.
01:17:05.440 --> 01:17:10.800
You also have the very interesting thing that I think it's worth reading that passage in Corinthians,
01:17:10.800 --> 01:17:16.080
beginning with verse 23. Just read through it and note, pay attention to the nouns. Because what
01:17:16.080 --> 01:17:20.800
you will find is that when Paul is writing this, when the Holy Spirit is inspiring him to write this,
01:17:20.800 --> 01:17:26.960
I'm not attributing this argument to Paul. This is God. He uses bread and wine and cup
01:17:27.840 --> 01:17:33.840
and blood interchangeably. He just bounces between them. Why? Because it's the same thing.
01:17:33.840 --> 01:17:40.640
And this is one of the other crucial distinctions among the various denominations.
01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:49.600
When the Reformation occurred, there was already a strong push for rationalism that existed within
01:17:49.600 --> 01:17:55.440
Rome. The age of reason was dawning. People were trying to be more rational about things.
01:17:55.440 --> 01:18:02.320
You have Thomism. You have this vein of, we need to make sure we do the math on this thing, right?
01:18:03.040 --> 01:18:10.240
And so the reason that Rome ended up with the view of transubstantiation, which effectively says
01:18:10.240 --> 01:18:16.320
that when the bread and wine are consecrated, they effectively cease to be the bread and wine,
01:18:16.320 --> 01:18:20.880
and they become the body and blood, and it's only the accidents that are remaining.
01:18:21.600 --> 01:18:24.960
So it still looks like bread and wine, but that's not really the case.
01:18:26.640 --> 01:18:31.520
The Reformed take the same logical position. They simply go in the other direction.
01:18:32.240 --> 01:18:38.560
They say that it can only be one of these things at a time. And obviously, it's still bread and
01:18:38.560 --> 01:18:44.800
wine, which it is. It's obviously bread and wine. And Paul's words say that. He says bread wine.
01:18:44.800 --> 01:18:49.200
Jesus says bread wine. There's no doubt in Scripture that that is completely true.
01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:56.560
The problem is that if you believe that the only thing that bread and wine can possibly be
01:18:56.560 --> 01:19:00.960
is bread and wine, well, it gets back to the argument about the hypostatic union.
01:19:01.520 --> 01:19:05.440
This is the reason that Lutherans refer to this as the sacramental union,
01:19:05.440 --> 01:19:12.640
that it is both simultaneously and we don't know how. We don't take the Catholic position of saying,
01:19:12.640 --> 01:19:17.520
well, it's not bread and wine. It's much more important for it to be the body and blood,
01:19:17.520 --> 01:19:22.720
which is true. Without the body and blood, there's no point. They're completely right about that.
01:19:22.720 --> 01:19:26.720
What they're wrong about is the rational conclusion that, well, we absolutely believe
01:19:26.720 --> 01:19:30.640
this Christ's body and blood and therefore the bread and wine have to be gone,
01:19:31.440 --> 01:19:37.440
all but completely gone. And there's their rational philosophical trash arguments to try
01:19:37.440 --> 01:19:41.920
to substantiate how that's okay. The Roman Catholics and the Reformed agree it can only
01:19:41.920 --> 01:19:49.200
be one or the other. The problem is that God says it's both. So eat the bread, drink the cup.
01:19:49.200 --> 01:19:53.280
Anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body drinks judgment on himself.
01:19:54.480 --> 01:20:02.400
Which is it? Is it the body or is it the bread? Yes, it's both. How? We don't know. That's it.
01:20:02.400 --> 01:20:08.480
We have the same response to these texts that Peter had to the whole scene in John 6. His response
01:20:08.480 --> 01:20:12.720
when Jesus, like, do you wander off? Do you not believe this? Like, Lord, to whom shall we go?
01:20:12.720 --> 01:20:18.640
You have the words of eternal life. That is the Christian confession. God, I don't know what's
01:20:18.640 --> 01:20:25.120
going on, but I believe you anyway. You said it. I believe it. And try to understand. Like, as we said,
01:20:25.120 --> 01:20:29.120
Catechesis teaching around these things is important. Jesus spent time teaching.
01:20:29.680 --> 01:20:33.840
The Church has always spent time teaching these things and teaching before communion.
01:20:33.840 --> 01:20:39.840
Because the other part of this passage is that there were people who died. They were killed by
01:20:39.840 --> 01:20:46.480
unworthy reception. And this goes to one of the errors and the crucial distinction
01:20:46.480 --> 01:20:52.240
between the Lutheran position and what our confessions call the sacramentarian position,
01:20:52.240 --> 01:20:58.560
which is effectively the Reformed position today. And that is that they will say, and you'll find
01:20:58.560 --> 01:21:04.240
this in much reform, particularly some of the Presbyterians, sound just like Lutherans up to
01:21:04.240 --> 01:21:10.480
the very end. They will say that there's a real presence. And if you don't press, you will think
01:21:10.480 --> 01:21:15.600
that we're in agreement. But when you do press, when you ask the right questions and you narrow
01:21:15.680 --> 01:21:23.120
it down, what comes out is that there is no body and blood in your mouth. That's a crucial distinction.
01:21:23.120 --> 01:21:27.600
That's what makes it a sacrament. That's what makes it complete. That's what makes it the
01:21:27.600 --> 01:21:34.240
antitype to the pipe type of the bread of the manna in the desert. Because if it's not actually
01:21:34.240 --> 01:21:41.680
Christ's body going in your mouth, you're not receiving what God promised. And when Paul talks
01:21:41.760 --> 01:21:47.600
about discerning the body, eating and drinking judgment on himself, he means it. And so the
01:21:47.600 --> 01:21:54.400
crucial distinction in the sacramentarian Reformed position is that it is a spiritual mode of presence.
01:21:55.120 --> 01:21:58.560
They will say that they believe it, and God bless them for it. I'm glad that they take it
01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:04.960
seriously. Thank you so much for not being Baptist because that is a far worse error. However,
01:22:05.920 --> 01:22:11.920
the problem with this is that it also denies part of this passage. Because in order for the
01:22:11.920 --> 01:22:20.400
sacramentarian view that there is a physical oral reception of only bread and wine, and then
01:22:21.520 --> 01:22:29.280
we spiritually ascend to the right hand of God, we receive his body and blood in a spiritual sense
01:22:29.360 --> 01:22:35.840
and a heavenly sense. The problem with that is that that requires faith. And what is said here
01:22:35.840 --> 01:22:43.520
in 1 Corinthians 11 is that they're people who ate unworthily, and God makes clear that they're
01:22:43.520 --> 01:22:48.640
guilty of the body and blood because they ate in an unworthy manner by not examining themselves
01:22:48.640 --> 01:22:58.880
and discerning the body and blood. This is crucial because if the Reformed are correct and you can
01:22:58.880 --> 01:23:05.120
have communion and it's all faith-based and it's all spiritual, there's no possibility for anyone
01:23:05.120 --> 01:23:09.360
to die because if you don't have faith, you cannot spiritually ascend to heaven to receive
01:23:09.360 --> 01:23:17.840
Christ's body and blood there. The only way that that mode of thought can work is if the damned,
01:23:17.840 --> 01:23:23.280
if those without faith, can also ascend to heaven to receive Christ's body and blood,
01:23:23.280 --> 01:23:30.160
and then they're killed for it, they're killed by it, that necessarily makes no sense. There's no
01:23:30.160 --> 01:23:35.760
possible ascent into heaven spiritually for those unbelievers, and it is unbelief that's being
01:23:35.760 --> 01:23:40.080
described there. When you're guilty concerning the body and blood of Christ because you don't discern
01:23:40.080 --> 01:23:46.240
it, it's a rejection of God. It's calling him a liar saying that what you said is not true. And so
01:23:47.120 --> 01:23:52.800
the reason for the Lutheran position, it's a literalist and it's mysterious. It's like,
01:23:52.800 --> 01:24:00.240
I don't know. I know this far and I know no further. And as we've said before, for me personally,
01:24:00.240 --> 01:24:05.760
that's always been enough. I don't feel the need to concern myself with trying to figure out the
01:24:05.760 --> 01:24:11.760
mechanisms and the math and the scales of all these things. When God says it, if I don't understand,
01:24:11.920 --> 01:24:17.280
okay, there's something I don't understand. Add it to the list. I have a very long list of things
01:24:17.280 --> 01:24:22.400
I don't understand. And particularly when we're looking at things that are necessarily spiritual,
01:24:22.400 --> 01:24:28.320
they're necessarily supernatural. They're outside of the material world. That's what we're talking
01:24:28.320 --> 01:24:33.920
about here. And remember, that's the crux of this. Because it is outside of the material world,
01:24:34.560 --> 01:24:40.880
all bets are off. You can't rationally figure out that which is inherently irrational because
01:24:40.880 --> 01:24:46.240
it's outside of creation. This is something different that God is doing in a special way.
01:24:46.960 --> 01:24:51.520
And so this one passage, when you look at all the various pieces of it,
01:24:52.160 --> 01:24:56.400
all the denominations are going to fall into their various buckets on one side or the other of
01:24:56.400 --> 01:25:02.400
these disputes. And I believe with a clean conscience that the only possible synthesis
01:25:02.400 --> 01:25:08.560
of this passage and the other passages is a Lutheran one, that it is truly Christ's body
01:25:08.560 --> 01:25:13.680
and blood, physically present. We don't know how. And again, this is not one of the early
01:25:13.680 --> 01:25:18.640
episodes we did on the clarity of Scripture. We go into this detail some more. We did about an hour
01:25:18.640 --> 01:25:25.280
specifically talking about this one debate around physical versus real because it blew up on Twitter
01:25:25.280 --> 01:25:30.000
nearly a year ago. There was a false teacher effectively spreading reform positions and
01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:34.880
pretending that they were Lutheran and causing Lutherans to abandon the Lutheran faith. Not
01:25:34.960 --> 01:25:38.960
that there's a difference in faith, but there's clearly a difference in belief and in practice.
01:25:41.120 --> 01:25:44.960
It's important to get this stuff right, and it's important to know clearly where the lines are
01:25:44.960 --> 01:25:50.560
because we all fall on one side or another. And if you hold a position contrary to what we're saying,
01:25:51.200 --> 01:25:56.320
you need to have an argument that stands up to effectively dismantling the one that we have. And
01:25:56.320 --> 01:26:02.320
I've read them. We're not giving you a fair shake here today by reading off clearly all the other
01:26:02.400 --> 01:26:07.440
affirmative positions for what everyone else believes, because we believe genuinely that
01:26:07.440 --> 01:26:14.320
there's no possibility for them to exist in totality with the very plain words of Scripture.
01:26:14.320 --> 01:26:18.960
Again, there's a tremendous amount in the Book of Concord that deals with these debates in all
01:26:18.960 --> 01:26:23.520
directions, deals with the Roman Catholics, deals with the Reformed, deals with the Anabaptists
01:26:23.520 --> 01:26:28.720
at great length. We're not referring to those confessions not because they're not good arguments,
01:26:28.720 --> 01:26:33.840
but because it's important to look at what God said just as they did. They've made very good
01:26:33.840 --> 01:26:38.240
arguments in that confessional document. The arguments are also from Scripture.
01:26:39.680 --> 01:26:46.560
And so I suppose that the Reformed listeners have expected the following phrase from two Lutherans
01:26:46.560 --> 01:26:55.440
since starting this episode. So I won't disappoint you. Is means is. And I would be remiss if I did
01:26:55.440 --> 01:27:01.760
not mention the Marburg colloquy in which Luther and Zwingli discuss the issue. It would probably be
01:27:01.760 --> 01:27:10.640
too charitable to say attempted to come to terms. But famously, at that debate, Luther carved into
01:27:10.640 --> 01:27:16.400
the table. We don't know if he carved it facing himself or upside down facing Zwingli. I happen
01:27:16.400 --> 01:27:23.120
to believe the latter is more likely. But he carved into the table hook est corpus meum,
01:27:23.120 --> 01:27:32.720
which is simply the Latin for this is my body. And that really is the simplicity of the Lutheran
01:27:32.720 --> 01:27:40.880
position. We take Christ at his words. When some will contend that they have a literal understanding
01:27:41.440 --> 01:27:47.920
of Scripture, I find a great deal of irony in that those who most vehemently insist they interpret
01:27:47.920 --> 01:27:55.120
Scripture literally never interpret the sacraments literally. They always reject at least almost
01:27:55.120 --> 01:28:00.880
always reject baptism and the Lord supper as being what Scripture very clearly says that they are.
01:28:02.320 --> 01:28:10.720
When Christ says this is my body, this is my blood. Well, that's what he means. He said it.
01:28:10.720 --> 01:28:17.840
He means it. Christ most certainly knew the word for symbol or symbolizes, represents,
01:28:18.480 --> 01:28:25.280
or is an allegory of whatever term you want to use. He did not use those words. He said,
01:28:25.920 --> 01:28:32.240
this is my body. And that is why that is the teaching that Lutherans affirm.
01:28:33.280 --> 01:28:39.760
Now, of course, you've undoubtedly heard arguments related to other parts of Scripture parables,
01:28:39.760 --> 01:28:47.200
where Christ taught, I am the vine or I am the door or any various things like that a number
01:28:47.200 --> 01:28:54.080
of different parables. I want to highlight a grammar point here. And grammar is not nitpicky
01:28:54.080 --> 01:28:59.600
grammar matters because grammar determines the meaning of the words you are using. The order
01:28:59.600 --> 01:29:07.360
of the words matters. The words you choose matters. All of these things contribute to the actual meaning
01:29:07.920 --> 01:29:11.120
that you intend and that will be taken away from what you have said.
01:29:12.560 --> 01:29:20.560
And so I want to highlight Christ says, I am the vine. He does not say I am a vine.
01:29:20.560 --> 01:29:24.400
There's a difference there, a very important difference. And yes,
01:29:24.400 --> 01:29:28.880
Greek can also distinguish between the definite and indefinite articles.
01:29:29.840 --> 01:29:34.320
So when Christ says, I am the vine, he is in fact the vine.
01:29:35.760 --> 01:29:45.440
Now, is he a literal vine? No, that's not what that is saying. It is saying that he is the vine
01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:50.560
literal in the sense of being, yes, it's a metaphorical vine. And yes, it does make sense
01:29:50.560 --> 01:29:56.720
to say something is literally metaphorically true. If on the other hand, he had said,
01:29:56.720 --> 01:30:02.880
I am a vine, that would have been him declaring that he is in fact a literal physical vine.
01:30:04.160 --> 01:30:07.360
In which case, perhaps we have to raise Lewis's trilemma.
01:30:08.720 --> 01:30:13.920
He also does not say I am a door. He says I am the door and he is in fact the door,
01:30:13.920 --> 01:30:20.800
because he is the only passage through which we can get to God. He is the only way to salvation.
01:30:20.800 --> 01:30:28.240
So he is in fact the door. So the contentions around those parables, those parabolic sayings,
01:30:29.760 --> 01:30:37.120
do not in any way argue against taking literally what Christ says about the bread and the wine
01:30:37.120 --> 01:30:44.800
in the supper. And so I want to read just four quick paragraphs here from the Lutheran confessions
01:30:44.800 --> 01:30:51.600
that state the Lutheran position on the Lord's Supper that state very clearly what we believe.
01:30:51.600 --> 01:30:54.560
These are from the epitome of the formula of Concord.
01:31:15.600 --> 01:31:22.720
So the bread does not signify Christ's absent body and the wine his absent blood,
01:31:23.280 --> 01:31:28.640
but because of the sacramental union the bread and wine are truly Christ's body and blood.
01:31:29.840 --> 01:31:35.200
Now about the consecration we believe teach and confess that no work of man or recitation of the
01:31:35.200 --> 01:31:41.120
minister produces this presence of Christ's body and blood in the holy supper. Instead,
01:31:41.680 --> 01:31:47.520
this presence is to be credited only and alone to the almighty power of our Lord Jesus Christ.
01:31:48.640 --> 01:31:54.240
At the same time we also believe teach and confess unanimously that in the use of the
01:31:54.240 --> 01:32:00.080
holy supper the words of Christ's institution should in no way be left out. Instead they should
01:32:00.080 --> 01:32:06.160
be publicly recited as it is written in 1 Corinthians 10.16, the cup of blessing that we
01:32:06.160 --> 01:32:11.360
bless and so forth. This blessing occurs through the reciting of Christ's words.
01:32:14.240 --> 01:32:19.200
And so those four paragraphs give a very brief statement of exactly what it is that
01:32:19.200 --> 01:32:24.720
Lutherans believe. Of course they're just a restatement of Scripture. We believe literally
01:32:25.280 --> 01:32:31.600
what the words of Scripture say and it may seem like we mentioned that to repeat that ad nauseam,
01:32:31.600 --> 01:32:36.480
but it is simply the case. In fact it is one thing that annoys many about Lutherans.
01:32:37.120 --> 01:32:41.680
We are simply going to insist on what the words of the book say because they're the
01:32:41.680 --> 01:32:46.560
word of God. That's why we believe them. We don't believe them because we happen to like the book.
01:32:47.280 --> 01:32:53.280
We believe them because having been given faith we believe the word of God. We believe
01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:59.680
that what is contained in Scripture is true because it is the inspired word of God.
01:33:00.240 --> 01:33:09.760
And so when God says this is my body we say yes. But he also says this bread is my body.
01:33:10.400 --> 01:33:15.280
Okay he said two things there. He said this is bread. We believe him. He said the bread is his
01:33:15.280 --> 01:33:21.360
body. We still believe him. We do not have to understand. We do not have to subject it to human
01:33:21.360 --> 01:33:29.040
reason in order to believe it because the ground of all truth said it. And if God says it it's true.
01:33:30.080 --> 01:33:35.200
It's very easy to believe this. You can simply affirm the truth of it. You don't have to work
01:33:35.200 --> 01:33:41.600
out the philosophical minutiae. In fact you cannot do so. But you don't have to do so.
01:33:42.480 --> 01:33:45.280
This again comes back to something we previously discussed.
01:33:47.840 --> 01:33:53.040
You don't believe the things in Scripture because you believe the things in Scripture.
01:33:54.000 --> 01:34:01.040
Let me clarify what I mean. You believe the things in Scripture because having been given
01:34:01.040 --> 01:34:09.520
faith you believe God is the author of Scripture and God being God who does not lie, who cannot lie,
01:34:09.520 --> 01:34:15.680
you believe that his word is true. Many reverse the order of operations there.
01:34:16.640 --> 01:34:23.760
They'll say I believe Scripture and therefore I believe in God. No. You believe God,
01:34:24.400 --> 01:34:29.920
therefore you believe in Scripture. It is the exact opposite way. Now if you're arguing with
01:34:29.920 --> 01:34:36.480
someone who is an unbeliever, who is an atheist, yes you can use secular reasoning to prove things
01:34:36.480 --> 01:34:42.480
in Scripture are true. You can use archaeology, history, etc. in order to prove Scripture
01:34:42.560 --> 01:34:47.920
to tear down some of the barriers to that person hearing the word of God and believing.
01:34:49.360 --> 01:34:56.320
But as a believer you believe the word of God is true because you believe that God is the one
01:34:56.320 --> 01:35:04.560
who inspired it. And just to emphasize to go back to Woe's point about the difference between
01:35:05.200 --> 01:35:09.920
the Romans and the Reformed. Conveniently both start with R.
01:35:10.640 --> 01:35:16.000
But the big difference between them as has been used many times before,
01:35:17.120 --> 01:35:23.520
the example of the illustration of falling off a horse. The Romans fall off the right side of the
01:35:23.520 --> 01:35:30.320
horse. It's not that they take it too literally, it's that they ignore part of it, subject it to
01:35:30.320 --> 01:35:35.840
reason, and say well it must simply be his body, it can't be bred at the same time. So they fall
01:35:35.840 --> 01:35:40.560
off the right side of the horse. For many of them I am willing to concede they are trying to believe
01:35:40.560 --> 01:35:47.120
what God says. But the problem is they aren't believing what God actually said. You have to
01:35:47.120 --> 01:35:54.880
look at what he said. This bred, it's bred, is my body, it's his body, it's both. The Reformed on
01:35:54.880 --> 01:36:00.800
the other hand, also subjecting the words of God to reason, fall off the left side of the horse,
01:36:01.440 --> 01:36:08.080
and say well it's bred, it tastes like bred, when I eat it, it feels like bred, it has
01:36:09.040 --> 01:36:15.440
all of the accidents of bred, it must be bred, and yes I'll hint there at the underlying philosophy,
01:36:15.440 --> 01:36:21.280
it's not really the point of this episode, but it is why we have some of these distinctions between
01:36:21.280 --> 01:36:27.200
the Romans and the Reformed. But so they fall off the left side of the horse and say it's bred,
01:36:27.200 --> 01:36:32.720
my senses all report that it is bred, I have to find some other explanation for God's words.
