Transcript: Episode 0101
This transcript:
- Was machine generated.
- Has not been checked for errors.
- May not be entirely accurate.
WEBVTT 00:00:37.392 --> 00:00:39.712Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast. 00:00:39.712 --> 00:00:40.752 I am Corey J. 00:00:40.752 --> 00:00:41.832 Mahler. 00:00:41.832 --> 00:00:44.112 And I'm still, whoa. 00:00:44.112 --> 00:00:48.712 Today's Stone Choir is Episode 2 of our Septuagint Series. 00:00:48.712 --> 00:00:58.552 Beginning with Episode 99, we did a prequel called Context Window, where we discussed the framework that we're using for covering a very expansive subject. 00:00:58.552 --> 00:01:04.052 And the point that I made there that I reiterated in the first episode of the Septuagint Series, and I'll reiterate here briefly. 00:01:05.272 --> 00:01:08.112 We're covering so much ground, particularly in this episode. 00:01:08.112 --> 00:01:10.932 There's no possible way for you to keep it all in your head. 00:01:10.932 --> 00:01:17.832 And in the last episode, we covered a lot of time, but we focused on a relatively short list of events. 00:01:17.832 --> 00:01:22.232 As I said in that episode, none of this is revolutionary, none of this is new information. 00:01:22.232 --> 00:01:28.992 But the way it has been framed in the modern world, looking back through history, is false. 00:01:28.992 --> 00:01:32.452 So everyone will repeat the same facts, but they'll lie about the context. 00:01:32.892 --> 00:01:38.912 And that's where the confusion has come today about understanding why the Septuagint matters or doesn't matter. 00:01:38.912 --> 00:01:42.272 Until a couple of years ago, I knew it was just trivia. 00:01:42.272 --> 00:01:45.112 It was the Greek Old Testament and okay, whatever. 00:01:45.112 --> 00:01:46.672 That's a Jeopardy answer. 00:01:46.672 --> 00:01:49.592 It wasn't relevant to the Church. 00:01:49.592 --> 00:01:55.552 This episode, we're going to be covering basically the European portion of the history of Scripture. 00:01:55.552 --> 00:02:00.792 So in episode 100, we went through a couple thousand years, was focused on the Near East. 00:02:01.452 --> 00:02:14.952 And in the Context Window episode, I mentioned if you hear something that you disagree with or you think we're nuts or whatever, I beg listeners, if you get mad, write it down, take notes, and then try to set it aside so that we can make the case. 00:02:14.952 --> 00:02:30.392 This episode, I'll repeat that, but I don't think there's probably going to be very much the people are going to get mad about till we get to the end of this episode, because you're probably not going to recognize most of the names that come up today, or you'll know a little bit about them, but they won't seem to have anything to do with the Septuagint. 00:02:31.212 --> 00:02:37.972 So, while I would encourage you, if you do get mad to continue taking notes, you probably won't need your notepad much this time. 00:02:37.972 --> 00:02:43.772 I knew a few of these names before we started, and it didn't seem to make much difference. 00:02:43.772 --> 00:03:12.892 One of the fascinating things about this subject, as we look at the European history of the Bible itself, what we find is that although this is part two of our Septuagint series, on the historical aspects of it, and just to recap, part three is going to be specifically focused on Old Testament differences, and then part four will be focused specifically on New Testament quotations of the Old Testament, which is when we will finally validate what we've been saying all along. 00:03:12.892 --> 00:03:16.532 The Septuagint is the Bible of Jesus and the Apostles in the early Church. 00:03:16.532 --> 00:03:19.832 We'll prove that in the fourth episode, Beyond Any Shadow of a Doubt. 00:03:19.832 --> 00:03:22.972 And I kind of waffled about four versus five episodes. 