01:36:34.080 --> 01:36:38.960
Lutherans don't have this problem because God says it's bred, I eat it, it tastes like bred,
01:36:38.960 --> 01:36:45.280
okay it's bred, God says it's its body, if God says it's his body, I just believe him. So the
01:36:45.280 --> 01:36:52.880
Lutheran position is very simple, it is purely a matter of faith of course, because you have to
01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:59.680
believe this in faith, you can't eat the bread and know with your senses that Christ is present,
01:37:01.040 --> 01:37:05.200
and the only reason he's present is because of his word, as I just read from the book of
01:37:05.200 --> 01:37:10.240
Concord, that's what Lutherans affirm, he is present because of his word, and we know he is
01:37:10.240 --> 01:37:18.080
present because of his word, and so all of it flows from faith. And then I suppose I should address
01:37:18.320 --> 01:37:27.280
at least briefly the Reformed contention that comes up throughout discussions of the differences
01:37:27.280 --> 01:37:34.080
between Lutherans and Reformed, and that is this is again a difference in the application of reason,
01:37:34.080 --> 01:37:41.760
as should be unsurprising. The Reformed will assert finitum non-kapax infinity,
01:37:42.400 --> 01:37:46.880
which simply means the finite is not capable of the infinite.
01:37:49.920 --> 01:37:55.440
We will avoid getting into some of the theological weeds as it were here, so
01:37:55.440 --> 01:38:03.040
the Communicatio and such will leave aside to some degree, but the gist of the Reformed position,
01:38:03.680 --> 01:38:14.480
the central contention, is that Christ cannot be physically omnipresent according to his humanity
01:38:15.280 --> 01:38:24.800
because the communication of the divine attributes is impossible in its fullness with regard to the
01:38:24.800 --> 01:38:30.240
human nature, because the human nature is finite. I believe that is a fair statement
01:38:30.240 --> 01:38:37.040
of what the Reformed believe. The Lutheran contention, and quite frankly to be blunt,
01:38:37.040 --> 01:38:42.160
the contention of Scripture, is that the fullness of deity dwells bodily in Christ.
01:38:42.960 --> 01:38:48.480
That's just a quote from Scripture, that's a verse. And so when Scripture says that,
01:38:49.120 --> 01:38:55.680
that necessarily means something, and so the personal union of God and man in Christ
01:38:56.560 --> 01:39:04.560
is indivisible, inseparable, where the divinity of Christ is present, the humanity of Christ is
01:39:04.560 --> 01:39:10.320
present, because Christ is an indivisible person, having assumed the humanity into himself.
01:39:12.240 --> 01:39:20.480
And so the humanity of Christ has and exercises the divine attributes of Christ. It does not have
01:39:20.480 --> 01:39:26.880
them in itself by its nature, because we do not teach that there is a mixing of the natures in
01:39:26.880 --> 01:39:36.080
the person of Christ. We went over this previously in other episodes. But Christ, even according to
01:39:36.080 --> 01:39:44.400
his humanity, is omnipresent because of that communication of the divine attributes, omnipresence
01:39:44.400 --> 01:39:51.200
being properly an attribute of the divinity, but because of the communication of attributes
01:39:51.200 --> 01:39:58.400
being an attribute of the person, the person being the totality of Christ, fully God, fully man.
01:39:59.200 --> 01:40:06.880
And so the argument that the finite is not capable of the infinite is simply refuted by Scripture
01:40:06.880 --> 01:40:13.280
and refuted by not terribly complicated theology. Yes, a little bit, but not horribly so.
01:40:15.120 --> 01:40:22.800
A simpler version of that argument that I think everyone will be immediately able to grasp,
01:40:23.360 --> 01:40:30.560
quite fully, to refute the idea that the finite is not capable of the infinite in
01:40:30.560 --> 01:40:34.080
this particular way, whatever it is, and specifically the reform meme.
01:40:36.400 --> 01:40:37.600
The refutation is Mary.
01:40:37.760 --> 01:40:47.440
And the reason for that is simple. Mary bore in her womb for nine months the infinite God.
01:40:49.840 --> 01:40:58.240
Could there be other than the person of Christ himself, but this is even a more visceral and
01:40:58.240 --> 01:41:04.960
easier to grasp illustration of the principle, really. Could there be any more clear example
01:41:05.040 --> 01:41:11.760
of the finite holding, containing, being capable of the infinite
01:41:12.480 --> 01:41:19.040
than Mary having Christ in her womb? I don't think there is. And so if Mary could have the
01:41:19.040 --> 01:41:24.240
infinite God in her womb, then the finite is most certainly capable of the infinite.
01:41:24.240 --> 01:41:31.920
And the only way to reject that would be to reject the personal union, which would be rank heresy.
01:41:32.720 --> 01:41:39.840
I think everything that you just said is really boiled down by going back to a portion of the
01:41:39.840 --> 01:41:46.640
middle of that passage from John 6. Jesus says again, I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate
01:41:46.640 --> 01:41:51.200
the manna and the wilderness and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven,
01:41:51.200 --> 01:41:56.160
so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven.
01:41:56.160 --> 01:42:01.040
If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for
01:42:01.040 --> 01:42:06.880
the life of the world is my flesh. The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying,
01:42:06.880 --> 01:42:14.880
how can this man give us his flesh to eat? That's really the whole argument, because while these
01:42:14.880 --> 01:42:19.600
things will often boil down to, well, what does the text say, which is always a good question,
01:42:20.320 --> 01:42:26.880
as Corey was dealing with right there at the end, the underlying question is, can God do it?
01:42:27.440 --> 01:42:34.240
And they have first answered, no, God can't. And therefore, they must find in a text some other
01:42:34.240 --> 01:42:40.400
version that lets God not being able to do something be in accord with Scripture. Because
01:42:40.400 --> 01:42:46.320
if you simply believe what Scripture says, you don't have the problem. And you don't have to
01:42:46.320 --> 01:42:52.080
worry about John 6 being eucharistic, because it's all just figurative language. What's the
01:42:52.160 --> 01:42:58.400
same problem that the Jews had? How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Well, exactly the same
01:42:58.400 --> 01:43:04.880
way that Jesus had done the day before with the feeding of the 5,000. Five loaves and two fishes
01:43:04.880 --> 01:43:13.040
turned into 12 baskets of leftovers after probably 20,000 people had eaten. That's how God can do it.
01:43:13.040 --> 01:43:19.280
God works miracles. He works material miracles in the world. And we don't have to worry about it.
01:43:19.280 --> 01:43:24.400
His very demonstration of power, which is given incidentally by their demand, they said,
01:43:24.400 --> 01:43:29.760
give us a sign. They were constantly demanding signs for him to back up his teaching. And so
01:43:29.760 --> 01:43:35.920
sometimes he did. And the sign that he gave them on that day, he didn't cause a dove to appear.
01:43:35.920 --> 01:43:41.920
He didn't cause the clouds to part. What did he do? He took a small amount, a finite amount,
01:43:42.560 --> 01:43:48.160
and created in that day effectively an infinite amount. There was such a super abundance that
01:43:48.160 --> 01:43:54.320
there was more than they could have possibly eaten. That's how God does it. Is that an answer? No.
01:43:55.120 --> 01:44:00.720
It doesn't explain anything beyond just believing. God is like, okay, he delivered. If he can feed
01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:06.960
20,000 people with a basket full of food, I think he can deliver on this promise too.
01:44:07.520 --> 01:44:14.240
And what does he say? He says, I am the bread of life. I will give for the life of the world.
01:44:14.240 --> 01:44:22.080
It's my flesh. It's the same thing. Communion is vital because it delivers the forgiveness of sins.
01:44:22.960 --> 01:44:27.680
Again, the miracle that Jesus performed with the food was just to feed their bellies.
01:44:27.680 --> 01:44:31.520
But the very next day, all the teaching was, this is not about feeding your bellies because
01:44:31.520 --> 01:44:36.160
we skipped a few verses at the beginning of that, where they were demanding a bread king.
01:44:37.200 --> 01:44:42.640
This guy can do miracles. He can feed everybody, put him in charge. No one will ever go hungry
01:44:42.640 --> 01:44:46.320
again. I want this guy to be my king. He's like, no, that's not why I'm here.
01:44:47.120 --> 01:44:51.200
Your fathers were fed in the desert and they still died, even though the food they were giving
01:44:51.200 --> 01:44:57.760
was miraculous. This food that I'm giving you is an even greater miracle. Those who will eat
01:44:57.760 --> 01:45:03.840
this food will never die. And yet, what does he say even then? Jesus said a little while later,
01:45:03.840 --> 01:45:10.000
whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood has eternal life and I will raise him up on the
01:45:10.080 --> 01:45:18.720
last day. So note that he's talking both about eternal life and about corporeal death. The only
01:45:18.720 --> 01:45:23.520
reason that a man would need to be raised up on the last day was that he died. So this medicine of
01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:31.680
immortality, this eternal life that's being given by his flesh, by the bread, it's not the tree of
01:45:31.680 --> 01:45:37.440
life from the garden where a man lives forever. This is delivering forgiveness of sins, which
01:45:38.320 --> 01:45:44.160
is how God delivers resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. See, forgiveness
01:45:44.160 --> 01:45:50.160
of sins, which is delivered through faith underpins all of this. It's why it's not a memorial meal,
01:45:50.160 --> 01:45:55.760
it's a sacrament. It's delivering an actual means of grace. God's doing something here. And what
01:45:55.760 --> 01:46:01.120
he's doing is one of the most important things that he's ever done. He's taking the sacrifice on
01:46:01.120 --> 01:46:07.760
the cross once for all and he's delivering it materially in our mouths. As we said and we emphasized
01:46:07.760 --> 01:46:14.800
for two hours in the baptism episode, it's for our comfort. When we receive the body and blood of
01:46:14.800 --> 01:46:20.320
Christ in our mouth, we know that God is delivering on his promises because, yes, we have faith and
01:46:20.320 --> 01:46:25.360
we trust in God and God knows we need more. He knows we need comfort, we need reassurance.
01:46:26.240 --> 01:46:31.840
He pours out more than we actually need because he's giving us everything we could possibly need
01:46:31.840 --> 01:46:38.160
or want. And so when the sacraments are given to us, not us doing them, but God giving them,
01:46:38.160 --> 01:46:44.240
he's delivering forgiveness, he's delivering faith, he's strengthening faith, and he's ensuring that
01:46:44.240 --> 01:46:49.120
no one has any reason to doubt. Because we said in the baptism episode, even if there's a day where
01:46:49.120 --> 01:46:55.200
you doubt how hard you believe, how well you believe, how strong your faith is, if the only anchor that
01:46:55.200 --> 01:47:01.040
you have on that day is your confidence in your baptism, that's still, it's an anchor. It's holding
01:47:01.040 --> 01:47:07.040
you fast to the cross. The forgiveness of sins delivered in communion is the same thing. And
01:47:07.040 --> 01:47:12.880
the beautiful distinction between baptism, the sacrament, and the sacrament of the altar is that
01:47:12.880 --> 01:47:18.560
this is something that's given for us weekly. Jesus says, do this as often as you drink of it
01:47:18.560 --> 01:47:24.640
in remembrance of me. It's to be a regular meal. It's not to be infrequent. It should really be
01:47:24.640 --> 01:47:29.600
every week. And frankly, if you can do it more often, that's good. If you do it less often, it's
01:47:29.600 --> 01:47:35.760
not that, oh well, you went beneath the threshold, so you can't be saved now. It's not like some drug
01:47:35.760 --> 01:47:41.040
dosage. Because again, as we said in the baptism episode, and we'll save repeatedly, because it's
01:47:41.040 --> 01:47:48.560
so vital. It is finished means that all of your sins are already paid for. The fact that you have
01:47:48.560 --> 01:47:53.760
faith to believe that means that all of your sins are paid for and delivered to you through faith,
01:47:53.760 --> 01:47:59.840
in eternity. Your name is written in the book of life. Your name is tied to God's name in your
01:47:59.840 --> 01:48:08.560
baptism, and he gives you forgiveness of sins in the blood and in the body through bread and wine,
01:48:08.560 --> 01:48:12.720
so that there's never any doubt. There's no room for doubt. Even if you doubt yourself,
01:48:12.720 --> 01:48:17.280
even if you have a really bad day, all these things that God pours out through the sacraments,
01:48:17.360 --> 01:48:23.680
particularly eliminate the possibility for a man to think, well, I don't know. Maybe I'm out.
01:48:23.680 --> 01:48:30.000
Maybe this is just, I don't feel it anymore. I don't know if I can trust in God. Well, if you can
01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:34.320
at least trust in his promises, you can work your way back. He will work you back. He's using these
01:48:34.320 --> 01:48:42.560
to hang on to you. And sometimes it's necessary. This food, this medicine that's given to us
01:48:43.120 --> 01:48:49.360
preserves our faith and our health in God. And sometimes it's also a lifeline. But if we're being
01:48:49.360 --> 01:48:56.720
sustained regularly in the body and in the Word, we have more than we need. And so God keeps us safe.
01:48:56.720 --> 01:49:02.000
He keeps our faith preserved. And the reason that the sacraments are so important to Lutherans and
01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:06.720
should be important to everyone, we believe as Lutheran doctrine presents it, is that
01:49:07.680 --> 01:49:14.080
all of the other variations will sow doubt to some degree, some much more than others. We're not
01:49:14.080 --> 01:49:19.520
saying they're all equally incorrect. Some are a little bit off. Some are very terribly off.
01:49:20.240 --> 01:49:25.600
But anytime you're giving up on any of God's promises, you're missing out. And that's the
01:49:25.600 --> 01:49:31.280
point. It's not about winning this argument. It's not about changing minds or having a higher score
01:49:31.280 --> 01:49:36.320
on the board. It's about making sure that all these things that God says are really important
01:49:36.400 --> 01:49:42.800
and these things that deliver immortality take it. It's a free gift. It's freely given.
01:49:42.800 --> 01:49:48.800
Just as our faith is freely given, all this stuff is poured out. And we need to just receive it
01:49:48.800 --> 01:49:55.600
in thanksgiving and in gladness and in faith and in taking it seriously, not being dismissive of it.
01:49:56.320 --> 01:50:01.600
When we're warned that we should examine ourselves before communing, we should take that seriously.
01:50:02.400 --> 01:50:08.160
It's something that I think if some of the people who are causing problems in the world today inside
01:50:08.160 --> 01:50:15.280
the church actually reflected sincerely on the controversies that they've stirred up and the
01:50:15.280 --> 01:50:22.400
injury that they've done, they would repent before they communed, which is the goal. The goal is to
01:50:22.400 --> 01:50:28.560
instill repentance in us for us to turn away from all of our wickedness. We all crucify Christ
01:50:28.560 --> 01:50:35.120
every day with our evil actions. And yet, once for all, it was paid. And when this stuff is given
01:50:35.120 --> 01:50:40.480
to us in Scripture and it's given to us in physical means and the sacraments, it's to reassure us
01:50:40.480 --> 01:50:45.440
that God is going to keep every promise he's ever made. Because ultimately, that is the only thing
01:50:45.440 --> 01:50:50.480
that we can actually count on. You can't count on the sun rising. You can't count on your family
01:50:50.480 --> 01:50:56.080
liking you. You can't count on your heart not stopping, but you can count on God. And when you
01:50:56.080 --> 01:51:01.520
count on that, the rest of those things, while there's still concerns, they can't be worries.
01:51:02.080 --> 01:51:08.480
You can't worry when you have your faith rooted in all of God's promises. Everything else is,
01:51:09.040 --> 01:51:13.680
it's highly desirable, it's nice to have, but it's no longer critical. You don't have to have
01:51:14.320 --> 01:51:18.240
the stuff. You have to have God's promises. And he gives those for free.
01:51:19.040 --> 01:51:26.160
And so we will close out this episode with three quotes, one from the large catechism,
01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:32.480
one from what was effectively Luther's last will and testament, as he intended it at any rate.
01:51:33.120 --> 01:51:41.120
And then one other quote, and then a little bit about the history, just some quick tidbits
01:51:41.120 --> 01:51:45.680
from the history of the beliefs of the church with regard to the Lord's supper.
01:51:45.680 --> 01:51:50.320
And so first from the large catechism.
01:52:15.680 --> 01:52:30.320
Here also we do not wish to enter into controversy and fight with the defamers and blasphemers of
01:52:30.320 --> 01:52:36.240
this sacrament, but to learn first, as we did with baptism, what is of the greatest importance.
01:52:36.960 --> 01:52:42.720
The chief point is God's word and ordinance or command, for the sacrament has not been invented
01:52:42.720 --> 01:52:49.520
or introduced by any man. Without anyone's counsel and deliberation it has been instituted by Christ.
01:52:49.520 --> 01:52:54.320
The Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the Creed keep their nature and worth,
01:52:54.320 --> 01:53:00.800
even if you never keep, pray, or believe them. So also this honorable sacrament remains undisturbed.
01:53:01.360 --> 01:53:06.480
Nothing is withdrawn or taken from it, even though we use it and administer it unworthily.
01:53:07.120 --> 01:53:11.440
Do you think God cares about what we do or believe, as though on that account
01:53:11.440 --> 01:53:16.720
he should allow his ordinance to be changed? Why in all worldly matters everything stays the
01:53:16.720 --> 01:53:20.880
way God has created and ordered it, no matter how we employ or use it?
01:53:22.160 --> 01:53:27.520
This point must always be taught, for by it the chatter of nearly all the fanatical spirits can
01:53:27.520 --> 01:53:33.200
be repelled, for they regard the sacraments unlike God's word as something that we do.
01:53:34.080 --> 01:53:40.560
Now what is the sacrament of the altar? Answer, it is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus
01:53:40.560 --> 01:53:46.320
Christ in and under the bread and wine, which we Christians are commanded by Christ's word to eat
01:53:46.320 --> 01:53:53.120
and to drink. Just as we have said that baptism is not simple water, so here also we say that though
01:53:53.120 --> 01:53:58.800
the sacrament is bread and wine, it is not mere bread and wine, such as are ordinarily served at
01:53:58.800 --> 01:54:05.920
the table. But this is bread and wine included in and connected with God's word. It is the word I
01:54:05.920 --> 01:54:12.160
say that makes and sets this sacrament apart, so it is not mere bread and wine, but is and is called
01:54:12.160 --> 01:54:18.720
Christ's body and blood. For it is said, when the word is joined to the element or natural substance,
01:54:18.720 --> 01:54:24.400
it becomes a sacrament. This saying of St. Augustine is so properly and so well put,
01:54:24.400 --> 01:54:29.760
that he is scarcely said anything better. The word must make a sacrament out of the element,
01:54:29.760 --> 01:54:35.680
or else it remains a mere element. Now it is not the word or ordinance of a prince or emperor,
01:54:36.080 --> 01:54:41.440
but it is the word of the grand majesty, at whose feet all creatures should fall and affirm it as
01:54:41.440 --> 01:54:48.960
he says, and accept it with all reverence, fear and humility. With this word you can strengthen
01:54:48.960 --> 01:54:53.920
your conscience and say, if a hundred thousand devils together with all fanatics should rush
01:54:53.920 --> 01:54:59.840
forward crying, how can bread and wine be Christ's body and blood, and such I know that all spirits
01:54:59.840 --> 01:55:04.560
and scholars together are not as wise as is the divine majesty in his little finger.
01:55:05.520 --> 01:55:12.160
Now here stands Christ's word, take, eat, this is my body, drink of it all of you,
01:55:12.160 --> 01:55:17.920
this is my blood of the New Testament, and so on. Here we stop to watch those who will call
01:55:17.920 --> 01:55:24.160
themselves his masters, and make the matter different from what he has spoken. It is true,
01:55:24.160 --> 01:55:29.360
indeed, that if you take away the word, or regard the sacrament without the words,
01:55:29.360 --> 01:55:34.240
you have nothing but mere bread and wine. But if the words remain with them,
01:55:34.240 --> 01:55:40.000
as they shall and must, then by virtue of the words it is truly Christ's body and blood,
01:55:40.640 --> 01:55:46.000
what Christ slips say and speak, so it is, he can never lie or deceive.
01:55:48.320 --> 01:55:53.600
The second quote is from Luther's Confession Concerning Christ Supper.
01:55:54.320 --> 01:56:00.240
This one was effectively what Luther intended as his last will and testament,
01:56:00.240 --> 01:56:04.880
and you'll note that he concerned himself not with the disposition of his estate or any such
01:56:04.880 --> 01:56:11.040
matters, although those were handled as well elsewhere, he concerned himself with the Lord's
01:56:11.040 --> 01:56:15.680
Supper. That was how centrally important this was to the Reformer.
01:56:15.680 --> 01:56:23.200
I see that schisms and errors are increasing proportionately with the passage of time,
01:56:23.760 --> 01:56:30.160
and that there is no end to the rage and fury of Satan, hence lest any persons during my lifetime
01:56:30.160 --> 01:56:36.080
or after my death appeal to me or misuse my writings to confirm their error,
01:56:36.080 --> 01:56:41.760
as the sacramentarian and baptist fanatics are already beginning to do. I desire with this
01:56:41.760 --> 01:56:48.720
treatise to confess my faith before God and all the world, point by point. I am determined to abide
01:56:48.720 --> 01:56:55.280
by it until my death and so help me God, in this faith to depart from this world, and to appear
01:56:55.280 --> 01:57:01.760
before the judgment seat of our Lord Jesus Christ. Hence, if any one shall say after my death,
01:57:01.760 --> 01:57:06.400
if Luther were living now, he would teach and hold this or that article differently,
01:57:06.480 --> 01:57:13.040
for he did not consider it sufficiently, etc. Let me say once and for all that by the grace of
01:57:13.040 --> 01:57:19.200
God I have most diligently traced all these articles through the scriptures, have examined them again
01:57:19.200 --> 01:57:24.720
and again in the light thereof, and have wanted to defend all of them as certainly as I have now
01:57:24.720 --> 01:57:30.960
defended the sacrament of the altar. I am not drunk or irresponsible, I know what I am saying,
01:57:30.960 --> 01:57:35.760
and I well realize what this will mean for me before the last judgment at the coming of the
01:57:35.760 --> 01:57:42.080
Lord Jesus Christ. Let no one make this out to be a joke or idle talk. I am in dead earnest,
01:57:42.080 --> 01:57:47.680
since by the grace of God I have learned to know a great deal about Satan. If he can twist and pervert
01:57:47.680 --> 01:57:53.200
the word of God in the scriptures, what will he not be able to do with my or someone else's words?