00:03:22.972 --> 00:03:25.492 The fifth episode of the Septuagint series, we're going to do it. 00:03:25.492 --> 00:03:28.912 It's kind of going to be bonus content, because we're going to talk about how to fix this mess. 00:03:28.912 --> 00:03:30.292 But that's going to be entirely opinion. 00:03:30.292 --> 00:03:32.912 It's got nothing to do with history or the Bible itself. 00:03:32.912 --> 00:03:34.632 It's just what we think we need to do to solve it. 00:03:34.632 --> 00:03:38.852 So you can take or leave that episode, depending on what you think of our opinions. 00:03:38.852 --> 00:03:40.912 But this stuff is just facts. 00:03:40.912 --> 00:03:49.192 In this second historical episode, as we're focusing on the European history of scripture, the Septuagint never comes up once. 00:03:49.192 --> 00:03:52.052 None of the men that we're going to talk about ever talked about the Septuagint. 00:03:52.052 --> 00:03:53.732 And that's the reason we're talking about them. 00:03:54.232 --> 00:04:04.872 Because if we're telling the truth about the Septuagint being the Old Testament of Jesus and the Apostles and the Early Church, not only, hey, where did it go? 00:04:04.872 --> 00:04:07.812 But B, why did no one ever notice? 00:04:07.812 --> 00:04:17.312 And so at every point, we're going to highlight these minor inflection points where a decision was made in the Church, some decisions were bigger than others. 00:04:17.312 --> 00:04:19.752 Some of these moments that we're going to mention are pretty small. 00:04:20.952 --> 00:04:25.072 None of them by themselves add up to a complete rejection of the Septuagint. 00:04:25.072 --> 00:04:32.372 But what they add up to is every time there was an opportunity for someone to ask the question, hey, what about that old Bible? 00:04:32.372 --> 00:04:39.092 What about those codices that we have that are from the fourth century, the Bible of the Council of Nicaea? 00:04:39.092 --> 00:04:41.132 Why don't we look at that? 00:04:41.132 --> 00:04:44.772 There were opportunities for that question to be asked and nobody ever asked them. 00:04:45.312 --> 00:04:52.232 And so we're going to highlight 15 or 20 moments from like 400 through Reformation. 00:04:52.232 --> 00:04:59.292 We're basically going to cover Jerome very briefly again up through the Reformation, specifically focusing on Europeans this time. 00:04:59.292 --> 00:05:01.272 No one ever talks about the Septuagint. 00:05:01.272 --> 00:05:05.312 And that's why this is part of our Septuagint series is to say, hey, where to go? 00:05:05.312 --> 00:05:11.112 Because when we're sitting here in the 21st century asking the question, what is this old thing and why is it relevant to us? 00:05:12.272 --> 00:05:19.392 You have to understand all the moments in church history where someone could have asked that question and then didn't. 00:05:19.392 --> 00:05:27.372 And so when we lay out the pattern, you're going to see that moment after moment, someone who could have asked the question didn't. 00:05:27.372 --> 00:05:35.532 As I was trying to come up with a way of framing this to sort of make it more obvious what it is we're trying to accomplish, there are a few metaphors that came to mind. 00:05:35.532 --> 00:05:53.632 The first is if you listen to classical music in particular, because it has much more dynamic range than modern music, you'll have pianissimo sections which are followed by a crescendo, where it's very soft and then there's this swell of sound as the music flushes out loudly, boldly. 00:05:53.632 --> 00:06:00.532 The function of that pianissimo is to draw attention and build anticipation for the loudness that comes next. 00:06:00.532 --> 00:06:05.692 Not loud in an abrasive sense, but just way more decibels, way more volume, way more intensity. 00:06:06.652 --> 00:06:13.972 And so, the quiet part, actually, you don't focus necessarily on the quiet part when you're listening, other than it makes you anticipate. 00:06:13.972 --> 00:06:20.632 But the loud part, the crescendo that comes after, is accentuated by the contrast with the quiet part. 00:06:20.632 --> 00:06:26.392 Another metaphor for kind of what we're dealing with here would be a pregnant pause in a conversation. 00:06:26.392 --> 00:06:31.592 I can't really do it here because the audio software I use chops out the hesitations. 00:06:31.592 --> 00:06:42.632 But, you know, a pregnant pause in a conversation, someone says something, maybe something weighty or interesting or whatever, and then there's a pause that's too long for the normal flow of conversation. 00:06:42.632 --> 00:06:44.012 It just sits there. 00:06:44.012 --> 00:06:46.732 And then the conversation continues. 00:06:46.732 --> 00:06:49.092 And so what happens with a pregnant pause? 00:06:49.092 --> 00:06:55.912 It accentuates what came before and what came after by silence, by the complete absence of anybody talking. 00:06:55.912 --> 00:06:59.252 And so you don't notice the pause, you notice what's on either side of it. 00:06:59.952 --> 00:07:06.052 But what's on either side of it is amplified by that absence, by that pause. 00:07:06.052 --> 00:07:12.952 And last metaphor that I think is perhaps the most apt for what's going on here is negative space in a visual composition. 00:07:12.952 --> 00:07:23.512 If you're looking at a painting or a photograph, oftentimes someone who is skilled and has a particular idea in mind, they're not just going to put the subject right in the center. 00:07:23.512 --> 00:07:31.772 The subject may be off to one side and maybe most of the canvas or the photograph is empty space or it's kind of neutral, it's not detailed. 00:07:31.772 --> 00:07:37.112 And then you have something perhaps off to one side where your eye is drawn. 00:07:37.112 --> 00:07:48.512 And the function of negative space is the absence of something on most of the canvas, most of the picture, forces you naturally to focus on wherever there is something. 00:07:48.512 --> 00:07:52.072 So the composition would be completely different, it would just crop down to the thing itself. 00:07:52.692 --> 00:08:03.592 And so what we have in each of these cases is the absence of something accentuating and making far more important the thing that actually happens. 00:08:03.592 --> 00:08:14.872 And so really what we're talking about in this episode is a whole bunch of negative space moments, where when you look at Church history, you're not going to look at any of these moments as having anything to do with Septuagint. 00:08:14.872 --> 00:08:18.212 Because I said the Septuagint doesn't come up, and that's the point. 00:08:18.792 --> 00:08:25.872 The negative space here is the conversations that did not take place when they could have, and we are arguing should have. 00:08:25.872 --> 00:08:30.972 At every one of these points, Christian men should have said, hey, what happened? 00:08:30.972 --> 00:08:32.732 Why are we not using that? 00:08:32.732 --> 00:08:43.312 And what we're going to demonstrate by this series of seemingly small, for the most part, historical moments is that they were solving an immediate problem naturally. 00:08:43.312 --> 00:08:47.032 It's a what problem are you trying to solve situation for almost all of these? 00:08:47.712 --> 00:08:52.832 And so, they weren't stupid, as we said earlier on, they're not faithless men, they weren't dumb. 00:08:52.832 --> 00:09:02.112 They had an immediate problem to solve, and it never occurred to anyone that the solution to their problem might have been to use the Bible of Jesus and the apostles in the early church. 00:09:02.112 --> 00:09:04.072 The question simply never came up. 00:09:04.072 --> 00:09:10.412 And so, these examples, these moments will demonstrate why those decisions were made. 00:09:10.412 --> 00:09:18.472 And in almost every case, what we're going to have is fundamentally two false decisions, because they never thought about the third question they could have asked. 00:09:18.472 --> 00:09:28.792 They were making a false choice between two options that were both bad in some way, never considering the third option of use the Bible of Jesus and the apostles in the early church. 