01:57:54.800 --> 01:58:01.120
In the same way I also say and confess that in the sacrament of the altar the true body and
01:58:01.120 --> 01:58:06.960
blood of Christ are orally eaten and drunk in the bread and wine, even if the priests who distribute
01:58:06.960 --> 01:58:13.040
them or those who receive them do not believe or otherwise misuse the sacrament. It does not rest
01:58:13.040 --> 01:58:18.800
on man's belief or unbelief, but on the word and ordinance of God, unless they first change
01:58:18.800 --> 01:58:24.000
God's word and ordinance and misinterpret them as the enemies of the sacrament do at the present
01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:29.840
time. They indeed have only bread and wine, for they do not also have the words and instituted
01:58:29.840 --> 01:58:34.480
ordinance of God, but have perverted and changed it according to their own imagination.
01:58:36.320 --> 01:58:43.360
And for the third quote. The amazing thing, meanwhile, is that of all the fathers, as many as
01:58:43.360 --> 01:58:49.360
you can name, not one has ever spoken about the sacrament as these fanatics do. None of them
01:58:49.360 --> 01:58:55.360
uses such an expression as, it is simply bread and wine, or Christ's body and blood are not present.
01:58:56.000 --> 01:59:00.960
Yet since this subject is so frequently discussed by them, it is impossible that they should not at
01:59:00.960 --> 01:59:07.520
some time have let slip such an expression as, it is simply bread, or not that the body of Christ
01:59:07.520 --> 01:59:13.120
is physically present or the like. Since they are greatly concerned not to mislead the people,
01:59:13.120 --> 01:59:18.080
actually they simply proceed to speak as if no one doubted that Christ's body and blood are present.
01:59:18.720 --> 01:59:24.240
Certainly, among so many fathers and so many writings, a negative argument should have turned
01:59:24.240 --> 01:59:32.000
up at least once, as happens in other articles, but actually they all stand uniformly and consistently
01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:38.480
on the affirmative side. That quote is speaking of the church fathers.
01:59:39.680 --> 01:59:46.880
And in the church fathers, you will not find a denial of the real present, of the real presence
01:59:46.880 --> 01:59:53.120
of the sacramental union. You will find affirmation after affirmation after affirmation of this
01:59:53.120 --> 02:00:03.200
teaching. And so to close out, I will end with a bit of the history of this with regard to the
02:00:03.200 --> 02:00:10.000
early church. This ties into the fact that you will not find a different teaching on this subject
02:00:10.000 --> 02:00:14.640
in the church fathers, because this is the unanimous voice of the historic church.
02:00:17.520 --> 02:00:22.080
During the Roman persecution, the particularly heinous parts of the Roman persecution,
02:00:22.800 --> 02:00:29.120
of the early Christians, of the early church. One of the charges, one of the common charges,
02:00:29.120 --> 02:00:36.400
was a charge of cannibalism. And that charge was leveled against Christians because of the
02:00:36.400 --> 02:00:42.640
teaching on the Lord's Supper. Now, you may think, well they would still say that because
02:00:42.640 --> 02:00:49.360
of the words, even if no. They were given the opportunity to recant or to explain what they
02:00:49.360 --> 02:00:54.000
meant before they were sentenced to death, typically thrown to the lions, although
02:00:54.000 --> 02:00:58.480
other punishments were also used depending on the emperor and the one passing judgment.
02:01:00.960 --> 02:01:06.640
If they had simply said, no we believe in a spiritual presence, echoing the Reformed,
02:01:06.640 --> 02:01:12.880
or if they had simply said, no this is merely a memorial for Christ, echoing the Baptists,
02:01:13.920 --> 02:01:16.480
they would not have been executed for what they believed.
02:01:16.720 --> 02:01:26.160
Those in the early church who were subjected to persecution on account of Christ, on account of
02:01:26.160 --> 02:01:32.160
the teaching regarding the Lord's Supper, were willing to go to the lions, were willing to die
02:01:33.120 --> 02:01:40.000
rather than to affirm any of the various false teachings that are today held by many traditions,
02:01:40.720 --> 02:01:47.200
many denominations. All they had to do was say no it's a spiritual presence, no it's a memorial,
02:01:47.200 --> 02:01:51.120
and they would not have been sentenced to death. Because if they had said that,
02:01:51.120 --> 02:01:55.040
they would have been just another mystery cult. The Roman Empire had plenty of those,
02:01:55.040 --> 02:01:58.480
those were normal, if you want to be weird in the corner that's fine, you do that.
02:01:59.360 --> 02:02:04.960
It was the charge of cannibalism and the insistence of the early Christians that know
02:02:05.920 --> 02:02:12.640
we consume the body and blood of our Savior in this sacrament, that is what sentenced them to
02:02:12.640 --> 02:02:20.400
death, and they were willing to die for it. Because when you are called upon to affirm
02:02:20.400 --> 02:02:29.280
scriptural truth, when you are called upon to affirm right doctrine, even if failing to do so,
02:02:29.920 --> 02:02:36.160
even if denying those truths would save your life, you are required and in fact you are probably
02:02:36.160 --> 02:02:41.520
more required in the case where your life is in jeopardy, you are required to affirm the truth
02:02:41.520 --> 02:02:48.720
and to die for your faith. That is what it means to suffer persecution gladly. It is when you are
02:02:48.720 --> 02:02:54.560
persecuted specifically for your faith that you stand up and declare the truth and suffer the
02:02:54.560 --> 02:03:00.880
consequences. It is not in regards to the left-hand kingdom, in regard to politics and secular issues,
02:03:00.880 --> 02:03:05.200
that is a separate matter, and we have discussed that previously and will certainly get into it
02:03:05.200 --> 02:03:11.760
more in future episodes. But when it comes to the truth of the faith, when it comes to the word of
02:03:11.760 --> 02:03:19.680
God, we are to affirm the truth whatever the consequences may be. And that is what the early
02:03:19.760 --> 02:03:26.400
Christian Church did when faced with the option of either deny the real presence,
02:03:27.120 --> 02:03:33.280
deny the sacramental union, that presence of Christ in the Supper, in, with, and under the
02:03:33.280 --> 02:03:41.760
bread and wine, deny it or die, they chose to die. Because that is how important the Lord Supper is,
02:03:42.640 --> 02:03:48.480
because as stated before there are two sacraments in the Christian religion, two core sacraments,
02:03:48.480 --> 02:03:53.760
again, we will not argue, quibble over whether or not there are some other sacramental things or
02:03:53.760 --> 02:04:00.560
sacraments. But there is baptism and there is the Lord Supper. Baptism is the ordinary means
02:04:01.360 --> 02:04:07.680
in the sense of traditional or proper. It is the ordinary means by which one enters into the family
02:04:07.680 --> 02:04:15.280
of God. One enters into that covenant, one is given faith and salvation. And the Lord Supper
02:04:15.280 --> 02:04:20.480
is how that is strengthened. It is how you are kept in the faith. And of course, both
02:04:21.440 --> 02:04:26.080
must be with the word, for a sacrament is a pairing together of an element and the word.
02:04:27.280 --> 02:04:32.560
These are the means of grace. These are the things instituted by God for the salvation
02:04:32.560 --> 02:04:38.160
of your soul. And so they are worth defending, even unto death.
WEBVTT
00:00:00 – 00:00:05: If you are new to our channel e3, please subscribe to at least one for more recipes and videos.
00:00:30 – 00:00:46: Welcome to the Stone Choir podcast. I am Corey J. Mahler and I'm still whoa. On today's Stone
00:00:46 – 00:00:52: Choir we're going to be discussing Communion or the Sacrum or the Altar or the Eucharist. We
00:00:52 – 00:00:58: are doing kind of a collection here. We began with baptism about a month ago, about two weeks
00:00:58 – 00:01:04: ago, we did the Reformation episode and we thought that we would end up that sort of grouping with a
00:01:04 – 00:01:10: discussion of Communion because they all go together and we'll explain kind of how that works
00:01:10 – 00:01:16: historically. I mentioned in the Reformation episode that there are effectively four distinct
00:01:16 – 00:01:21: groups that emerged from the Reformation, at least by Lutheran standards. There are obviously the
00:01:21 – 00:01:25: Roman Catholics who remained Roman Catholic. Their doctrine really didn't change much at
00:01:25 – 00:01:30: Trent. It did change but not much. You have the Lutherans who emerged from the Roman Catholic
00:01:30 – 00:01:37: Church. You have the Reformed and you have the Anabaptists. And the reason that we divide everybody
00:01:37 – 00:01:43: else, including ourselves into those four distinct groups, has to do with the nature of the arguments
00:01:43 – 00:01:49: in the Reformation itself. So obviously the Reformation principally was kicked off based on
00:01:50 – 00:01:55: disagreement about justification. So on one side you have Rome with one approach to justification
00:01:55 – 00:02:00: and on the other side you have the Protestants with a different version of justification,
00:02:00 – 00:02:07: effectively faith alone, grace alone. As soon as the Reformation kicked off, there were immediately
00:02:07 – 00:02:13: additional arguments within the Protestant camp about a bunch of other stuff. Because as we said
00:02:13 – 00:02:18: in the Reformation episode, like the gates were open, once people started asking the question,
00:02:18 – 00:02:25: what did the Roman Catholic Church get wrong, it became a matter of concern. Well, you know,
00:02:25 – 00:02:33: did how many things did they get wrong? And unfortunately a lot of people reflexively went
00:02:33 – 00:02:39: way too far in rejecting things that were not distinctives of the Roman Catholic Church, but in
00:02:39 – 00:02:44: fact just been traditional Christian doctrine in the east and the west, going back to the very
00:02:44 – 00:02:54: beginning of the Church. So the initial division was on justification. The substantial immediate
00:02:54 – 00:02:59: divisions after that were about the sacraments. The two principal sacraments that Lutherans
00:02:59 – 00:03:05: recognize are baptism, which we did an entire episode on, and communion. And as we mentioned
00:03:05 – 00:03:10: in the baptism episode, Lutherans and Roman Catholics are more or less in agreement on
00:03:10 – 00:03:15: almost all baptism. There's a small matter of disagreement surrounding original sin as
00:03:15 – 00:03:21: it interacts with baptism, but otherwise we're pretty much on the same page. And when you look
00:03:21 – 00:03:28: at communion, there are very significant differences between Lutheran and Roman Catholic doctrine
00:03:28 – 00:03:32: that were initially part of the arguments of Lutheran and the other. Lutheran reformers
00:03:32 – 00:03:38: had against Rome, but almost immediately all of the other people who had also left Rome but
00:03:38 – 00:03:45: didn't agree with the Lutheran position went so much further that looking backward today,
00:03:46 – 00:03:52: Lutherans effectively get lumped in with Roman Catholics in terms of communion. A lot of people,
00:03:52 – 00:03:58: if they're coming from certainly like a Baptist upbringing, when you look at Lutheran doctrine
00:03:58 – 00:04:03: on baptism and communion, you're going to say these guys are just papas. These guys are Catholics.
00:04:04 – 00:04:09: And like you said, there's significant disagreements on communion, but there's so much
00:04:09 – 00:04:15: more significant between Lutherans and the Reformed and the Baptists that they're kind of right.
00:04:15 – 00:04:21: And so there's not a clean division of three and one anymore. It's almost kind of one and one and a
00:04:21 – 00:04:26: half and then the other two. And so we'll talk a little bit down the road about in the Lutheran
00:04:26 – 00:04:34: Confessions, initially what began as us disputing with Rome very quickly became a four-way fight
00:04:34 – 00:04:39: with what the Confessions call the Sacramentarians. Today it's the Reformed and the Anabaptists,
00:04:39 – 00:04:44: which today are Baptists. And those four distinct bodies, the reason we consider those distinct
00:04:44 – 00:04:50: is that none of them agree on both sacraments. They'll fall into one camp or the other on either of
00:04:50 – 00:04:56: them, such that there's no possible substantial agreement about doctrine among any of them.
00:04:56 – 00:05:02: There cannot be any sort of unity until we overcome those disagreements about the sacraments.
00:05:02 – 00:05:07: So that's why they're foundational issues. And that's probably why we're going to do this episode.
00:05:07 – 00:05:11: As we said before, we don't do too many episodes. They're kind of systematic theology.
00:05:11 – 00:05:15: And we're not trying to sell Lutheranism. Obviously we're Lutheran. We think it's important,
00:05:15 – 00:05:19: but we had a lot of questions about it. And it's, like I said, it really nicely bookends
00:05:19 – 00:05:26: the Reformation episode with the Baptism episode in terms of, like, here's why we have these
00:05:26 – 00:05:31: different groups. Why did I mention in the Reformation episode that Lutherans just kind of
00:05:31 – 00:05:37: laugh when Reformed guys think that we're part of the same camp? Like, it seems alien to us.
00:05:37 – 00:05:41: And it has to do with Communion. It doesn't have to do with Baptism. It has to do with Communion.
00:05:42 – 00:05:46: And so working through these issues, at least explaining them, like,
00:05:46 – 00:05:51: I'm, this is an episode that I said earlier on Twitter teasing it, that this is going to make
00:05:51 – 00:05:56: everybody mad. Because what we say is going to disagree with everything that everyone else believes
00:05:56 – 00:06:00: unless you're Lutheran. And even some of the Lutherans are going to get mad at some of the things
00:06:00 – 00:06:05: we say, because a couple of things we say disagree with Luther, but don't disagree with the Confessions,
00:06:05 – 00:06:09: because they weren't always completely aligned. And it's not something to worry about. But like,
00:06:09 – 00:06:17: it's just, it's how things play out in history. So to begin, we're going to dig in in John 6.
00:06:17 – 00:06:24: This is one of the first areas where we don't agree with some of what Luther ended up saying down the
00:06:24 – 00:06:31: road. John 6 is the chapter that begins with the Feeding of the 5000. And then it's what's called
00:06:31 – 00:06:39: the Bread of Life Discourse. And it's a beautiful chapter. It's a very long chapter in John. And
00:06:39 – 00:06:44: there's so much theology packed into it. The reason we wanted to begin there is that our view
00:06:45 – 00:06:50: in distinction from Luther's, but again, as I said, not in distinction from what the Confessions
00:06:50 – 00:06:59: say, John 6 is fundamentally Jesus cataclyzing the disciples and the assembled crowd about communion.
00:06:59 – 00:07:04: It's about faith. It's about the entire Christian faith, but specifically dealing with some of the
00:07:04 – 00:07:09: particulars of communion in such a way that later on when we address the other verses that deal
00:07:09 – 00:07:15: specifically with the words of institution at the Last Supper, and then subsequently,
00:07:15 – 00:07:22: when Paul reiterates them, there's a short version there at the time, but the long version is found
00:07:22 – 00:07:29: in John 6. And so it's important because this framing of the discussion of communion really
00:07:29 – 00:07:34: lays bare all the disputes. Every single disagreement that you will have with us and that you all have
00:07:34 – 00:07:39: with each other in different denominations, that we all are mutually incompatible in terms of how
00:07:39 – 00:07:46: we view communion, it boils down to the short version in 1 Corinthians 11 and the long version
00:07:46 – 00:07:50: in John 6. So we're going to read all and then go through some of the particulars because
00:07:51 – 00:07:57: the divisions are clear in Jesus' teaching, including the responses from both the Pharisees
00:07:57 – 00:08:04: and the crowd who had the very same responses 2,000 years ago that we see today in these discussions.
00:08:04 – 00:08:11: Two quick points before I get into reading the long passage from John 6. First, to be entirely
00:08:11 – 00:08:20: fair to Luther, he did affirm both that John 6 is catechesis on the Lord's Supper and that it deals
00:08:20 – 00:08:24: with faith, which is the position of the Confessions, the Lutheran Confessions.
00:08:25 – 00:08:30: He did emphasize the faith aspect in dealing with the Reformed in part because he was simply
00:08:30 – 00:08:36: tired of arguing with them. I'm sure that even some of our Reformed listeners can commiserate
00:08:36 – 00:08:45: with Luther on that one. And the second point is Woe mentioned that these divisions in the church
00:08:45 – 00:08:51: really center on the sacraments, which is absolutely true. And I just want to read
00:08:51 – 00:08:55: Article 7 of the Augsburg Confession because it really points out
00:08:56 – 00:08:59: this has been the nature of things from the Reformation forward.
00:09:00 – 00:09:06: And so Article 7 defining the church. Our churches teach that one holy church is to
00:09:06 – 00:09:12: remain forever. The church is the congregation of saints in which the gospel is purely taught
00:09:12 – 00:09:16: and the sacraments correctly administered. For the true unity of the church,
00:09:16 – 00:09:21: it is enough to agree about the doctrine of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments.
00:09:21 – 00:09:27: It is not necessary that human traditions that his rights or ceremonies instituted by men
00:09:27 – 00:09:34: should be the same everywhere. As Paul says, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and
00:09:34 – 00:09:42: father of all. Ephesians 4, 5 through 6. And so clearly, given the definition of the church,
00:09:43 – 00:09:48: unless we can agree on the sacraments, we can't have that full unity. That doesn't mean we can't
00:09:48 – 00:09:53: agree on many things and get along and work together. It just means we can't have the full
00:09:53 – 00:10:00: unity of full communion without agreement on the sacraments. And so I will read now from John 6.
00:10:01 – 00:10:05: On the next day the crowd that remained on the other side of the sea
00:10:06 – 00:10:10: saw that there had been only one boat there and that Jesus had not entered the boat with
00:10:10 – 00:10:16: his disciples, but that his disciples had gone away alone. Other boats from Tiberius came near
00:10:16 – 00:10:20: the place where they had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. So when the crowd
00:10:20 – 00:10:26: saw that Jesus was not there, nor his disciples, they themselves got into the boats and went to
00:10:26 – 00:10:32: Capernaum seeking Jesus. When they found him on the other side of the sea they said to him,
00:10:32 – 00:10:40: Rabbi, when did you come here? Jesus answered them, truly, truly I say to you, you are seeking me,
00:10:40 – 00:10:45: not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not work for the food
00:10:45 – 00:10:50: that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to
00:10:51 – 00:10:57: you, for on him God the Father has set his seal. Then they said to him, what must we do to be
00:10:57 – 00:11:04: doing the works of God? Jesus answered them, this is the work of God that you believe in him whom
00:11:04 – 00:11:11: he has sent. So they said to him, then what sign do you do that we may see and believe you,
00:11:11 – 00:11:16: what work do you perform? Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, as it is written,
00:11:16 – 00:11:23: he gave them bread from heaven to eat. Jesus then said to them, truly, truly I say to you,
00:11:23 – 00:11:27: it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my father gives you the true bread from
00:11:27 – 00:11:33: heaven, for the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.
00:11:33 – 00:11:40: They said to him, sir, give us this bread always. Jesus said to them, I am the bread of life,
00:11:40 – 00:11:45: whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst,
00:11:45 – 00:11:51: but I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. All that the Father gives me will
00:11:51 – 00:11:57: come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out. For I have come down from heaven,
00:11:57 – 00:12:04: not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me,
00:12:04 – 00:12:08: that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day.
00:12:09 – 00:12:14: For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should
00:12:14 – 00:12:20: have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. So the Jews grumbled about him because
00:12:20 – 00:12:28: he said, I am the bread that came down from heaven. They said, is this not Jesus, the Son of Joseph,
00:12:28 – 00:12:33: whose Father and Mother we know? How does he now say, I have come down from heaven?
00:12:34 – 00:12:39: Jesus answered them, do not grumble among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the
00:12:39 – 00:12:46: Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the prophets,
00:12:46 – 00:12:51: and they will all be taught by God. Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me,
00:12:52 – 00:12:57: not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God, he has seen the Father.
00:12:58 – 00:13:03: Truly truly I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life, I am the bread of life.
00:13:03 – 00:13:09: Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness and they died. This is the bread that comes down
00:13:09 – 00:13:14: from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from
00:13:14 – 00:13:20: heaven. If anyone eats of this bread he will live forever, and the bread that I will give
00:13:20 – 00:13:26: for the life of the world is my flesh. The Jews then disputed among themselves saying,
00:13:26 – 00:13:32: how can this man give us his flesh to eat? So Jesus said to them, truly truly I say to you,
00:13:32 – 00:13:37: unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
00:13:37 – 00:13:43: Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the
00:13:43 – 00:13:48: last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
00:13:49 – 00:13:56: Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father
00:13:56 – 00:14:02: sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me he also will live because of me.
00:14:03 – 00:14:07: This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like the bread the Fathers ate and died.
00:14:08 – 00:14:14: Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever. Jesus said these things in the synagogue,
00:14:14 – 00:14:18: as he taught at Capernaum. When many of his disciples heard it they said,
00:14:18 – 00:14:24: this is a hard saying, who can listen to it. But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples
00:14:24 – 00:14:30: were grumbling about this said to them, do you take offense at this? Then what if you were to see
00:14:30 – 00:14:35: the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the Spirit who gives life,
00:14:35 – 00:14:40: the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life,
00:14:40 – 00:14:45: but there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning,
00:14:45 – 00:14:50: who those were who did not believe, and who it was who would betray him. And he said,
00:14:50 – 00:14:55: this is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.