00:09:28.792 --> 00:09:33.612 I keep repeating that phrase because it's true, and it's ridiculous that it never came up. 00:09:33.612 --> 00:09:39.172 But in the moments when they were dealing with immediate problems, it simply didn't matter. 00:09:39.172 --> 00:09:46.652 And so, to briefly revisit one of the last moments that we covered in the previous episode, we have Jerome. 00:09:46.652 --> 00:09:58.272 Jerome was tasked initially by Pope Damascus I, initially just to harmonize the four Gospels and to get a Latin translation that was good and was consistent with the manuscripts that they had in Greek. 00:09:58.272 --> 00:10:04.272 Because already, and we're going to round numbers here, there's so many more names that we could discuss. 00:10:04.272 --> 00:10:06.432 We don't want to confuse and overwhelm you. 00:10:06.432 --> 00:10:12.592 So we're going to be a little bit sloppy by omitting names and actually generalizing some of the dates so as not to confuse you. 00:10:12.672 --> 00:10:14.752 So I'm just going to talk about AD 400. 00:10:14.752 --> 00:10:21.032 Jerome AD 400, the very beginning of the 5th century, is tasked with translating Greek into Latin. 00:10:21.032 --> 00:10:21.552 Why? 00:10:21.552 --> 00:10:23.772 Because Greek was already being lost in the West. 00:10:23.772 --> 00:10:30.872 The Western Roman Empire was losing the ability to read and to speak Greek, so they needed Latin Bibles. 00:10:30.872 --> 00:10:33.432 There was a proliferation of Latin Bibles. 00:10:33.432 --> 00:10:38.432 Virtually all of them were based on the Septuagint until Jerome. 00:10:38.432 --> 00:10:55.072 When Jerome was tasked by the Church very sensibly with coming up with a new Latin translation of initially the New Testament and he chose to do the Old Testament as well, he was solving the right problem to have a good solid Latin translation in Latin because it was the vernacular. 00:10:55.072 --> 00:11:00.952 That was the vulgar language of that day, which is why Jerome's Vulgate, his name Vulgate, it was the vulgar language. 00:11:00.952 --> 00:11:03.012 It was the language of everyone. 00:11:03.012 --> 00:11:06.272 Because they were losing Greek, they had to have something they could read. 00:11:06.272 --> 00:11:07.972 That was a perfectly reasonable thing to do. 00:11:08.792 --> 00:11:20.192 Jerome, unilaterally, without permission, without any discussion, without any church council, chose to use Hebrew as the basis for his Old Testament. 00:11:20.192 --> 00:11:23.332 No one had done that in church history previously. 00:11:23.332 --> 00:11:35.212 Now, we mentioned that Origen, about two centuries before him, had compared the Hebrew to the four exemplars that they had of different Greek manuscripts of the Septuagint versions. 00:11:35.212 --> 00:11:43.432 But he was principally solving the problem of A, arguing with the Jews and saying, hey, look, it's consistent, and B, just demonstrating like which one is going to be the best. 00:11:43.432 --> 00:11:52.492 So that was Hebrew scholarship, but it never entered church practice, and it was never an argument that we got to learn Hebrew to understand. 00:11:52.492 --> 00:11:57.112 He was doing something that was very specifically academic. 00:11:57.112 --> 00:12:03.552 He was doing something that was very specifically academic to just make sure that the Septuagint was being used consistently. 00:12:04.312 --> 00:12:08.092 When Jerome chose to use Hebrew, it was an entirely different thing. 00:12:08.092 --> 00:12:12.592 And we made the argument last week that what Jerome did in that moment was satanic. 00:12:12.592 --> 00:12:17.572 He did something that rejected the scripture that the church had adopted to that point. 00:12:17.572 --> 00:12:21.092 But the point of bringing it up again is that no one talked about it apart from Augustine. 00:12:21.092 --> 00:12:22.012 Augustine fought it. 00:12:22.012 --> 00:12:23.932 There was some controversy. 00:12:23.932 --> 00:12:27.652 After a couple decades, it died down completely, and the question went away. 00:12:28.852 --> 00:12:38.412 After Jerome translated the New Testament and then the Hebrew into Latin, now we just have another Latin Bible floating around. 00:12:38.412 --> 00:12:44.392 And crucially, there was no Hebrew scholarship after that point for 800 years. 00:12:44.392 --> 00:12:55.112 And even Jerome's translation was not automatically dominant, although it had the blessing before Pope Damascus died of, they'd go do this. 00:12:55.112 --> 00:12:59.452 It was not immediately and universally accepted by everyone else. 00:12:59.452 --> 00:13:04.612 So just keep that in mind at the very beginning of this conversation, there was never a discussion about using Hebrew. 00:13:04.612 --> 00:13:06.232 Jerome just went and did it. 00:13:06.232 --> 00:13:08.532 He just decided he wanted to do it. 00:13:08.532 --> 00:13:16.492 And absent a fight apart from Augustine's quibbles, he fought for a little while, but then Augustine basically gave up. 00:13:16.492 --> 00:13:18.392 He just quit fighting. 00:13:18.392 --> 00:13:19.872 After that, it was just the Latin Bible. 00:13:20.372 --> 00:13:25.312 And past that point, no one really cared what the underlying text was. 00:13:25.312 --> 00:13:31.312 It was just their Bible in Latin, which incidentally was exactly what the Septuagint was to begin with. 00:13:31.332 --> 00:13:35.452 It was just the Bible in Greek, which is what everyone was reading and speaking in that day. 00:13:35.452 --> 00:13:44.592 So there was nothing wrong with the project that Jerome undertook, except for the fact that he changed the rules without permission, without discussion, and then everyone just kind of forgot about it. 00:13:44.592 --> 00:13:47.152 So that's going to be the predicate for this entire episode today. 00:13:48.112 --> 00:13:53.312 One decision by one man to reject the Septuagint never comes up again. 00:13:53.312 --> 00:13:56.532 Augustine fights it, and that's just the end of the discussion. 00:13:56.532 --> 00:14:12.112 By the time we get to the end and we're talking about the Reformation, it will come up a little bit, but the intermediary events that we're going to discuss have accumulated to the point that there is absolutely no possibility that the Reformers would ever consider the Septuagint. 00:14:12.112 --> 00:14:20.632 And so this episode is to show all the layers of decisions that prevented that question from ever being asked again in Church history until today. 00:14:21.952 --> 00:14:33.692 So for the sake of this episode, we are going to try to avoid going down too many tangents or rabbit trails just for the sake of time and being concise. 00:14:33.692 --> 00:14:36.592 But every so often, there are things that are worth mentioning. 00:14:36.592 --> 00:14:56.352 And so here at the outset leading into one of the other individuals who plays a part in this narrative, I want to mention what is called the quadriga, the traditional fourfold interpretation of scripture, because it winds up playing a role in how some of these things play out in time. 00:14:56.352 --> 00:15:16.652 And for those who are unfamiliar, the fourfold interpretation is first the literal interpretation, second the allegorical, which winds up playing a large role in some of this, third the tropological, which could also be called the moral, and then fourth the anagogical, which is sort of the spiritual, but in the higher sense almost eschatological. 00:15:18.232 --> 00:15:34.532 And these different senses of interpreting scripture become relevant because the focus on the allegorical is part of what lays the groundwork for a later return to a focus on the literal. 00:15:34.532 --> 00:15:45.792 We're not saying that you cannot have all four of these levels of interpretation, because of course there are certainly passages in scripture where all four of these are in play. 00:15:45.792 --> 00:15:49.732 One of the most commonly used examples would be the Exodus. 