00:14:56 – 00:15:00: After this, many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him.
00:15:00 – 00:15:03: So Jesus said to the twelve, do you want to go away as well?
00:15:04 – 00:15:10: Simon Peter answered him, Lord to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,
00:15:10 – 00:15:15: and we have believed and have come to know that you are the Holy One of God.
00:15:17 – 00:15:21: That's obviously a very long passage and I recommend you go back and reread it yourselves.
00:15:21 – 00:15:29: It's beautiful, it's straight from the mouth of God, and it's vital to understanding the theology
00:15:29 – 00:15:35: of both faith and communion. There are a couple of interesting things in there that I want to
00:15:35 – 00:15:40: tease out. Obviously, there's extensive discussion of eating flesh and drinking blood,
00:15:40 – 00:15:47: and when you look in the Greek words that are used for flesh, it's sarks. It means actual
00:15:47 – 00:15:53: flesh. If you were to find roadkill and cut a piece off, that's what you're talking about,
00:15:53 – 00:16:00: that type of flesh. It's not any sort of metaphorical version, it's the real material version of the
00:16:00 – 00:16:09: thing. The historic disputes about this have been, well, this can't possibly be true because
00:16:09 – 00:16:17: from the post-Reformation era, we have faith alone, precluding all works, and so there's the
00:16:17 – 00:16:22: passage where Jesus says, whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood has eternal life,
00:16:22 – 00:16:26: unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
00:16:28 – 00:16:35: If you misunderstand faith alone, grace alone, you will not understand that this is not a work.
00:16:36 – 00:16:40: That's one of the problems that we addressed in the baptism episode at some lengths. We're not
00:16:40 – 00:16:47: going to repeat the arguments about how sacraments interact with human action. The short version
00:16:47 – 00:16:53: is that when God says to do something and you receive his gift when you do it, and then you do
00:16:53 – 00:16:59: it, that's not a work in the sense of us affecting anything. That is us receiving God's gift. It's
00:16:59 – 00:17:05: like going to church and hearing the word of God. Yes, going to church is obedience, but the hearing
00:17:06 – 00:17:13: is passive. It's receptive. When it discusses us eating and drinking from Christ's body and blood,
00:17:13 – 00:17:18: it's receiving something. It's not doing something. We'll get to that elsewhere in this episode,
00:17:18 – 00:17:24: but it's just important that this is one of the distinctions of a sacrament, that if you misplace
00:17:24 – 00:17:30: the action as, oh, well, I'm doing this. Therefore, any passage that says do something
00:17:30 – 00:17:36: must necessarily mean that it can't be salvific. You're missing out on a lot of Scripture,
00:17:36 – 00:17:41: because there's stuff that God says to do that's clearly not us saving ourselves. There's nowhere
00:17:41 – 00:17:45: in Scripture where God says you can save yourself. There's many places in Scripture where God says
00:17:45 – 00:17:51: to do stuff, in particular when the sacraments are delivered by God to us, as in the case of
00:17:51 – 00:17:57: baptism and in the case of communion. What we receive is the very forgiveness that God promised
00:17:57 – 00:18:03: to deliver from the cross. I think the strongest argument to be made for how none of this can be
00:18:03 – 00:18:11: taken entirely is Al Goree. Obviously, it's describing faith. Faith is absolutely inextricable.
00:18:11 – 00:18:16: Faith is how we receive salvation. No doubt about that. Faith is how we receive the gifts in the
00:18:16 – 00:18:22: sacraments. God is pouring out his abundance of his grace to us through the sacraments.
00:18:23 – 00:18:28: The fact that there's a physical means with it doesn't change the equation. Apart from giving us
00:18:28 – 00:18:34: a physical touchstone in history, in time, in a place that we can point to and say, yes, right here,
00:18:34 – 00:18:40: God is giving me his stuff here. Whatever he promised to be attached to the stuff, I will also
00:18:40 – 00:18:47: receive. The physical presence of elements is part of God's reassurance to us that he's keeping
00:18:47 – 00:18:54: all the other promises. The argument from the Jews, they disputed it and said, how can this man give
00:18:54 – 00:19:00: us his flesh to eat? That's one of the arguments that is used against this passage, possibly,
00:19:00 – 00:19:06: being about communion. Because how can that be? One of the arguments is that, well,
00:19:06 – 00:19:12: God is stuck at the right hand of the Father. He has a corporeal body. Jesus Christ, the incarnate
00:19:12 – 00:19:21: Son of God, can no longer do what he could do when he was not corporeal. How can this man give us
00:19:21 – 00:19:29: his flesh to eat is, I think, critically set in the context of this passage, which, as I mentioned
00:19:29 – 00:19:34: at the beginning, it's immediately after the feeding of the 5,000. The day before, they had
00:19:34 – 00:19:40: all sat down and they had the 5 loaves and the 2 fishes, and Jesus performed the miracle. They
00:19:40 – 00:19:46: got back 12 baskets full after everyone had been fed, 5,000 men and women and children beside.
00:19:48 – 00:19:53: Right in the very context of him saying this and the Jews saying, how can this be that he could
00:19:53 – 00:20:01: give us his flesh to eat, the very context of the miracles demonstrates that God was showing how he
00:20:01 – 00:20:06: does it. He says, I'm going to do it, and he does it. It's miraculous. It is outside of the
00:20:06 – 00:20:13: material world that 5 loaves and 2 fishes could feed everybody. It's impossible, but Jesus did it,
00:20:13 – 00:20:20: and it was just as plain as day. There was no magic. There was no moment. There was no flashes.
00:20:20 – 00:20:25: He just said, pass it out, and they did. They got back so much more than they had handed out that
00:20:26 – 00:20:30: it was clear to everyone that a great miracle had been performed. That was his introduction to
00:20:30 – 00:20:37: saying, here is how I will feed you. Then when he finished, the disciples heard it and they
00:20:37 – 00:20:42: grumbled. They said, this is a hard saying. Who can listen to this? Many of them grumbled and they
00:20:42 – 00:20:48: walked away. They abandoned him on the spot. Now, this is critical because if this passage in John 6
00:20:48 – 00:20:54: were just about faith, which they understood, he'd been talking about faith, even the Jews who were
00:20:54 – 00:20:59: not believing understood faith. They understood the concept of believing and then receiving things
00:20:59 – 00:21:06: from God. If it had been clear from Jesus' teaching that day, the text that we just read,
00:21:06 – 00:21:11: if it had been clear that this was only about faith and not about something more immediate,
00:21:11 – 00:21:15: more material than that, they wouldn't have been confused. They wouldn't have said,
00:21:15 – 00:21:18: this is a hard saying. If they had, he would have said, no, no, wait, come back, come back. I didn't
00:21:18 – 00:21:24: mean that. It's all spiritual. There's nothing physical here. He said, do you take offense?
00:21:25 – 00:21:29: Then if you were seeing the Son of Man ascending to where he was before,
00:21:30 – 00:21:33: he's saying to them, if you don't believe this small thing that I'm telling you,
00:21:33 – 00:21:38: how will you believe the greater things? Then they wandered off. I think one of the most beautiful
00:21:38 – 00:21:43: parts of this and the reason that we let that passage go long was Simon Peter's confession at
00:21:43 – 00:21:48: the end. After some of the other disciples had wandered off because they were offended,
00:21:48 – 00:21:54: Jesus said, what do you believe? Will you go away as well? Peter famously
00:21:54 – 00:21:59: responded, Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. He didn't say, I get it.
00:21:59 – 00:22:04: It makes perfect sense to me. He said, where else are we going to go? I think this is a perfect
00:22:04 – 00:22:10: example of proper faith when receiving hard teachings. This is a hard teaching. We've said
00:22:10 – 00:22:18: in the past episode, there are a few places in scripture where our reason collapses. You have
00:22:18 – 00:22:25: the hypostatic union of Jesus Christ being fully God and fully man. How can there be two 100% in
00:22:25 – 00:22:32: one thing? What sort of analogies can you invent to try to explain that? Effectively, every analogy
00:22:32 – 00:22:38: that men have invented in the past has effectively created some sort of heresy because it's irrational.
00:22:38 – 00:22:43: It's not two boards glued together. It's not two halves in a cup. It's not a mixture. There's no
00:22:43 – 00:22:49: comparison for when Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man. It's impossible. It doesn't make sense.
00:22:50 – 00:22:56: That is the essential predicate for the entire Christian faith, that this man who was incarnate
00:22:56 – 00:23:02: is also fully God. The same is absolutely true when we're looking at communion. When Jesus said,
00:23:02 – 00:23:07: they didn't know yet what was going to happen with communion. It wasn't until later on the last
00:23:07 – 00:23:13: supper when he actually instituted it. This is a teaching moment to explain the theology behind
00:23:13 – 00:23:20: it. As we'll get to in a bit, when they received that teaching on the night he was betrayed,
00:23:20 – 00:23:25: there was an argument. All the questions went away because they received it the same way.
00:23:25 – 00:23:30: I don't think they understood it any better, but when he said, this is my body given for the
00:23:30 – 00:23:33: forgiveness of your sins, it wasn't out of left field because they had heard it before.
00:23:33 – 00:23:39: They had heard it here at this moment the day after the feeding of the 5000. Whatever questions
00:23:39 – 00:23:45: they may have had, whatever doubts they may have had, he had cataclyzed them. When he said it,
00:23:45 – 00:23:49: when it was finally being instituted, they just received it and they ate and they drank and they
00:23:49 – 00:23:56: gave thanks. I think that this is a good point to define a few terms to go over some things that
00:23:56 – 00:24:05: are frequently confused. Two of the most important terms here are sacrament and sacrifice. It is
00:24:05 – 00:24:12: important to understand the distinction between these two things because this is where the Roman
00:24:12 – 00:24:22: error creeps in. Rome wants to turn the sacrament of the altar into a sacrifice, which it is not in
00:24:22 – 00:24:28: the sense that they use it, but I'll define the terms first so that we are on the same page as it
00:24:28 – 00:24:34: were. A sacrament is a ceremony or work in which God presents what the promise of the ceremony
00:24:34 – 00:24:41: offers. For Christians, well as Lutherans we are not going to quibble over the number of the
00:24:41 – 00:24:46: sacraments. We're very explicit in our confessions and elsewhere that we're not going to do that.
00:24:46 – 00:24:51: Rome insisted we had to recognize a certain number of sacraments. We said there are most
00:24:51 – 00:24:55: certainly two. We're not going to debate whether there are more. If you want to call marriage a
00:24:55 – 00:25:03: sacrament, have fun and other things as well. But obviously the two core sacraments on which
00:25:03 – 00:25:08: Christians cannot disagree that these are sacraments would be baptism and the Lord's Supper.
00:25:10 – 00:25:16: And so you cannot call these a work and the reason you can't call them a work in terms of human
00:25:16 – 00:25:22: beings doing the work is because these are God's work and so you cannot steal from God.
00:25:22 – 00:25:29: To call baptism or to call the Lord's Supper a human work is to say that a human being is doing
00:25:29 – 00:25:39: God's work. Now certainly God uses the hands, the mouth of the pastor as means to deliver his work,
00:25:39 – 00:25:45: to deliver his blessing, his promises to those who receive them. That does not make them the work
00:25:45 – 00:25:54: of the pastor. They are still God's work. And now a sacrifice, a sacrifice contrary to a sacrament,
00:25:54 – 00:26:01: is a ceremony or work that we give to God in order to provide him honor. Now notably, there are two
00:26:01 – 00:26:06: kinds of sacrifice and it is important to know both of them because one of them is in play here and
00:26:06 – 00:26:14: one is not with regard to those of us mortals who are partaking of the Eucharist.
00:26:15 – 00:26:21: And so one of those is in fact the Eucharistic Sacrifice. This does not merit the forgiveness
00:26:21 – 00:26:27: of sins or reconciliation. It is practiced by those who have already been reconciled.
00:26:27 – 00:26:32: This is so that we may give thanks or return gratitude for the forgiveness of sins that
00:26:32 – 00:26:39: has already been received or for other benefits. The other kind of sacrifice there has been one
00:26:39 – 00:26:45: in the history of the world that is an atoning sacrifice. That is a work that makes satisfaction
00:26:45 – 00:26:50: for guilt and punishment. Obviously there has been only one, that is Christ's sacrifice,
00:26:50 – 00:26:59: that is the atonement. And so Rome's error when it comes to the Lord's Supper is that they believe
00:26:59 – 00:27:07: that each time the priest oversees the Lord's table, oversees the Sacrament,
00:27:07 – 00:27:16: he is re-sacrificing Christ. And that's false. Christ's sacrifice was once for all, one atonement.
00:27:16 – 00:27:21: That is why Christ said from the cross, it is finished. This is not something that plays out
00:27:21 – 00:27:26: again on altars across the world through all eternity or at least until the end of the world.
00:27:27 – 00:27:37: Once for all, what we are doing is one, in remembrance of Christ, two, receiving the benefits
00:27:37 – 00:27:44: of Christ, and three, giving thanks for those benefits. What we are doing is a Eucharistic
00:27:44 – 00:27:48: sacrifice, the sacrifice of praise. All we're doing is using a Greek term for that in essence.
00:27:49 – 00:27:54: And so it's important to keep in mind these moving parts, the difference between a Sacrament
00:27:54 – 00:28:04: and a Sacrifice. The Lord's Supper is a Sacrament. It is God bringing His gifts to us. We in turn,
00:28:05 – 00:28:10: after partaking of the Sacrament, and in fact in partaking of the Sacrament,
00:28:10 – 00:28:16: give a Eucharistic sacrifice, a sacrifice of praise, we are praising God for the gifts He has given us.
00:28:19 – 00:28:24: These have to be kept distinct, because we cannot steal from God that which is properly His,
00:28:24 – 00:28:29: we cannot claim to be the one doing His works, because they are His works.
00:28:30 – 00:28:34: There's no good in an Atoning Sacrifice if it is made by a mere man.
00:28:35 – 00:28:43: The Atoning Sacrifice required the God-man who is Christ. Because, again as we have said many
00:28:43 – 00:28:51: times before, the debt of sin being infinite required demanded an infinite Atonement, and the
00:28:51 – 00:28:58: only possible infinite Atonement is Christ. And so one of the fundamental problems here, if you get
00:28:59 – 00:29:07: the theology wrong, the doctrine wrong on the Sacrament, on the Lord's Supper, is that you are
00:29:07 – 00:29:15: implicitly denying the Unio Personalis, the personal union of God and man in Christ.
00:29:16 – 00:29:23: Because many of the arguments, supposed arguments, against the Sacramental Union,
00:29:23 – 00:29:29: the Sacramental Presence of Christ, Christ being actually present in the Sacrament,
00:29:29 – 00:29:35: in, with, and under the bread and wine, one of the most common arguments against that is that how can
00:29:35 – 00:29:41: this be? It's an argument based on reason, obviously, and human reason does fail, it has limits,
00:29:41 – 00:29:49: it's the misuse of reason that is at issue here. The difference between reason as Magister or Master
00:29:49 – 00:29:57: and reason as Servant. Reason is a Servant you use to understand things. Reason is not the Master
00:29:57 – 00:30:06: of the Universe that determines what is real. If you look at it, top down as reason imposing
00:30:06 – 00:30:17: reality, that's incorrect, that's reason as Magister. If you are looking at it instead as reason as one
00:30:17 – 00:30:22: of your interpretive lenses to understand reality, that's reason as Minister, reason as Servant,
00:30:22 – 00:30:28: that is the correct use of reason. But when you attempt to apply reason as a Master to these
00:30:28 – 00:30:34: things, particularly the Mysteries of God, you are not going to be able to understand them in that
00:30:34 – 00:30:41: light. You have to understand them from what God has revealed about them, and what God has revealed
00:30:41 – 00:30:49: about them we'll get to in Christ's words and Paul's explanation of those words. But when God
00:30:49 – 00:30:55: speaks what he says is true and you simply believe it, you do not have to subject his words to your
00:30:55 – 00:31:05: reason to prove that they are true. And then I would also like to expand on the issue of what is
00:31:05 – 00:31:14: of work? Is this faith plus works? And the answer to that, the second question is no. This is not
00:31:14 – 00:31:20: faith plus works as we have highlighted before particularly in the baptism episode but also
00:31:20 – 00:31:30: elsewhere. The Spirit uses means to create faith and to strengthen faith. Baptism is one of the
00:31:30 – 00:31:35: primary means, the word being the other. Of course the word flows through all of this because a
00:31:35 – 00:31:41: sacrament, another way of defining it is simply the word plus an element, the word plus a sign,
00:31:41 – 00:31:47: a physical thing. That is one of the traditional or classical definitions of a sacrament. And so
00:31:47 – 00:31:53: the word is always present, but you have word and baptism to create faith, and then you have word
00:31:53 – 00:31:59: and supper to strengthen faith. That is the way that things are supposed to go, that is the way
00:31:59 – 00:32:07: that God has ordained it. And as I've mentioned before, we being spiritual and physical, being
00:32:07 – 00:32:14: spirit and body, will set aside the issue of mind and such matters for now. But the fact that we have
00:32:15 – 00:32:23: these dual natures, God reaches out to us where we are and how we are, what we are. We have the word
00:32:24 – 00:32:31: which reaches the spirit. Yes, it also reaches the physical ear, but you have also the physical
00:32:31 – 00:32:38: signs. The body can understand the physical signs. The part of you that is physical can understand
00:32:38 – 00:32:45: water, can understand bread, can understand wine. God uses these to strengthen your faith,
00:32:46 – 00:32:54: to reach the totality of who and what you are, not just the spirit, because you are not a spirit
00:32:54 – 00:33:01: riding around in a meat suit. That's a mischaracterization. You are your body, you are your soul,
00:33:01 – 00:33:06: you are both of those things. And so there's some bit of understanding you can have if you can grasp
00:33:06 – 00:33:12: that to a certain degree of the personal union. But to get back to that original point, if you
00:33:12 – 00:33:24: deny that you can have bread and body, wine and blood, simultaneously present, you are tacitly
00:33:24 – 00:33:30: saying that the personal union cannot be possible. And you may think, well, the difference is that
00:33:30 – 00:33:37: the one is God, the one is Christ, and the other is bread. No. Because you have Christ's word saying
00:33:37 – 00:33:43: that it is bread and that it is body, saying that it is wine and that it is blood. You also have
00:33:43 – 00:33:48: his word about the personal union in a number of places in Scripture. God does not lie.
00:33:48 – 00:33:54: God always speaks the truth. God always speaking the truth. We have to believe what he has told us.
00:33:55 – 00:34:01: And then to emphasize, Woe's comment about the right hand of the Father, because this is
00:34:02 – 00:34:08: an issue that comes up constantly in this area, and it is vitally important to understand this,
00:34:08 – 00:34:15: to get this right. Because theological and doctrinal errors flow from this, left, right, and center.
00:34:16 – 00:34:22: The right hand of the Father is not a physical location. How do we know this?
00:34:23 – 00:34:32: The Father is Spirit. The Father does not have a right hand. The right hand of the Father is not
00:34:32 – 00:34:39: a physical location, because again, the Father is not physical. Scripture is very clear. Scripture
00:34:39 – 00:34:45: says this in a number of places. The Father and the Spirit, obviously, one would hope that
00:34:45 – 00:34:50: with the Spirit this is obvious, but the Father and the Spirit being Spirit, being not corporeal,
00:34:51 – 00:34:59: do not have right hands. And so their right hands cannot be a physical location. The right hand
00:34:59 – 00:35:05: of the Father is a position of power and authority. When Scripture speaks of the right hand of the
00:35:05 – 00:35:13: Father and Christ being there, think of it as a right hand man. Or, historically, many kings would
00:35:13 – 00:35:19: have a vizier or equivalent, someone, some minister who was very high ranking, who acted as his right
00:35:19 – 00:35:26: hand and was called his right hand. That is what Scripture is saying when it says Christ is the
00:35:26 – 00:35:32: right hand of the Father. It is a matter of the exaltation of Christ. It is not a matter of a
00:35:32 – 00:35:39: physical location. So no, he is not physically limited to some specific small place in heaven.
00:35:39 – 00:35:46: That is not how this works. Also notably, heaven, not a physical location. But that's a point for
00:35:46 – 00:35:53: another time. Before we conclude with John 6, I just want to provide a warning to the folks who
00:35:53 – 00:35:59: are still shouting at us that can't possibly be about the Eucharist, can't be about communion.
00:35:59 – 00:36:07: I want to reread a small portion. Jesus says, For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
00:36:07 – 00:36:12: Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood abides in me, and I in him.
00:36:12 – 00:36:18: The reason that this is important is that if you say, Well, that can't possibly be about communion,
00:36:18 – 00:36:26: because that's tying your salvation to a work, any argument along those lines that anyone would
00:36:26 – 00:36:33: make, including some Lutherans against John 6 being Eucharistic, must necessarily and absolutely
00:36:33 – 00:36:39: apply to baptism now saves you. And see, this is something that astonishes me that some folks
00:36:39 – 00:36:46: who agree that baptism can be salvific, and they can maybe agree that communion is salvific,
00:36:46 – 00:36:52: but they will sternly argue against John 6 being about the Eucharist, specifically because of this
00:36:52 – 00:37:00: language that Jesus uses that's conditional. Well, if baptism now saves you, then it's obvious that
00:37:00 – 00:37:04: if you reject baptism, you're rejecting salvation. And we talked about in the baptism episode says
00:37:04 – 00:37:10: nothing about someone who's unable to be baptized. You know, it's not a question of rejection. If
00:37:10 – 00:37:16: it's a question of the absence of the opportunity, that is not something that's going to separate
00:37:16 – 00:37:21: you from Christ because it is faith that saves. And that's crucial in all this faith undergirds
00:37:22 – 00:37:30: salvation period. And there is faith in baptism, and there is faith in communion, and there is
00:37:30 – 00:37:37: faith in the forgiveness of sins, the confession and absolution of sins. Again, this is all God
00:37:37 – 00:37:43: pouring out as gifts to us in all these myriad ways. And so just when you read the text of this,
00:37:43 – 00:37:50: if you're like, that can't possibly be because there's this conditional here, try that same logic
00:37:50 – 00:37:56: that you're applying to this, to baptism now saves you, and see a baptism survives as a sacrament.
00:37:56 – 00:38:03: What you will find is that it doesn't. If you remove John 6 as being also about communion,
00:38:04 – 00:38:10: the logic by which you do that is going to nullify baptism. I think that's one of the strongest
00:38:10 – 00:38:16: pieces of evidence that this must be. It's the same type of thing. Another piece of evidence for it is
00:38:16 – 00:38:24: back at the beginning. Jesus directly makes the manna in the desert typologically pointing towards
00:38:25 – 00:38:31: the bread of life, which is him, which is his body. And how do we receive his body? If it's
00:38:31 – 00:38:36: spiritual, if it's by faith, then we're not receiving anything physical. And the type would fall apart
00:38:36 – 00:38:41: because they were given manna in the desert. There was actual bread that fell from heaven,
00:38:41 – 00:38:46: physical bread. They gathered it up in baskets, and they ate it. And as he said, it sustained them,
00:38:46 – 00:38:52: but they still died. The same is true of all the sacrifices in the Old Testament. Blood was shed,
00:38:52 – 00:38:58: but it always pointed towards what? The actual shedding of Christ's blood on the cross.
00:38:58 – 00:39:03: This is how the typology in the Old Testament always plays out. You have the smaller version
00:39:03 – 00:39:11: that's a physical object that points toward the final anti-type of the thing, and that is also
00:39:11 – 00:39:17: physical. So it would not be possible if Jesus is making the comparison between physical manna
00:39:17 – 00:39:24: from heaven and himself as manna from heaven coming from God. That doesn't then become allegorical.
00:39:24 – 00:39:31: He's still talking about his flesh as he says over and over. He gets gratuitous and cumulative
00:39:31 – 00:39:38: in the passage where he's talking about his blood being true, food, etc. So don't ignore that typology
00:39:38 – 00:39:45: as being a necessary part of this being sacramental catechesis. I can tell you just from personal
00:39:45 – 00:39:52: experience, there are multiple Baptists I know who, when they read this, they ceased to be Baptists
00:39:52 – 00:39:57: because they realized they had precluded that view of the sacrament. They realized that they were
00:39:57 – 00:40:04: Lutheran when they actually believed what John 6 said about communion. Now, I find it terrifying
00:40:04 – 00:40:09: that there would be then anyone, but especially Lutherans, to come along and say, no, no, no,
00:40:09 – 00:40:15: well, that's not about communion. If it is having this efficacious and beneficial outcome in the
00:40:15 – 00:40:21: faith and the souls of men to realize that a false confession needs to be reoriented in a way
00:40:21 – 00:40:25: that is Lutheran, we're like, yes, absolutely, that is correct to then say, well, but not that text,
00:40:25 – 00:40:32: that can't be it. That's judge the tree by its fruit. And when men read John 6 and they become
00:40:32 – 00:40:38: Lutheran, please don't argue with them. Please just don't do that. The same sort of typology,
00:40:38 – 00:40:45: incidentally, is used by Jesus elsewhere, again, pointing physically. We always quote John 3.16
00:40:45 – 00:40:52: and sometimes 17 and 18. But John 3.14 says, And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,
00:40:52 – 00:40:57: so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.
00:40:58 – 00:41:02: If you remember that story, they were being, they've been cursed by God, they're being bitten by
00:41:02 – 00:41:08: poisonous snakes and dying. God told Moses to craft a bronze serpent, put it up on a pole,
00:41:08 – 00:41:13: whoever looked, whoever gazed upon that serpent would be saved from the poison. He did it,
00:41:13 – 00:41:21: and many of Israel lived. And Jesus himself says in John 3, This is typological of me hanging on
00:41:21 – 00:41:27: the cursed tree of the cross. The bronze serpent was a typological pointer to Christ's sacrifice
00:41:28 – 00:41:35: when he was crucified. Again, there's physical on both ends of that. You will not have typology
00:41:35 – 00:41:41: where the physical version then just sort of falls off into, into what? It doesn't just vanish
00:41:41 – 00:41:48: into space. It can't just float away. It has to point to something physical. So please, you know,
00:41:49 – 00:41:55: one of the interesting things about the reason that Luther doesn't necessarily go as hard as we
00:41:55 – 00:42:02: do with this is that John 6 is not necessary for the Lutheran view of the sacrament of communion.
00:42:02 – 00:42:08: If John 6 were not present, we would still have much the same understanding. And that's part of
00:42:08 – 00:42:12: why he was, he just didn't want to fight with the Reformed anymore. At the end of his life,
00:42:12 – 00:42:19: he was sick of constantly doing the same battles over and over again. That fact that
00:42:20 – 00:42:25: a man would make a concession so as not to have to keep getting beaten about the face and head
00:42:26 – 00:42:31: doesn't mean that it doesn't apply. It just means that sometimes you're gonna,
00:42:31 – 00:42:37: if you have the argument nailed down elsewhere, you don't need additional evidence. But we have
00:42:37 – 00:42:40: the luxury, you know, like, certainly Cori and I have the luxury of no one's yelling at us because
00:42:40 – 00:42:45: you don't have mics, you're yelling, but we can't hear you. So we can just go on and on.
00:42:46 – 00:42:52: When we point to this, it's because it's all, it's all what Jesus said. This is by far the richest
00:42:52 – 00:43:00: and most fleshed out, I'm not saying that ironically, version of catechesis. And so as we get into the
00:43:00 – 00:43:05: actual words of institution, just keep in mind the reaction that the apostles had, you know,
00:43:05 – 00:43:10: the disciples and their gathered in the upper room on Monday, Thursday. There was no arguing.
00:43:10 – 00:43:15: There was no saying, how can this be? There was nothing except for acquiescence because
00:43:15 – 00:43:22: their teacher had already explained it to him. And this is something that I think it's an important
00:43:22 – 00:43:26: thing when you're reading the New Testament, particularly when you're reading the Gospels,
00:43:26 – 00:43:34: and then moved to Acts and beyond. Prior to Pentecost, these 12 men, you know, 11 survive because
00:43:34 – 00:43:38: Judas obviously apostatized and was killed and then replaced. He killed himself, self-murdered.
00:43:40 – 00:43:46: These men went to seminary with God for three years, three and a half years. Jesus taught them
00:43:46 – 00:43:51: every day. They lived together. They ate together morning till night. They were constantly discussing
00:43:51 – 00:43:58: these things. He was constantly teaching them. In many places it's recorded, Jesus telling them,
00:43:58 – 00:44:03: basically, you'll understand later. And they understood later at Pentecost when they received
00:44:03 – 00:44:10: the gift of the Holy Spirit. This teaching, the catechesis in the seminary education that they
00:44:10 – 00:44:18: received at Christ's feet was unlocked by the Holy Spirit. And so I think one of the things that's,
00:44:18 – 00:44:24: I think we kind of just assumed today, we kind of read into the text of Acts and beyond. Well,
00:44:24 – 00:44:31: the apostles were special and they were inspired by God. And we just kind of assumed that what they
00:44:31 – 00:44:39: say in Acts and beyond was New Revelation from God directly. I think it's a much more natural
00:44:39 – 00:44:42: reading, particularly when you look at what happens, you know, from the end of, you know,
00:44:42 – 00:44:46: especially the end of Luke to Acts, which is effectively part one and part two of the same
00:44:46 – 00:44:54: book. I wish John came first and then Luke and Acts were bookended. Because when you look at that,
00:44:54 – 00:45:00: Peter in particular, you know, Peter's like the Kool-Aid man of theology. He's boisterous and he's
00:45:00 – 00:45:06: enthusiastic and he just crashes through walls and he's like, what's up guys? I'm going to be the
00:45:06 – 00:45:12: loudest, most confident man in the room, even if he has no idea what he's talking about. And
00:45:12 – 00:45:16: God bless him for it because many of his confessions, even when he didn't understand something,
00:45:16 – 00:45:23: he still got enough right. He's like, yeah, that is a good model for our faith. And yet,
00:45:23 – 00:45:28: what do we see immediately after Pentecost? He's the man who stands up and just unloads this sermon
00:45:28 – 00:45:35: out of nowhere that's beautiful. It's rich, it's textural, there's so much theology and scripture
00:45:35 – 00:45:42: that he pulls in. And in some cases, it is new teaching. But I think that if you understand
00:45:42 – 00:45:48: that the Holy Spirit unlocked the seminary education that had been locked away behind blinders,
00:45:49 – 00:45:53: it makes a lot more sense where all that stuff came from. And so as these men, as the apostles,
00:45:53 – 00:45:58: who had lived with Jesus for three and a half years, as they go up on with the rest of their
00:45:58 – 00:46:04: lives and their ministries, they certainly did receive direct revelation. Paul in particular
00:46:04 – 00:46:09: did not have the benefit. So he was talking to God directly, God communicated with him,
00:46:09 – 00:46:13: something that does not exist for us today. So not minimizing the fact that they did,
00:46:13 – 00:46:17: in some case, you know, John, obviously with his revelation, the apocalypse,
00:46:18 – 00:46:23: that was all new, that was directly coming from God. That wasn't something the book itself says,
00:46:23 – 00:46:29: this was a direct revelation. It wasn't something that Jesus told him. So they absolutely did,
00:46:29 – 00:46:36: in some cases, receive new, inspired teaching. They were inspired. But much of what they were
00:46:36 – 00:46:43: inspired by was not immediate, but it was through their seminary education with Jesus.
00:46:43 – 00:46:48: And so just keep that in mind as you look at the things that they say in Acts and beyond. And even
00:46:48 – 00:46:54: as the passages were about to read on the night of the Last Supper, and then what Paul says about
00:46:54 – 00:47:02: the same moment, the fact that they just sat there and received it faithfully with no argument,
00:47:02 – 00:47:06: they're short, they're brief scenes. It's obviously a very short scene that we're given. It was an
00:47:06 – 00:47:12: entire night. But the fact that God doesn't say anything about them arguing or grumbling or doubting
00:47:12 – 00:47:19: or anything is a clear indication that they'd heard this before. They'd heard it at the feeding
00:47:19 – 00:47:24: in the 5,000. And so it wasn't new information. It was the fulfillment of what had already been
00:47:24 – 00:47:29: taught. That's exactly how Catechesis works in churches today. Almost every church, whatever
00:47:29 – 00:47:36: their views of communion, there's typically some form of teaching before communion. It's the same
00:47:36 – 00:47:42: thing. You teach and then you deliver. So the disconnection temporarily from the feeding of
00:47:42 – 00:47:48: 5,000 to later on in the upper room when they actually received First Communion, the First
00:47:48 – 00:47:54: Communion, it makes perfect sense. It's the same model that we have followed ever since. You teach
00:47:55 – 00:48:00: someone what it is, and then you give it to them, just as Jesus did for the apostles. It's been
00:48:00 – 00:48:08: passed on to all of us as well. Before we get into the passages dealing with the words of institution,
00:48:08 – 00:48:12: and we'll really deal with just two of those. There are a couple of parallel ones. We'll mention
00:48:12 – 00:48:17: the parallel ones, but not read them into the episode, as it were. I want to address
00:48:18 – 00:48:21: promise and typology. First, promise.
00:48:23 – 00:48:28: Promise is a central concept to everything we're discussing here, and indeed, to the Christian
00:48:28 – 00:48:36: faith. And the reason for that is, how do you receive a promise? Because what is promised here
00:48:36 – 00:48:41: in the Lord's Supper is the forgiveness of sins. We'll get into that with the words of institution,
00:48:41 – 00:48:48: what is promised in baptism is forgiveness of sins. But how do you receive a promise?
00:48:49 – 00:48:56: If I promise you that I will do something, the only way that you can receive that promise from me
00:48:56 – 00:49:05: is to believe what I've said. You have to believe that I will do what I have said I will do.
00:49:06 – 00:49:12: It's faith. It's belief. That is how you receive a promise. And so all of these things, the core
00:49:12 – 00:49:21: of the Christian faith, the things we are dealing in here, are promises. You receive those via faith.
00:49:21 – 00:49:26: And so when someone tells you that, oh, well, this teaching means there's works, no it doesn't,
00:49:26 – 00:49:31: this has nothing to do with human works. It has everything to do with Christ's work.
00:49:32 – 00:49:41: But it is not a human work that receives the promise. It is faith, and faith is the free gift
00:49:41 – 00:49:48: of God. And so God gives you the capacity, the attribute, the thing that receives
00:49:50 – 00:49:57: the promise, and that is faith. And so there's no work here on your part. It is all from God,
00:49:57 – 00:50:01: because He gives you both the capacity to receive the promise, and then He gives you
00:50:01 – 00:50:08: the promise as well. And the second point I wanted to make is the issue of typology.
00:50:09 – 00:50:15: We've spoken of typology a fair number of times in this podcast, and we will continue to do so.
00:50:16 – 00:50:22: I find it very unfortunate that many modern Christian denominations have essentially
00:50:23 – 00:50:29: jettisoned typology. It's no longer taught, it's no longer used, it's ignored. And that is deeply
00:50:29 – 00:50:36: unfortunate, because Scripture is incredibly rich, and a great deal of that richness comes from
00:50:36 – 00:50:41: typology, because typology flows from the beginning of Scripture all the way to the end.
00:50:43 – 00:50:49: And just as one example of that, you have the Tree of Life standing in the New Jerusalem in
00:50:49 – 00:50:54: Revelation. But you also have the Tree of Life all the way back in Genesis in the garden.
00:50:56 – 00:51:03: But you also have the Tree of Life in Christ. Christ is the Tree of Life. It is His flesh
00:51:03 – 00:51:12: that is given for food to the world, to the elect. And it gives us eternal life. It gives us salvation.
00:51:13 – 00:51:19: Now, to be clear, that salvation is offered to everyone. Scripture is incredibly clear.
00:51:19 – 00:51:24: Ton Cosmon, it is Cosmos, the universe. It is all things that are redeemed in Christ.
00:51:24 – 00:51:31: It is the elect and only the elect who benefit from it. The difference between the objective and
00:51:31 – 00:51:38: the subjective justification. But typology flows throughout Scripture. You have typology of Christ
00:51:38 – 00:51:46: sacrifice and of our worship in the Old Testament sacrificial system. You have the typology of
00:51:46 – 00:51:52: Christ as the rock with the rock in the Old Testament, out of whom, out of which, depending
00:51:52 – 00:51:58: on your emphasis there, flows living water, water of life, that keeps the ancient Israelites alive
00:51:58 – 00:52:04: in the desert. And speaking of flowing waters, I will make one sort of tangential point here
00:52:04 – 00:52:12: right before I get into Matthew. We see both sacraments flowing directly from Christ on Golgotha.
00:52:14 – 00:52:22: When his side is pierced by that spear, what flows out? It is water and blood. So what do you have
00:52:22 – 00:52:28: present there? You have his body, you have water, and you have his blood. Well, that's baptism.
00:52:29 – 00:52:34: And that's the sacrament of the table. That's the Lord's Supper. You have both sacraments,
00:52:34 – 00:52:39: typologically and physically present there on the cross.
00:52:41 – 00:52:47: But now I'll read from Matthew 26, the words of institution. I said I would give the parallel
00:52:47 – 00:52:53: chapters as well, the parallel sections. Those would be Mark 14 and Luke 22, but we'll be reading
00:52:53 – 00:52:55: from Matthew 26.
00:53:24 – 00:53:31: There are a few important parts of this that we didn't already cover in John 6. One,
00:53:31 – 00:53:37: he specifically says, this is my blood of the covenant which is poured out for many for the
00:53:37 – 00:53:45: forgiveness of sins. Now, this is crucial because he's saying that communion does something.
00:53:46 – 00:53:53: What does it do? It forgives sins. Again, there's no work here of any man. The work is of God,
00:53:53 – 00:53:59: the deliverance is through means. We receive those means of grace, and they are indeed means of
00:53:59 – 00:54:05: grace. And this is a point where, thankfully, the Reformed, the Lutherans, and the Roman Catholics
00:54:05 – 00:54:12: all agree that communion does deliver the forgiveness of sins. Baptists, the Anabaptists
00:54:12 – 00:54:20: stand alone in rejecting that because they do not understand what sola fide means. They think that
00:54:20 – 00:54:25: anything that any man does can't possibly have anything to do with forgiveness of sins because
00:54:25 – 00:54:31: that would be us taking credit. Jesus, God everywhere, says the opposite. There's a whole
00:54:31 – 00:54:35: bunch of stuff where God tells us where he's going to deliver the forgiveness of sins.
00:54:35 – 00:54:42: Baptism now saves you. This blood is poured out for the forgiveness of sins, just as his
00:54:42 – 00:54:47: body was sacrificed for the forgiveness of sins. And again, typologically, that was the
00:54:47 – 00:54:53: essence of the sacrificial system. There were blood offerings and there were meat offerings
00:54:53 – 00:55:00: that were typologically pointing forward to the cross. To the final, the ultimate, the pure,
00:55:00 – 00:55:06: the only sacrifice that actually mattered, because it says elsewhere in the New Testament,
00:55:06 – 00:55:13: that those sacrifices couldn't do anything by themselves. They were an expression of faith.
00:55:13 – 00:55:20: They pointed to Jesus' perfect sacrifice once and for all time. So the words of institution,
00:55:20 – 00:55:26: when it talks about the forgiveness of sins, it's not simply talking about Jesus' blood
00:55:26 – 00:55:31: was shed on the cross for the forgiveness of sins. Remember, this is taking, this is my body,
00:55:31 – 00:55:38: drink of it all of you, for this is the blood, my blood of the covenant. This is how the forgiveness
00:55:38 – 00:55:45: of sins is delivered, which is precisely what Jesus said in John 6. He said, whoever has true
00:55:45 – 00:55:52: flesh and drinks true blood is going to receive eternal life. That was the whole point of that.
00:55:52 – 00:55:58: And that's why people got annoyed and they wandered off. Like, well, that can't be. They were confused
00:55:58 – 00:56:04: and they were annoyed because they took it literally. They listened to John 6 literally. He didn't
00:56:04 – 00:56:08: correct them. He didn't say, no, no, no, it's a figure. Don't worry about it. It's not actually
00:56:08 – 00:56:14: about blood and body. There's nothing gross here. It's okay. He didn't say it at all. He let them
00:56:14 – 00:56:22: go and asked the disciples, the 12, what do you think? You can leave too. So again, this is why
00:56:22 – 00:56:28: it is a sacrament to us and really to everyone, except the Baptist. And if you're Baptist and
00:56:28 – 00:56:34: you reject that, we're not trying to pick on you. We're trying to clearly delineate the substantial
00:56:34 – 00:56:41: distinctions among us. And the reason is why we're not the same denomination. Why until such disputes
00:56:41 – 00:56:47: rooted in Scripture are resolved, there can't be complete unanimity on what the faith means.
00:56:47 – 00:56:53: Because this is big ticket stuff. Remember the words of institution, given on the night in
00:56:53 – 00:56:59: which he was betrayed. That was his very last act. Everything else was him being taken in the garden
00:56:59 – 00:57:06: and then executed and rising. And this was his last act of ministry effectively. Everything after
00:57:06 – 00:57:11: this was leading to his death and resurrection. I'm not saying that's not ministry, but this was
00:57:11 – 00:57:16: his last teaching moment. Everything he said afterwards is like, look, I'm fulfilling what I
00:57:16 – 00:57:22: came to do. I did it. The other thing I want to point to is that he says, I tell you, I will not
00:57:22 – 00:57:27: drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it with you and my father's kingdom.
00:57:28 – 00:57:33: Fruit of the vine is synonymous with wine. It's used in lots of different places in Scripture.