00:15:49.732 --> 00:15:52.732 And so of course you have the literal sense, which is the history. 00:15:52.732 --> 00:15:55.292 The Exodus literally took place. 00:15:55.292 --> 00:15:58.992 Old Testament Israel literally came out of Egypt. 00:15:58.992 --> 00:16:02.252 There was a literal, physical Exodus. 00:16:02.252 --> 00:16:04.492 Then of course you have the allegory. 00:16:04.492 --> 00:16:08.532 You can draw that out to Christ himself. 00:16:09.012 --> 00:16:14.652 You have the typology there of Christ who does in fact go to Egypt and then return. 00:16:14.652 --> 00:16:16.372 You have the tropological sense of it. 00:16:16.372 --> 00:16:18.272 You have the moral sense. 00:16:18.272 --> 00:16:22.292 So that could be tied to personal conversion, for instance. 00:16:22.292 --> 00:16:32.192 And then you have the anagogical sense, which would be the eschatological fulfillment of God's plan of conversion of his people, of the elect. 00:16:32.192 --> 00:16:36.272 And so you can draw that out from different parts of scripture. 00:16:36.272 --> 00:16:37.972 And there's nothing wrong with doing that. 00:16:39.032 --> 00:16:47.072 When it became a problem was when there was a focus on the allegorical at the expense of the literal sense. 00:16:47.072 --> 00:16:59.012 So when you abandon the literal sense of scripture and focus only on this spiritualizing away, which is what it became, of the proper foundational understanding. 00:16:59.012 --> 00:17:04.152 One of the men who is involved in this is Pope Gregory I, Pope Gregory the Great. 00:17:04.152 --> 00:17:10.172 He is not the one who introduces this into the church because this traces all the way back to the Church Fathers. 00:17:10.172 --> 00:17:17.172 But he sort of formalizes it and entrenches it in the Western Church because he is one of the very early Popes. 00:17:17.172 --> 00:17:18.872 He plays an important role. 00:17:18.872 --> 00:17:20.032 He is a faithful man. 00:17:20.032 --> 00:17:20.832 That is worth noting. 00:17:20.832 --> 00:17:22.692 He is on our calendar of saints. 00:17:22.692 --> 00:17:24.492 He introduced many good things. 00:17:24.492 --> 00:17:26.732 He did liturgical reform, for instance. 00:17:26.732 --> 00:17:28.772 He supported a number of churches. 00:17:30.272 --> 00:17:40.272 But he helps to lay the groundwork for this later focus on the allegorical, which then lays the groundwork for a return to the literal. 00:17:41.792 --> 00:17:53.872 As we mentioned, as we'll mention specifically in the opening and the introduction there, sometimes some of these decisions don't seem like they cause problems until later on. 00:17:53.872 --> 00:17:57.252 Or they may even not be bad decisions in that time. 00:17:57.252 --> 00:18:09.292 But what they did not take into account is the long-term consequences, or, in many cases, the source of the fruit of the thing that they are introducing into the Church. 00:18:09.292 --> 00:18:21.152 In the case of the fourfold interpretation, it is not in and of itself dangerous, but again it becomes a problem when allegory takes over from the literal sense. 00:18:21.152 --> 00:18:39.392 Now for instance, with Pope Gregory, that was not a problem for him specifically, because for instance in his comments on the Book of Job, he says that the literal interpretation must be taken first because it lays the foundation for the spiritual interpretation, for the other levels. 00:18:39.392 --> 00:18:40.492 That is correct. 00:18:40.492 --> 00:18:44.532 You have to take the literal sense first and foremost. 00:18:44.532 --> 00:18:51.612 But Satan is willing to take something that can be used for good and later on use it for wickedness. 