00:57:33 – 00:57:40: There's only one thing that it means. It means alcoholic wine, which is itself redundant. There's
00:57:40 – 00:57:46: no such thing as non-alcoholic wine. Now in docks, I can say, I started a distillery. I produced
00:57:46 – 00:57:52: hundreds of thousands of gallons of alcohol. Both as an industry expert and as someone who
00:57:52 – 00:57:58: could do this very experiment that you could do in your garage, if you take a pail and you mash
00:57:58 – 00:58:05: up a bunch of grapes and you put a lid on it and you put something on it to seal it in and it's
00:58:05 – 00:58:09: called a bubbler, you can put something that will make just a one-way passage where you put
00:58:09 – 00:58:15: a little water in it so gases can escape, but nothing can get in and just let it sit for the
00:58:15 – 00:58:20: weekend. When you come back several days later, it's going to be bubbling and the reason it's
00:58:20 – 00:58:26: going to be bubbling is that you've now produced alcohol. All you did was squished some grapes
00:58:26 – 00:58:33: through in a bucket and you've produced alcohol. Why? Because there's everywhere in nature and
00:58:33 – 00:58:40: certainly absolutely everywhere in nature in Jesus' day. Yeast is on everything. Natural yeast is on
00:58:40 – 00:58:47: all the fruit in the universe. It's just there. It's regional. It's specific to different types
00:58:47 – 00:58:52: of plants. It's specific to parts of the country, parts of the world. There's always yeast on stuff.
00:58:53 – 00:59:01: Yeast in the presence of sugar with the right pH and the right temperatures
00:59:02 – 00:59:08: is going to produce two things. It's going to burp carbon dioxide, which is why you would get
00:59:08 – 00:59:13: bubbles coming out of your little bubbler if you seal this package up and it's going to excrete
00:59:13 – 00:59:20: ethanol, which is alcohol. This is how God made the universe. It's not like man used some sort of
00:59:20 – 00:59:26: alchemy to begin. Demons didn't need to teach anybody how to make alcohol. You accidentally
00:59:26 – 00:59:31: get alcohol if you just mishandle fruit. The Mongolians, they had fermented yaks milk.
00:59:31 – 00:59:39: They things get alcoholic very easily. Now the degree of alcohol that's present can vary,
00:59:39 – 00:59:44: but when Jesus says fruit of the vine, he's only talking about one thing. He's talking about real
00:59:44 – 00:59:52: natural wine with alcohol and not just a little bit either. The very first miracle that he did at
00:59:52 – 00:59:58: the wedding of Cana produced a huge volume of alcohol. Why? Because it was a party. Was he
59:58 – 01:00:04
say there's going to be wine in heaven? Alcohol is part of creation. It is not a part of the fall.
01:00:04 – 01:00:12: It is how God made everything to work. It's notable that today there are denominations
01:00:12 – 01:00:18: that reject their tea toddlers either entirely or they simply reject wine in the sacrament.
01:00:20 – 01:00:27: One that is completely in violation of the words of institution. If you are not using wine,
01:00:27 – 01:00:33: you are not having communion because God says to use wine. The Trayvon Martin
01:00:33 – 01:00:38: communion with Skittles in Arizona iced tea, that's the kind of theology that you're
01:00:38 – 01:00:44: employing if you think you can just start substituting stuff. Notably, grape juice.
01:00:44 – 01:00:47: People are like, you juice grapes and you can have no alcohol. No, you can't.
01:00:48 – 01:00:53: The reason that grape juice exists today is that a Wesleyan Methodist named Welch
01:00:54 – 01:01:00: denied communion and wanted to produce non-alcoholic wine so that his abolitionist,
01:01:00 – 01:01:07: detotaling Methodist congregation could practice communion as they thought they were. They were
01:01:07 – 01:01:14: not. It was a farce. But the very existence of pasteurized grapes and grape juice,
01:01:15 – 01:01:21: it's a modern scientific, synthetic rejection of scripture. That's the only reason that exists
01:01:21 – 01:01:28: today. It was created for the purpose of denying what God said to do. Today, you go to the story,
01:01:28 – 01:01:32: like you have the wine aisle and you have the juice aisle and you think, oh, this is all just
01:01:32 – 01:01:39: natural. It seems obvious when you're at the grocery store that obviously juice is the natural
01:01:39 – 01:01:45: product and then wine is the special product that the bad boys make if they want to make alcohol.
01:01:45 – 01:01:51: It's the other way around. All you get in nature is alcohol. You have to work really hard to actually
01:01:51 – 01:01:55: just make juice that's never going to grow anything. That is a much more unnatural product.
01:01:56 – 01:02:03: When Jesus says fruit of the vine and elsewhere, he says wine, he's talking about alcohol. Alcohol
01:02:03 – 01:02:09: is not only a gift from God, but it is explicitly commanded of us for the purpose of communion.
01:02:09 – 01:02:14: Even if you don't want to drink it anywhere else, you must drink wine at communion because that's
01:02:14 – 01:02:23: what God instituted. I think one of the disputes that has evolved over time is after the Reformation,
01:02:23 – 01:02:29: when everyone started getting really fiddly and introspective with the sacrament,
01:02:30 – 01:02:36: there became this impulse to try to create the minimum viable communion. What is the smallest
01:02:36 – 01:02:43: set of operant conditions we can have where it's still communion? I personally despise this impulse
01:02:43 – 01:02:49: in so many people because it's just do what God said. What does he say? He says take, eat.
01:02:50 – 01:02:57: Here's what it is. Say this, do this, eat it, receive it. That's it. That is communion. The whole
01:02:57 – 01:03:03: thing is communion. If you don't have wine, you don't have communion. If you consecrate it,
01:03:03 – 01:03:08: and then instead of eating it, you put it in a monstrance and you parade it around,
01:03:09 – 01:03:14: that's not communion either. You're taking something that God intended for one purpose
01:03:14 – 01:03:19: and saying, I'm not going to do what you said. I'm going to do something else. This is one of the
01:03:19 – 01:03:25: reasons I mentioned the Reformation episode, the Lutheran Confessions in some places refer to
01:03:25 – 01:03:29: the Roman Catholic Mass as the abomination of the Mass. This is one of the reasons, is that when
01:03:29 – 01:03:37: they consecrate the bread and wine, in the words of institution, Jesus and Paul both clearly say,
01:03:37 – 01:03:42: eat, hand drink. One of the things that Rome has long done is denied people the,
01:03:43 – 01:03:49: if you call it right, they're denied the wine. They're only given the bread. There's a logical
01:03:49 – 01:03:55: construction there that if, because the bread is the body, which is true, and the body must
01:03:55 – 01:03:58: necessarily have blood in it, they're already getting blood, so they don't need the wine.
01:03:59 – 01:04:05: That's not what God said to do. Why are you trying to logic this? What problem are you trying to solve?
01:04:05 – 01:04:10: Just do what God said to do. One of the other abuses that occurs in Rome is that
01:04:13 – 01:04:19: they will consecrate the bread. They will say that it has transubstantiated into Christ's flesh.
01:04:20 – 01:04:26: Then rather than eating it, which is what God said to do, at some point they decided, you know what,
01:04:26 – 01:04:30: we got God. Right here, we got God on a plate. As I said, they have these monstrances. There's,
01:04:30 – 01:04:37: monstrances are very fancy presentation cases where they will preserve and parade around
01:04:38 – 01:04:45: the body of Christ, the host, to adore it. Now, not only is this an abuse of what is actually
01:04:45 – 01:04:52: directed in Scripture, which says nothing of the sort, but it also is a direct corollary
01:04:53 – 01:04:57: to the events of the Old Testament where, you know, we mentioned the bronze serpent
01:04:57 – 01:05:02: that Moses created at God's command. God said, create this image of a serpent,
01:05:02 – 01:05:07: put it up on a wooden pole. Everyone who looks upon it will be healed. They will be saved. They
01:05:07 – 01:05:14: won't die from the poison. They did that. They obeyed. Then that bronze serpent shows up later
01:05:14 – 01:05:22: in the Old Testament as a false idol named Nehustan. They saved the serpent because like, well,
01:05:22 – 01:05:27: God did this one good thing with it. You know, it's pretty cool. You know, we spent some time on
01:05:27 – 01:05:33: it. We got this. Let's see what else we can do with it. They saved something that God gave
01:05:33 – 01:05:40: for a good purpose and they started worshiping it. They named it Nehustan and they worshiped
01:05:40 – 01:05:46: the bronze serpent as an idol. They took the very thing that God had provided according to his good
01:05:46 – 01:05:55: will as a salvific means of the flesh and of the soul. They turned it into idolatry. This is
01:05:55 – 01:06:01: exactly what the Roman Catholics do with their Corpus Christi parades. They were given something
01:06:01 – 01:06:06: for one purpose. They abuse it. They rip it from that purpose and they parade it around and they
01:06:06 – 01:06:14: worship it. It's Nehustan worship. It's an abomination. On one hand, they had the obedience
01:06:14 – 01:06:21: to believe and to do everything up until eating or drinking where they deny the drinking to some.
01:06:23 – 01:06:28: Just do what God said. I think that's one of the key distinctives when you're looking at some of
01:06:28 – 01:06:34: the variations in different denominational treatments of this stuff. How closely are you
01:06:34 – 01:06:40: following what God said to do? If he says, wine, you're like, no, I don't want wine. I think it's
01:06:40 – 01:06:47: sinful to drink. Well, crucially, not only does God not say that it's sinful to drink alcohol,
01:06:47 – 01:06:54: God commands the drinking of alcohol for the forgiveness of sins. Just as one last aside
01:06:54 – 01:07:02: here makes me incredibly, incredibly angry when there's someone who's an alcoholic who is told,
01:07:02 – 01:07:08: no, it's okay if you don't drink any wine and communion because I understand that you're forbidden
01:07:08 – 01:07:14: to ever have any alcohol again. One, that's not true. That's not what AA teaches. Even if it were,
01:07:14 – 01:07:19: that would make AA a false cult in opposition to Christianity. To whatever extent, that might be
01:07:19 – 01:07:24: true. It's neither here nor there. They do a lot of good, but there's also some very weird stuff
01:07:24 – 01:07:30: about it. The simple fact is that if someone else teaches you, you will sin by drinking alcohol
01:07:30 – 01:07:37: when God says this alcohol is for the forgiveness of sins. If you believe the man, you're denying
01:07:37 – 01:07:41: your sin and you're violating the first and second commandments, you're calling God a liar.
01:07:41 – 01:07:46: God says to do something like, no, God, I can't do that. You said it's to forgive my sins.
01:07:46 – 01:07:53: I would sin if I did that. Just as a mathematical question, the amount of alcohol on a small sip
01:07:54 – 01:08:01: cannot possibly raise your blood alcohol whatsoever. I understand that there are people who
01:08:01 – 01:08:04: struggle with addiction. I have friends who struggle with addiction. I understand
01:08:05 – 01:08:15: that this one specific case must be the exception. If you sincerely believe that you are going to
01:08:15 – 01:08:21: sin by obeying God, you shouldn't be communing anyway, not until you get straightened out to
01:08:21 – 01:08:26: the fact that God is saying this is for the forgiveness of sins. You must believe that.
01:08:26 – 01:08:31: If you can't believe that, that would be unworthy receiving, which is the next thing we're going
01:08:31 – 01:08:36: to get to. There are so many of these small variations where we start fiddling with what
01:08:36 – 01:08:44: God said to do. It's so simple. It's so simple. What God did in the upper room on Monday, Thursday
01:08:44 – 01:08:49: is as simple as it could be. It's a meal. Eat the bread, drink the wine, and yes, it must be real
01:08:49 – 01:08:54: bread too. It doesn't matter if it's leavened or unleavened, but it has to be bread. It can't be
01:08:54 – 01:08:59: potato chips. It can't be skittles. It has to be bread. Why? Because that's what God said.
01:09:00 – 01:09:05: That's it. We don't need to try to reverse engineer it and find the minimum viable communion
01:09:05 – 01:09:10: so that we can get away with getting God's gifts by some other means.
01:09:10 – 01:09:15: That's not Christianity. What are people doing when they go down that path? It's not a path of
01:09:15 – 01:09:21: faithfulness, and it inevitably leads to worse consequences. It's not just one small abuse.
01:09:21 – 01:09:26: It will get worse and worse because you can't mess with God's things and call Him a liar and come
01:09:26 – 01:09:35: out of it okay. Before we get to additional theology and doctrine, here we'll read one more
01:09:35 – 01:09:41: section of Scripture dealing with a number of other issues related to the Lord's Supper,
01:09:41 – 01:09:48: and also recounting again the words of institution. This time the reading is from First Corinthians,
01:09:48 – 01:09:54: First Corinthians 11. For I receive from the Lord what I also delivered to you,
01:09:54 – 01:09:59: that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks
01:09:59 – 01:10:05: he broke it and said, This is my body, which is for you, do this in remembrance of me.
01:10:06 – 01:10:09: In the same way also he took the cup after Supper saying,
01:10:09 – 01:10:15: This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this as often as you drink it in remembrance of me.
01:10:16 – 01:10:21: For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until
01:10:21 – 01:10:27: he comes. Whoever therefore eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner
01:10:27 – 01:10:33: will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself then,
01:10:33 – 01:10:38: and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning
01:10:38 – 01:10:45: the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. This is why many of you are weak and ill and some have
01:10:45 – 01:10:54: died. Before we get into the specific matter of what it means to eat and drink in an unworthy
01:10:54 – 01:11:00: manner and the consequences of doing that, I want to highlight one of the words here that often comes
01:11:00 – 01:11:07: up in arguments against understanding the Lord's Supper simply as Christ has presented it to us,
01:11:08 – 01:11:14: and that word is remembrance. Now I said earlier that one of the points of
01:11:15 – 01:11:19: this sacrament is in fact to remember Christ, and that is simply what Scripture teaches here,
01:11:20 – 01:11:24: but we need to know what it means to remember Christ.
01:11:26 – 01:11:34: To remember Christ means something specific in this context. The reason for that is that simply
01:11:34 – 01:11:43: noting historical facts avails nothing. That's worth nothing to you. Demons have that knowledge,
01:11:43 – 01:11:49: as Scripture points out and as is pointed out by basically every Christian theologian down through
01:11:49 – 01:11:57: time. Demons have knowledge, it doesn't save them. This comes back to something we have discussed
01:11:57 – 01:12:05: previously. There are three kinds of belief or knowledge that are at issue when we discuss theology.
01:12:05 – 01:12:12: There would be Noticia, Ascensus, and Fiducius. These are just the Latin terms. Two of them you
01:12:12 – 01:12:18: can certainly understand immediately. Noticia is just notice, Ascensus is Ascent, and Fiducius,
01:12:19 – 01:12:27: Fiduciary, Trust. Demons have Noticia. They know that these things happen.
01:12:28 – 01:12:34: These things happened in the past. Demons also have Ascensus. They assent to the fact that these
01:12:34 – 01:12:40: things happen. They don't contest that Christ died on the cross. They don't contest any of the narrative
01:12:40 – 01:12:47: in Scripture, and so demons quite frankly have a better faith than many. But what demons do not
01:12:47 – 01:12:53: have and what is called for here in remembering Christ, because it's not mere or bare remembrance,
01:12:53 – 01:13:01: it's not Noticia, it's not even Noticia and Ascensus, it is Fiducius. It is faith. What is called for
01:13:01 – 01:13:07: is belief in the things that Christ said, in the things that he promised. That is what Christians
01:13:07 – 01:13:13: have. That is what separates a believer from a demon or an unbeliever. Hardly a difference in
01:13:13 – 01:13:20: this case. And so to remember Christ is to remember his benefits, to remember what he has promised,
01:13:20 – 01:13:25: what he has told us, what he has said will happen, what he has said that his supper does.
01:13:26 – 01:13:34: That is what it means to remember Christ. A bare recounting of the facts is not what is in view here.
01:13:34 – 01:13:39: That is not what a Christian does, because a Christian has more than just the belief that the
01:13:39 – 01:13:46: thing happened, a scent to the reality of the thing, a Christian has trust in it. And so that
01:13:46 – 01:13:52: is what the word remembrance means. And so a focus by certain groups on the word remembrance, as if
01:13:52 – 01:13:58: that somehow undermines the totality of the teaching or changes what Christ is saying,
01:14:01 – 01:14:04: is just an abominable perversion of Scripture. It is absolutely false.
01:14:05 – 01:14:13: Calling to remembrance the work of Christ is faith. That is what is demanded of the believer.
01:14:14 – 01:14:19: That is what is demanded for those who would approach the table. And that is part of what it
01:14:19 – 01:14:26: means to approach in a worthy manner. Because not to have faith in the reality of this sacrament
01:14:26 – 01:14:29: is to approach the table in an unworthy manner.
01:14:29 – 01:14:39: So that 1 Corinthians 11 passage is vital for our understanding of the doctrine of communion,
01:14:39 – 01:14:48: because in just two paragraphs, it effectively chops up all the different denominations into
01:14:48 – 01:14:54: all the buckets that we fall into today. Every single dispute is represented in this text.
01:14:55 – 01:15:01: So you have the remembrance argument, as Corey just dispatched. That is the view of some,
01:15:01 – 01:15:06: you know, the Baptists and Jehovah's Witnesses say that there's nothing there. It's not a means of
01:15:06 – 01:15:14: grace. It's literally just you do it and you remember Jesus and thanks for, you know, thanks
01:15:14 – 01:15:19: for being Jesus. They're not that, well, some of them are that sacrilegious, frankly, that's
01:15:19 – 01:15:25: that's how the Arizona iced tea and Skittles happen in the first place. It was, it was that sort of
01:15:25 – 01:15:31: view that if it's just, you know, remembering God, who cares? Why would you need wine? It's how it's
01:15:31 – 01:15:36: how Baptists can be teetotalers because all bets are off. Like it's just, if you're just remembering
01:15:36 – 01:15:40: God, if that's the important part, then doing what he said doesn't matter. Because frankly,
01:15:40 – 01:15:45: if you do what God says, that makes you acting in earning your salvation. And so you can't be
01:15:45 – 01:15:51: Christian, right? Well, no, that's not who said that's not how any of this works. You do what God
01:15:51 – 01:15:56: says because he says to do it. No one, no Christian thinks that doing stuff is going to save you.
01:15:56 – 01:16:02: I mean, that's again, that was one of the divisions at the initial spark of the Reformation.
01:16:02 – 01:16:07: You had the issues with indulgences and with pilgrimages and these other requirements that
01:16:08 – 01:16:12: Rome said, this is going to earn you a time off in purgatory. You can do this stuff. You're going to
01:16:12 – 01:16:18: earn some portion of your salvation. Even if it's not the eternal part, you're still going to be stuck
01:16:18 – 01:16:26: in kind of baby hell for a while. This will help out. Part of the Reformation was a rejection
01:16:26 – 01:16:34: saying that's contrary to all of Scripture. Your conflating works with justification as never
01:16:34 – 01:16:38: permissible. And yet, once we get on the other side of that justification argument, there's
01:16:38 – 01:16:45: still many places where individual denominations still try to bring that notion back into attack,
01:16:45 – 01:16:51: more things that are frankly just basic parts of Christian doctrine. So remembrance is right out.
01:16:52 – 01:16:57: Eating the bread and drinking the cup, again, that's something that Rome for a long time
01:16:58 – 01:17:05: either restricted or forbade or at least an offer to the laity, so-called.
01:17:05 – 01:17:10: You also have the very interesting thing that I think it's worth reading that passage in Corinthians,
01:17:10 – 01:17:16: beginning with verse 23. Just read through it and note, pay attention to the nouns. Because what
01:17:16 – 01:17:20: you will find is that when Paul is writing this, when the Holy Spirit is inspiring him to write this,
01:17:20 – 01:17:26: I'm not attributing this argument to Paul. This is God. He uses bread and wine and cup
01:17:27 – 01:17:33: and blood interchangeably. He just bounces between them. Why? Because it's the same thing.
01:17:33 – 01:17:40: And this is one of the other crucial distinctions among the various denominations.
01:17:42 – 01:17:49: When the Reformation occurred, there was already a strong push for rationalism that existed within
01:17:49 – 01:17:55: Rome. The age of reason was dawning. People were trying to be more rational about things.
01:17:55 – 01:18:02: You have Thomism. You have this vein of, we need to make sure we do the math on this thing, right?
01:18:03 – 01:18:10: And so the reason that Rome ended up with the view of transubstantiation, which effectively says
01:18:10 – 01:18:16: that when the bread and wine are consecrated, they effectively cease to be the bread and wine,
01:18:16 – 01:18:20: and they become the body and blood, and it's only the accidents that are remaining.
01:18:21 – 01:18:24: So it still looks like bread and wine, but that's not really the case.
01:18:26 – 01:18:31: The Reformed take the same logical position. They simply go in the other direction.
01:18:32 – 01:18:38: They say that it can only be one of these things at a time. And obviously, it's still bread and
01:18:38 – 01:18:44: wine, which it is. It's obviously bread and wine. And Paul's words say that. He says bread wine.
01:18:44 – 01:18:49: Jesus says bread wine. There's no doubt in Scripture that that is completely true.
01:18:51 – 01:18:56: The problem is that if you believe that the only thing that bread and wine can possibly be
01:18:56 – 01:19:00: is bread and wine, well, it gets back to the argument about the hypostatic union.
01:19:01 – 01:19:05: This is the reason that Lutherans refer to this as the sacramental union,
01:19:05 – 01:19:12: that it is both simultaneously and we don't know how. We don't take the Catholic position of saying,
01:19:12 – 01:19:17: well, it's not bread and wine. It's much more important for it to be the body and blood,
01:19:17 – 01:19:22: which is true. Without the body and blood, there's no point. They're completely right about that.
01:19:22 – 01:19:26: What they're wrong about is the rational conclusion that, well, we absolutely believe
01:19:26 – 01:19:30: this Christ's body and blood and therefore the bread and wine have to be gone,
01:19:31 – 01:19:37: all but completely gone. And there's their rational philosophical trash arguments to try
01:19:37 – 01:19:41: to substantiate how that's okay. The Roman Catholics and the Reformed agree it can only
01:19:41 – 01:19:49: be one or the other. The problem is that God says it's both. So eat the bread, drink the cup.
01:19:49 – 01:19:53: Anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body drinks judgment on himself.
01:19:54 – 01:20:02: Which is it? Is it the body or is it the bread? Yes, it's both. How? We don't know. That's it.
01:20:02 – 01:20:08: We have the same response to these texts that Peter had to the whole scene in John 6. His response
01:20:08 – 01:20:12: when Jesus, like, do you wander off? Do you not believe this? Like, Lord, to whom shall we go?
01:20:12 – 01:20:18: You have the words of eternal life. That is the Christian confession. God, I don't know what's
01:20:18 – 01:20:25: going on, but I believe you anyway. You said it. I believe it. And try to understand. Like, as we said,
01:20:25 – 01:20:29: Catechesis teaching around these things is important. Jesus spent time teaching.
01:20:29 – 01:20:33: The Church has always spent time teaching these things and teaching before communion.
01:20:33 – 01:20:39: Because the other part of this passage is that there were people who died. They were killed by
01:20:39 – 01:20:46: unworthy reception. And this goes to one of the errors and the crucial distinction
01:20:46 – 01:20:52: between the Lutheran position and what our confessions call the sacramentarian position,
01:20:52 – 01:20:58: which is effectively the Reformed position today. And that is that they will say, and you'll find
01:20:58 – 01:21:04: this in much reform, particularly some of the Presbyterians, sound just like Lutherans up to
01:21:04 – 01:21:10: the very end. They will say that there's a real presence. And if you don't press, you will think
01:21:10 – 01:21:15: that we're in agreement. But when you do press, when you ask the right questions and you narrow
01:21:15 – 01:21:23: it down, what comes out is that there is no body and blood in your mouth. That's a crucial distinction.
01:21:23 – 01:21:27: That's what makes it a sacrament. That's what makes it complete. That's what makes it the
01:21:27 – 01:21:34: antitype to the pipe type of the bread of the manna in the desert. Because if it's not actually
01:21:34 – 01:21:41: Christ's body going in your mouth, you're not receiving what God promised. And when Paul talks
01:21:41 – 01:21:47: about discerning the body, eating and drinking judgment on himself, he means it. And so the
01:21:47 – 01:21:54: crucial distinction in the sacramentarian Reformed position is that it is a spiritual mode of presence.
01:21:55 – 01:21:58: They will say that they believe it, and God bless them for it. I'm glad that they take it
01:21:58 – 01:22:04: seriously. Thank you so much for not being Baptist because that is a far worse error. However,
01:22:05 – 01:22:11: the problem with this is that it also denies part of this passage. Because in order for the
01:22:11 – 01:22:20: sacramentarian view that there is a physical oral reception of only bread and wine, and then
01:22:21 – 01:22:29: we spiritually ascend to the right hand of God, we receive his body and blood in a spiritual sense
01:22:29 – 01:22:35: and a heavenly sense. The problem with that is that that requires faith. And what is said here
01:22:35 – 01:22:43: in 1 Corinthians 11 is that they're people who ate unworthily, and God makes clear that they're
01:22:43 – 01:22:48: guilty of the body and blood because they ate in an unworthy manner by not examining themselves
01:22:48 – 01:22:58: and discerning the body and blood. This is crucial because if the Reformed are correct and you can
01:22:58 – 01:23:05: have communion and it's all faith-based and it's all spiritual, there's no possibility for anyone
01:23:05 – 01:23:09: to die because if you don't have faith, you cannot spiritually ascend to heaven to receive
01:23:09 – 01:23:17: Christ's body and blood there. The only way that that mode of thought can work is if the damned,
01:23:17 – 01:23:23: if those without faith, can also ascend to heaven to receive Christ's body and blood,
01:23:23 – 01:23:30: and then they're killed for it, they're killed by it, that necessarily makes no sense. There's no
01:23:30 – 01:23:35: possible ascent into heaven spiritually for those unbelievers, and it is unbelief that's being
01:23:35 – 01:23:40: described there. When you're guilty concerning the body and blood of Christ because you don't discern
01:23:40 – 01:23:46: it, it's a rejection of God. It's calling him a liar saying that what you said is not true. And so
01:23:47 – 01:23:52: the reason for the Lutheran position, it's a literalist and it's mysterious. It's like,
01:23:52 – 01:24:00: I don't know. I know this far and I know no further. And as we've said before, for me personally,
01:24:00 – 01:24:05: that's always been enough. I don't feel the need to concern myself with trying to figure out the
01:24:05 – 01:24:11: mechanisms and the math and the scales of all these things. When God says it, if I don't understand,
01:24:11 – 01:24:17: okay, there's something I don't understand. Add it to the list. I have a very long list of things
01:24:17 – 01:24:22: I don't understand. And particularly when we're looking at things that are necessarily spiritual,
01:24:22 – 01:24:28: they're necessarily supernatural. They're outside of the material world. That's what we're talking
01:24:28 – 01:24:33: about here. And remember, that's the crux of this. Because it is outside of the material world,
01:24:34 – 01:24:40: all bets are off. You can't rationally figure out that which is inherently irrational because
01:24:40 – 01:24:46: it's outside of creation. This is something different that God is doing in a special way.
01:24:46 – 01:24:51: And so this one passage, when you look at all the various pieces of it,
01:24:52 – 01:24:56: all the denominations are going to fall into their various buckets on one side or the other of
01:24:56 – 01:25:02: these disputes. And I believe with a clean conscience that the only possible synthesis
01:25:02 – 01:25:08: of this passage and the other passages is a Lutheran one, that it is truly Christ's body
01:25:08 – 01:25:13: and blood, physically present. We don't know how. And again, this is not one of the early
01:25:13 – 01:25:18: episodes we did on the clarity of Scripture. We go into this detail some more. We did about an hour
01:25:18 – 01:25:25: specifically talking about this one debate around physical versus real because it blew up on Twitter
01:25:25 – 01:25:30: nearly a year ago. There was a false teacher effectively spreading reform positions and
01:25:30 – 01:25:34: pretending that they were Lutheran and causing Lutherans to abandon the Lutheran faith. Not
01:25:34 – 01:25:38: that there's a difference in faith, but there's clearly a difference in belief and in practice.
01:25:41 – 01:25:44: It's important to get this stuff right, and it's important to know clearly where the lines are
01:25:44 – 01:25:50: because we all fall on one side or another. And if you hold a position contrary to what we're saying,
01:25:51 – 01:25:56: you need to have an argument that stands up to effectively dismantling the one that we have. And
01:25:56 – 01:26:02: I've read them. We're not giving you a fair shake here today by reading off clearly all the other
01:26:02 – 01:26:07: affirmative positions for what everyone else believes, because we believe genuinely that
01:26:07 – 01:26:14: there's no possibility for them to exist in totality with the very plain words of Scripture.
01:26:14 – 01:26:18: Again, there's a tremendous amount in the Book of Concord that deals with these debates in all
01:26:18 – 01:26:23: directions, deals with the Roman Catholics, deals with the Reformed, deals with the Anabaptists
01:26:23 – 01:26:28: at great length. We're not referring to those confessions not because they're not good arguments,
01:26:28 – 01:26:33: but because it's important to look at what God said just as they did. They've made very good
01:26:33 – 01:26:38: arguments in that confessional document. The arguments are also from Scripture.
01:26:39 – 01:26:46: And so I suppose that the Reformed listeners have expected the following phrase from two Lutherans
01:26:46 – 01:26:55: since starting this episode. So I won't disappoint you. Is means is. And I would be remiss if I did
01:26:55 – 01:27:01: not mention the Marburg colloquy in which Luther and Zwingli discuss the issue. It would probably be
01:27:01 – 01:27:10: too charitable to say attempted to come to terms. But famously, at that debate, Luther carved into
01:27:10 – 01:27:16: the table. We don't know if he carved it facing himself or upside down facing Zwingli. I happen
01:27:16 – 01:27:23: to believe the latter is more likely. But he carved into the table hook est corpus meum,
01:27:23 – 01:27:32: which is simply the Latin for this is my body. And that really is the simplicity of the Lutheran
01:27:32 – 01:27:40: position. We take Christ at his words. When some will contend that they have a literal understanding
01:27:41 – 01:27:47: of Scripture, I find a great deal of irony in that those who most vehemently insist they interpret
01:27:47 – 01:27:55: Scripture literally never interpret the sacraments literally. They always reject at least almost
01:27:55 – 01:28:00: always reject baptism and the Lord supper as being what Scripture very clearly says that they are.
01:28:02 – 01:28:10: When Christ says this is my body, this is my blood. Well, that's what he means. He said it.
01:28:10 – 01:28:17: He means it. Christ most certainly knew the word for symbol or symbolizes, represents,
01:28:18 – 01:28:25: or is an allegory of whatever term you want to use. He did not use those words. He said,
01:28:25 – 01:28:32: this is my body. And that is why that is the teaching that Lutherans affirm.
01:28:33 – 01:28:39: Now, of course, you've undoubtedly heard arguments related to other parts of Scripture parables,
01:28:39 – 01:28:47: where Christ taught, I am the vine or I am the door or any various things like that a number
01:28:47 – 01:28:54: of different parables. I want to highlight a grammar point here. And grammar is not nitpicky
01:28:54 – 01:28:59: grammar matters because grammar determines the meaning of the words you are using. The order
01:28:59 – 01:29:07: of the words matters. The words you choose matters. All of these things contribute to the actual meaning
01:29:07 – 01:29:11: that you intend and that will be taken away from what you have said.
01:29:12 – 01:29:20: And so I want to highlight Christ says, I am the vine. He does not say I am a vine.
01:29:20 – 01:29:24: There's a difference there, a very important difference. And yes,
01:29:24 – 01:29:28: Greek can also distinguish between the definite and indefinite articles.
01:29:29 – 01:29:34: So when Christ says, I am the vine, he is in fact the vine.
01:29:35 – 01:29:45: Now, is he a literal vine? No, that's not what that is saying. It is saying that he is the vine
01:29:46 – 01:29:50: literal in the sense of being, yes, it's a metaphorical vine. And yes, it does make sense
01:29:50 – 01:29:56: to say something is literally metaphorically true. If on the other hand, he had said,
01:29:56 – 01:30:02: I am a vine, that would have been him declaring that he is in fact a literal physical vine.
01:30:04 – 01:30:07: In which case, perhaps we have to raise Lewis's trilemma.
01:30:08 – 01:30:13: He also does not say I am a door. He says I am the door and he is in fact the door,
01:30:13 – 01:30:20: because he is the only passage through which we can get to God. He is the only way to salvation.
01:30:20 – 01:30:28: So he is in fact the door. So the contentions around those parables, those parabolic sayings,
01:30:29 – 01:30:37: do not in any way argue against taking literally what Christ says about the bread and the wine
01:30:37 – 01:30:44: in the supper. And so I want to read just four quick paragraphs here from the Lutheran confessions
01:30:44 – 01:30:51: that state the Lutheran position on the Lord's Supper that state very clearly what we believe.
01:30:51 – 01:30:54: These are from the epitome of the formula of Concord.
01:31:15 – 01:31:22: So the bread does not signify Christ's absent body and the wine his absent blood,
01:31:23 – 01:31:28: but because of the sacramental union the bread and wine are truly Christ's body and blood.
01:31:29 – 01:31:35: Now about the consecration we believe teach and confess that no work of man or recitation of the
01:31:35 – 01:31:41: minister produces this presence of Christ's body and blood in the holy supper. Instead,
01:31:41 – 01:31:47: this presence is to be credited only and alone to the almighty power of our Lord Jesus Christ.
01:31:48 – 01:31:54: At the same time we also believe teach and confess unanimously that in the use of the
01:31:54 – 01:32:00: holy supper the words of Christ's institution should in no way be left out. Instead they should
01:32:00 – 01:32:06: be publicly recited as it is written in 1 Corinthians 10.16, the cup of blessing that we
01:32:06 – 01:32:11: bless and so forth. This blessing occurs through the reciting of Christ's words.
01:32:14 – 01:32:19: And so those four paragraphs give a very brief statement of exactly what it is that
01:32:19 – 01:32:24: Lutherans believe. Of course they're just a restatement of Scripture. We believe literally
01:32:25 – 01:32:31: what the words of Scripture say and it may seem like we mentioned that to repeat that ad nauseam,
01:32:31 – 01:32:36: but it is simply the case. In fact it is one thing that annoys many about Lutherans.
01:32:37 – 01:32:41: We are simply going to insist on what the words of the book say because they're the
01:32:41 – 01:32:46: word of God. That's why we believe them. We don't believe them because we happen to like the book.
01:32:47 – 01:32:53: We believe them because having been given faith we believe the word of God. We believe
01:32:54 – 01:32:59: that what is contained in Scripture is true because it is the inspired word of God.
01:33:00 – 01:33:09: And so when God says this is my body we say yes. But he also says this bread is my body.
01:33:10 – 01:33:15: Okay he said two things there. He said this is bread. We believe him. He said the bread is his
01:33:15 – 01:33:21: body. We still believe him. We do not have to understand. We do not have to subject it to human
01:33:21 – 01:33:29: reason in order to believe it because the ground of all truth said it. And if God says it it's true.
01:33:30 – 01:33:35: It's very easy to believe this. You can simply affirm the truth of it. You don't have to work
01:33:35 – 01:33:41: out the philosophical minutiae. In fact you cannot do so. But you don't have to do so.
01:33:42 – 01:33:45: This again comes back to something we previously discussed.
01:33:47 – 01:33:53: You don't believe the things in Scripture because you believe the things in Scripture.
01:33:54 – 01:34:01: Let me clarify what I mean. You believe the things in Scripture because having been given
01:34:01 – 01:34:09: faith you believe God is the author of Scripture and God being God who does not lie, who cannot lie,
01:34:09 – 01:34:15: you believe that his word is true. Many reverse the order of operations there.
01:34:16 – 01:34:23: They'll say I believe Scripture and therefore I believe in God. No. You believe God,
01:34:24 – 01:34:29: therefore you believe in Scripture. It is the exact opposite way. Now if you're arguing with
01:34:29 – 01:34:36: someone who is an unbeliever, who is an atheist, yes you can use secular reasoning to prove things
01:34:36 – 01:34:42: in Scripture are true. You can use archaeology, history, etc. in order to prove Scripture
01:34:42 – 01:34:47: to tear down some of the barriers to that person hearing the word of God and believing.
01:34:49 – 01:34:56: But as a believer you believe the word of God is true because you believe that God is the one
01:34:56 – 01:35:04: who inspired it. And just to emphasize to go back to Woe's point about the difference between
01:35:05 – 01:35:09: the Romans and the Reformed. Conveniently both start with R.
01:35:10 – 01:35:16: But the big difference between them as has been used many times before,
01:35:17 – 01:35:23: the example of the illustration of falling off a horse. The Romans fall off the right side of the
01:35:23 – 01:35:30: horse. It's not that they take it too literally, it's that they ignore part of it, subject it to
01:35:30 – 01:35:35: reason, and say well it must simply be his body, it can't be bred at the same time. So they fall
01:35:35 – 01:35:40: off the right side of the horse. For many of them I am willing to concede they are trying to believe
01:35:40 – 01:35:47: what God says. But the problem is they aren't believing what God actually said. You have to
01:35:47 – 01:35:54: look at what he said. This bred, it's bred, is my body, it's his body, it's both. The Reformed on
01:35:54 – 01:36:00: the other hand, also subjecting the words of God to reason, fall off the left side of the horse,
01:36:01 – 01:36:08: and say well it's bred, it tastes like bred, when I eat it, it feels like bred, it has
01:36:09 – 01:36:15: all of the accidents of bred, it must be bred, and yes I'll hint there at the underlying philosophy,
01:36:15 – 01:36:21: it's not really the point of this episode, but it is why we have some of these distinctions between
01:36:21 – 01:36:27: the Romans and the Reformed. But so they fall off the left side of the horse and say it's bred,
01:36:27 – 01:36:32: my senses all report that it is bred, I have to find some other explanation for God's words.
01:36:34 – 01:36:38: Lutherans don't have this problem because God says it's bred, I eat it, it tastes like bred,
01:36:38 – 01:36:45: okay it's bred, God says it's its body, if God says it's his body, I just believe him. So the
01:36:45 – 01:36:52: Lutheran position is very simple, it is purely a matter of faith of course, because you have to
01:36:52 – 01:36:59: believe this in faith, you can't eat the bread and know with your senses that Christ is present,
01:37:01 – 01:37:05: and the only reason he's present is because of his word, as I just read from the book of
01:37:05 – 01:37:10: Concord, that's what Lutherans affirm, he is present because of his word, and we know he is
01:37:10 – 01:37:18: present because of his word, and so all of it flows from faith. And then I suppose I should address
01:37:18 – 01:37:27: at least briefly the Reformed contention that comes up throughout discussions of the differences
01:37:27 – 01:37:34: between Lutherans and Reformed, and that is this is again a difference in the application of reason,
01:37:34 – 01:37:41: as should be unsurprising. The Reformed will assert finitum non-kapax infinity,
01:37:42 – 01:37:46: which simply means the finite is not capable of the infinite.
01:37:49 – 01:37:55: We will avoid getting into some of the theological weeds as it were here, so
01:37:55 – 01:38:03: the Communicatio and such will leave aside to some degree, but the gist of the Reformed position,
01:38:03 – 01:38:14: the central contention, is that Christ cannot be physically omnipresent according to his humanity
01:38:15 – 01:38:24: because the communication of the divine attributes is impossible in its fullness with regard to the
01:38:24 – 01:38:30: human nature, because the human nature is finite. I believe that is a fair statement
01:38:30 – 01:38:37: of what the Reformed believe. The Lutheran contention, and quite frankly to be blunt,
01:38:37 – 01:38:42: the contention of Scripture, is that the fullness of deity dwells bodily in Christ.
01:38:42 – 01:38:48: That's just a quote from Scripture, that's a verse. And so when Scripture says that,
01:38:49 – 01:38:55: that necessarily means something, and so the personal union of God and man in Christ
01:38:56 – 01:39:04: is indivisible, inseparable, where the divinity of Christ is present, the humanity of Christ is
01:39:04 – 01:39:10: present, because Christ is an indivisible person, having assumed the humanity into himself.
01:39:12 – 01:39:20: And so the humanity of Christ has and exercises the divine attributes of Christ. It does not have
01:39:20 – 01:39:26: them in itself by its nature, because we do not teach that there is a mixing of the natures in
01:39:26 – 01:39:36: the person of Christ. We went over this previously in other episodes. But Christ, even according to
01:39:36 – 01:39:44: his humanity, is omnipresent because of that communication of the divine attributes, omnipresence
01:39:44 – 01:39:51: being properly an attribute of the divinity, but because of the communication of attributes
01:39:51 – 01:39:58: being an attribute of the person, the person being the totality of Christ, fully God, fully man.
01:39:59 – 01:40:06: And so the argument that the finite is not capable of the infinite is simply refuted by Scripture
01:40:06 – 01:40:13: and refuted by not terribly complicated theology. Yes, a little bit, but not horribly so.
01:40:15 – 01:40:22: A simpler version of that argument that I think everyone will be immediately able to grasp,
01:40:23 – 01:40:30: quite fully, to refute the idea that the finite is not capable of the infinite in
01:40:30 – 01:40:34: this particular way, whatever it is, and specifically the reform meme.
01:40:36 – 01:40:37: The refutation is Mary.
01:40:37 – 01:40:47: And the reason for that is simple. Mary bore in her womb for nine months the infinite God.
01:40:49 – 01:40:58: Could there be other than the person of Christ himself, but this is even a more visceral and
01:40:58 – 01:41:04: easier to grasp illustration of the principle, really. Could there be any more clear example
01:41:05 – 01:41:11: of the finite holding, containing, being capable of the infinite
01:41:12 – 01:41:19: than Mary having Christ in her womb? I don't think there is. And so if Mary could have the
01:41:19 – 01:41:24: infinite God in her womb, then the finite is most certainly capable of the infinite.
01:41:24 – 01:41:31: And the only way to reject that would be to reject the personal union, which would be rank heresy.
01:41:32 – 01:41:39: I think everything that you just said is really boiled down by going back to a portion of the
01:41:39 – 01:41:46: middle of that passage from John 6. Jesus says again, I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate
01:41:46 – 01:41:51: the manna and the wilderness and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven,
01:41:51 – 01:41:56: so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven.
01:41:56 – 01:42:01: If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for
01:42:01 – 01:42:06: the life of the world is my flesh. The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying,
01:42:06 – 01:42:14: how can this man give us his flesh to eat? That's really the whole argument, because while these
01:42:14 – 01:42:19: things will often boil down to, well, what does the text say, which is always a good question,
01:42:20 – 01:42:26: as Corey was dealing with right there at the end, the underlying question is, can God do it?
01:42:27 – 01:42:34: And they have first answered, no, God can't. And therefore, they must find in a text some other
01:42:34 – 01:42:40: version that lets God not being able to do something be in accord with Scripture. Because
01:42:40 – 01:42:46: if you simply believe what Scripture says, you don't have the problem. And you don't have to
01:42:46 – 01:42:52: worry about John 6 being eucharistic, because it's all just figurative language. What's the
01:42:52 – 01:42:58: same problem that the Jews had? How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Well, exactly the same
01:42:58 – 01:43:04: way that Jesus had done the day before with the feeding of the 5,000. Five loaves and two fishes
01:43:04 – 01:43:13: turned into 12 baskets of leftovers after probably 20,000 people had eaten. That's how God can do it.