00:18:51.612 --> 00:19:19.032 And so we will see that as we proceed through this episode, through these individuals down through these centuries, that this allegorical interpretation is part of what Satan then uses in order to, later on, not according to the allegory, but according to the right desire to return to a literal sense, Satan uses that as an opening, as an opportunity to say, well, if you want the literal sense, well, you should go talk to the Jews. 00:19:19.032 --> 00:19:21.792 You should look at the Hebrew. 00:19:21.792 --> 00:19:23.832 And that is going to be a constant refrain here. 00:19:25.032 --> 00:19:34.732 Almost anytime you see a decision, a question comes up, a decision needs to be made, and the decision winds up being, well, we should go talk to the Jews. 00:19:34.732 --> 00:19:37.412 That's where things go off the rails. 00:19:37.412 --> 00:19:44.552 And as Christians, of course, as mentioned in the first episode, and as we've mentioned elsewhere, you should recognize this as a danger. 00:19:44.552 --> 00:19:52.992 Because as a Christian, you do not go to those who have rejected Christ and hate Christ to ask them questions about the Word of God. 00:19:53.632 --> 00:19:56.712 Because to them, the Word of God is a closed book. 00:19:56.712 --> 00:19:58.952 Moses' veil remains. 00:19:58.952 --> 00:20:00.572 They cannot see the truth. 00:20:00.572 --> 00:20:02.292 They have nothing to tell you. 00:20:02.292 --> 00:20:05.372 They have nothing that is good to give you. 00:20:05.372 --> 00:20:12.832 But Satan takes as an opportunity to bring back in this Jewish influence and to undermine the Church. 00:20:12.832 --> 00:20:16.852 And we will see that as we proceed through the episode and some later individuals. 00:20:18.772 --> 00:20:26.092 And this is one of many examples as we're going through these, where there's a lot of bouncing back and forth from century to century. 00:20:26.092 --> 00:20:34.992 So, when Gregory the Great begins to push the allegorical, as Corey said, not exclusively, he wasn't bad. 00:20:34.992 --> 00:20:43.572 But his arguments became the basis for later, much heavier pushes into very, very heavily allegorical readings. 00:20:43.572 --> 00:20:50.912 And this came up in the previous episode when we mentioned Philo, the Jew from Alexandria, who was not a racial Jew. 00:20:51.412 --> 00:20:54.792 He converted into Judaism probably after they murdered Christ. 00:20:54.792 --> 00:20:56.912 He said, yeah, this is my team. 00:20:56.912 --> 00:21:03.292 One of the things that Philo did was to import this sort of allegorical reading from Platonism. 00:21:03.292 --> 00:21:10.952 So, it wasn't a typical argument that was made by the Jews at that time, unless you're looking at their Kabbalah. 00:21:10.952 --> 00:21:20.952 They have sort of two different tracks where historically the rabbis, when they're talking about things, especially when they're talking to Christians, are going to focus on the literal. 00:21:20.952 --> 00:21:31.852 If you get them talking about their Babylonian black magic, their Kabbalah, then everything gets allegorical, mystical, symbolic, completely departs from the literal reading. 00:21:31.852 --> 00:21:37.152 But ironically, when Philo converted into Judaism, he didn't get that sort of allegorical read from Kabbalah. 00:21:37.152 --> 00:21:38.652 He got it from Plato. 00:21:38.652 --> 00:21:40.572 And as we mentioned, Origen picked up on it. 00:21:40.572 --> 00:21:41.412 He liked it. 00:21:41.412 --> 00:21:43.912 And so, some of the early Church fathers used it. 00:21:43.912 --> 00:21:49.952 But interestingly, we mentioned this previously, Augustine and Jerome agreed on literalism. 00:21:49.952 --> 00:21:56.312 Augustine, because he was a faithful reader of scripture, and Jerome, because he'd been talking to the rabbis. 00:21:56.312 --> 00:22:02.912 So both of them agreed with literalism over rejecting Origen's allegorical reads. 00:22:02.912 --> 00:22:04.952 Pope Gregory comes along two centuries later. 00:22:04.952 --> 00:22:06.792 This is around 600 AD. 00:22:06.792 --> 00:22:13.232 So two centuries after Jerome and Augustine had their fight, Gregory begins to go in the other direction. 