01:43:13 – 01:43:19: God works miracles. He works material miracles in the world. And we don't have to worry about it.
01:43:19 – 01:43:24: His very demonstration of power, which is given incidentally by their demand, they said,
01:43:24 – 01:43:29: give us a sign. They were constantly demanding signs for him to back up his teaching. And so
01:43:29 – 01:43:35: sometimes he did. And the sign that he gave them on that day, he didn't cause a dove to appear.
01:43:35 – 01:43:41: He didn't cause the clouds to part. What did he do? He took a small amount, a finite amount,
01:43:42 – 01:43:48: and created in that day effectively an infinite amount. There was such a super abundance that
01:43:48 – 01:43:54: there was more than they could have possibly eaten. That's how God does it. Is that an answer? No.
01:43:55 – 01:44:00: It doesn't explain anything beyond just believing. God is like, okay, he delivered. If he can feed
01:44:00 – 01:44:06: 20,000 people with a basket full of food, I think he can deliver on this promise too.
01:44:07 – 01:44:14: And what does he say? He says, I am the bread of life. I will give for the life of the world.
01:44:14 – 01:44:22: It's my flesh. It's the same thing. Communion is vital because it delivers the forgiveness of sins.
01:44:22 – 01:44:27: Again, the miracle that Jesus performed with the food was just to feed their bellies.
01:44:27 – 01:44:31: But the very next day, all the teaching was, this is not about feeding your bellies because
01:44:31 – 01:44:36: we skipped a few verses at the beginning of that, where they were demanding a bread king.
01:44:37 – 01:44:42: This guy can do miracles. He can feed everybody, put him in charge. No one will ever go hungry
01:44:42 – 01:44:46: again. I want this guy to be my king. He's like, no, that's not why I'm here.
01:44:47 – 01:44:51: Your fathers were fed in the desert and they still died, even though the food they were giving
01:44:51 – 01:44:57: was miraculous. This food that I'm giving you is an even greater miracle. Those who will eat
01:44:57 – 01:45:03: this food will never die. And yet, what does he say even then? Jesus said a little while later,
01:45:03 – 01:45:10: whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks on my blood has eternal life and I will raise him up on the
01:45:10 – 01:45:18: last day. So note that he's talking both about eternal life and about corporeal death. The only
01:45:18 – 01:45:23: reason that a man would need to be raised up on the last day was that he died. So this medicine of
01:45:23 – 01:45:31: immortality, this eternal life that's being given by his flesh, by the bread, it's not the tree of
01:45:31 – 01:45:37: life from the garden where a man lives forever. This is delivering forgiveness of sins, which
01:45:38 – 01:45:44: is how God delivers resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. See, forgiveness
01:45:44 – 01:45:50: of sins, which is delivered through faith underpins all of this. It's why it's not a memorial meal,
01:45:50 – 01:45:55: it's a sacrament. It's delivering an actual means of grace. God's doing something here. And what
01:45:55 – 01:46:01: he's doing is one of the most important things that he's ever done. He's taking the sacrifice on
01:46:01 – 01:46:07: the cross once for all and he's delivering it materially in our mouths. As we said and we emphasized
01:46:07 – 01:46:14: for two hours in the baptism episode, it's for our comfort. When we receive the body and blood of
01:46:14 – 01:46:20: Christ in our mouth, we know that God is delivering on his promises because, yes, we have faith and
01:46:20 – 01:46:25: we trust in God and God knows we need more. He knows we need comfort, we need reassurance.
01:46:26 – 01:46:31: He pours out more than we actually need because he's giving us everything we could possibly need
01:46:31 – 01:46:38: or want. And so when the sacraments are given to us, not us doing them, but God giving them,
01:46:38 – 01:46:44: he's delivering forgiveness, he's delivering faith, he's strengthening faith, and he's ensuring that
01:46:44 – 01:46:49: no one has any reason to doubt. Because we said in the baptism episode, even if there's a day where
01:46:49 – 01:46:55: you doubt how hard you believe, how well you believe, how strong your faith is, if the only anchor that
01:46:55 – 01:47:01: you have on that day is your confidence in your baptism, that's still, it's an anchor. It's holding
01:47:01 – 01:47:07: you fast to the cross. The forgiveness of sins delivered in communion is the same thing. And
01:47:07 – 01:47:12: the beautiful distinction between baptism, the sacrament, and the sacrament of the altar is that
01:47:12 – 01:47:18: this is something that's given for us weekly. Jesus says, do this as often as you drink of it
01:47:18 – 01:47:24: in remembrance of me. It's to be a regular meal. It's not to be infrequent. It should really be
01:47:24 – 01:47:29: every week. And frankly, if you can do it more often, that's good. If you do it less often, it's
01:47:29 – 01:47:35: not that, oh well, you went beneath the threshold, so you can't be saved now. It's not like some drug
01:47:35 – 01:47:41: dosage. Because again, as we said in the baptism episode, and we'll save repeatedly, because it's
01:47:41 – 01:47:48: so vital. It is finished means that all of your sins are already paid for. The fact that you have
01:47:48 – 01:47:53: faith to believe that means that all of your sins are paid for and delivered to you through faith,
01:47:53 – 01:47:59: in eternity. Your name is written in the book of life. Your name is tied to God's name in your
01:47:59 – 01:48:08: baptism, and he gives you forgiveness of sins in the blood and in the body through bread and wine,
01:48:08 – 01:48:12: so that there's never any doubt. There's no room for doubt. Even if you doubt yourself,
01:48:12 – 01:48:17: even if you have a really bad day, all these things that God pours out through the sacraments,
01:48:17 – 01:48:23: particularly eliminate the possibility for a man to think, well, I don't know. Maybe I'm out.
01:48:23 – 01:48:30: Maybe this is just, I don't feel it anymore. I don't know if I can trust in God. Well, if you can
01:48:30 – 01:48:34: at least trust in his promises, you can work your way back. He will work you back. He's using these
01:48:34 – 01:48:42: to hang on to you. And sometimes it's necessary. This food, this medicine that's given to us
01:48:43 – 01:48:49: preserves our faith and our health in God. And sometimes it's also a lifeline. But if we're being
01:48:49 – 01:48:56: sustained regularly in the body and in the Word, we have more than we need. And so God keeps us safe.
01:48:56 – 01:49:02: He keeps our faith preserved. And the reason that the sacraments are so important to Lutherans and
01:49:02 – 01:49:06: should be important to everyone, we believe as Lutheran doctrine presents it, is that
01:49:07 – 01:49:14: all of the other variations will sow doubt to some degree, some much more than others. We're not
01:49:14 – 01:49:19: saying they're all equally incorrect. Some are a little bit off. Some are very terribly off.
01:49:20 – 01:49:25: But anytime you're giving up on any of God's promises, you're missing out. And that's the
01:49:25 – 01:49:31: point. It's not about winning this argument. It's not about changing minds or having a higher score
01:49:31 – 01:49:36: on the board. It's about making sure that all these things that God says are really important
01:49:36 – 01:49:42: and these things that deliver immortality take it. It's a free gift. It's freely given.
01:49:42 – 01:49:48: Just as our faith is freely given, all this stuff is poured out. And we need to just receive it
01:49:48 – 01:49:55: in thanksgiving and in gladness and in faith and in taking it seriously, not being dismissive of it.
01:49:56 – 01:50:01: When we're warned that we should examine ourselves before communing, we should take that seriously.
01:50:02 – 01:50:08: It's something that I think if some of the people who are causing problems in the world today inside
01:50:08 – 01:50:15: the church actually reflected sincerely on the controversies that they've stirred up and the
01:50:15 – 01:50:22: injury that they've done, they would repent before they communed, which is the goal. The goal is to
01:50:22 – 01:50:28: instill repentance in us for us to turn away from all of our wickedness. We all crucify Christ
01:50:28 – 01:50:35: every day with our evil actions. And yet, once for all, it was paid. And when this stuff is given
01:50:35 – 01:50:40: to us in Scripture and it's given to us in physical means and the sacraments, it's to reassure us
01:50:40 – 01:50:45: that God is going to keep every promise he's ever made. Because ultimately, that is the only thing
01:50:45 – 01:50:50: that we can actually count on. You can't count on the sun rising. You can't count on your family
01:50:50 – 01:50:56: liking you. You can't count on your heart not stopping, but you can count on God. And when you
01:50:56 – 01:51:01: count on that, the rest of those things, while there's still concerns, they can't be worries.
01:51:02 – 01:51:08: You can't worry when you have your faith rooted in all of God's promises. Everything else is,
01:51:09 – 01:51:13: it's highly desirable, it's nice to have, but it's no longer critical. You don't have to have
01:51:14 – 01:51:18: the stuff. You have to have God's promises. And he gives those for free.
01:51:19 – 01:51:26: And so we will close out this episode with three quotes, one from the large catechism,
01:51:26 – 01:51:32: one from what was effectively Luther's last will and testament, as he intended it at any rate.
01:51:33 – 01:51:41: And then one other quote, and then a little bit about the history, just some quick tidbits
01:51:41 – 01:51:45: from the history of the beliefs of the church with regard to the Lord's supper.
01:51:45 – 01:51:50: And so first from the large catechism.
01:52:15 – 01:52:30: Here also we do not wish to enter into controversy and fight with the defamers and blasphemers of
01:52:30 – 01:52:36: this sacrament, but to learn first, as we did with baptism, what is of the greatest importance.
01:52:36 – 01:52:42: The chief point is God's word and ordinance or command, for the sacrament has not been invented
01:52:42 – 01:52:49: or introduced by any man. Without anyone's counsel and deliberation it has been instituted by Christ.
01:52:49 – 01:52:54: The Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the Creed keep their nature and worth,
01:52:54 – 01:53:00: even if you never keep, pray, or believe them. So also this honorable sacrament remains undisturbed.
01:53:01 – 01:53:06: Nothing is withdrawn or taken from it, even though we use it and administer it unworthily.
01:53:07 – 01:53:11: Do you think God cares about what we do or believe, as though on that account
01:53:11 – 01:53:16: he should allow his ordinance to be changed? Why in all worldly matters everything stays the
01:53:16 – 01:53:20: way God has created and ordered it, no matter how we employ or use it?
01:53:22 – 01:53:27: This point must always be taught, for by it the chatter of nearly all the fanatical spirits can
01:53:27 – 01:53:33: be repelled, for they regard the sacraments unlike God's word as something that we do.
01:53:34 – 01:53:40: Now what is the sacrament of the altar? Answer, it is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus
01:53:40 – 01:53:46: Christ in and under the bread and wine, which we Christians are commanded by Christ's word to eat
01:53:46 – 01:53:53: and to drink. Just as we have said that baptism is not simple water, so here also we say that though
01:53:53 – 01:53:58: the sacrament is bread and wine, it is not mere bread and wine, such as are ordinarily served at
01:53:58 – 01:54:05: the table. But this is bread and wine included in and connected with God's word. It is the word I
01:54:05 – 01:54:12: say that makes and sets this sacrament apart, so it is not mere bread and wine, but is and is called
01:54:12 – 01:54:18: Christ's body and blood. For it is said, when the word is joined to the element or natural substance,
01:54:18 – 01:54:24: it becomes a sacrament. This saying of St. Augustine is so properly and so well put,
01:54:24 – 01:54:29: that he is scarcely said anything better. The word must make a sacrament out of the element,
01:54:29 – 01:54:35: or else it remains a mere element. Now it is not the word or ordinance of a prince or emperor,
01:54:36 – 01:54:41: but it is the word of the grand majesty, at whose feet all creatures should fall and affirm it as
01:54:41 – 01:54:48: he says, and accept it with all reverence, fear and humility. With this word you can strengthen
01:54:48 – 01:54:53: your conscience and say, if a hundred thousand devils together with all fanatics should rush
01:54:53 – 01:54:59: forward crying, how can bread and wine be Christ's body and blood, and such I know that all spirits
01:54:59 – 01:55:04: and scholars together are not as wise as is the divine majesty in his little finger.
01:55:05 – 01:55:12: Now here stands Christ's word, take, eat, this is my body, drink of it all of you,
01:55:12 – 01:55:17: this is my blood of the New Testament, and so on. Here we stop to watch those who will call
01:55:17 – 01:55:24: themselves his masters, and make the matter different from what he has spoken. It is true,
01:55:24 – 01:55:29: indeed, that if you take away the word, or regard the sacrament without the words,
01:55:29 – 01:55:34: you have nothing but mere bread and wine. But if the words remain with them,
01:55:34 – 01:55:40: as they shall and must, then by virtue of the words it is truly Christ's body and blood,
01:55:40 – 01:55:46: what Christ slips say and speak, so it is, he can never lie or deceive.
01:55:48 – 01:55:53: The second quote is from Luther's Confession Concerning Christ Supper.
01:55:54 – 01:56:00: This one was effectively what Luther intended as his last will and testament,
01:56:00 – 01:56:04: and you'll note that he concerned himself not with the disposition of his estate or any such
01:56:04 – 01:56:11: matters, although those were handled as well elsewhere, he concerned himself with the Lord's
01:56:11 – 01:56:15: Supper. That was how centrally important this was to the Reformer.
01:56:15 – 01:56:23: I see that schisms and errors are increasing proportionately with the passage of time,
01:56:23 – 01:56:30: and that there is no end to the rage and fury of Satan, hence lest any persons during my lifetime
01:56:30 – 01:56:36: or after my death appeal to me or misuse my writings to confirm their error,
01:56:36 – 01:56:41: as the sacramentarian and baptist fanatics are already beginning to do. I desire with this
01:56:41 – 01:56:48: treatise to confess my faith before God and all the world, point by point. I am determined to abide
01:56:48 – 01:56:55: by it until my death and so help me God, in this faith to depart from this world, and to appear
01:56:55 – 01:57:01: before the judgment seat of our Lord Jesus Christ. Hence, if any one shall say after my death,
01:57:01 – 01:57:06: if Luther were living now, he would teach and hold this or that article differently,
01:57:06 – 01:57:13: for he did not consider it sufficiently, etc. Let me say once and for all that by the grace of
01:57:13 – 01:57:19: God I have most diligently traced all these articles through the scriptures, have examined them again
01:57:19 – 01:57:24: and again in the light thereof, and have wanted to defend all of them as certainly as I have now
01:57:24 – 01:57:30: defended the sacrament of the altar. I am not drunk or irresponsible, I know what I am saying,
01:57:30 – 01:57:35: and I well realize what this will mean for me before the last judgment at the coming of the
01:57:35 – 01:57:42: Lord Jesus Christ. Let no one make this out to be a joke or idle talk. I am in dead earnest,
01:57:42 – 01:57:47: since by the grace of God I have learned to know a great deal about Satan. If he can twist and pervert
01:57:47 – 01:57:53: the word of God in the scriptures, what will he not be able to do with my or someone else's words?
01:57:54 – 01:58:01: In the same way I also say and confess that in the sacrament of the altar the true body and
01:58:01 – 01:58:06: blood of Christ are orally eaten and drunk in the bread and wine, even if the priests who distribute
01:58:06 – 01:58:13: them or those who receive them do not believe or otherwise misuse the sacrament. It does not rest
01:58:13 – 01:58:18: on man's belief or unbelief, but on the word and ordinance of God, unless they first change
01:58:18 – 01:58:24: God's word and ordinance and misinterpret them as the enemies of the sacrament do at the present
01:58:24 – 01:58:29: time. They indeed have only bread and wine, for they do not also have the words and instituted
01:58:29 – 01:58:34: ordinance of God, but have perverted and changed it according to their own imagination.
01:58:36 – 01:58:43: And for the third quote. The amazing thing, meanwhile, is that of all the fathers, as many as
01:58:43 – 01:58:49: you can name, not one has ever spoken about the sacrament as these fanatics do. None of them
01:58:49 – 01:58:55: uses such an expression as, it is simply bread and wine, or Christ's body and blood are not present.
01:58:56 – 01:59:00: Yet since this subject is so frequently discussed by them, it is impossible that they should not at
01:59:00 – 01:59:07: some time have let slip such an expression as, it is simply bread, or not that the body of Christ
01:59:07 – 01:59:13: is physically present or the like. Since they are greatly concerned not to mislead the people,
01:59:13 – 01:59:18: actually they simply proceed to speak as if no one doubted that Christ's body and blood are present.
01:59:18 – 01:59:24: Certainly, among so many fathers and so many writings, a negative argument should have turned
01:59:24 – 01:59:32: up at least once, as happens in other articles, but actually they all stand uniformly and consistently
01:59:32 – 01:59:38: on the affirmative side. That quote is speaking of the church fathers.
01:59:39 – 01:59:46: And in the church fathers, you will not find a denial of the real present, of the real presence
01:59:46 – 01:59:53: of the sacramental union. You will find affirmation after affirmation after affirmation of this
01:59:53 – 02:00:03: teaching. And so to close out, I will end with a bit of the history of this with regard to the
02:00:03 – 02:00:10: early church. This ties into the fact that you will not find a different teaching on this subject
02:00:10 – 02:00:14: in the church fathers, because this is the unanimous voice of the historic church.
02:00:17 – 02:00:22: During the Roman persecution, the particularly heinous parts of the Roman persecution,
02:00:22 – 02:00:29: of the early Christians, of the early church. One of the charges, one of the common charges,
02:00:29 – 02:00:36: was a charge of cannibalism. And that charge was leveled against Christians because of the
02:00:36 – 02:00:42: teaching on the Lord's Supper. Now, you may think, well they would still say that because
02:00:42 – 02:00:49: of the words, even if no. They were given the opportunity to recant or to explain what they
02:00:49 – 02:00:54: meant before they were sentenced to death, typically thrown to the lions, although
02:00:54 – 02:00:58: other punishments were also used depending on the emperor and the one passing judgment.
02:01:00 – 02:01:06: If they had simply said, no we believe in a spiritual presence, echoing the Reformed,
02:01:06 – 02:01:12: or if they had simply said, no this is merely a memorial for Christ, echoing the Baptists,
02:01:13 – 02:01:16: they would not have been executed for what they believed.
02:01:16 – 02:01:26: Those in the early church who were subjected to persecution on account of Christ, on account of
02:01:26 – 02:01:32: the teaching regarding the Lord's Supper, were willing to go to the lions, were willing to die
02:01:33 – 02:01:40: rather than to affirm any of the various false teachings that are today held by many traditions,
02:01:40 – 02:01:47: many denominations. All they had to do was say no it's a spiritual presence, no it's a memorial,
02:01:47 – 02:01:51: and they would not have been sentenced to death. Because if they had said that,
02:01:51 – 02:01:55: they would have been just another mystery cult. The Roman Empire had plenty of those,
02:01:55 – 02:01:58: those were normal, if you want to be weird in the corner that's fine, you do that.
02:01:59 – 02:02:04: It was the charge of cannibalism and the insistence of the early Christians that know
02:02:05 – 02:02:12: we consume the body and blood of our Savior in this sacrament, that is what sentenced them to
02:02:12 – 02:02:20: death, and they were willing to die for it. Because when you are called upon to affirm
02:02:20 – 02:02:29: scriptural truth, when you are called upon to affirm right doctrine, even if failing to do so,
02:02:29 – 02:02:36: even if denying those truths would save your life, you are required and in fact you are probably
02:02:36 – 02:02:41: more required in the case where your life is in jeopardy, you are required to affirm the truth
02:02:41 – 02:02:48: and to die for your faith. That is what it means to suffer persecution gladly. It is when you are
02:02:48 – 02:02:54: persecuted specifically for your faith that you stand up and declare the truth and suffer the
02:02:54 – 02:03:00: consequences. It is not in regards to the left-hand kingdom, in regard to politics and secular issues,
02:03:00 – 02:03:05: that is a separate matter, and we have discussed that previously and will certainly get into it
02:03:05 – 02:03:11: more in future episodes. But when it comes to the truth of the faith, when it comes to the word of
02:03:11 – 02:03:19: God, we are to affirm the truth whatever the consequences may be. And that is what the early
02:03:19 – 02:03:26: Christian Church did when faced with the option of either deny the real presence,
02:03:27 – 02:03:33: deny the sacramental union, that presence of Christ in the Supper, in, with, and under the
02:03:33 – 02:03:41: bread and wine, deny it or die, they chose to die. Because that is how important the Lord Supper is,
02:03:42 – 02:03:48: because as stated before there are two sacraments in the Christian religion, two core sacraments,
02:03:48 – 02:03:53: again, we will not argue, quibble over whether or not there are some other sacramental things or
02:03:53 – 02:04:00: sacraments. But there is baptism and there is the Lord Supper. Baptism is the ordinary means
02:04:01 – 02:04:07: in the sense of traditional or proper. It is the ordinary means by which one enters into the family
02:04:07 – 02:04:15: of God. One enters into that covenant, one is given faith and salvation. And the Lord Supper
02:04:15 – 02:04:20: is how that is strengthened. It is how you are kept in the faith. And of course, both
02:04:21 – 02:04:26: must be with the word, for a sacrament is a pairing together of an element and the word.
02:04:27 – 02:04:32: These are the means of grace. These are the things instituted by God for the salvation
02:04:32 – 02:04:38: of your soul. And so they are worth defending, even unto death.