00:22:13.232 --> 00:22:14.832 He begins to make it more allegorical. 00:22:15.432 --> 00:22:27.552 And from this moment on, from about 600 AD until about 1200 AD, which we'll talk about later, more and more and more of the reading becomes very, very heavily allegorical. 00:22:27.552 --> 00:22:33.952 Basically, the pitch was that the literal sense was seen as merely a husk that contained the richer spiritual kernel. 00:22:33.952 --> 00:22:46.832 And some of this was actually pushed because when they could make allegorical the readings of scripture, they could push some of the monastic ideas that were being developed in the West. 00:22:46.832 --> 00:22:50.852 And when you talk about monasticism, everyone wants to talk about the doctrine. 00:22:50.852 --> 00:22:53.252 Maybe we want to talk about the history. 00:22:53.252 --> 00:22:55.492 Nobody ever wants to talk about the money. 00:22:55.492 --> 00:23:03.432 The reason that Rome today is the single largest holder of real estate on the planet was monasticism. 00:23:03.432 --> 00:23:12.032 It was a cash grab that specifically targeted rich families to make sure that as much as possible the Church could be the inheritor of those estates. 00:23:13.052 --> 00:23:17.272 Not a dig, like this happened well well before the Reformation. 00:23:17.272 --> 00:23:27.432 But when you hear these hermeneutic choices, don't always assume that it's just specifically someone making a better argument from scripture, a different kind of argument. 00:23:27.432 --> 00:23:28.992 Sometimes there are political reasons. 00:23:28.992 --> 00:23:40.052 Now that was not Gregory's reason, but later on part of the reason for pushing it was that it turned scripture into more of a wax nose that could sort of justify where the Church wanted to go anyway. 00:23:41.472 --> 00:23:48.232 One other thing to note, we're already past the fall of the Western Roman Empire here. 00:23:48.232 --> 00:23:59.512 And today when we talk about the Western Church Rome and the Eastern Church, which we just typically call the Orthodox, those are visible remnants of the Rome itself. 00:23:59.512 --> 00:24:06.032 The Roman Empire, which was geographically the size of North America, it was the entire surrounds of the Mediterranean. 00:24:06.032 --> 00:24:07.192 It was a big place. 00:24:08.372 --> 00:24:13.792 In the early 300s, that was divided administratively. 00:24:13.792 --> 00:24:20.652 And then by the end of the 4th century, it was officially divided into the Eastern and Western empires. 00:24:20.652 --> 00:24:28.172 And that is when Byzantium was renamed to Constantinople, Constantine city. 00:24:28.172 --> 00:24:32.712 The capital of Rome was moved from the West to the East. 00:24:32.712 --> 00:24:38.212 And not long thereafter, the Western Roman Empire essentially collapsed. 00:24:38.212 --> 00:24:39.492 Some call that the Dark Ages. 00:24:39.492 --> 00:24:41.752 Some people get very mad and say it wasn't that dark. 00:24:41.752 --> 00:24:48.972 But there was so much turmoil in the Western Roman Empire, which then went away and there was no longer any Roman Empire. 00:24:48.972 --> 00:24:52.072 In the East, the Roman Empire lived on. 00:24:52.072 --> 00:25:04.652 And so today, what we call orthodoxy, historically, you know, ignoring doctrine and everything else, there is a degree of continuation right from when Constantine was Christianized and he was a Roman Emperor. 00:25:05.832 --> 00:25:17.952 So these divisions of West in one direction with Latin, and East in the other direction with Greek and maintaining Greek, are not only theological, but they're political. 00:25:17.952 --> 00:25:19.592 And they're principally political. 00:25:19.592 --> 00:25:22.312 The theological is really just along for the ride. 00:25:22.312 --> 00:25:26.292 Because ultimately, wherever you live on the planet, you're going to speak the local language. 00:25:26.292 --> 00:25:28.232 You're subject to the local laws. 00:25:28.232 --> 00:25:30.532